swap to LB9 heads
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ
Car: currently thirdgenless!!!
swap to LB9 heads
I'm thinking of squeezing a few more ponies out of the LO3. Would LB9 heads be a good choice? And can anyone recommend a mild cam to upgrade to. I'm not very knowledable in this area.
Any comments would be welcome. Thanks.
Bill
Any comments would be welcome. Thanks.
Bill
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Car: 2002 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
LB9 heads and the L98 cam should go well together. The specs on one of the three L98 cams are .404/.415 202/206 114.5*. Alot better than the stock L03 cam and still milder than the LT1 camshaft. I was thinking about doing this swap but dont know if i want to swap cams on a 159K mile engine.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
there are only 2 diffrent LB9 castings. the ports on them are virtualy identical, some are pre86 peremeter bolt style, the rest are centerbolt. that is really the only diffrence.
also if you are looking for a little bit of a hotter cam. i am trying to sell an UltraDyne Racing cam right now.
specs
272/282
206/216
.447 .447
112
its a little hotter than the LT1, and will take some computer work to really dial in, but if you are doing a heads swap, computer work would be needed anyway.
also if you are looking for a little bit of a hotter cam. i am trying to sell an UltraDyne Racing cam right now.
specs
272/282
206/216
.447 .447
112
its a little hotter than the LT1, and will take some computer work to really dial in, but if you are doing a heads swap, computer work would be needed anyway.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
That cam isn't bad. Would take some tuning but like mentioned above your gonna need it anyways.
If your gonna stay TBI I recommend you go ahead and get prom burning stuff. TBI will never run perfect when modded unless you spend the time to burn your own chips...a JET, hypertech, or some other aftermarket one probably won't do.
If your gonna stay TBI I recommend you go ahead and get prom burning stuff. TBI will never run perfect when modded unless you spend the time to burn your own chips...a JET, hypertech, or some other aftermarket one probably won't do.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
yeah, i think it would be a great upgrade for alot of TBI'ers it really is still fairly mild, but with TPI heads and a 4bbl intake, it would really wake one of these cars up. i acidently ordered the wrong one. the one i meant to get is 210/218 .500 .500 112 so i just need to sell this one, so i can get to correct one
but my stupidity can save some lucky person some coin....
but my stupidity can save some lucky person some coin.... Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Are there any problems running pre-87 heads on a later syle. I am currently looking at some LB9's off an 86. Beside perimiter valve covers will I have to run a differnt intake if I don't mod the holes on my curent one? Is there any valve train differneces from a non roller to a roller set-up?
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
yes there are diffrences.
the pre 87 heads, use pushrod guides that are cast into the heads. 87+ uses self aligning rockers. you can only use one method or the other. if you descide to go with SA rockers, you don't need to do more than just drill those factory pushrod guides out. if you plan to keep the guides, or drill them out and run aftermarket guideplates (i am going the guideplate option on mine) you need to get non-SA rockers. also, if you go with a guideplate system, you need hardend pushrods. other than that you should have no issues. you would of course want to check your geomitry and you may need custom lenght pushrods.
the pre 87 heads, use pushrod guides that are cast into the heads. 87+ uses self aligning rockers. you can only use one method or the other. if you descide to go with SA rockers, you don't need to do more than just drill those factory pushrod guides out. if you plan to keep the guides, or drill them out and run aftermarket guideplates (i am going the guideplate option on mine) you need to get non-SA rockers. also, if you go with a guideplate system, you need hardend pushrods. other than that you should have no issues. you would of course want to check your geomitry and you may need custom lenght pushrods.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Dewey316
yes there are diffrences.
the pre 87 heads, use pushrod guides that are cast into the heads. 87+ uses self aligning rockers. you can only use one method or the other. if you descide to go with SA rockers, you don't need to do more than just drill those factory pushrod guides out. if you plan to keep the guides, or drill them out and run aftermarket guideplates (i am going the guideplate option on mine) you need to get non-SA rockers. also, if you go with a guideplate system, you need hardend pushrods. other than that you should have no issues. you would of course want to check your geomitry and you may need custom lenght pushrods.
yes there are diffrences.
the pre 87 heads, use pushrod guides that are cast into the heads. 87+ uses self aligning rockers. you can only use one method or the other. if you descide to go with SA rockers, you don't need to do more than just drill those factory pushrod guides out. if you plan to keep the guides, or drill them out and run aftermarket guideplates (i am going the guideplate option on mine) you need to get non-SA rockers. also, if you go with a guideplate system, you need hardend pushrods. other than that you should have no issues. you would of course want to check your geomitry and you may need custom lenght pushrods.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
not hard, i actualy believe comp cams makes a tool for doing this, i did it with a large drill press and was just very carefull to line everything up, if you drill through to a port, you heads are screwed. if you are dropping the heads off at a machine shop for some work anyway, like valve guids, stud boses ect. they should be able to do it for a small bit of money. how far they need to be drilled really depends on the cam lift. with .525 lift, the ones i drilled where right at the edge, i probably should have opened them up even more.
and yes, if you drill those out, you can reuse everything. i am not a big fan of re-using any valve train parts (exept lifters) but that is just me.
and yes, if you drill those out, you can reuse everything. i am not a big fan of re-using any valve train parts (exept lifters) but that is just me.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Thanks dewey. I decided not to get them. That is to much effort and money put into something that I am trying to learn on and won't be really on the road consistantly. I may try and port my LO3 heads (for learning purposes only, I realize this is a waste of time). I just want a slight boost in power for a little fun whenever I take her out for a spin. I sold the LT4 cam and bought a used 97 LT1 cam instead. Saved a load of money there plus the cam will be small enough to keep with the stock 1.5's and new springs. Plus should be cake for Chuck! and I to datalog and tune.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
it really is not that bad, and hte 416's are far and away better than the boat anchors we have. don't be scared to try it, so you mess it up, 416's are what 50 bucks?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,777
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Dewey316
it really is not that bad, and hte 416's are far and away better than the boat anchors we have. don't be scared to try it, so you mess it up, 416's are what 50 bucks?
it really is not that bad, and hte 416's are far and away better than the boat anchors we have. don't be scared to try it, so you mess it up, 416's are what 50 bucks?
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,577
Likes: 0
From: Portland, OR www.cascadecrew.org
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: Juiced 5.0 TBI - 300rwhp
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton Posi, 10 Bolt
those heads came on so many diffrent cars, it is hard to beleive you can't find a set in the junk yards, all the 305 f-bodies before 87 got them, g-body's got them, i am sure there are others.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM






