impossible, stupid, or both?
impossible, stupid, or both?
Hey all, still new to these forums and my own 3rd gen iroc, I have a hardtop but I really love t tops, is there a way to convert it? Maybe a kit or something? Or would I have to fabricate it myself (if possible)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,213
Likes: 1,140
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Find a good TTOP car and cut the roof off. Cut yours off and install TTOP roof.
Easy way, buy a TTOP car.
Easy way, buy a TTOP car.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Putnam Valley, NY
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
And who wouldn't want to ruin two third gens in one fell swoop! Seriously, sell yours to someone who loves hard tops, preferrably on these boards, and buy a t-top car, also preferrably from someone on these boards.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Putnam Valley, NY
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
It probably would, but I love these cars, and seeing someone willfully destroy one hurts my feelings lol.
Trending Topics
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Lol I wouldn't destroy it, I love this car! And I'm pretty darn good with fab work ( welding teacher taught me alot) its definitly not somethin I would undertake if i thought it would ruin it/mess it up, its mainly just a thought right now, still not done planning out my restoration for the car, gonna have everything planned out down to the stitching in the
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 1
From: Aloha, Oregon
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Don't the TTOP cars have more frame/chassis support due to the lack of roof? Similar to a convertible needing extra support.
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 6
From: Kemah, Tx
Car: 1991 z28
Engine: Turbo 310
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: D44
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: NY
Car: 1983 Z-28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ?
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
SFC's couldn't hurt anyways. Last time I was at the junkyard a guy was buying a roof for the same project. I almost cried at the thought until I saw the car they cut it off of, I think the roof and the tail lights were all that were worth saving on the whole car.
On Probation
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
I wouldn't tackle this without inner and outer sets of SFCs and a full cage. Better to trade this car for a factory T-top car.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 517
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Car: '88 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
I guess Cars & Customs doesn't exist any more. My '88 was a hardtop untill 1996 when the original owner had the C & C t-tops installed
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Belleville ON Canada
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 LS
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 839
Likes: 4
From: Melbourne, Australia
Car: 1988 IROC Camaro (RHD)
Engine: 350 ci L98 SBC
Transmission: T700
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt BW, Disk, Posi-traction
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Find a car in a wrecking yard with a "Cars & Concepts" after-market T-Tops.
Get out a drill and remove the rivets used to fasten it.
Cut your roof with a 45cm gap.
Rivet the C&C T-Top on.
The C & C T-Tops possibly have better bracing than the factory T-Tops and drain water better.
Search for info about "Cars & Concepts" T-Tops for third gen bodies.
Get out a drill and remove the rivets used to fasten it.
Cut your roof with a 45cm gap.
Rivet the C&C T-Top on.
The C & C T-Tops possibly have better bracing than the factory T-Tops and drain water better.
Search for info about "Cars & Concepts" T-Tops for third gen bodies.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Belleville ON Canada
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 LS
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Okay smart guy, take the head liner out of any T-Top car and look in between the rear hatch glass and T lids and compare it to a hard top, the top cross member is thicker there for stronger
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 916
Likes: 9
From: Wichita Falls, TX
Car: 91 Firebird,00 c2500,75 Vette
Engine: 3.1 but 350 soon, 350, 350
Transmission: T56 soon
Axle/Gears: stock 3.42 Posi to come
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
There is a how to thread on here somewhere for converting to a T Top. The guy explained why he did everything the way he did and posted pics etc. It definitely is not and easy job though.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Have you ever had a time when you regretted starting a project on an already perfectly good car? I think most people on here have. They get bored with their current set up so they decide to change something just for a little bit of variety. Then it turns into one of those "I should have left well enough alone" or " Why the **** did I decide to do this" moments. This is one of those times.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Putnam Valley, NY
Car: 1992 RS 6spd
Engine: Carbed 357c.i.
