SFCs vs Roll bar
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
SFCs vs Roll bar
What is stronger/better? Considering that a CE 8-pt roll bar is cheaper than SFCs, why shouldn't I go with a 8-pt roll bar instead?
Sure, with a harness bar on them, it restricts rear seat access & basically a danger to rear seat passengers. But lets say there is no rear seat. How many of us use it anyways? Not many, unless we REALLY need to.
With a roll bar, you get a harness mount (for those that want them...Chassis stiffening....And rollover/impact protection.
I'm not sure I see any downside to getting a roll bar instead of SFCs. Someone tell me if I'm wrong here & there is something I haven't thought of.
Sure, with a harness bar on them, it restricts rear seat access & basically a danger to rear seat passengers. But lets say there is no rear seat. How many of us use it anyways? Not many, unless we REALLY need to.
With a roll bar, you get a harness mount (for those that want them...Chassis stiffening....And rollover/impact protection.
I'm not sure I see any downside to getting a roll bar instead of SFCs. Someone tell me if I'm wrong here & there is something I haven't thought of.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
What is stronger/better? Considering that a CE 8-pt roll bar is cheaper than SFCs, why shouldn't I go with a 8-pt roll bar instead?
Sure, with a harness bar on them, it restricts rear seat access & basically a danger to rear seat passengers. But lets say there is no rear seat. How many of us use it anyways? Not many, unless we REALLY need to.
With a roll bar, you get a harness mount (for those that want them...Chassis stiffening....And rollover/impact protection.
I'm not sure I see any downside to getting a roll bar instead of SFCs. Someone tell me if I'm wrong here & there is something I haven't thought of.
Sure, with a harness bar on them, it restricts rear seat access & basically a danger to rear seat passengers. But lets say there is no rear seat. How many of us use it anyways? Not many, unless we REALLY need to.
With a roll bar, you get a harness mount (for those that want them...Chassis stiffening....And rollover/impact protection.
I'm not sure I see any downside to getting a roll bar instead of SFCs. Someone tell me if I'm wrong here & there is something I haven't thought of.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
paying to install the cage/bar will bring the cost much higher than the SFC would be, installed as well.
suck it up and buy a set of SFC's already
suck it up and buy a set of SFC's already

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
That kit looks pretty good, although I'd probably delete the 2 points inward of the main hoop. Installation aside ('cause you're gonna have it on both), its impressive that you can buy a complete, pre-bent cage for the same (or less) than what you can buy SFCs for. Seems a little odd, huh...
BTW: That main hoop in that kit is quite ugly.
BTW: That main hoop in that kit is quite ugly.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
Yes, a bar will SFCs is the best all-around option, but not REALLY required to be done. But it is hard to spend more $ for less material(SFCs).
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
And that is just the basic 8-pt cage. I found a way to buy it even cheaper & get the door bars as the easier access ones (not track legal, but i don't run tracks so no worries) & using rear seat saver bars (if a person wanted to save their rear seat). For that matter.....I could still piece it together cheaper & use standard rear bars since they are simply straight tubing & could be sourced locally. Just gotta know what to buy when you do.
Yes, a bar will SFCs is the best all-around option, but not REALLY required to be done. But it is hard to spend more $ for less material(SFCs).
Yes, a bar will SFCs is the best all-around option, but not REALLY required to be done. But it is hard to spend more $ for less material(SFCs).

costs more, but makes access much easier, is plently strong, anda door bar can still be added after if needed. (this is the Polly motorsports 86 Trans Am)
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
I can say the Alston SFC I got from Doug Herbert Racing was worth $190 shipped. They have some real design to them, not just two straight bars.
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar

http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/940303K/10002/-1
And I'd install SFCs or the cage myself, since I'm certified to weld. Well, technically I'm not anymore, since the license has expired, but that it really just a piece of paper.

http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/940008/10002/-1
Last edited by Stephen; Jan 17, 2011 at 07:59 PM. Reason: roll bar link fixed
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
The Jeg's 8-pt cage is $30 cheaper, for the same sized tubing & wall thickness. 1 3/4" x .134 wall

http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/943303K/10002/-1 .
