trans am with performance suspension
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, B.C.
Car: 87 GTA 120,000k, 90 CRX Si
Engine: 5.7 TPI, 1.6L 16 valve SOHC
Transmission: 700r4, 5spd std
Axle/Gears: 3.73
trans am with performance suspension
last year i bought new rear menroe sensitrack shocks and new rear springs for my 83 firebird. i havent used them and since then bought an 87 trans am with performance suspension...so my question is, should i replace the suspension with the new parts i bought or are they not as good as what is in the trans am?
and also what makes it better than reagular suspension...the vin# doesnt say anything about the suspension.
and also what makes it better than reagular suspension...the vin# doesnt say anything about the suspension.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
"Performance Suspension" is a sticker that goes on the dash, not a parts specification. I can't recall ever seeing a Trans Am of that age that didn't have that sticker.
A car that's 18 years old needs new springs and shocks. You can believe that, no matter what. So yes, new parts are better than 18-year-old ones, no matter what stickers the car has.
A car that's 18 years old needs new springs and shocks. You can believe that, no matter what. So yes, new parts are better than 18-year-old ones, no matter what stickers the car has.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, B.C.
Car: 87 GTA 120,000k, 90 CRX Si
Engine: 5.7 TPI, 1.6L 16 valve SOHC
Transmission: 700r4, 5spd std
Axle/Gears: 3.73
ok thats waht i was thinkin...cuz yah they are 18 years old.... thanks
Banned
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod, MA
Car: 1998 eclipse GSX
Engine: 4G63 2.0
Transmission: 5 speed
hahahah yeah i thought performance suspension ment something too - but noticed over bumps that age wore them out. new, old, regardless - replace with driving needs
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, B.C.
Car: 87 GTA 120,000k, 90 CRX Si
Engine: 5.7 TPI, 1.6L 16 valve SOHC
Transmission: 700r4, 5spd std
Axle/Gears: 3.73
the only thing i noticed when i changed the shocks yesterday, was that the new springs were like 2 inches shorter than the neww ones. so i left them in.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
THat's because they're stiffer to begin with. It takes more force to squish them the same amount (that being the definition of "stiffer", of course) so they have to start out life shorter before they're loaded.
Go back and change them, you'll like the improvement.
Go back and change them, you'll like the improvement.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, B.C.
Car: 87 GTA 120,000k, 90 CRX Si
Engine: 5.7 TPI, 1.6L 16 valve SOHC
Transmission: 700r4, 5spd std
Axle/Gears: 3.73
but then will the ride hieght be a bit taller than it is now? cuz i want to keep it low like it is now...or after a couple months will teh new springs compress to the hieght it is now?
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
No.
That's why the new springs are shorter.
They're stiffer. So they compress less under the same weight. Duh.... that being the definition of "stiffer". So they have to start out shorter in order to end up the same height with a car sitting on them.
That's why the new springs are shorter.
They're stiffer. So they compress less under the same weight. Duh.... that being the definition of "stiffer". So they have to start out shorter in order to end up the same height with a car sitting on them.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 725
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, B.C.
Car: 87 GTA 120,000k, 90 CRX Si
Engine: 5.7 TPI, 1.6L 16 valve SOHC
Transmission: 700r4, 5spd std
Axle/Gears: 3.73
ah crap...sorry in my earlier post what i ment to say was the old springs were 2 inches shorter...and i left those ones in cuz i want to keep the same ride height...so should i put in the new springs that are taller, or just leave the old ones in....sorry about all te confusion, but i thot i had said the old ones were 2 inches shorter not the new ones.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





