Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

SFCs vs Roll bar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 04:18 PM
  #1  
Stephen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
SFCs vs Roll bar

What is stronger/better? Considering that a CE 8-pt roll bar is cheaper than SFCs, why shouldn't I go with a 8-pt roll bar instead?

Sure, with a harness bar on them, it restricts rear seat access & basically a danger to rear seat passengers. But lets say there is no rear seat. How many of us use it anyways? Not many, unless we REALLY need to.

With a roll bar, you get a harness mount (for those that want them...Chassis stiffening....And rollover/impact protection.

I'm not sure I see any downside to getting a roll bar instead of SFCs. Someone tell me if I'm wrong here & there is something I haven't thought of.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 04:35 PM
  #2  
Dante93GTZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by Stephen
What is stronger/better? Considering that a CE 8-pt roll bar is cheaper than SFCs, why shouldn't I go with a 8-pt roll bar instead?

Sure, with a harness bar on them, it restricts rear seat access & basically a danger to rear seat passengers. But lets say there is no rear seat. How many of us use it anyways? Not many, unless we REALLY need to.

With a roll bar, you get a harness mount (for those that want them...Chassis stiffening....And rollover/impact protection.

I'm not sure I see any downside to getting a roll bar instead of SFCs. Someone tell me if I'm wrong here & there is something I haven't thought of.
I've thought about the same thing - I'm ultimately going to go with both, but as with most things, price is usually king - I honestly didn't know the cages were cheaper than the SFCs.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 04:55 PM
  #3  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

SFC first I say, but a cage completes it.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 05:06 PM
  #4  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

paying to install the cage/bar will bring the cost much higher than the SFC would be, installed as well.

suck it up and buy a set of SFC's already
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 05:06 PM
  #5  
TheMonster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
Car: 1983 Z28
Engine: Forged 355
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Show a link where a cage would be cheaper than a set of SFC?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 05:09 PM
  #6  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by TheMonster
Show a link where a cage would be cheaper than a set of SFC?
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CEE-3130-K/

price is close, but still has to be installed
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 05:36 PM
  #7  
Dante93GTZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

That kit looks pretty good, although I'd probably delete the 2 points inward of the main hoop. Installation aside ('cause you're gonna have it on both), its impressive that you can buy a complete, pre-bent cage for the same (or less) than what you can buy SFCs for. Seems a little odd, huh...

BTW: That main hoop in that kit is quite ugly.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 05:45 PM
  #8  
Stephen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by TheMonster
Show a link where a cage would be cheaper than a set of SFC?
Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CEE-3130-K/

price is close, but still has to be installed
And that is just the basic 8-pt cage. I found a way to buy it even cheaper & get the door bars as the easier access ones (not track legal, but i don't run tracks so no worries) & using rear seat saver bars (if a person wanted to save their rear seat). For that matter.....I could still piece it together cheaper & use standard rear bars since they are simply straight tubing & could be sourced locally. Just gotta know what to buy when you do.

Yes, a bar will SFCs is the best all-around option, but not REALLY required to be done. But it is hard to spend more $ for less material(SFCs).
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 05:56 PM
  #9  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by Stephen
And that is just the basic 8-pt cage. I found a way to buy it even cheaper & get the door bars as the easier access ones (not track legal, but i don't run tracks so no worries) & using rear seat saver bars (if a person wanted to save their rear seat). For that matter.....I could still piece it together cheaper & use standard rear bars since they are simply straight tubing & could be sourced locally. Just gotta know what to buy when you do.

Yes, a bar will SFCs is the best all-around option, but not REALLY required to be done. But it is hard to spend more $ for less material(SFCs).
if i ever put a bar/cage in a car thats street driven, SCREW door bars, easyier access style or not, they both suck. I would go this route
Name:  PIC00044-2.jpg
Views: 168
Size:  48.8 KB

costs more, but makes access much easier, is plently strong, anda door bar can still be added after if needed. (this is the Polly motorsports 86 Trans Am)
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 06:00 PM
  #10  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

I can say the Alston SFC I got from Doug Herbert Racing was worth $190 shipped. They have some real design to them, not just two straight bars.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2011 | 08:21 PM
  #11  
Stephen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CEE-3130-K/

price is close, but still has to be installed
The Jeg's 8-pt cage is $30 cheaper, for the same sized tubing & wall thickness. 1 3/4" x .134 wall

http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/940303K/10002/-1
And I'd install SFCs or the cage myself, since I'm certified to weld. Well, technically I'm not anymore, since the license has expired, but that it really just a piece of paper.

