twin turbo l03
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
twin turbo l03
what do you guys think about putting 2 garrett t25 turbo's on my carb'ed l03. also if any of you guys could help me out with basic requirements that would be needed ( i already have a set of headers i can modify to work with these) as far as fuel requirements from what gm told me the turbos would make between 4-6 lbs of boost per turbo im getting the turbo's off of a couple of sunbird's dont laugh this is just a toy as im wanting to build a 355 that i can transfer the system over to. also the turbo's are free since my father in law has a salvage yard so i can get pretty much anything i want. and please no 305 vs 350 debates this is just for right now until i can get the money up to build a vortec headed 355. any comments or advice welcome , just none about i should just stick them on a 350. thanx in advance.
thomas
thomas
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
well............
hmm nobody is responding to my question????? 47 views=no replies i suppose since its not a 350 nobody cares. oh well guess ill just have to figure it out on my own.
THOMAS
THOMAS
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
????
above what the engine is producing now ? i think thats what you are saying if not can you be a little more specific?
thanx in advance.
thomas
thanx in advance.
thomas
Supreme Member

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,159
Likes: 2
From: Munster IN
Car: 92 RS, 05 GTO (sold), 10 TL AWD
Engine: 383 HSR w/DSC1
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Strange S60/3.73
well, I say go for it but if you do, ditch the heads, stock intake, and cam. I say this because I think you would make more power on that 305 with heads, cam and intake, then twin turbos on a stock lo3. those heads and cam won't let it really use the turbos.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by 1992rs/ss
well, I say go for it but if you do, ditch the heads, stock intake, and cam. I say this because I think you would make more power on that 305 with heads, cam and intake, then twin turbos on a stock lo3. those heads and cam won't let it really use the turbos.
well, I say go for it but if you do, ditch the heads, stock intake, and cam. I say this because I think you would make more power on that 305 with heads, cam and intake, then twin turbos on a stock lo3. those heads and cam won't let it really use the turbos.
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo
Car: 87 Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: THM700R4
Originally posted by 1992rs/ss
well, I say go for it but if you do, ditch the heads, stock intake, and cam. I say this because I think you would make more power on that 305 with heads, cam and intake, then twin turbos on a stock lo3. those heads and cam won't let it really use the turbos.
well, I say go for it but if you do, ditch the heads, stock intake, and cam. I say this because I think you would make more power on that 305 with heads, cam and intake, then twin turbos on a stock lo3. those heads and cam won't let it really use the turbos.
If you don't have the $$$$ for these other upgrades just throw the turbos on those and the headers will shake the rust off.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
o.k. guys
lemme let you know something first of all I switched to carb, hei and I also have true 2.5 inch duals with 1 5/8 inch headers (hence no catback) , also which cam would you upgrade to so it will help the turbos and heads and intake(single plane or dual)? , Ill have the ignition taken care of have a pretty good idea on that.
on the heads preferably suggest some factory heads that I can port I can use since I can come across just about any heads since my father in law has a salvage yard that I live next door from.
on the heads preferably suggest some factory heads that I can port I can use since I can come across just about any heads since my father in law has a salvage yard that I live next door from.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Don’t worry about the heads so much… they’re not that bad, and work find for a small displacement/low rpm engine. If you want better, probably the best ‘80’s heads were the ones used on the earlier 305’s, like the LG4, L69 and L05 heads. Of course, you could always drop compression with a set of 64 or 76cc heads, and my first choice there would be some stock vortec heads.
The stock intake is a piece of junk… not really great for anything but a low rpm, low hp application. Carb… if you can tune it it does have a few advantages, primarily the fuel will cool the intake charge some making an intercooler not as necessary.
Go for it… it will be fun, if I had an LO3 I’d do it in a second, but I’d probably do it with a smallish (good for say 450hp or so) single turbo. I’d also keep the tbi… fun, good mileage and if built right even reasonably reliable.
The stock intake is a piece of junk… not really great for anything but a low rpm, low hp application. Carb… if you can tune it it does have a few advantages, primarily the fuel will cool the intake charge some making an intercooler not as necessary.