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Soon to be Strange S60
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
If it were that much stronger, then it wouldn't flex nearly as much as mine and everyone else does, and not because my "dad" says, but because I've seen it flex, along with everyone else who has had one. Oh and for proof of no frame support on t-top cars, all you need to do is look underneath. They are identical. And for the roof? Well there are two giant rectangles missing from the t-top roof, so yes I'd say they were visually different that hard top cars lol.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 916
Likes: 9
From: Wichita Falls, TX
Car: 91 Firebird,00 c2500,75 Vette
Engine: 3.1 but 350 soon, 350, 350
Transmission: T56 soon
Axle/Gears: stock 3.42 Posi to come
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
I found one of the best threads on here for doing the conversion.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/body...-top-roof.html
It should help you out alot for the best way to do it. There are other threads sectioning the a pillars and on one they welded in another support pipe inside the a pillar for added strength. But this thread shows how to do it without sectioning the a pillar and be as strong as factory there. Worth a good read or two if you are considering it.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/body...-top-roof.html
It should help you out alot for the best way to do it. There are other threads sectioning the a pillars and on one they welded in another support pipe inside the a pillar for added strength. But this thread shows how to do it without sectioning the a pillar and be as strong as factory there. Worth a good read or two if you are considering it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 1
From: St.Louis, IL
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 377
Transmission: TH350; Circle D 4200 converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
I've seen people do this. I understand WHY you want to do it, but I seriously think you should avoid it because once it's done - it's done. It's not like it will be a hardtop anymore (and I'm not just talking about the value necessarily - we're also talking about the structural integrity). If you want a welding project - take a t-top car and turn it into a vert or something of that nature since the 'foundation' at the factory was the same (if I recall correctly).
Hardtops are NOT easy to find around here. I vote selling it instead of hacking it up.
If you ever plan to sell it - DON'T do this; most people don't like custom jobs done, even if they're done right because it's usually "one of one" parts that were used.. something the average guy can't remake.
Hardtops are NOT easy to find around here. I vote selling it instead of hacking it up.
If you ever plan to sell it - DON'T do this; most people don't like custom jobs done, even if they're done right because it's usually "one of one" parts that were used.. something the average guy can't remake.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,867
Likes: 2,428
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Personally I'd just use the easy 2-step method. Quick, painless, involves no cutting.
You can probably do it one day, or maybe even a few minutes, depending on .... things.
Totally risk-free.
Doesn't damage any cars.
Should be pretty close to free; but that's up to you. You can spend as much as you want on it, or possibly even make money by doing it.
Ready?
.
.
.
.
.
.
See, not so tough, eh??
You can probably do it one day, or maybe even a few minutes, depending on .... things.
Totally risk-free.
Doesn't damage any cars.
Should be pretty close to free; but that's up to you. You can spend as much as you want on it, or possibly even make money by doing it.
Ready?
.
.
.
.
.
.
- Sell car you DON'T want.
- Buy car you DO want.
See, not so tough, eh??
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: NY
Car: 1983 Z-28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ?
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Well, if you're cutting off the hardtop roof, then welding in a t-top roof, then that "top cross member" is going to be in the new roof assembly that gets welded in. So you're right, but it doesn't apply to the situation at hand.
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
I really appreciate all of the feedback, gives a me better idea of what I'm getting into, it'll be awhile before I tackle this project of I don't change my mind beforehand, my main concern now is building a hinged air dam, almost done with the drawings
On Probation
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Have you ever had a time when you regretted starting a project on an already perfectly good car? I think most people on here have. They get bored with their current set up so they decide to change something just for a little bit of variety. Then it turns into one of those "I should have left well enough alone" or " Why the **** did I decide to do this" moments. This is one of those times.
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
From: NY
Car: 1983 Z-28
Engine: 305
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ?
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
That sounds like a great idea. So will it be spring loaded?
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
DIY I'm in Louisiana, and gordiggz yes ill have a soft spring, I'm thinking about making the dam span the whole width underneath the car so I can make it slim and have more ground clearance also, gonna start making some out of cardboard soon to see how its gonna look
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Also, C&C was an aftermarket conversion so Dealers wouldn't have had anything to do with the conversion other than selling a hard top car to a buyer.
My car was purchased in 89 as a hardtop and not converted till almost 6 months after its purchase. It was titled and registered BEFORE the conversion was done, I have the C&C stickers and DMV records as proof.
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: ..
Transmission: Automatic Trans.
Axle/Gears: ..
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
I didn't really read everything. But I was flipping through YouTube videos quite some time ago, and this guy converted his hard top car into a t-top but they did have to reinforce the car with steel rods in the bottom... A company in Florida does this for all sorts of cars & that's where I learned it from.. Just sayin. Ha, they do it because since you're basically missing your entire roof the car isn't as .. What's the word.. Stable? So ... Yea. Maybe 3rd gen camaro's/firebirds aren't like that.. Just thought I'd throw in my little bit of info.
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: ..
Transmission: Automatic Trans.
Axle/Gears: ..
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
And they just cut out the holes in the car for the T's. They don't just remove 2 different car roofs.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
I didn't really read everything. But I was flipping through YouTube videos quite some time ago, and this guy converted his hard top car into a t-top but they did have to reinforce the car with steel rods in the bottom... A company in Florida does this for all sorts of cars & that's where I learned it from.. Just sayin. Ha, they do it because since you're basically missing your entire roof the car isn't as .. What's the word.. Stable? So ... Yea. Maybe 3rd gen camaro's/firebirds aren't like that.. Just thought I'd throw in my little bit of info.
