Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

UMI Wonder Bar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 10:18 AM
  #1  
matt3383's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert AZ
Car: 2000 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
UMI Wonder Bar

I recently purchased a wonder bar from UMI performance. I was wondering if anyone had some pics of this bar installed on their car? I attempted to install it but noticed that the dual fans on my car blocked this bar. Does anyone have this set up on their car with dual fans? I called the company back up and they said to make it fit i needed to grind off some of the shroud where its hitting. I just wanted to see if anyone else had some tips before i do this. Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #2  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Make sure the bar isn't upside down/backwards? They require a little pushing and shoving to get them to fit in right. I have a TDS bar and while it was straight forward to install, it required a bit of pushing and pulling on the swaybar and fan setup to fit in, but once I got it in place, it fit perfectly with no other modifications.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 10:25 AM
  #3  
matt3383's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert AZ
Car: 2000 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Well i think i should of done some reading before i bought the UMI one, cause i have read many people have purchased other Wonder Bars but from other companies and hit them fit dual fan setups. The thing that bothers me is i just called the comp and like i said they want me to grind away at the lower plastic covers around the bolts for the fans to make it fit. I just want to know if anyone has done this or has another way with this paticular bar?
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 10:33 AM
  #4  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
I think the Spohn bar had issues with the dual fan setup and a 36mm swaybar combination. Don't recall what the fix was though. I bought my TDS bar for like $40-50, and it was definitely worth the price. Can get 'em cheaper than that even too. The stock wonderbar/steering brace off of an IROC can be had for pretty cheap sometimes. eBay tends to be expensive for those though. I've seen stock ones going for over $60 go figure.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 11:26 AM
  #5  
18inchboyds's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3
From: Amsterdam , NY
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: vee eight
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 4.10 gears
i never heard of umi , do theyhave a website.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #6  
12secformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by 18inchboyds
i never heard of umi , do theyhave a website.
Yeah, it like UMIperformance.com or something, just do a search for umi performance and you will find it. Nice stuff too.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 11:47 AM
  #7  
Jade Grey's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 689
Likes: 1
From: Irmo, SC
Car: 1992 Pontiac GTA
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 2.73
18inchboyds, here's the website, UMI Performance.

matt3383, your problem sounds like the one with the Spohn-designed wonderbar. I passed on modifiying the dual-fan supports and purchased a TDS wonderbar instead.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 03:22 PM
  #8  
Mkos1980's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 3,968
Likes: 1
From: Macedonia ,OH
Car: Formula
Engine: 6.0 LSX
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt 3:27
I have had nothing but good stuff sent from UMI. Thunbs up from me!
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #9  
86z/92rs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 86Z/92 RS Camaro
Engine: 357 vortec finished. need tuning
Transmission: Still works
Axle/Gears: need 3.73
Originally posted by Mkos1980
I have had nothing but good stuff sent from UMI. Thunbs up from me!
Me too, just got my rear relocation bracket from UPS today. Also have the following items from them, the panhard bar and rear lower control arm.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 03:35 PM
  #10  
matt3383's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert AZ
Car: 2000 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Well after some reading, i think im going to grind down the extra plastic around the rear fan mounts and see if i cant make this bar fit. Im too lazy to send it back do get 80% of what i paid for it back. So i will let you guys know if i can get it to fit tonight or not.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 10:09 PM
  #11  
Whitels1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Vegas
Car: 99 Z28
Engine: ls1
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I believe this is the Stock wonderbar, Kinda Dirty tho maybe ill clean it soon.!!!