Go for it… it will be fun, if I had an LO3 I’d do it in a second, but I’d probably do it with a smallish (good for say 450hp or so) single turbo. I’d also keep the tbi… fun, good mileage and if built right even reasonably reliable.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
crossfire
i have a edelbrock streetmaster single plane its an old intake but works pretty well , also the lg4,l69 or lu5 heads would you have any casting numbers on them as most of the heads we have are already off the vehicles and on a shelf in our shop or in a storage van. plus one more thing is 9.3:1 compression too much to run between 8-12 lbs of boost (not sure how much that would put me at,a little help would be nice) and at what psi should my fuel pressure be. im sorry for all the questions but ive never done a turbo setup on anything and i really wanna do this.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: crossfire
Originally posted by firebird89355
i have a edelbrock streetmaster single plane its an old intake but works pretty well , also the lg4,l69 or lu5 heads would you have any casting numbers on them as most of the heads we have are already off the vehicles and on a shelf in our shop or in a storage van.
i have a edelbrock streetmaster single plane its an old intake but works pretty well , also the lg4,l69 or lu5 heads would you have any casting numbers on them as most of the heads we have are already off the vehicles and on a shelf in our shop or in a storage van.
There’s a few part numbers for them… probably the most common are the 416’s. Again, those are small chamber 305 heads, if you can get the compression to where it would be OK with them (they LG4’s had something in the mid 8’s, so it is possible), then they would be one of your better choices…
Vortec stuff should be easy to pick out since both the common castings will have a different intake manifold bolt pattern.
plus one more thing is 9.3:1 compression too much to run between 8-12 lbs of boost (not sure how much that would put me at,a little help would be nice)
For a stockish setup, yea, it would be a bit much… with a good tune, good quench and a larger then stock cam it could work well.
and at what psi should my fuel pressure be. im sorry for all the questions but ive never done a turbo setup on anything and i really wanna do this.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
but again, I don't have as big a problem with the stock L03 heads as most people do...
but again, I don't have as big a problem with the stock L03 heads as most people do...
Take a look at the sy/ty guys and you'll notice that the swirl port heads "work" with some high pressure but the guys running vortec heads are just as fast without the crazy boost. I prefer the higher horsepower with less boost approach while others like the high boost, difference of opinions. Only thing that can't be argued is that good heads will make more hp everywhere with everything else being equal.... but good heads aren't free as is everything in this hobby.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
From: Dallas/Fort-Worth
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI (L98)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.45
I third change out the heads, cam, and intake.
I would get vortec heads and matching manifold. Then just use the stock cam or a cam setup for a turbo. This will improve greatly. JMHO
I would get vortec heads and matching manifold. Then just use the stock cam or a cam setup for a turbo. This will improve greatly. JMHO
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
this would be a good project for a stock LO3, if you start suping up the engine or increase the cubic inches I think these turbos are the wrong idea.
2 T25's good for a stock LO3, not good enough for a well modified LO3.
2 T25's good for a stock LO3, not good enough for a well modified LO3.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by JPrevost
Ever see a flow test of them? Sure they have 185cc ports but that doesn't mean squat.
Ever see a flow test of them? Sure they have 185cc ports but that doesn't mean squat.
Are those the V6 ones or the V8… I haven’t actually measured a set but they sure act like they’re a lot smaller then that.
There is nothing good about the design of those swirl ports.
I completely disagree… as long as you work within their constraints (they’re great for lower rpm efficiency…) they work great. I’ve dealt with them on a few different setups, the most interesting were a 350 and a 383 both used in full size trucks… made for some serious torque monsters…
It's just a bad design and the only way around it is to boost the engine (which he wants to do).
Take a look at the sy/ty guys and you'll notice that the swirl port heads "work" with some high pressure but the guys running vortec heads are just as fast without the crazy boost. I prefer the higher horsepower with less boost approach while others like the high boost, difference of opinions.
