History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2013, 12:31 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
KMK454's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,337
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

My right rear end-link lost its bushings due to dry-rot and age. I discovered this when driving and the car sounded like it had some loose change in the suspension. Since I'll be replacing the end link/rubber, may as well do the bushings and all suspension rubber... and since I'll be doing the suspension, may as well take a look at those 20 year old original shocks/struts and springs... and this is where the problems start:

Maybe my googling isn't that good, but it seems difficult to find factory-style replacement suspension components. Almost everything is polyurethane or derlin, which isn't a huge issue as long as it looks/fits like stock, but a lot of the offerings are bright red. Shocks aren't as big of a deal, but the color of replacement shocks most likely won't match factory. Springs, not even sure where to begin. They all have some degree of drop.

So, where does everybody get their stock-ish replacement components?

Also, at what point is an original starting to cross into modified? If I replace all the bushings with black polyurethane high performance ones, put in 1LE end links from TDS, throw on some Bilsteins, and get Hotchkis springs (1" drop), am I over the line? Has sacrilege been committed? I've seen cars running Eibach Pro Kits or Hotchkis Springs and you would be hard pressed to tell the ride height wasn't stock.

The original plan when I bought the thing was to lower and get some 18" CCW Classics... I think I may be over that, but I know that would definitely cross over the "original" line.

Riding high and stock:
Old 03-10-2013, 12:44 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Reid Fleming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: SuperRam 350
Transmission: Pro Built S/S TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

Much of our car's suspension is 82-92 replacement. Meaning you can't just go out and buy a shock that is meant for a WS6 GTA or an IROC or a Berlinetta. You simply buy a shock that is meant for a 3rd gen F-body. I like this as it makes buying replacements easier.

Bushings: The stiffness of a poly bushing probably won't be much different than a 20 year old, hard as a brick, rubber bushing. I suppose you could order stock style rubber bushings. But it depends on what area. No point in not going to poly on the sway bar bushings. They don't bind up. I have the Global West Del-Alum (Delrin) bushings for the A-arms. The original rubber ones that came out were pretty old looking.

Springs: All the cars with original springs have sagged in height by 1.0-1.5 inches in height. Most of the aftermarket "lowering" springs are lower by 1.0 -1.5 inches in height. So buying lowering springs to replace original springs results in the same height give or take.

I did Moog 5662/5665 (front/back) springs on my car. Raised the height back up by roughly .75 to 1.25 inches in each corner, depending on how much each corner had sagged over the years. I like it. Many people complain their cars sit too high with these. But that's because they're used to the saggy spring look that 25 year old springs have. Plus all new cars on the road have low ride heights in comparison to our cars.

I think red parts for suspension are overrated. I buy black.
a) You're never down there looking at a lower control arm or a subframe connector. Neither is anybody else. I don't have a mirror under my car at car shows.
b) Red parts won't look so good after you've been through the rain and dirt gets stuck to them.

The biggest improvement will come from new struts/shocks. And those will be invisible to the observer anyways. Spend the most of your money here. The rest of the suspension can be pieced together overtime depending on your desires. A casual cruiser? Racetrack star? Somewhere in between? Your choice.
Old 03-24-2013, 08:08 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
KMK454's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,337
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

Originally Posted by Reid Fleming
Much of our car's suspension is 82-92 replacement. Meaning you can't just go out and buy a shock that is meant for a WS6 GTA or an IROC or a Berlinetta. You simply buy a shock that is meant for a 3rd gen F-body. I like this as it makes buying replacements easier.

Bushings: The stiffness of a poly bushing probably won't be much different than a 20 year old, hard as a brick, rubber bushing. I suppose you could order stock style rubber bushings. But it depends on what area. No point in not going to poly on the sway bar bushings. They don't bind up. I have the Global West Del-Alum (Delrin) bushings for the A-arms. The original rubber ones that came out were pretty old looking.

Springs: All the cars with original springs have sagged in height by 1.0-1.5 inches in height. Most of the aftermarket "lowering" springs are lower by 1.0 -1.5 inches in height. So buying lowering springs to replace original springs results in the same height give or take.