Last edited by Whitels1; Feb 21, 2005 at 10:12 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 11:50 PM
  #12  
86z/92rs's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 86Z/92 RS Camaro
Engine: 357 vortec finished. need tuning
Transmission: Still works
Axle/Gears: need 3.73
Yes those are the stock steering brace/wonder bar. Just happen to have 1 laying in the garage.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 02:52 AM
  #13  
RTFC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Yes I'm Dean
Car: Agood2.8,
Engine: V6rsr,
Transmission: Afrikingoodtime
If you enjoy removing the LCA's everytime you would like to try and adjust they to proper alignment specs then hey, go for it. They are a slightly "cheaper" knockoff of Spohn's designs and are lacking the adjustability provisons that Spohn offers making them adjustable without having to unbolt them each time you try and get the setting correct. Sounds trivial until you try it, then you would wish you bought the Spohn ones.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 03:43 AM
  #14  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Huh??? What are you talking about?

I can’t figure out what “they” could possibly be in reference to that has been mentioned in this thread that would have to be removed every time to align a car.

For that matter, how many times a week do you align your car? Donno about the rest of you, but I tend to get it someplace reasonable and leave it there, check it occasionally to make sure it hasn’t changed… It might have to be adjusted every few years when something wears out and gets replaced, if the car gets hit…
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 09:46 AM
  #15  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Originally posted by matt3383
Well after some reading, i think im going to grind down the extra plastic around the rear fan mounts and see if i cant make this bar fit. Im too lazy to send it back do get 80% of what i paid for it back. So i will let you guys know if i can get it to fit tonight or not.
Hello Matt,

I was emailed a link to this post by a Thirdgen.org member and thought I would check it out and reply.

I am sorry you are having trouble with our Wonder Bar, when you ordered we should have specified some cutting may be required on the dual electric fan set up, but we must not have, sorry. Since this is our mistake I will not hit you with the 20% restocking fee and refund you a 100% if you still wanted to return it. If you would like to just email me or give us a call.

Thanks everyone else for the thumbs up

Regards,
Ryan
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #16  
matt3383's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert AZ
Car: 2000 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Well yesterday i decided to go at the fans but it started getting dark and rainging so i stopped. I did get the piece to fit in there better but it was still a little bit off. I think i need to just cut the plastic down a little further up than i have already and it should go in fine. I could get the pass side in but the driver side was off by about 1/4 inch, and it felt like it was hitting the fans. If i cant get it to fit this weekend i might take you up on that offer but im going to try and make it fit 1st. Thanks for the reply to my topic UMI
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 10:32 AM
  #17  
RTFC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Yes I'm Dean
Car: Agood2.8,
Engine: V6rsr,
Transmission: Afrikingoodtime
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
Huh??? What are you talking about?

I can’t figure out what “they” could possibly be in reference to that has been mentioned in this thread that would have to be removed every time to align a car.

For that matter, how many times a week do you align your car? Donno about the rest of you, but I tend to get it someplace reasonable and leave it there, check it occasionally to make sure it hasn’t changed… It might have to be adjusted every few years when something wears out and gets replaced, if the car gets hit…
Gee, "they" meaning UNI products that are so called adjustable. Not hard to figure out.

Like I stated, unless you are familiar with using them, you will have no idea the ease Spohn's adjusting provisions offer over the UNI. Every thime you unbolt and try to shorten or lengthenone side or the other to get the thrust angle correct, you will fight having to realign the hole by having to kick the TQarm forward or rear so the hole will line up- love kicking crap on jack stands.

Also, every time you unbolt UNI "adjustable" LCA's and slightly alter the length, when you re-torque the rear bolt in place holding the rodend, they will just remain basically the same length because of slight bolt hole elongation. The shaft of the bolt will move back and forth in the holes- this is why you need to hav adjustable provisions WITHOUT having to remove the torqued bolts to adjust the thrust angle on an alignment rack.

You my friend don't need this but your alignment mechanic does if you want the alignment dialed flawless.

Spohn is well worth the few buck more compared to the crappy engineered UNI.

Dean
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #18  
12secformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by RTFC
Gee, "they" meaning UNI products that are so called adjustable. Not hard to figure out.