And I'd install SFCs or the cage myself, since I'm certified to weld. Well, technically I'm not anymore, since the license has expired, but that it really just a piece of paper.

http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/943303K/10002/-1 .
And I'd install SFCs or the cage myself, since I'm certified to weld. Well, technically I'm not anymore, since the license has expired, but that it really just a piece of paper.
GM 1955-57 Chevy
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
Still would like one of these myself, as it would work better with my notch. Even though all folks can do is bitch that its not race ready and it has to be unsafe.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...e-4-point.html
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...e-4-point.html
Last edited by Gumby; Jan 17, 2011 at 01:21 AM.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
what Gumby said, that cage you linked to Stephen is for a tri-five chevy.
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
A rollbar/cage is firstly designed to protect the driver. If all you're after is a basic 6 or 8 point roll bar, you need the SFC. The basic roll bar doesn't tie the front and rear sub frames together like the SFC will do. Although the rollbar will add some stiffness to the car, the floor will still bend and flex.
Going to a full cage, you'll need more than the basic cage before you can eliminate the SFC. Until the cage is designed to completely replace the factory frame structure, you'll still need SFC. If you're following this thread, https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/orga...ast-8-off.html you'll see that even with a full cage, something still ties the front and rear subframes together to provide the body with an underside framework.
I still have the original custom made SFC installed in my car. Although I may finally change them to a design similar to the above thread, I won't run without them even though I have a full cage.
Going to a full cage, you'll need more than the basic cage before you can eliminate the SFC. Until the cage is designed to completely replace the factory frame structure, you'll still need SFC. If you're following this thread, https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/orga...ast-8-off.html you'll see that even with a full cage, something still ties the front and rear subframes together to provide the body with an underside framework.
I still have the original custom made SFC installed in my car. Although I may finally change them to a design similar to the above thread, I won't run without them even though I have a full cage.
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
http://www.jegs.com/i/Jegster/550/940303K/10002/-1
A rollbar/cage is firstly designed to protect the driver. If all you're after is a basic 6 or 8 point roll bar, you need the SFC. The basic roll bar doesn't tie the front and rear sub frames together like the SFC will do. Although the rollbar will add some stiffness to the car, the floor will still bend and flex.
Going to a full cage, you'll need more than the basic cage before you can eliminate the SFC. Until the cage is designed to completely replace the factory frame structure, you'll still need SFC. If you're following this thread, https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/orga...ast-8-off.html you'll see that even with a full cage, something still ties the front and rear subframes together to provide the body with an underside framework.
I still have the original custom made SFC installed in my car. Although I may finally change them to a design similar to the above thread, I won't run without them even though I have a full cage.
Going to a full cage, you'll need more than the basic cage before you can eliminate the SFC. Until the cage is designed to completely replace the factory frame structure, you'll still need SFC. If you're following this thread, https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/orga...ast-8-off.html you'll see that even with a full cage, something still ties the front and rear subframes together to provide the body with an underside framework.
I still have the original custom made SFC installed in my car. Although I may finally change them to a design similar to the above thread, I won't run without them even though I have a full cage.
For a real race car like yours? Sure. You need both. But for a 99% street car? Chassis twist is not exactly a big concern, otherwise GM woulda put SFCs (even just using the convertible stamped sheet metal ones) on at the factory.
Kinda wondering how 2 flat steel bars can cost more than multiple bend tubing can too. Is it the powdercoating on SFCs, that raises their price? Since some has to be ground away for welding, then spray paint put on anyways.....Why not offer SFCs as bare steel & just let the customer spray paint the whole 2 SFCs?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
Kinda wondering how 2 flat steel bars can cost more than multiple bend tubing can too. Is it the powdercoating on SFCs, that raises their price? Since some has to be ground away for welding, then spray paint put on anyways.....Why not offer SFCs as bare steel & just let the customer spray paint the whole 2 SFCs?
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
Still would like one of these myself, as it would work better with my notch. Even though all folks can do is bitch that its not race ready and it has to be unsafe.
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...e-4-point.html
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...e-4-point.html
Last edited by Stephen; Jan 17, 2011 at 08:06 PM.