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
if i ever put a bar/cage in a car thats street driven, SCREW door bars, easyier access style or not, they both suck.
This these are the door bars I was talking about. No way I'd do the standard bar on the street. I'd add a short piece of tubing under that door bar, to the corner where it meets the mounting plate for the main hoop.

http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/940008/10002/-1

Last edited by Stephen; Jan 17, 2011 at 07:59 PM. Reason: roll bar link fixed
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 01:14 AM
  #12  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by Stephen
The Jeg's 8-pt cage is $30 cheaper, for the same sized tubing & wall thickness. 1 3/4" x .134 wall

http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/943303K/10002/-1 .
And I'd install SFCs or the cage myself, since I'm certified to weld. Well, technically I'm not anymore, since the license has expired, but that it really just a piece of paper.
Jegster 943303K - Jegster ''GM'' Roll Cage Kits Details
GM 1955-57 Chevy
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 01:17 AM
  #13  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Still would like one of these myself, as it would work better with my notch. Even though all folks can do is bitch that its not race ready and it has to be unsafe.

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...e-4-point.html

Last edited by Gumby; Jan 17, 2011 at 01:21 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 07:20 PM
  #14  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

what Gumby said, that cage you linked to Stephen is for a tri-five chevy.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 07:37 PM
  #15  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

A rollbar/cage is firstly designed to protect the driver. If all you're after is a basic 6 or 8 point roll bar, you need the SFC. The basic roll bar doesn't tie the front and rear sub frames together like the SFC will do. Although the rollbar will add some stiffness to the car, the floor will still bend and flex.

Going to a full cage, you'll need more than the basic cage before you can eliminate the SFC. Until the cage is designed to completely replace the factory frame structure, you'll still need SFC. If you're following this thread, https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/orga...ast-8-off.html you'll see that even with a full cage, something still ties the front and rear subframes together to provide the body with an underside framework.

I still have the original custom made SFC installed in my car. Although I may finally change them to a design similar to the above thread, I won't run without them even though I have a full cage.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 07:55 PM
  #16  
Stephen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
what Gumby said, that cage you linked to Stephen is for a tri-five chevy.
Originally Posted by Gumby
Jegster 943303K - Jegster ''GM'' Roll Cage Kits Details
GM 1955-57 Chevy
I posted the wrong link, but same price. Here is the correct link.
http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/940303K/10002/-1


Originally Posted by AlkyIROC
A rollbar/cage is firstly designed to protect the driver. If all you're after is a basic 6 or 8 point roll bar, you need the SFC. The basic roll bar doesn't tie the front and rear sub frames together like the SFC will do. Although the rollbar will add some stiffness to the car, the floor will still bend and flex.

Going to a full cage, you'll need more than the basic cage before you can eliminate the SFC. Until the cage is designed to completely replace the factory frame structure, you'll still need SFC. If you're following this thread, https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/orga...ast-8-off.html you'll see that even with a full cage, something still ties the front and rear subframes together to provide the body with an underside framework.

I still have the original custom made SFC installed in my car. Although I may finally change them to a design similar to the above thread, I won't run without them even though I have a full cage.
I had no intention of "eliminating the SFC" from the build. But I do believe that the cage would more than suffice & work quite well, without SFCs, in a pure street car.

For a real race car like yours? Sure. You need both. But for a 99% street car? Chassis twist is not exactly a big concern, otherwise GM woulda put SFCs (even just using the convertible stamped sheet metal ones) on at the factory.