I did Moog 5662/5665 (front/back) springs on my car. Raised the height back up by roughly .75 to 1.25 inches in each corner, depending on how much each corner had sagged over the years. I like it. Many people complain their cars sit too high with these. But that's because they're used to the saggy spring look that 25 year old springs have. Plus all new cars on the road have low ride heights in comparison to our cars.

I think red parts for suspension are overrated. I buy black.
a) You're never down there looking at a lower control arm or a subframe connector. Neither is anybody else. I don't have a mirror under my car at car shows.
b) Red parts won't look so good after you've been through the rain and dirt gets stuck to them.

The biggest improvement will come from new struts/shocks. And those will be invisible to the observer anyways. Spend the most of your money here. The rest of the suspension can be pieced together overtime depending on your desires. A casual cruiser? Racetrack star? Somewhere in between? Your choice.
Thanks for the reply. My thing is I'd like to replace the worn components with ones that look factory original (or as near as possible) while performing better. This is why I think black poly bushings in the suspension and some replacement 1LE end links will fit the bill.

I was thinking of the following:
Front and rear End Links (Either Poly or TDS 1LE Nylon)
Poly front and rear sway bar bushings
Poly front and rear control arm bushings
Poly Panhard Bar bushings

Not sure if I should bother doing the tie rod boots or any mount bushings while I'm in there (trans).

As for shocks, I'm thinking Koni yellows or Bilstein HDs. Not really sure where to go here. And springs are interesting; I imagine Moogs will lift my car a fraction of an inch or so, while Eibach pro-kits will slightly drop it. I like the ride height I have now.
Old 03-24-2013, 08:41 AM
  #4  
Junior Member
 
c10freak87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Loganville GA
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

you have a very clean looking car i love it
Old 03-24-2013, 08:43 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,037
Received 1,666 Likes on 1,264 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

Don't bother with the "1LE" buzzword stuff.

Just get black poly end links as well.

Likewise, don't even bother attempting to change the Panhard bar & rear LCA bushings. The stamped sheet rubber parts they press into, usually don't survive the attempt intact. They're just altogether too weenie to withstand that much stress, especially considering that you (or at least, the 6'1" 145 lb gorilla that I am) can bend them with your hands.

If the car has so many miles on it that those parts are wore out, then it's not such a garage queen that "original" is ever going to make any difference. Certainly, not worth accepting inferior parts and suffering with impaired performance over.
Old 03-24-2013, 09:27 AM
  #6  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
KMK454's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,337
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
If the car has so many miles on it that those parts are wore out, then it's not such a garage queen that "original" is ever going to make any difference. Certainly, not worth accepting inferior parts and suffering with impaired performance over.
Yeah, well it has 20k miles and all the rubber bits are original, so some of the stuff on the underside is so dried out and brittle that it is deteriorating. For example, the rear end link bushing fell off while driving. I figure if I'm in there doing the end link, may as well hit everything at once.
Old 03-24-2013, 09:46 AM
  #7  
Member
 
Van Nuys born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

The slippery slope ....... I'll probably be right behind you.

As for shocks, Bilsteins would be my choice.
I set up a 1980 911SC once and it turned out awsome..... I didn't go overboard...... just increased the rear torsion bars a tad and Bilsteins. It did get lowered quite a bit... and the wheels and tires went to the same size as on a factory Turbo.
Old 03-24-2013, 11:08 AM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (9)
 
1MeanZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: North Central Indiana
Posts: 2,984
Received 36 Likes on 28 Posts
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 IRS
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

Here is what I recommend you do:

