variable valve timing for smallblocks
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
From: portland, Maine USA
Car: grand prix/84 z28
Engine: 4.6 Northstar
Transmission: t-56
variable valve timing for smallblocks
Hey guys,
I was looking around and found this site. Www.hotrocker.com
What do you guys think?
It looks cheesy to me but the idea is a good one. Vette magazine is going to test them out and publish the results.
It looks good and stuff. It costs 1000 bucks.
Just letting you know.
:lala: :lala: :lala:
I was looking around and found this site. Www.hotrocker.com
What do you guys think?
It looks cheesy to me but the idea is a good one. Vette magazine is going to test them out and publish the results.
It looks good and stuff. It costs 1000 bucks.
Just letting you know.
:lala: :lala: :lala:
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, IL
Car: 1985 Z-28
Engine: a big one
Transmission: 4 spd auto soon to be a 6 speed
that system is variable lift, not timing.
but it is still pretty cool stuff, i saw an article about them about a year or two ago.
but it is still pretty cool stuff, i saw an article about them about a year or two ago.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Variable ratio would be a better term maybe, it will affect the timing of the opening and closing events a bit. I've been waiting for someone to review it.
I've got to tell you, that setup doesn't seem like a winner. I used to have a 300ZX with variable valve timing. It had four cams, all variable (rather than VTEC, Variable Timed Exhaust Cam). The way this works is that at high RPM, the cams completely change shape, this is done with a cam with progressive grinds that moves in and out. What you're looking at would only vary the rocker ratio (if it even works), but I can't see why you would even want the smaller end, why not just swich rockers to a bigger, fixed ratio? What I'm saying is, if this technology is so great, why aren't Crane and Comp offering it?
Its making the cam act smaller therefore making it less radical at idle / low rpm. In theory it could take a car that idles at 8" of vacuum and make it idle at like 11 or 12... also giving you back some lost low end torque so the car would pull harder below the 3000-4500 rpm point where a motor like this would normally start pulling. Probably get you some better gas mileage as well. It's allowing someone to run a bigger cam w/o sacrificing as much.
I think the theory is sound and I'm sure it works but the packaging is a bit awkward and I'd question durability.
I think the theory is sound and I'm sure it works but the packaging is a bit awkward and I'd question durability.
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Originally posted by 12 Sec GTA
I thought VTEC stood for Variable Timing Electronically Controlled?
I thought VTEC stood for Variable Timing Electronically Controlled?
Trending Topics
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
I cant wait for electronicly controlled valves (no valvetrain)
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: Peoria, IL
Car: 1985 Z-28
Engine: a big one
Transmission: 4 spd auto soon to be a 6 speed
i remember reading about ferarri's new "variable balistic valve" somehow they found a way to use valve float in their favor.
Supreme Member



Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,306
Likes: 77
From: Fl
Car: 5.3L turbo 2800lbs RWD
Engine: Prefer 3L Iron & 5.3L Aluminum
Transmission: 4l80e
Axle/Gears: 3.512
last thing i read about VTEC is this:
its a 2 rocker arm per intake valve setup. 1 rocker is low lift, the other is high lift. simple. the computer just switches over to the second rocker at higher rpms to give the extra life/duration the engine needs. the cam only has 2 lobes however, the computer just uses some sort of hydroulic mechanism to switch rockers. I've never seen this in person, I just read about it in some mag and could be WAyyyyy off. just thought i would let everyone know what I read. sounds like it works too.
its a 2 rocker arm per intake valve setup. 1 rocker is low lift, the other is high lift. simple. the computer just switches over to the second rocker at higher rpms to give the extra life/duration the engine needs. the cam only has 2 lobes however, the computer just uses some sort of hydroulic mechanism to switch rockers. I've never seen this in person, I just read about it in some mag and could be WAyyyyy off. just thought i would let everyone know what I read. sounds like it works too.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Actually Jesel makes a kit like that for SBCs. IIRC, it's about $700.
CHP did a test on it and they said it's great. Of course I'm sure $$$ had some say in that test.
I'll look in my past issues and see if I can find it. It may take me a day or two though.
AJ
CHP did a test on it and they said it's great. Of course I'm sure $$$ had some say in that test.

I'll look in my past issues and see if I can find it. It may take me a day or two though.
AJ
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
backtothe80s
Suspension and Chassis
33
Sep 5, 2015 12:39 AM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM





