Stock TBI Heads/Intake
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Car: 89 S-10 Blazer
Engine: 4.3 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Stock TBI Heads/Intake
First off I'll explain my situation. I own a 1989 S-10 Blazer with a 4.3L V6 in it. I am getting a 305 from a 1986 K5 Blazer (fullsize) and am going to be rebuilding it to swap into my S-10. The 305 is currently carbed so I'll be ditching the heads/intake for a TBI setup. The easiest car to find 305s at the wreckers is F-Bodies, specifically 3rd Gens. My question is is there any particular year I should be looking for to get the best flowing setup? Or were the heads all the same throughout these years. Thanx for the help!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
the stock tpi heads for the LB9(i thik thats what it is) 305 is probably your best bet at the bone yard if you want direct fit. You can get 350 heads from an l98 but i belive youll have to have them machined to get the right compression w/ a 305. Youll want to get the 86 and up heads b/c the older heads have different intake bolt angles and a few acc. bolts missing.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
they sould accept it w. no probs. The intake face and bolt patterns should be the same (87 and up)
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
i think its the other way around... He wants tbi + tbi intake. But slade is right, the pattern changed mid year. Look at the heads and the 4 center bolts should be at a shollower angle than the other bolts on the corners of the heads. Those are the heads you want for your tbi setup.
Trending Topics
See if you can find a set of L98 alum. corvette heads. They have the same size combustion chambers as a 305 (58cc). Then use an aftermarket dual plane intake with a tbi adaptor plate. That should make your S10 rock. You'll be looking for traction help next.
Steve
Steve
Guest
Posts: n/a
I dont agree with that, at all. The 305 heads are supposed to be 58cc, same for the corvette heads. I know in reality both cc lower than that, but the compression ratio will be the same with either head. I think you are talking about an entirely different subject, which has nothing to do with static compression ratio.
So you dont agree than that GM would put 64cc combustion chambers with iron heads on 350's and 58cc chambers with aluminum heads on 350's to obtain the similar compression ratios? If you bolt on 58cc aluminum heads on a 305 you will lose compression but maybe not a huge amount.
Last edited by iroc22; Jul 14, 2002 at 12:39 PM.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by iroc22
So you dont agree than that GM would put 64cc combustion chambers with iron heads on 350's and 58cc chambers with aluminum heads on 350's to obtain the similar compression ratios? If you bolt on 58cc aluminum heads on a 305 you will lose compression but maybe not a huge amount.
So you dont agree than that GM would put 64cc combustion chambers with iron heads on 350's and 58cc chambers with aluminum heads on 350's to obtain the similar compression ratios? If you bolt on 58cc aluminum heads on a 305 you will lose compression but maybe not a huge amount.
Originally posted by iroc22
So you dont agree than that GM would put 64cc combustion chambers with iron heads on 350's and 58cc chambers with aluminum heads on 350's to obtain the similar compression ratios? .
So you dont agree than that GM would put 64cc combustion chambers with iron heads on 350's and 58cc chambers with aluminum heads on 350's to obtain the similar compression ratios? .
You are wrong , it doesnt matter if the heads are iron or aluminum the compression ratio willl be the same if the combustion chambers are the same size. Aluminum dissapates heat better and enables you to run a little higher compression ratio without detonation but the material itself doesnt change the ratio.
I know you can run a higher compression ratio with aluminum without dentonation, but Ive been told many times before by engine builders at the track that during the normal engine operation the aluminum transfers/dissipates more heat lowering your effective compression ratio.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Car: 89 S-10 Blazer
Engine: 4.3 V6
Transmission: 700R4
for the price its gonna cost I'll probably just go pick up some heads from the local engine shop and then put them together myself.. Then they're already done and wont require cleaning or anything.
Originally posted by iroc22
I know you can run a higher compression ratio with aluminum without dentonation, but Ive been told many times before by engine builders at the track that during the normal engine operation the aluminum transfers/dissipates more heat lowering your effective compression ratio.
I know you can run a higher compression ratio with aluminum without dentonation, but Ive been told many times before by engine builders at the track that during the normal engine operation the aluminum transfers/dissipates more heat lowering your effective compression ratio.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