Like I stated, unless you are familiar with using them, you will have no idea the ease Spohn's adjusting provisions offer over the UNI. Every thime you unbolt and try to shorten or lengthenone side or the other to get the thrust angle correct, you will fight having to realign the hole by having to kick the TQarm forward or rear so the hole will line up- love kicking crap on jack stands.

Also, every time you unbolt UNI "adjustable" LCA's and slightly alter the length, when you re-torque the rear bolt in place holding the rodend, they will just remain basically the same length because of slight bolt hole elongation. The shaft of the bolt will move back and forth in the holes- this is why you need to hav adjustable provisions WITHOUT having to remove the torqued bolts to adjust the thrust angle on an alignment rack.

You my friend don't need this but your alignment mechanic does if you want the alignment dialed flawless.

Spohn is well worth the few buck more compared to the crappy engineered UNI.

Dean
Man, I don't ahve a problem w/ you but don't you ever get tired of running your mouth about everybodies products except Steve Spohn's? This thread in no way had anything to do w/ Spohn LCA's or his relocation brackets, so keep your propaganda spewing mouth shut about it. Everybody knows that Spohn's stuff is awesome, I have some of both.....and I like both, but you don't need to go around saying that everything else is engineered crappy. Leave it alone, stop trying to find ways to put down what other people buy, and praise Spohn in a thread that wasn't about his products, go ahead and start a new thread about it if you would like. I think you make a good point USUALLY, not this time man. Let me do this for you, ALL HAIL STEVE SPOHN, he is the man.....but there is room out in the aftermarket for other products, and I feel that UMI offers another quality product. If you knew anything about UMI products that you are bashing, you would know the name is UMI, not UNI.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 10:53 AM
  #19  
RTFC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Yes I'm Dean
Car: Agood2.8,
Engine: V6rsr,
Transmission: Afrikingoodtime
To the uninformed person that comes in here, clicks on the UMI link and then decides to go shopping because the price is less, I am simply giving them info on the downside of UMI adjustable products and why they are cheaper. You are simply getting what you pay for.

Most people do not have a good understanding of how suspension products work in the real world and also how adjustments can benefit, these don't.

If I "shut my mouth" like you so arrogantly want me too, someone may end up buying a set of these unaware of the trouble they will have trying to use the misnomered adjustment.
Some may not care and have no idea there car could be setup better.

I state facts around here, not personal preferences. Spohn products are the best, I recomend the best and state why they are the best. The day someone makes a product better, I will readily state they are better than Spohn- I don't get paid to say anything by anyone.

Last edited by RTFC; Feb 22, 2005 at 10:56 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #20  
RTFC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Yes I'm Dean
Car: Agood2.8,
Engine: V6rsr,
Transmission: Afrikingoodtime
Now with that said above, UMI does make a proper adjustable arm for the Mustangs. Why are they not making these adjustment provisions for the F-body LCA's?

http://www.umiperformance.com/1017.htm
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:03 AM
  #21  
12secformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by RTFC
To the uninformed person that comes in here, clicks on the UMI link and then decides to go shopping because the price is less, I am simply giving them info on the downside of UMI adjustable products and why they are cheaper. You are simply getting what you pay for.

Most people do not have a good understanding of how suspension products work in the real world and also how adjustments can benefit, these don't.

If I "shut my mouth" like you so arrogantly want me too, someone myay end up buying a set of these unaware of the trouble they will have trying to use the misnomered adjustment.
Some may not car and have no idea there car could be setup better.

