Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Front subframe triangulation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #1  
Matthew91-Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Car: 1991 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 with Eaton posi
Front subframe triangulation

OK...as far as stability goes, a triangle is much more resistant to stress/strain than a square. This is why even the typical ladder bar setup, although strong in appearance, has serious limitations in torsional (twisting) stress. Chassis designers say that by adding a few pieces to the chassis in the right places can dramatically increase resistance to torsion. Even a full nascar roll cage does not reduce torsional stress very well.

Every owner of an f-body (esp. convertibles) can attest to all the groans the chassis makes when cornering, turning onto an incline, etc..

About a year ago, I had some Alston sfc's welded in. Made the car feel much "straighter" when driving, but my convertible chassis steel seemed to lack alot of torsional resistance. So, I borrowed some of steve spohns SFC design and decided to triangulate the front subframe to see if there was any improvement.

All I did was get some 1" round 12 guage tube and some flat bar ($5). I had the tubing welded in at a right angle to the convertible ASC sfc and then to the point on the front subframe where the Alstons were welded (both sides...the 1" tube clears the cat well). I used a piece of 5/16 flat bar between the tubing and the chassis.

RESULTS: Very nice difference in handling. The front end seems like it wants to get down to business. No protest during hard cornering. The front end just feels "low and mean", especially at WOT. Easy mod for $40 (welding incl.).

Oh and this mod was made after Alston sfcs, 2-pt STB, wonderbar, and Eibach prokit springs, WS6 sway bars, poly bushings (not to mention boxed in LCA,s and a panhard rod.) I think that if you can feel a very noticeable difference in handling even after you've done ALOT to your suspension, its definately worth it.

If you have a vert its easy because you already have 2-sides of the triangle (factory sfc and the front subframe).

If you have non-vert, all you have to do is add about two feet of tubing under your door sill on each side to complete the triangle.

Anyway...I thought I'd share.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 12:45 PM
  #2  
TKOPerformance's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
Sounds like a worthwhile modification.

Anything done in a flat plane has very little to do with torsional stiffness though. The best thing you can do for torsional stiffness is install a cage. Even then, properly triangulating it to resist deflection would make it nearly impossible to drive on the street.

BTW, after having driven a Winston Cup car I can say that they are about as stiff as anything on the planet. They are totally precise, totally predictable, and feel like you're doing 60 when you're really going 135! They test them for torsional stiffness by instering a long bar through the front and rear frame rails an aplying a 200 lb weight to the end of a 10' lever. Deflection is usually measured in thousandths of an inch! If that isn't torsional stiffness I don't know what is!
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 07:09 PM
  #3  
Matthew91-Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Car: 1991 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 with Eaton posi
The bit about the Nascar roll cage was a model made from balsa wood with the same testing; a torqe arm with a weight attached. But, the design only included a bare bones nascar cage on a typical suspension and did not include all the extra trimming you'd expect to find in a race car. I believe you when you say how driving it felt. I'd love to get behind the wheel of a winston cup car . How did you manage that btw?



My goals with triangulation were to just increase handling/performance without sacrificing drivability too much. The front feels alot more solid now. Only problem is that I still get alot of window rattle/door creak. It bugs the crap out of me.

Now...I don't now wether to run 1.75" round 12 guage along the already present ASC (crap) sfc's or to just go ahead and install a 4-pt roll bar.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 12:19 AM
  #4  
TKOPerformance's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
I drove a Winston Cup car when I was down in Florida at one of the Richard Petty tracks. All the cars are Chevy powered with different bodies. They limit you to 135 if it's your first time, but it was still a lot of fun. Once you are up to speed you aren't allowed to downshift, but even in 4th gear it would put you back int he seat without a problem. I have an open invitation to come back at any time and take the advanced course, where the rules are a lot more lax. It was pricey, but one of the best experiences, and in my opinion well worth it.

To stiffen the car up further you would have to use a rollbar. It sounds to me like what you really did was keep the shock towers stable under cornering loads, which significantly improved handling, but in order to really tighten up the car you will have to triangulate the structure to a central hoop.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 08:58 AM
  #5  
laiky's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
can you post pictures??
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #6  
robertg's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
From: northeast ohio
Car: 2000 astro
Engine: 4.3
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 with 3.42 gears
yeah, can you post some pictures? i'd like to see that.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2004 | 02:00 PM
  #7  
Matthew91-Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Car: 1991 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 with Eaton posi
Sorry for delay...here it what I have
Attached Thumbnails Front subframe triangulation-mysuspension.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #8  
laiky's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 2
Thats how the Spohn's would look with the lakewoods. I missed that you were modifying factory convertible SFC's
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #9  
FSTFBDY's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,945
Likes: 1
From: Boosted Land
Car: 92 Z28
Engine: Boosted LSX
pretty much what Im doing with my vert. Im actually cutting out the stock pos rivited on sfc metal. and taking the box tube through the sheetmetal. and tieing my 8point cage into it.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2004 | 06:55 PM
  #10  
Matthew91-Z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 1
From: Texas
Car: 1991 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 with Eaton posi
TPI 383...do you have that 8-pt installed yet? If so...how did it help with chassis flex?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
deracer
Camaros for Sale
3
Apr 11, 2016 12:04 AM
Nervous2
LSX and LTX Parts
8
Mar 10, 2016 09:49 PM
Dialed_In
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 20, 2015 01:45 PM
86White_T/A305
LTX and LSX
0
Aug 17, 2015 12:16 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:51 AM.