-poly sway bar end links.
-Poly sway bar bushings
-Global West Del-a-lum front control arm bushings (don't bother with poly here)
-1LE or poly rear control arm bushings. Yes you can change them, I did mine years ago and it wasn't terrible. A shop press and a few pieces of scrap metal for support works wonders.
-poly panhard bushings
-unless you don't like the current stance of the car, leave the stock springs alone, they are fine. Springs can settle over time, but they don't get soft and lose their rate as many think. If you like the way the car sits/handles/rides leave them alone.
-poly torque arm mount. not a must but I really hate the stock ones.
-If you haven't torn the stock trans mount yet you're not trying hard enough, with stock rubbber engine mounts I'd run a stock replacement rubber trans mount. The new ones are stiffer and have a life time warranty.
-I'd go with Koni shocks and struts, if not them Bilstein HD. I wouldn't run anything else on these cars contrary to what others might tell you.
-The stock caster/camber plates in these cars are terrible. The rubber in them is too soft and doesn't allow the strut to do it's job effectively. There aren't any stock appearing camber plates on the market I know of, but Founders/Hotpart.com have the best ones IMO.
-Now might also be a good time to replace all the brake hoses too.

Last edited by 1MeanZ; 03-24-2013 at 11:12 AM.
Old 03-25-2013, 07:45 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member
 
2007xl50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Streetsboro Oh
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1987 T/A WS6 T-Tops/92 RS
Engine: LB9/3.1
Transmission: 700R4/700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73/3.23
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

I get that you want to keep the car original and with only 20K on the clock I get it and it's a killer looking car, but at some point you have to install replacement parts. With that being said I don't see that installing better bushings, struts and shocks is going to be counted as madding really or hurt the value of the car.
Old 04-04-2013, 12:49 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
KMK454's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,337
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

Anybody use AC Delco rubber bushings? I was messing around on their website looking for some truck parts when I checked for thirdgens and they have quite a selection of rubber suspension components.
Old 04-06-2013, 01:59 AM
  #11  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
actarnoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 RS/B4C clone
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt Street/Strip 700r4
Axle/Gears: 7.625 axle with 3.23 gears/TrueTrac
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

I replaced my entire car's suspension using Moog/Delco/Bilstein parts. In the end, it drives great.
Old 04-08-2013, 09:58 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Van Nuys born's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 4/89 IROC Z28 G92 -
Engine: LB9 TPI
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

Here's a picture that came with my 89 that the original owner included.

It was taken in July of 89...... I'm posting it so you can see the ride height. The other pics are current as of last Fall.

Name:  new89IROC.jpg
Views: 145
Size:  88.3 KB
Name:  IROC065.jpg
Views: 140
Size:  154.5 KB
Name:  IROC064.jpg
Views: 150
Size:  109.1 KB
Name:  IROC063.jpg
Views: 146
Size:  120.0 KB

Last edited by Van Nuys born; 04-08-2013 at 10:00 PM. Reason: add pics
Old 04-08-2013, 10:07 PM
  #13  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
actarnoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 RS/B4C clone
Engine: 355 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt Street/Strip 700r4
Axle/Gears: 7.625 axle with 3.23 gears/TrueTrac
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

I'm running Moog 5662 and CC635

Replacement Suspension Components and Originality-gsfsri7.jpg
Replacement Suspension Components and Originality-rwzwpho.jpg
Old 05-30-2013, 08:13 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
KMK454's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 1,337
Received 47 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro B4C
Engine: 305
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality

Just had the following installed:

Energy Suspension Polyurethane Bushings for:
36mm front sways
New front end links
23mm rear sways
New rear end links
Front LCAs
Rear LCAs
Panhard Bar

And then:
Bilstein HD Shocks and Struts
Four wheel alignment

The difference is remarkable. I think the two biggest fixes I have done to my car are the tires (year and a half ago) and the shocks/struts. The Bilsteins hold the car to the road very well and the rebound is very controlled. I love how it feels. It's firm and refined, but not in a teeth-rattling way.

The bushings tightened up the car in general. The car as a whole was tight to begin with, but the bushings definitely closed up any wiggles and gaps. So far, no squeaks from the poly, but we shall see as the mileage progresses. The car hugged the on-ramps and was a blast to drive.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
customblackbird
Suspension and Chassis
4
08-15-2021 10:16 PM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
01-10-2020 05:33 PM
TheExaminer
Suspension and Chassis
21
08-25-2015 07:34 PM
Fronzizzle
Electronics
2
08-09-2015 01:15 PM



Quick Reply: Replacement Suspension Components and Originality



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.