I state facts around here, not personal preferences.
The fact of the matter is what, I understand that the way Steve Spohn's LCA"S adjust is a better setup than UMI's for our cars, but if you look at some of their other products, they adjust like Spohn's do. Given the fact some people want a nice product that can give them some adjustability in their car, they may not have enough money to buy from Steve, then they have the right to do it. The UMI products have a lifetime warranty also, and if nothing else provide a quality piece to replace the crappy factory one. I don't feel that I am arrogant, I just said that because I feel you are being inconsiderate, rude, and close minded.....thats all.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:05 AM
  #22  
12secformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by RTFC
Now with that said above, UMI does make a proper adjustable arm for the Mustangs. Why are they not making these adjustment provisions for the F-body LCA's?

http://www.umiperformance.com/1017.htm
Exactly, what I was saying. Besides that, the products are very nice, and the customer service was also very good. I am not saying they are the best, but I am saying they are nice....plus how can they be the best....Only Spohn has that rank.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #23  
RTFC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Yes I'm Dean
Car: Agood2.8,
Engine: V6rsr,
Transmission: Afrikingoodtime
Originally posted by 12secformula
I don't feel that I am arrogant, I just said that because I feel you are being inconsiderate, rude, and close minded.....thats all.
I'm being inconsiderate and rude?

My friend, I happen to be the one giving factual info on how they adjust and what problems arise with that style of so called adj.
That is being considerate to others and giving shoppers information to base their individual purchases on.

How is that inconciderate? or rude?

What have you contributed in the way of tech?
I have, read my review above.
You have not given any tech feedback.
Who's bias?
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #24  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
This may provide some info (but has nothing to do with UMI), since I too wondered about problems with dual electrics and an after market steering box brace:

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=254631

JamesC
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:18 AM
  #25  
12secformula's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by RTFC
I'm being inconsiderate and rude?

My friend, I happen to be the one giving factual info on how they adjust and what problems arise with that style of so called adj.
That is being considerate to others and giving shoppers information to base their individual purchases on.

How is that inconciderate? or rude?

What have you contributed in the way of tech?
I have, read my review above.
Yes, you are. You give very good tech advice, advice I follow....that's not the point. You also state your personal opinion on top of that.....thats what I am saying. You don't need to bad mouth products w/ out having all the info, someday(not likely this will happen) someone may have a better product than Spohn, then I doubt your view will change....thats how you are close minded.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:33 AM
  #26  
Dyno Don's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,711
Likes: 133
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
plus how can they be the best....Only Spohn has that rank.

(Cough, Cough)
The jury is still out on that one!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #27  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Originally posted by RTFC
I'm being inconsiderate and rude?

My friend, I happen to be the one giving factual info on how they adjust and what problems arise with that style of so called adj.
That is being considerate to others and giving shoppers information to base their individual purchases on.

How is that inconciderate? or rude?

What have you contributed in the way of tech?
I have, read my review above.
You have not given any tech feedback.
Who's bias?
Hello Dean,

Maybe these will help you out a little. We try to make different applications for different set ups. These are on our new web site that is being put up shortly, we also have the Panhard bar that is the indentical set up.

http://www.umiperformance.com/images/2017a.jpg

http://www.umiperformance.com/images/2017c.jpg

Regards,
Ryan
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2005 | 11:56 AM
  #28  
matt3383's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert AZ
Car: 2000 Camaro SS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Just to stop this. I bought a non adjustable Wonder bar. I dont care about Spohn bars TCA bars or A Arm replacments. I wanted to see some pics of intalled UMI wonder bars. Make a new thread to bash UMI if you want. Keep my thread the way i intended please.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 01:19 AM
  #29  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by RTFC
Gee, "they" meaning UNI products that are so called adjustable. Not hard to figure out.


Um, yea… after reading what you wrote and this response I finally figured it out…, at least I figured out why I was confused. What does their LCA design have to do with if their wonderbar clears the stock fans?

Like I stated, unless you are familiar with using them, you will have no idea the ease Spohn's adjusting provisions offer over the UNI.


I own a set of Spohn LCA’s, they’re hanging on the wall in my garage. They used to be on my ’97 WS6 but at this point all my f-bodies have suspension links that I made myself. The only bought fabricated suspension piece on any of my cars right now is the GW wonderbar on my formula 350. Well, I have the spohn relocation brackets on my WS6 but the LCA’s are bolted in the stock location.