Take a look at the sy/ty guys and you'll notice that the swirl port heads "work" with some high pressure but the guys running vortec heads are just as fast without the crazy boost. I prefer the higher horsepower with less boost approach while others like the high boost, difference of opinions.
He’s asking about using stock heads with boost. He’s also talking about doing this on a relatively low rpm engine with relatively small turbos. This will never be a high rpm, low boost, high flow setup. If it’s going to make real power he will run high boost. I’ve already suggested that vortec heads would be better from both a flow and detonation control perspective, but if he’s going to stick to something “more standard” then the swirl ports will work as well/almost as well as most of what he’ll find in the JY.
Only thing that can't be argued is that good heads will make more hp everywhere with everything else being equal.... but good heads aren't free as is everything in this hobby.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Both the v6 and v8 swirl ports are 185cc. Yeah they act like smaller ports because they're trash, literally. This just goes to show you that port volume means squat, it's the shape that counts. Large engines should have large ports or small engines that want to make horsepower need larger ports, that's just a general rule. There's a guy running a 406 AFR 195cc heads in the 10's n/a with a miniram.... that's only 10cc bigger than the swirl port heads
.
As for swirl port heads making monster low end torque... ummm let's put some things into perspective. They aren't torque monster heads, they're just crappy heads. They have "low end torque" because they can't make any torque at higher RPM because the flow is so bad. Hence the effect of low end torque. I have a feeling that people say "moster torque" to feel better about an engine that revs like a diesel. Put a set of the LB9 heads on the L03 and then boost it, that'll make MORE low end torque AND high end torque resulting in more "free" horsepower.
I just wouldn't waste my time turbo charging a swirl port engine. The results will be similar to the truck owners and that whipple charger..... disapointed. Straight shot heads will make more torque everywhere than a swirl port head, I'll dig up my proof if need be.
So my recommendation is go for the twin turbo setup and if anything the headers you make will work on any small block in the future. Just use the stock swirl port heads for making the headers/manifolds, get a set of junkyard LB9 heads from a TPI 305 for like $100, spend $50 cleaning them up, test the valve springs and slam them onto the stock L03 short block.
.As for swirl port heads making monster low end torque... ummm let's put some things into perspective. They aren't torque monster heads, they're just crappy heads. They have "low end torque" because they can't make any torque at higher RPM because the flow is so bad. Hence the effect of low end torque. I have a feeling that people say "moster torque" to feel better about an engine that revs like a diesel. Put a set of the LB9 heads on the L03 and then boost it, that'll make MORE low end torque AND high end torque resulting in more "free" horsepower.
I just wouldn't waste my time turbo charging a swirl port engine. The results will be similar to the truck owners and that whipple charger..... disapointed. Straight shot heads will make more torque everywhere than a swirl port head, I'll dig up my proof if need be.
So my recommendation is go for the twin turbo setup and if anything the headers you make will work on any small block in the future. Just use the stock swirl port heads for making the headers/manifolds, get a set of junkyard LB9 heads from a TPI 305 for like $100, spend $50 cleaning them up, test the valve springs and slam them onto the stock L03 short block.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
o.k. lemme see
im pretty sure i can get a set of either 416's or a set of vortecs pretty easy so...... what about cam selection what kind of specs should i be looking for as far as it goes(and dont forget i do have a carb onthere) right now i have a edelbrock but will probably switch to holley.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Re: o.k. lemme see
Originally posted by firebird89355
im pretty sure i can get a set of either 416's or a set of vortecs pretty easy so...... what about cam selection what kind of specs should i be looking for as far as it goes(and dont forget i do have a carb onthere) right now i have a edelbrock but will probably switch to holley.
im pretty sure i can get a set of either 416's or a set of vortecs pretty easy so...... what about cam selection what kind of specs should i be looking for as far as it goes(and dont forget i do have a carb onthere) right now i have a edelbrock but will probably switch to holley.
I've got one if you want it for $25 shipped. And no I'm not just trying to unload the cam. It is good for power adders.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
hey JPREVOST
what year lt1 is it out of im doing some playing with DD2000 and read there are different lt1 cams out there so if i knew what year i could get a little more ball park guess on what id be making.