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
Factories build cars to suit a wide range of driving styles however the third gens were never factory made for aggressive driving styles that require SFC. It also comes down to a cost figure. Think about how much better a wiring harness would work if it had an inch more wire. 1 inch of wire in 500,000 cars is a lot more wire to buy. Adding in extras such as SFC increase the cost of the vehicle production considerably so if they can build it cheaper, they will. If third gens were assembly line built for all out performance, they sure wouldn't have received the 7.5" 10 bolt under them. No true performance means SFC are not a major priority to a production car.
That doesn't mean they don't need them. Anyone who wants to improve the performance or handling in their car needs to upgrade to better options. To reduce body flexing and twisting, SFC are the first thing that should be installed. They physically join the front and rear subframes.
A 6 point rollbar will add some rigidity however, it's welded to steel plates that are welded to sheetmetal that is nowhere near the subframes. A rollbar is designed to protect the driver, not improve the car's chassis/frame. At least not until you start getting close to a full tube chassis but by then, the car's original body has little to do with structural integrity.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
.....It also comes down to a cost figure. Think about how much better a wiring harness would work if it had an inch more wire. 1 inch of wire in 500,000 cars is a lot more wire to buy. Adding in extras such as SFC increase the cost of the vehicle production considerably so if they can build it cheaper, they will.
A 6 point rollbar will add some rigidity however, it's welded to steel plates that are welded to sheetmetal that is nowhere near the subframes. A rollbar is designed to protect the driver, not improve the car's chassis/frame. At least not until you start getting close to a full tube chassis but by then, the car's original body has little to do with structural integrity.
I fully agree that both are the best option. But I still have to question why SFCs cost more, considering that, like the 8-pt cage, is not only more material but even just the main hoop, has more work in bending to it. Argument was made that more roll bars/cages are sold than SFCs. I find that hard to swallow. There are a LOT of street cars with SFCs. How many race cars (drag/autocross/road race) even have roll bars/cages? I would love to see a manufacturer actually say "I sold X # of SFCs last year." & compare that to another that said "I sold X # of roll bars/cages last year." Even if 1 roll bar/cage fit multiple chassis's, I think we'd be surprised to see SFCs>roll bar/cages.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
I fully agree that both are the best option. But I still have to question why SFCs cost more, considering that, like the 8-pt cage, is not only more material but even just the main hoop, has more work in bending to it. Argument was made that more roll bars/cages are sold than SFCs. I find that hard to swallow. There are a LOT of street cars with SFCs. How many race cars (drag/autocross/road race) even have roll bars/cages? I would love to see a manufacturer actually say "I sold X # of SFCs last year." & compare that to another that said "I sold X # of roll bars/cages last year." Even if 1 roll bar/cage fit multiple chassis's, I think we'd be surprised to see SFCs>roll bar/cages.
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
i dont see why you dont get this yet. Your average set of SFC's, from any manufacturer, require bending, cutting, welding, brackets being fabbed/bent/wedled, holes drilled, then cleaning and powdercoating. That takes much more time than just cutting a couple bars to length, and making 4 quick bends on 1 piece of tubing, which takes no time at all since its done with a CNC machine, and nothing is welded, cleaned or coated with anything. Is it that hard to see why SFC's cost what they do?
I get it, sorta. Don't think I don't. But one thing is for certain. You are paying more $, to buy less material.
You think SFCs are bent by hand?
And not all SFCs are even bent. Some are "stacked" pieces, just welded together. It would not surprise me one single bit, to find out the SFCs are machine welded too, not by hand.Cat backs are very much the same. Computer controlled & automated to twist the pie to where it needs to bend, then bent...By the same machine. Operator puts in a X" piece of pipe & the machine does the rest.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
not all have the main tubes bent, but some do. Im sure if you called and asked nicely, you could get the SFC's without coating, i've managed to get a few custom details done with a simple PM or call. However, i would prefer the entire part to the coated, then just remove what i need to weld, since the powder is much tougher than paint and it will hold up better overall if the places you cant get to after they are installed are already coated with powder.
