TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

TBI-->TPI swap. Is it worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 10:38 PM
  #1  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
TBI-->TPI swap. Is it worth it?

I'm looking at a 1991 Firebird (bone stock) and I'm already trying to figure out what I'd do to it. It has the LO3 TBI engine, but to be honest, I'm not a big fan of TBI at all. My current car has it (1990 Plymouth Sundance with 2.5L I-4 TBI), and I really don't think its all that genius of an idea.

Anyways, I was wondering how much power would be picked up by swapping to a TPI setup. I take it this would consist of a new ECM, new harness, and all of the associated TPI stuff (runners, injectors, throttle body, etc.). Is there anything else that would be needed? I mean, it sounds fairly easy to do and fairly cheap like ~$300 if I can find a ECM cheap enough.

What kind of gains would I be looking at over the stock 170HP and 255LB-FT?

Obviously, I realize a tune-up and the such would be done before all of this, I'm just trying to get an idea of waht kind of power difference there would be if I were to do this.

EDIT: I'd also then go with a CAI/Ram Air setup of some type, but I'm looking for what just the swap to TPI would bring...and then what would be the total effect with the CAI/Ram Air (haven't decided yet)..
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #2  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
I just realized this might have been somewhat of a stupid question considering the LB9 engine is basically a TPI variant of the L03 (same compression, etc.). So, would a TPI'd L03 be comparable to a LB9 (the low-output model)? How different is the L03 cam from the lower-output LB9 cam in 1991?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 10:54 PM
  #3  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,776
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Swapping the TPI set up and retaining the stock LO3 heads and cam will only give you about 15 to 20 hp. It is not worth the money. I would much rather have a modded 305TBI than 305 TPI. The stock TPI stuff doesn't make high end power at all and you can easily do that with a TBI set up. The TPI cars had really good cams and really good heads (as far as stock equiptment goes) but the induction system is lame after 3500rpm. The TBI system is lame all around in its stock form but is cheap to mod and make fast.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 11:14 PM
  #4  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Ah yes, forgot about that how it hold back the upper RPMs. I suppose the only really decent way for a CAI/Ram Air effect on a TBI unit then is to get either a new hood or cut a hole for one of those cheap ram-air hood bulge things. Obviously, I wouldn't want to keep the crappy stock intake..

How much power do these cars get from an improved intake (beyond an open element though, something like CAI or Ram Air)? Also, how exhaust-restricted are these engines? They come with a 2.5" exhaust stock, correct?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 01:20 AM
  #5  
BronYrAur's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 2
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 91 Camaro RS Convertible
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I believe the stock LO3 exhaust was actually 2 1/4" (correct me if I'm wrong). The exhaust on that car is by far the biggest restriction. Headers and a full 3" exhaust should be done on it; some have gained about 30 horsepower just from exhaust, that's pretty solid gains.

The TPI swap is definitely not worth it. I'd say the only time you need an induction swap from TBI to something else is when you have a built up motor that TBI can no longer support. At that point TPI would be a bad swap too because its still very restrictive especially high RPM. Go aftermarket then.

Basically, my thoughts are keep TPI cars TPI cars and keep TBI cars TBI cars after you've exceeded stock induction limitations then go with a stealth ram or super ram or something comparable.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 06:30 AM
  #6  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Aw and I just passed up a great deal on a 3" mandrel bent exhaust system. I figured it'd be overkill for a 305...guess I was wrong, lol. Oh well, I don't even have the car yet, I'm just trying to get an idea whether its worth it to buy a TBI one, but they seem decent enough..
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 07:47 AM
  #7  
Gunny Highway's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,467
Likes: 1
From: The nation's capital
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 350 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
It's not worth it. Someone on this site did the swap a while ago, and he picked up hardly anything at all.

Like the others have said, it's not the induction system that makes these engines suck. It's the package underneath them. . . broomsticks for cams, crap swirlport heads, tiny exhaust. . .

I went with the TBI for insurance purposes. It's not considered a performance model, which saves me $1,000 a year or something like that, plus, it's cheaper to mod.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2004 | 05:59 PM
  #8  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Aight sounds good enough. I'll stick with the stock TBI unit if I end up getting the car. My uncle has a 70's sbc 350 with forged 10:1 pistons that I'd want to get together by, say, next summer, if I end up getting a Thirdgen this summer. Thanks for the help guys!
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2004 | 09:23 PM
  #9  
ToplessT5's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Southern Colorado
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: L-03 305c.i. T.B.I.
Transmission: Borg Warner T-5 World Class 5-Speed
Honestly, I wouldnt go past 2.5'' for a 5.0L 305c.i. If so, you might be facing some serious back-pressure issues and a possible loss of power rather than gain. 3'' is usually reserved for Big Blocks, ***** extention trucks, and ricers. Just my .02

Last edited by ShiftyCapone; Apr 4, 2004 at 11:41 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2004 | 11:41 PM
  #10  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,776
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by ToplessT5
Honestly, I wouldnt go past 2.5'' for a 5.0L 305c.i. If so, you might be facing some serious back-pressure issues and a possible loss of power rather than gain. 3'' is usually reserved for Big Blocks, ***** extention trucks, and ricers. Just my .02
Actually this couldn't be farther from the truth. Any small block chevy, even as meesy as the 305TBI, will see gains from a 3"
exhaust. You never want back pressure EVER. I suggest you do more research on exhaust.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2004 | 02:48 AM
  #11  
dimented24x7's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,962
Likes: 5
From: Moorestown, NJ
Car: 88 Camaro SC
Engine: SFI'd 350
Transmission: TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt w/ 3.23's
Originally posted by ToplessT5
Honestly, I wouldnt go past 2.5'' for a 5.0L 305c.i. If so, you might be facing some serious back-pressure issues and a possible loss of power rather than gain. 3'' is usually reserved for Big Blocks, ***** extention trucks, and ricers. Just my .02
Theres nothing wrong with a 3 in exaust on one of these cars. The only place where you can really get into trouble is using headers with too large of a dia. primaries. The slow moving exaust pulses will reduce scavanging and cost torque. Its not the back pressure that causes problems...
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2004 | 05:28 PM
  #12  
ToplessT5's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Southern Colorado
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: L-03 305c.i. T.B.I.
Transmission: Borg Warner T-5 World Class 5-Speed
I sit corrected.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2004 | 10:23 PM
  #13  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Yeah, I ended up being able to get teh exhaust system anyways. Made by SLP, 3" mandrel-bent cat-back to the dual 2.5" (i think?) tailpipes on the driver's side. Got it used for $125. Amazing how I spent $125 on parts for a car I don't even have yet...can you say addiction? Obsessive compulsiveness maybe?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
14
Jan 31, 2025 05:10 PM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 25, 2015 11:49 PM
jharrison5
Engine Swap
5
Aug 19, 2015 05:53 PM
st.evel07
Engine Swap
5
Aug 13, 2015 06:15 PM
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Aug 12, 2015 03:41 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59 PM.