Every thime you unbolt and try to shorten or lengthenone side or the other to get the thrust angle correct, you will fight having to realign the hole by having to kick the TQarm forward or rear so the hole will line up- love kicking crap on jack stands.

Also, every time you unbolt UNI "adjustable" LCA's and slightly alter the length, when you re-torque the rear bolt in place holding the rodend, they will just remain basically the same length because of slight bolt hole elongation. The shaft of the bolt will move back and forth in the holes- this is why you need to hav adjustable provisions WITHOUT having to remove the torqued bolts to adjust the thrust angle on an alignment rack.


The only _real_ issue that design causes is that the closest that you’ll possibly get the alignment is within ½ a turn of the rod end. Those rod ends probably have 18TPI threads which means that the smallest amount that each side can be moved is 1/36” (1/2 of 1/18”) and there is no reason to be more then ½ of the smallest adjustment difference off or you can just move to the next ½ turn on either side so realistically you should be able to get within 1/72”. That means that you should be able to set thrust angle within .01*, better then the accuracy of an alignment machine (this is assuming a track width of 70”, but you get my point).

BTW, to get some concept of exactly how ridiculous this whole thing is, take a look in the body section of an early 3rd gen FSM, it lists factory tolerances there. The granularity of adjustment that we are discussing here is 13.5 times the tolerance that the factory specified for that measurement.

You my friend don't need this but your alignment mechanic does if you want the alignment dialed flawless.


Um… haven’t paid anyone to do an alignment in a while, well not on any of my f-bodies or the assorted race cars that I tinker with. There are a bunch of ways that you can do an alignment with relatively simple tools fairly accurately if you’re willing to take the time, but in my case I built a setup using some fixtures and laser pointers that I was able to confirm vs the alignment machine at a local shop.

That way I can futz with my setup till it’s much closer to where I actually want it to be then taking it to a shop somewhere.

Spohn is well worth the few buck more compared to the crappy engineered UNI.
heh… Spohn stuff is no great example of marvelous engineering. In a nutshell, especially their older designs are basically over built and under engineered. In most cases you can rely that his stuff will not break, but you can also bet that it’s heavier then it needs to be and nothing stunning WRT to suspension geometry. If you want to see some nicely engineered suspension pieces there are a bunch of places to look, ex, GW, Herb Adams, Unbalanced engineering all have at least 1 or 2 interesting pieces… I’m not saying that anyone’s stuff is “the best,” but I will say that there are a number of companies out there that appear to have a better handle on what is necessary to make things work then the more common Spohn and similar knockoff pieces.

Originally posted by 12secformula
This thread in no way had anything to do w/ Spohn LCA's or his relocation brackets,


Interesting thing to bring up… the 2 major players, spohn and BMR both sell relo brackets that _look_ completely different. Funny thing is that if you actually compare the two and their critical dimensions when installed you’ll notice something funny, they are functionally identical with their relocation being EXACTLY the same. Hum… I wonder who built theirs first?

Originally posted by RTFC
Most people do not have a good understanding of how suspension products work in the real world and also how adjustments can benefit, these don't.


heh…

Now back to your regularly scheduled program. I haven’t tried the UMI wonderbar so I can’t speak from first hand experience, but I know that the GW one fits perfectly with the fans in my dual fan Formula.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2005 | 09:58 AM
  #30  
RTFC's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Yes I'm Dean
Car: Agood2.8,
Engine: V6rsr,
Transmission: Afrikingoodtime
No longer worth my time. Buy what you want and learn for yourself.
And Mark, In the other posted that you asked me how "Scrub angle" effects handling? its "scrub radius" and included angle". But hey, you are an alignment expert and do it in you own garage.

Last edited by RTFC; Feb 23, 2005 at 10:29 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
5
Oct 13, 2015 12:33 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
meeklay812
Camaros for Sale
1
Oct 1, 2015 03:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:25 AM.