THOMAS
p.s. thanx for the offer i might be taking you up on that also.
THOMAS
p.s. thanx for the offer i might be taking you up on that also.
Last edited by firebird89355; Oct 10, 2004 at 02:21 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
The cam is from a 96 firebird, that's all I know about it. Just about any lt1 cam has the lift you need and the tight LS to keep boost in the cylinder. The duration is mild for a 350 but is a good 305 cam power adder or not.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
jprevost
1 more quick question does the cam you have a fuel pump lobe? i was reading some did some did not.
thomas
thomas
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
this would be a good project for a stock LO3, if you start suping up the engine or increase the cubic inches I think these turbos are the wrong idea.
2 T25's good for a stock LO3, not good enough for a well modified LO3.
this would be a good project for a stock LO3, if you start suping up the engine or increase the cubic inches I think these turbos are the wrong idea.
2 T25's good for a stock LO3, not good enough for a well modified LO3.
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
I would have to suggest larger turbos then
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
I would have to suggest larger turbos then
I would have to suggest larger turbos then
Some good T3 turbo's like those found in the K cars. For a mild 355 (stock gm non-vortec heads) T3's should still be good. Going to a hybrid like a GN turbo when you're wanting to get into the 10's.... it's all about goals and not undersizing a junkyard turbo! Nothing like worn bearings and a shaft speed of 150,000+ to make for a immediate rebuild.
Originally posted by JPrevost
Yeah.
Some good T3 turbo's like those found in the K cars. For a mild 355 (stock gm non-vortec heads) T3's should still be good. Going to a hybrid like a GN turbo when you're wanting to get into the 10's.... it's all about goals and not undersizing a junkyard turbo! Nothing like worn bearings and a shaft speed of 150,000+ to make for a immediate rebuild.
Yeah.
Some good T3 turbo's like those found in the K cars. For a mild 355 (stock gm non-vortec heads) T3's should still be good. Going to a hybrid like a GN turbo when you're wanting to get into the 10's.... it's all about goals and not undersizing a junkyard turbo! Nothing like worn bearings and a shaft speed of 150,000+ to make for a immediate rebuild.
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 2
Car: 91 Red Sled
Axle/Gears: 10bolt Richmond 3.73 Torsen
Originally posted by nightrider87
Crazy joe of toohighpsi went high 9s with a set of .60/.63 T3s on a more or less stock 351 engine so you really don't need much more than that lol
Crazy joe of toohighpsi went high 9s with a set of .60/.63 T3s on a more or less stock 351 engine so you really don't need much more than that lol
Good point.
I do believe his race weight was somewhere around 3400 lbs though.
the weight listed on the site is 3200, but i've been told it weighed more than that when the fast runs were made...those times aren't even on the site either.
I do believe his race weight was somewhere around 3400 lbs though.
the weight listed on the site is 3200, but i've been told it weighed more than that when the fast runs were made...those times aren't even on the site either.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
As far as the heads discussion, if I had nothing better to do I’d build a nice boosted engine for my truck with a set of swirl ports to show you what could be done… but if I was going to put the effort in (since I don’t have either sitting around and would cost about the same) I would probably just port another set of vortec heads and use those (I put together a 350 with some that I did last summer that put down over 400hp NA at the wheels in a friend’s dually pickup)
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
hey im back
sorry i havent been on in a few days i havent been able to access thirdgen but now i can. have any of you heard of schwitzer brand turbo's? reason im asking is because i can get a couple of those for a real good deal just want some opinions.
thomas
thomas
TGO Supporter


Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
yes they are fine but what size are they, that may not be fine.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: HOULKA MISSISSIPPI
Car: 1989 pontiac firebird formula
Engine: Currently building a 355
Transmission: 700r4
go ahead
ive decided to go ahead and build a 355 TT so if you want that cam and if he wants to sell it to you go ahead thats cool with me.
THOMAS
THOMAS
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