Kinda wondering how 2 flat steel bars can cost more than multiple bend tubing can too. Is it the powdercoating on SFCs, that raises their price? Since some has to be ground away for welding, then spray paint put on anyways.....Why not offer SFCs as bare steel & just let the customer spray paint the whole 2 SFCs?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:01 PM
  #17  
Dante93GTZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by Stephen
Kinda wondering how 2 flat steel bars can cost more than multiple bend tubing can too. Is it the powdercoating on SFCs, that raises their price? Since some has to be ground away for welding, then spray paint put on anyways.....Why not offer SFCs as bare steel & just let the customer spray paint the whole 2 SFCs?
I want to know the same - I always found that dumb - Why have something powdercoated that has to be ground down/off in some areas to be welded, then spray painted back over?? I'd prefer bare steel ones, at a discounted rate, and then I'll spray 'em myself so all the paint matches.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 08:03 PM
  #18  
Stephen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by Gumby
Still would like one of these myself, as it would work better with my notch. Even though all folks can do is bitch that its not race ready and it has to be unsafe.

https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...e-4-point.html
People like to bitch about things not fitting for certain things (like full-on drag race rules) but they forget that not everyone needs their stuff to fit certain rules. That B4C style would be perfectly in in a street car.

Last edited by Stephen; Jan 17, 2011 at 08:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2011 | 11:15 PM
  #19  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by Stephen
But for a 99% street car? Chassis twist is not exactly a big concern, otherwise GM woulda put SFCs (even just using the convertible stamped sheet metal ones) on at the factory.
Ha! Yeah right. Tell that to first and second gen owners who have more of a real frame than our third gens have. SFC is the first thing to install in a car that uses sheet metal to join the front and rear clips.

Factories build cars to suit a wide range of driving styles however the third gens were never factory made for aggressive driving styles that require SFC. It also comes down to a cost figure. Think about how much better a wiring harness would work if it had an inch more wire. 1 inch of wire in 500,000 cars is a lot more wire to buy. Adding in extras such as SFC increase the cost of the vehicle production considerably so if they can build it cheaper, they will. If third gens were assembly line built for all out performance, they sure wouldn't have received the 7.5" 10 bolt under them. No true performance means SFC are not a major priority to a production car.

That doesn't mean they don't need them. Anyone who wants to improve the performance or handling in their car needs to upgrade to better options. To reduce body flexing and twisting, SFC are the first thing that should be installed. They physically join the front and rear subframes.

A 6 point rollbar will add some rigidity however, it's welded to steel plates that are welded to sheetmetal that is nowhere near the subframes. A rollbar is designed to protect the driver, not improve the car's chassis/frame. At least not until you start getting close to a full tube chassis but by then, the car's original body has little to do with structural integrity.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2011 | 03:01 AM
  #20  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by AlkyIROC
SFC is the first thing to install in a car that uses sheet metal to join the front and rear clips.
And cheesy spot welds.......
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 07:25 PM
  #21  
Stephen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by AlkyIROC
.....the third gens were never factory made for aggressive driving styles that require SFC.....
Really? Then why were they selected for the IROC series? Sounds like a "aggressive driving style" to me.

Originally Posted by AlkyIROC
.....It also comes down to a cost figure. Think about how much better a wiring harness would work if it had an inch more wire. 1 inch of wire in 500,000 cars is a lot more wire to buy. Adding in extras such as SFC increase the cost of the vehicle production considerably so if they can build it cheaper, they will.
I absolutely agree there.

Originally Posted by AlkyIROC
If third gens were assembly line built for all out performance, they sure wouldn't have received the 7.5" 10 bolt under them. No true performance means SFC are not a major priority to a production car.
While *WE* see SFCs as a "performance part", they also serve well as not just performance from a drag racing/autocross/road racing standpoint, but also in a cars ability to dodge dogs running across the road. Avoiding accidents. After all, the quicker a car will respond to driver input, the quicker it be able to avoid an accident. Not to mention that, in some regard, it does provide protection for the passengers, because it helps the passenger compartment resist crumpling.

Originally Posted by AlkyIROC
A 6 point rollbar will add some rigidity however, it's welded to steel plates that are welded to sheetmetal that is nowhere near the subframes. A rollbar is designed to protect the driver, not improve the car's chassis/frame. At least not until you start getting close to a full tube chassis but by then, the car's original body has little to do with structural integrity.
Does that make a SFC+roll cage car almost a "semi" tube chassis car?

