Mystery fuel rail fitting
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: LS1 / LS3
Transmission: M6 / M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27
Mystery fuel rail fitting
This was on the rail when I got it. I have no idea what type of fitting this is. I need to convert it to -6AN. Any ideas?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: LS1 / LS3
Transmission: M6 / M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
I would like to go the opposite connector route
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 3
From: Butler,Ky
Car: 1982 Camaro
Engine: 454
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 410
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
It looks like a compression fitting (union) you can get from the hardware store. Is it brass?
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 10
From: PA
Car: 86 Trans AM
Engine: LS1 (not stock...)
Transmission: Built T56
Axle/Gears: Strange 12-bolt w/ 3.73
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
How about another shot? from the side perhaps? Move the nut back and forth and get a couple shots of what all is going on there.... Does it look factory or like someone stuck it on?
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: LS1 / LS3
Transmission: M6 / M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
Just in case someone runs across this fitting too, it's called a swagelok.
Unfortunitly I can't find a male to AN adaptor.
Unfortunitly I can't find a male to AN adaptor.
Last edited by Omega; Dec 22, 2008 at 10:01 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 4
From: In the Garage
Car: Camaro
Engine: 6.2L
Transmission: T56
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
Looks like a compression fitting to me. Swagelok is a brand of compression fittings that are very high quality ( its all I used in my swap for fuel lines ). The main difference between the swageloks and regular compression fittings is the material ( swage uses high quality strong alloy stuff i used their stainless line ) and the swagelocs use two ferules that are tapered and lock together rather than the brass round ball thing that most use.
Anyways regardless all you need to make that fit is a compression fitting female to whatever size NPT you want to use. From there you can adapt to anything you want with a small coupler and another NPT to whatever
Hope that makes sense
http://www.swagelok.com/search/find_...0000007/type-1
Anyways regardless all you need to make that fit is a compression fitting female to whatever size NPT you want to use. From there you can adapt to anything you want with a small coupler and another NPT to whatever
Hope that makes sense
http://www.swagelok.com/search/find_...0000007/type-1
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 4
From: Houston, Texas
Car: 88' IROCZ
Engine: 388 TPI Motown 350 Race block
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
I don't think Swagelok has adapters for automotive fuel lines and as mentioned it may take a minimum of 2 adapters and that can take up a lot of room.
If there's enough tube behind that connector I'd cut it off and use something like Russell Performance tube and hose fittings.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: LS1 / LS3
Transmission: M6 / M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
Fortunately I have a lot of room to go from the rail to the pushlok hose I plan on using for fuel line. However, I do not want 4 inches of different connectors.
I found this: http://www.swagelok.com/search/produ...art=SS-PB6-SL6
Which I hope will enable me to go directly from the fuel rail fitting to the fuel hose. My main issue at the moment is that these fittings are not easily obtained unless you are a business.
If that fails, I might have to go with a new rail. There isn't much left and I'm not sure if the swagelok destroys the tube when you put it on. Is this the case?
I found this: http://www.swagelok.com/search/produ...art=SS-PB6-SL6
Which I hope will enable me to go directly from the fuel rail fitting to the fuel hose. My main issue at the moment is that these fittings are not easily obtained unless you are a business.
If that fails, I might have to go with a new rail. There isn't much left and I'm not sure if the swagelok destroys the tube when you put it on. Is this the case?
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 1
From: Marine City, MI
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 6.0 LSX Single turbo
Transmission: 4l80E
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.55
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
I have some rails for sale if you need them. I'd like $40 for them shipped.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,387
Likes: 0
From: Northern NJ
Car: 89 Formula / 09 G8
Engine: LS1 / LS3
Transmission: M6 / M6
Axle/Gears: 3:42 / 3:27
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
Thanks, but I'm not sure that truck rails will work with my setup... will they?
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 1
From: Marine City, MI
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 6.0 LSX Single turbo
Transmission: 4l80E
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.55
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
No i dont think so, these are off a truck manifold, i thought thats what you were using.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 4
From: Houston, Texas
Car: 88' IROCZ
Engine: 388 TPI Motown 350 Race block
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: Mystery fuel rail fitting
Omega, If you can't get a local business to buy it for you let me know and I'll buy one from one of our suppliers and ship it to you. I'm in Houston, Texas.
Russell also has quick release fittings And LS1, LT1, and LT4.
http://www.russellperformance.com/mc...rel/main.shtml
http://www.russellperformance.com/mc...fit/fuel.shtml
Russell also has quick release fittings And LS1, LT1, and LT4.
http://www.russellperformance.com/mc...rel/main.shtml
http://www.russellperformance.com/mc...fit/fuel.shtml
Last edited by rgarcia63; Dec 23, 2008 at 04:21 AM. Reason: More info
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







