Northern California Discussion board for Northern and Central California.

F'ugly!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 01:34 AM
  #1  
JMJ2003's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
From: Fres-Yes, California
Car: A beater.
Engine: Not enough HP.
Transmission: Automatic... I can't drive a stick!
F'ugly!

This thing is uuuugly.

What the hell is Chevy thinking?

I'm sorry... But am I the ONLY one who thinks that the new Camaro's are uglier sin???

***... I want to boycott GM at this point.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 01:48 AM
  #2  
Firebreed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
Car: 2011 SS/RS
Engine: LS3
Transmission: Tremic6060
Axle/Gears: good enough
Remeber.. its a concept car, the sharp lines wont be so dramatic, im sure the wheels would be more like 17's, maybe 19's at the most, only thing i hope they do with the car is get rid of 2 of the three grills!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 02:57 AM
  #3  
Naft's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Chico, CA
Car: 89 Firebird, 92 RS
Engine: 2.8L MPFI, 355 TPI
Transmission: t-5, t-5
Axle/Gears: open 3.42, posi 3.42
it looks best in red, and a crapload better in person. I wasnt impressed by the pictures at all either.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 06:26 AM
  #4  
Daniel U's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 1
From: SLO County, CA.
Car: '88 Camaro
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 9 bolt w/3.27 lim. slip
I think it's a purty, and my wife actually likes it! She might get one too!
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #5  
TMoNeE's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, CA
Car: 87 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T-56
Uh, I really like it...
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #6  
Mr. IROC-Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 6
From: san jose, ca
Car: 1990 IROC-Z (De-Badged-Carbon Hood)
Engine: Superram 383
Transmission: T-56 w/upgraded Viper Internals
Axle/Gears: 3.73 18x8 and 18x11 irocs
Originally Posted by JMJ2003
This thing is uuuugly.

What the hell is Chevy thinking?

I'm sorry... But am I the ONLY one who thinks that the new Camaro's are uglier sin???

***... I want to boycott GM at this point.

Wow, finally someone who agrees with me. That thing is ugly as sin.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #7  
urbanhunter44's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Originally Posted by JMJ2003
I'm sorry... But am I the ONLY one who thinks that the new Camaro's are uglier sin???
Yep, you are the only one.

I'd do ALOT of things to get one
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2006 | 06:21 PM
  #8  
SmallTires's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Car: 1984 Camaro Z28
Engine: Roller 350
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: built ten bolt 3.73's
The concept pics remind me far too much of a CTS-V. Just looks big and bulky.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MoJoe
Members Camaros
33
Feb 6, 2025 09:47 PM
Elephantismo
Electronics
14
Feb 13, 2019 12:51 AM
dbrochard
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
8
Sep 25, 2015 04:56 PM
Box of Rocks
Tech / General Engine
7
May 20, 2001 09:41 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:43 AM.