I fully agree that both are the best option. But I still have to question why SFCs cost more, considering that, like the 8-pt cage, is not only more material but even just the main hoop, has more work in bending to it. Argument was made that more roll bars/cages are sold than SFCs. I find that hard to swallow. There are a LOT of street cars with SFCs. How many race cars (drag/autocross/road race) even have roll bars/cages? I would love to see a manufacturer actually say "I sold X # of SFCs last year." & compare that to another that said "I sold X # of roll bars/cages last year." Even if 1 roll bar/cage fit multiple chassis's, I think we'd be surprised to see SFCs>roll bar/cages.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 08:03 PM
  #22  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by Stephen

I fully agree that both are the best option. But I still have to question why SFCs cost more, considering that, like the 8-pt cage, is not only more material but even just the main hoop, has more work in bending to it. Argument was made that more roll bars/cages are sold than SFCs. I find that hard to swallow. There are a LOT of street cars with SFCs. How many race cars (drag/autocross/road race) even have roll bars/cages? I would love to see a manufacturer actually say "I sold X # of SFCs last year." & compare that to another that said "I sold X # of roll bars/cages last year." Even if 1 roll bar/cage fit multiple chassis's, I think we'd be surprised to see SFCs>roll bar/cages.
i dont see why you dont get this yet. Your average set of SFC's, from any manufacturer, require bending, cutting, welding, brackets being fabbed/bent/wedled, holes drilled, then cleaning and powdercoating. That takes much more time than just cutting a couple bars to length, and making 4 quick bends on 1 piece of tubing, which takes no time at all since its done with a CNC machine, and nothing is welded, cleaned or coated with anything. Is it that hard to see why SFC's cost what they do?
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 08:19 PM
  #23  
Stephen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
i dont see why you dont get this yet. Your average set of SFC's, from any manufacturer, require bending, cutting, welding, brackets being fabbed/bent/wedled, holes drilled, then cleaning and powdercoating. That takes much more time than just cutting a couple bars to length, and making 4 quick bends on 1 piece of tubing, which takes no time at all since its done with a CNC machine, and nothing is welded, cleaned or coated with anything. Is it that hard to see why SFC's cost what they do?
Ask as I asked before....Why not offer the powdercoating as an extra? Gotta grind some away anyways & spray paint that section, so why not just sell them bare & spray paint the whole thing?

I get it, sorta. Don't think I don't. But one thing is for certain. You are paying more $, to buy less material.

You think SFCs are bent by hand? And not all SFCs are even bent. Some are "stacked" pieces, just welded together. It would not surprise me one single bit, to find out the SFCs are machine welded too, not by hand.

Cat backs are very much the same. Computer controlled & automated to twist the pie to where it needs to bend, then bent...By the same machine. Operator puts in a X" piece of pipe & the machine does the rest.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 08:41 PM
  #24  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by Stephen

You think SFCs are bent by hand? And not all SFCs are even bent. Some are "stacked" pieces, just welded together. It would not surprise me one single bit, to find out the SFCs are machine welded too, not by hand.
im pretty sure the site sponsors, spohn UMI, BMR, dont have machines to weld their parts together, they are all dont by hand. could be wrong, buit i doubt it.

not all have the main tubes bent, but some do. Im sure if you called and asked nicely, you could get the SFC's without coating, i've managed to get a few custom details done with a simple PM or call. However, i would prefer the entire part to the coated, then just remove what i need to weld, since the powder is much tougher than paint and it will hold up better overall if the places you cant get to after they are installed are already coated with powder.
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2011 | 08:43 PM
  #25  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

If you want cheap unpainted SFC, make your own. It's not hard to do. Mine were made the second week I owned the car. Some 2x2 square tubing is cheap.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 07:49 AM
  #26  
UMI Performance's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 652
Likes: 12
From: Philipsburg, Pa
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by //<86TA>\\
im pretty sure the site sponsors, spohn UMI, BMR, dont have machines to weld their parts together, they are all dont by hand. could be wrong, buit i doubt it.
Correct, all our welding is done by hand and I am sure the others are the same.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 07:54 AM
  #27  
JamesC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Just to put powder coating in perspective, I contacted UMI's Ryan Kirkwood, who was good enough to respond and who offered the following take:

"The cost is tough because it depends on a few things. For us for example we run black and red powder coat all day everyday so our cost to coat is less because it is production using the same color. Another thing to consider is the brand of powder, we use an expensive powder and a lot of others do not.

