Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 10:10 PM
  #1  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,265
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Stumbled across this today. It's a different type of system that gives simplicity of a ladder bar and adjustability of a 4-link. Looks like a system that could fit under a third gen with little to no floor modifications to easily allow a diff swap without needing to worry about using a torque arm, panhard or any other diff locating device. The photo layout on the web site really sucks though. Poor formatting.

The kit is a little pricey compared to other suspensions systems but when you don't have to do major surgery to the car to install it, it's actually quite cheap.

http://www.ultralinksuspension.com/

Last edited by AlkyIROC; Nov 6, 2007 at 10:16 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 10:41 PM
  #2  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Cool stuff! That looks very similar to other designs, i'd think it's nothing new...? (ie, why didn't *I* think of that eh?)

That looks like it'd be very easy to build one in your home garage. I'm assuming the left side gets welded onto the axle tubes, and the right side gets welded to the frame somehow. With another tube bracket type of thing?

Nifty.
You'd still need a panhard though if you were going to corner with this car at all i'd think. Or is this meant to be a PURE dragstrip item?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:31 PM
  #3  
BobItzaboy's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Originally Posted by Sonix
You'd still need a panhard though if you were going to corner with this car at all i'd think. Or is this meant to be a PURE dragstrip item?
You would get absolutely 0% articulation with that setup. very primative. Might as well just go bck to the old school dragsters with 0 susepension. That could not be run on a car that needs to turn corners even slowly with any kind of traction safety.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:41 PM
  #4  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,265
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

I was thinking that it wouldn't take much to build either. You can buy the thick walled tubing for the bars. Buy left and right weld ends and rod ends. The front and rear brackets could probably be a combination of ladder bar and 4-link brackets. Scratch building it might only cost half of that kit. CM rod ends are $20-$25 each.

Yes the left side attaches to the axle. The bar mounts are in roughly the same positions as ladder bars would be but also offer some adjustability.

The front mounts need to attach to a front crossmember which can be purchased at any speed shop. To mount it high in the chassis, it will have a dip in the center to clear the driveshaft. The front mounts are similar to a 4-link allowing you positions to set the IC at. Unlike ladder bars, these bars are available in different lengths so shorter bars could fit easier under a third gen.

Because the bottom 2 bars are welded together, you don't need a diagonal link, wishbone or panhard bar to keep the diff centered under the car. They triangulate the bars preventing and sideways movement of the diff. Technically 2 separate bottom bars with a diagonal link will work just as well however a diagonal link and a panhard bar can bind or cause misalignment when the diff moves through a rotational arc as it moves up and down or when one wheel moves up or down going over a bump etc. The bottom 2 bars welded together like that will work like a wishbone and eliminate any bind or alignment issues as the diff moves up and down and still keeps it centered under the car.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 07:26 AM
  #5  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,893
Likes: 2,436
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

That's similar to what the Pro Stock guys run.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 08:56 AM
  #6  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

I'm just thinking about cornering loading here. You'd be putting side loads on the rod ends. That setup is very weak as far as strength when you're thinking about cornering. I would be wary to use on it on the street, that's all i'm saying. If you're only going to be using it at a dragstrip, it's probably a moot point.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:01 AM
  #7  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,893
Likes: 2,436
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Right... it's very much like ladder bars, in that it is designed to go STRAIGHT ONLY. It forces the car into a straight line. That's part of its point, is to always render it impossible for the car to do ANYTHING BUT go straight, and isf the car tries to go in a turn, it tries REAL HARD to straighten it out. Note how all those cars they show are leaving STRAIGHT and LEVEL. Good design for that, terrible for anything else.

Definitely not streetable in the normal sense.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:21 AM
  #8  
Sonix's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Ok fair enough. I don't know anything about ladder bars or 4 links, so I can't make comparisons.
But I guess the idea is - Get a high powered dragster to go straight and plant the tires well - cheaply if possible. A mig welder, chop saw and a grinder and you could build this setup. Put it on any kind of rear end you like, add springs and shocks and you're done eh?
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:25 AM
  #9  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,893
Likes: 2,436
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Yup, pretty much.... looks like all it needs at the front is the usual horizontal crossmember installed to the chassis at a convenient spot that will put the optimum points within the thing's adjustment range.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #10  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,265
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Any rod end rear suspension including ladder bars and 4-link are not designed for long life or high mileage. The rod ends do wear out and need to be replaced every few years depending on how much use they get. In a street car with a 4-link that may get 6000 miles a year, the rod ends would probably need to be changed every year or 2.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #11  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Basically it's a 4-link system, but some alterations that IMO would make it less useable. Yes, with the lower links being tied together you wouldn't need a diagonal, but this would also eliminate body roll, making it act like ladder bars. Also, with the upper and lower links being so close together, it would require some fairly stiff shock valving to slow dow the reaction enough to not rebound. As for street use, just as a regular 4-link kit, lowering the front of the upper bar will create anit-squat, helping traction, but non-parrallel bars create roll steer in corners, although since the lowers would not allow body roll, this should be non-existent.
If you were to mount it low enough to not remove the rear seat, then either your geometry would have to suck, or you would have to jack the back of the car up. If you were to run short enough bars to attempt to fit it behind the seat, again, your geometry would suck, and the short bars quick reaction coupled w/ the close upper/lower links quick reaction would put more demand on the shocks than would be feasable.
As far as the site bragging about the 60' times and ET's, ? You need to be bottom 1.1x 60's and mid 4's in 10.5 outlaw to play, so bragging about 1.18 and 5.20 is kinda dumb. As for the car on 11" slicks, we've got factory suspension cars on 10" drag radials going 1.3X 60's.

sofa - Pro Stock? Pro stock is running a standard configuration 4-link system that has clamp blocks that mount between the frame/diff brackets and the link bars. The clamp brackets have multiple holes for the bars and multiple holes for the brackets, thus creating 1/4 hole increments of adjustment at each end of each bar.

all in all, this would be slightly better than a ladder bar set-up, but not as good as a race 4-link.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 11:10 AM
  #12  
BMmonteSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 9
From: Buckhannon, WV
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

As stated this is just a glorified lader bar with the ability to move your IC slightly. It will still tri-cycle if you tried to turn fast. Also you are loading the lower heim's in shear instead of simple tension/compression. This is a BIG no no and will result in broken heims if too much cornering loads are applied.

Also you can see in their litterature that that they have no clue what they are talking about. They claim this setup does not bind....which it does 100% while they also claim that a panhard will bind.....which it won't.

These guys don't have a clue.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 02:51 PM
  #13  
Shagwell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 3
From: Southwest Florida
Car: projects.......
Re: Alternative to ladder bars or 4-link

Originally Posted by BMmonteSS
As stated this is just a glorified lader bar with the ability to move your IC slightly. It will still tri-cycle if you tried to turn fast. Also you are loading the lower heim's in shear instead of simple tension/compression. This is a BIG no no and will result in broken heims if too much cornering loads are applied.

Also you can see in their litterature that that they have no clue what they are talking about. They claim this setup does not bind....which it does 100% while they also claim that a panhard will bind.....which it won't.

These guys don't have a clue.
...hadn't thought about it, but yes, buy tieing the lowerlinks together and not using a diagonal link, you are loading the lower heim joints in sheer when cornering. - I wouldn't be susprised if they built a panhard that binds.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RS Reaper
Electronics
4
Oct 17, 2018 07:52 PM
apie2546
Electronics
3
Oct 16, 2016 02:24 PM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
5
Oct 13, 2015 12:33 PM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
SRKLEGIN
Interior
6
Oct 3, 2015 10:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 AM.