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Mobile, AL
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: ..
Transmission: Automatic Trans.
Axle/Gears: ..
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 916
Likes: 9
From: Wichita Falls, TX
Car: 91 Firebird,00 c2500,75 Vette
Engine: 3.1 but 350 soon, 350, 350
Transmission: T56 soon
Axle/Gears: stock 3.42 Posi to come
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
Once you put the new roof on it has been reinforced to a degree. No 3rd gens T Tops or Hard Tops left the factory with SFC's. All these cars have flexing. T Tops just have more. I have not heard of any major reinforcing for the Verts either. The floor and subframes are the same as far as I know.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
It is easy to make it an accordian but I have cut a roof off without doing that. I didn't twist it but I would not reccomend any one else doing it. In my case the car was eventually being scrapped and I had well placed jack stands under it with blocking under the doors.
Once you put the new roof on it has been reinforced to a degree. No 3rd gens T Tops or Hard Tops left the factory with SFC's. All these cars have flexing. T Tops just have more. I have not heard of any major reinforcing for the Verts either. The floor and subframes are the same as far as I know.
Once you put the new roof on it has been reinforced to a degree. No 3rd gens T Tops or Hard Tops left the factory with SFC's. All these cars have flexing. T Tops just have more. I have not heard of any major reinforcing for the Verts either. The floor and subframes are the same as far as I know.
On a stock thirdgen you simply cannot cut the roof off and expect it to maintain ANY sort of torsional stiffness, they are already weak as is shown by hard top B-pillar cracks. T-Tops don't show the cracks simply because the part that twists is the T-bar.
However, with true perimeter style SFC's you could easily cut the roof off the car and still have a stiffer structure than you did without. I'm not so sure about the non perimeter SFCs. Not saying you should go racing with that type of setup, but you could easily have a streetable car that wouldn't fall out of shape from metal fatigue.
Convertable conversions such as ASC added bracing, though it wasn't alot. It was however enough that SFC's are different between convertable and non-convertable cars.
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 916
Likes: 9
From: Wichita Falls, TX
Car: 91 Firebird,00 c2500,75 Vette
Engine: 3.1 but 350 soon, 350, 350
Transmission: T56 soon
Axle/Gears: stock 3.42 Posi to come
Re: impossible, stupid, or both?
If you talk to people who are doing roof swaps on cars they often weld in temporary bracing to hold the car to the same shape while they replace the roof.
On a stock thirdgen you simply cannot cut the roof off and expect it to maintain ANY sort of torsional stiffness, they are already weak as is shown by hard top B-pillar cracks. T-Tops don't show the cracks simply because the part that twists is the T-bar.
However, with true perimeter style SFC's you could easily cut the roof off the car and still have a stiffer structure than you did without. I'm not so sure about the non perimeter SFCs. Not saying you should go racing with that type of setup, but you could easily have a streetable car that wouldn't fall out of shape from metal fatigue.
Convertable conversions such as ASC added bracing, though it wasn't alot. It was however enough that SFC's are different between convertable and non-convertable cars.
On a stock thirdgen you simply cannot cut the roof off and expect it to maintain ANY sort of torsional stiffness, they are already weak as is shown by hard top B-pillar cracks. T-Tops don't show the cracks simply because the part that twists is the T-bar.
However, with true perimeter style SFC's you could easily cut the roof off the car and still have a stiffer structure than you did without. I'm not so sure about the non perimeter SFCs. Not saying you should go racing with that type of setup, but you could easily have a streetable car that wouldn't fall out of shape from metal fatigue.
Convertable conversions such as ASC added bracing, though it wasn't alot. It was however enough that SFC's are different between convertable and non-convertable cars.
What else I was trying to say was that after a TTop roof is properly swapped on (Key word being PROPERLY) that the car as a whole is very nearly or just as strong as factory in regards to flexing and safety. We all know it is very prone to flexing anyways.
As for the rest you just put in much better words what I said. In the example of what I did it wasn't sitting on its wheels. It may not have been specifically braced as such but was well supported to eliminate flex until I dropped it to the floor. It was also on a very level concrete floor. If it was on its wheels it would have been more likely to flex as the doors etc are not very structural in regards to torsional flexing. If outside the stands and ground could not be verified to be that level. All reasons for reinforcing before cutting a roof off.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Street Lethal
Miscellaneous Third Gen Items!
0
Sep 7, 2015 01:09 PM