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
If you want cheap unpainted SFC, make your own. It's not hard to do. Mine were made the second week I owned the car. Some 2x2 square tubing is cheap.
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 19,282
Likes: 103
From: Lawrence, KS
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
Just to put powder coating in perspective, I contacted UMI's Ryan Kirkwood, who was good enough to respond and who offered the following take:
"The cost is tough because it depends on a few things. For us for example we run black and red powder coat all day everyday so our cost to coat is less because it is production using the same color. Another thing to consider is the brand of powder, we use an expensive powder and a lot of others do not.
To coat a set of 3rd generation SFC's that we produce I would say the cost is $35+. We have about 10-15 minutes just in sand blasting them due to their length, then hanging and coating. After that they spend 20-30 minutes in the oven."
The cost of coating my 36mm and 24mm sway bars, including sandblasting, was $28 (by a shop that coated daily).
For the time and material involved, the cost doesn't sound exorbitant to me, but to each his own.
JamesC
"The cost is tough because it depends on a few things. For us for example we run black and red powder coat all day everyday so our cost to coat is less because it is production using the same color. Another thing to consider is the brand of powder, we use an expensive powder and a lot of others do not.
To coat a set of 3rd generation SFC's that we produce I would say the cost is $35+. We have about 10-15 minutes just in sand blasting them due to their length, then hanging and coating. After that they spend 20-30 minutes in the oven."
The cost of coating my 36mm and 24mm sway bars, including sandblasting, was $28 (by a shop that coated daily).
For the time and material involved, the cost doesn't sound exorbitant to me, but to each his own.
JamesC
Last edited by JamesC; Jan 20, 2011 at 11:53 AM.
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 537
Likes: 31
From: Texas
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: 454 RamJet
Transmission: LT1/T56
Axle/Gears: 8.8w/4.10
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
CE SFC way cheaper than there own roll bars
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/CHASS...item20b2c82503
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/CHASS...item20b2c82503
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
CE SFC way cheaper than there own roll bars
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/CHASS...item20b2c82503
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/CHASS...item20b2c82503
But honestly? I don't see how those could fit. If the c-brackets are for the rear...Why is there an angle right in front of them? Wouldn't the angle put those through a floor or hanging down with a gap between those & the floor?
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 537
Likes: 31
From: Texas
Car: 85 Camaro
Engine: 454 RamJet
Transmission: LT1/T56
Axle/Gears: 8.8w/4.10
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
I actually came across these after I purchased some from UMI during a sale they had( I must admit I like my UMI SFC). I to have been wanting a street friendly roll cage but I have kids that ride in the back occasionally so its kinda a now brainer for me not to right now. Definetly must have the drop down door bars though
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 107
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
I've never seen those before. Interesting. I trust CE, but interesting to see one doesn't hung the passenger side floor like all the others I've seen. And no bracket of any kind on the front.
But honestly? I don't see how those could fit. If the c-brackets are for the rear...Why is there an angle right in front of them? Wouldn't the angle put those through a floor or hanging down with a gap between those & the floor?
But honestly? I don't see how those could fit. If the c-brackets are for the rear...Why is there an angle right in front of them? Wouldn't the angle put those through a floor or hanging down with a gap between those & the floor?
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 2
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Car: 89 GTA/93 S13/91 Si
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
why not just get both...
lots of good info in this thread tho
bookmarked a couple links..haha
lots of good info in this thread tho
bookmarked a couple links..haha Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 13
From: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
I know companies do have to profit from their products, I just don't agree when some companies (just a general example) profit over 100%.
Last edited by Stephen; Jan 20, 2011 at 08:10 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,449
Likes: 5
From: Charlestown, IN
Car: 1971 Camaro
Engine: 427
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,499
Likes: 31
From: Macon, GA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: SFCs vs Roll bar
My Spohn sfc's were bare when I got them. I wish I had gotten them coated, hard to paint up and behind the backside of them after they're installed, so they get pretty rusty up there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TinnMann2
Canadian Region
16
Jun 18, 2017 05:10 PM
darwinprice
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
17
Oct 11, 2015 11:51 PM