To coat a set of 3rd generation SFC's that we produce I would say the cost is $35+. We have about 10-15 minutes just in sand blasting them due to their length, then hanging and coating. After that they spend 20-30 minutes in the oven."

The cost of coating my 36mm and 24mm sway bars, including sandblasting, was $28 (by a shop that coated daily).

For the time and material involved, the cost doesn't sound exorbitant to me, but to each his own.

JamesC

Last edited by JamesC; Jan 20, 2011 at 11:53 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 05:09 PM
  #28  
85Z28NOS's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 537
Likes: 31
From: Texas
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: 454 RamJet
Transmission: LT1/T56
Axle/Gears: 8.8w/4.10
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

CE SFC way cheaper than there own roll bars
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/CHASS...item20b2c82503
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 05:36 PM
  #29  
Stephen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by 85Z28NOS
CE SFC way cheaper than there own roll bars
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/CHASS...item20b2c82503
I've never seen those before. Interesting. I trust CE, but interesting to see one doesn't hung the passenger side floor like all the others I've seen. And no bracket of any kind on the front.

But honestly? I don't see how those could fit. If the c-brackets are for the rear...Why is there an angle right in front of them? Wouldn't the angle put those through a floor or hanging down with a gap between those & the floor?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 06:03 PM
  #30  
85Z28NOS's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 537
Likes: 31
From: Texas
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: 454 RamJet
Transmission: LT1/T56
Axle/Gears: 8.8w/4.10
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

I actually came across these after I purchased some from UMI during a sale they had( I must admit I like my UMI SFC). I to have been wanting a street friendly roll cage but I have kids that ride in the back occasionally so its kinda a now brainer for me not to right now. Definetly must have the drop down door bars though
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 07:35 PM
  #31  
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by Stephen
I've never seen those before. Interesting. I trust CE, but interesting to see one doesn't hung the passenger side floor like all the others I've seen. And no bracket of any kind on the front.

But honestly? I don't see how those could fit. If the c-brackets are for the rear...Why is there an angle right in front of them? Wouldn't the angle put those through a floor or hanging down with a gap between those & the floor?
i dont think thats the right picture, but im pretty sure they are the ones that require you to cut the floor up to install, thats why they are so cheap.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 07:54 PM
  #32  
itsMikey's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Car: 89 GTA/93 S13/91 Si
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

why not just get both...
lots of good info in this thread tho bookmarked a couple links..haha
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 08:07 PM
  #33  
Stephen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by itsMikey
why not just get both...
lots of good info in this thread tho bookmarked a couple links..haha
I want both(eventually). I just have a hard time letting go of more money for less. Seems like they could be quite a bit cheaper, if the whole "about 10-15 minutes just in sand blasting them due to their length, then hanging and coating. After that they spend 20-30 minutes in the oven" step was eliminated & only offered as an option. I'd rather just spray paint/POR-15/undercoat the item myself.

I know companies do have to profit from their products, I just don't agree when some companies (just a general example) profit over 100%.

Last edited by Stephen; Jan 20, 2011 at 08:10 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 09:55 PM
  #34  
FueledSoul's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 12
From: Minnesota
Car: 84 camaro, 88 trans am, 98 camaro
Engine: Modded , stock, LSX modded
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, t-56
Axle/Gears: 327, 308, 373
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

I have both

Name:  Picture098.jpg
Views: 309
Size:  153.8 KB
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2011 | 02:09 PM
  #35  
Johnny Blaze's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

Originally Posted by FueledSoul
I have both

Nice work!

Last edited by Johnny Blaze; Nov 26, 2011 at 03:22 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2011 | 02:20 PM
  #36  
InfernalVortex's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

My Spohn sfc's were bare when I got them. I wish I had gotten them coated, hard to paint up and behind the backside of them after they're installed, so they get pretty rusty up there.

Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TinnMann2
Canadian Region
16
Jun 18, 2017 05:10 PM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
5
Oct 13, 2015 12:33 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM
loud91rs
Camaros for Sale
7
Oct 5, 2015 10:05 PM
FormulaEngland
Interior
2
Sep 30, 2015 01:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 PM.