Do I NEED an adjustable panhard rod if I get lowering springs???
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: E. Patchogue, NY
Car: '90 Iroc
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5 spd
Do I NEED an adjustable panhard rod if I get lowering springs???
I'm looking into getting the Eibach Pro Kit (1" - 1.25") and I'm wondering if I need the adjustable panhard rod right away too? I've heard people say that the rear end will be out of alignment, is this true? Also, if alignment is the problem, how do you know when it's correct with the adjustable panhard? How do you align the rear? Thanks.
If I do need a panhard rod, I'm thinking Spohn adjustable with poly/spherical combo. What are the thoughts on that?
If I do need a panhard rod, I'm thinking Spohn adjustable with poly/spherical combo. What are the thoughts on that?
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: Germantown, MD USA
Car: 87 T/A
Engine: TPI 350 ci
Transmission: 5 speed
... yes, you should have the adj panhard (poly/rod) if you're lowering the car. Lowering moves the rear to the right. It's not much but it does matter in the handling, and the u-joint wear.
Just measure the tire from the wheelwell opening on both sides. That'll get you close.
Just measure the tire from the wheelwell opening on both sides. That'll get you close.
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 255
Likes: 1
From: indiana
Car: 91 Z-28
Engine: 420 sbc
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt/4.10 gears
ive got the eibach pro kit in my car. it shifts the rear about 1/4 inch to the passenger side. believe it or not this was very noticeable in terms of handling. if i did a hard right turn, my left rear wheel would rub the fenderwell. i got the bmr adjustable and havent heard any rubbing since
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 5,964
Likes: 37
From: Hacienda Heights, CA
Car: 90 RS 'Vert, 88 IROC-Z, 88 Firebird
Engine: 305 ci tbi, 305 ci tpi, 350 ci tpi
Transmission: WC-T5, WC-T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45, 3.27, 3.27
Originally posted by Ukraine Train
has anyone NOT put an adjustable one on after lowering only 1"? was it far off?
has anyone NOT put an adjustable one on after lowering only 1"? was it far off?
Lon
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 5
From: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
I'm with Lon on this one....just check your stuff to be sure. My '91 RS sits totally stock and the rear was off about 3/4" when I got it, I needed an adjustable bar anyway. Maybe the previous owner hit a curb or something??? All pieces under there look fine to me and the stock panhard bar is straight but something wasn't right.
Ed
Ed
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 0
From: PE, Canada
Car: '81 Trans Am
Engine: 6.6L
Transmission: auto 350
I had my car alined before my spring swap and he said it was as perfectly strait (in the rear) as hes ever seen. So i bet buy me droping it a bit only squed my rear only a tid bit. yeah cause thats the thing if it was oof before the springs then with the springs on it will be way off. When I get the car back out and alined again ill see if it needs a ajustale panard.
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
From: Damascus, OR, USA
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 383 Miniram AFR195
Transmission: Tremec TKO
Axle/Gears: BW 9 Bolt/3.70
I ran mine without the adjustable panhard for about 9 months after I put the Sportlines on (~1.5 inch drop). You can see that the rear was moved to the side a bit but I guess I didn't notice as much difference in handling overall as others have.
Bottom line is, you can run it without the adjustable panhard if you want but it would all probably work better properly aligned.
I would go with Lon's suggestion above.
-Schultzy
Bottom line is, you can run it without the adjustable panhard if you want but it would all probably work better properly aligned.
I would go with Lon's suggestion above.
-Schultzy
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I'm the opposite; I've run my '86 since '94 with air shocks on the back, which raised the back up about 2 inches; never used an adjustable panhard rod. The original u-joint is still back there; never noticed any handling problems, aside from the outer ends of the front P225/60r15's getting worn a little faster than normal. But our cars wear that edge down anyway...
(And before I get flamed, I had bigger tires back there; there was no huge gap.
First P245/60r15's, then P255/70r15's, then P275/60r15's, now I'm back to P245/60r15's and I'm going to lose the air shocks this summer.)
Don't forget too that by now, our springs have all sagged out (I've got 246,000 miles on mine!), and our panhard rods are probably out of adjustment anyway, just because of the sagging springs.
(And before I get flamed, I had bigger tires back there; there was no huge gap.
First P245/60r15's, then P255/70r15's, then P275/60r15's, now I'm back to P245/60r15's and I'm going to lose the air shocks this summer.)Don't forget too that by now, our springs have all sagged out (I've got 246,000 miles on mine!), and our panhard rods are probably out of adjustment anyway, just because of the sagging springs.
Supreme Member

Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Washington
Car: '87 IROC-Z/'82 RX7
Engine: SBC 355/1.1L Rotary
Transmission: T56/5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.33/3.93
I've got a Tubular panhard made 1/4 - 1/2" shorter on ebay. Perfect for a lowered car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
14
Jan 31, 2025 05:10 PM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM
1992rs/ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Jan 28, 2016 09:58 PM






