a couple questions....
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Car: 89 rs convertible, 99 Tahoe custom, 71 RS/SS 350 camaro (in restoration)
Engine: 305, 350, & 383 stroker
Transmission: 700r4 & Th350
a couple questions....
87 octane? Is it the truth or a myth that a stock TBI camaro will run better and faster using only 87 octane rather than premium? I am switching over to the holley 670. Do I have to bore the manifold to 2"? I just don't want to tear the whole car apart to do so. Thanks and have a great afternoon everyone.
Bob
Bob
I dont know about the holley TBI but if the bores are 2's in dia, and the manifold is not then you arent gaining anything by not boring it, you are esentialy choking the engine at the manifold, it creates an air restriction. taking the manifold off the engine is not a big task, i can have mine off in a few minutes.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Car: 89 rs convertible, 99 Tahoe custom, 71 RS/SS 350 camaro (in restoration)
Engine: 305, 350, & 383 stroker
Transmission: 700r4 & Th350
just parnoid I guess
Well I guess I am just paranoid. I've never had good luck with removing distributors and having the car fire up after re-installation. I'm very **** about the procedure while doing it too. I get the wifes finger nail polish so that I put it back in exactly as removed and I still have to start all over again with the timing etc. They never seem to fire up for me. But, it sounds like I need to remove the manifold anyway then. I guess it would be better to purchase the edelbrock performer TBI intake over simply boring out the stock one. Thanks for the info my friend. Have a great afternoon!
Bob
Bob
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,749
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: just parnoid I guess
Originally posted by matching#s
Well I guess I am just paranoid. I've never had good luck with removing distributors and having the car fire up after re-installation. I'm very **** about the procedure while doing it too. I get the wifes finger nail polish so that I put it back in exactly as removed and I still have to start all over again with the timing etc. They never seem to fire up for me. But, it sounds like I need to remove the manifold anyway then. I guess it would be better to purchase the edelbrock performer TBI intake over simply boring out the stock one. Thanks for the info my friend. Have a great afternoon!
Bob
Well I guess I am just paranoid. I've never had good luck with removing distributors and having the car fire up after re-installation. I'm very **** about the procedure while doing it too. I get the wifes finger nail polish so that I put it back in exactly as removed and I still have to start all over again with the timing etc. They never seem to fire up for me. But, it sounds like I need to remove the manifold anyway then. I guess it would be better to purchase the edelbrock performer TBI intake over simply boring out the stock one. Thanks for the info my friend. Have a great afternoon!
Bob
Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 349
Likes: 1
From: CO
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 4L60E
I'm wanting to get the same holley tbi for my car (and the edle intake to go with it) how do you bore an intake though? just take it to a machine shop? I'd like to know how that setup works out for you. be sure to post back w/the results.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
The octance debate has been going on longer then the different octanes have been around. Personally for my car, I use 91, for when I use anything else my gas miles just goes to all hell. It's really not even a performance issue for me. I average right about ~20mpg and have hit 30 with 91, and my last tank of 87 brought a wopping 14mpg. As far as bolt ons and timing advances or the like, though, yeah upping your octane is deff. a good idea...
Bruce (90RS305)
Bruce (90RS305)
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
MPG avg's 20 in mixed driving with the usual "play time" mixed in. 
Wonder what it "could" get with some real tuning, not my lazy get it running approach.

Wonder what it "could" get with some real tuning, not my lazy get it running approach.
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore MD area
Car: 82 El Camino
Engine: built 355
Transmission: T-56 upgraded internal
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42
i have stock timing, and only a cat back exhaust, and cant get my car to run good at all with 87, 89 is even sometimes touchy, all ive used the 2 yrs ive had it has been 93 on east coast, and now 91 that im west coast, any ideas on this, its got a newer fuel filter
for what i remember from Internal Engine class years back.. octane boosts are only required for higher compression ratio motors. threoretically: if your working a high milage motor with CC carbon buildup / or modded motors (specifically ported intakes, heads, or dometops) you're prolly looking at a motor that is 1/2 psi or more over factory compression, hence needing higher octane.
93 is "more explosive" then 87 basically. this would explain better mpg and performance. but if the motor isnt built for dynamite then you're gonna be fixin some stuff eventually.
I COULD BE WRONG:hail:
93 is "more explosive" then 87 basically. this would explain better mpg and performance. but if the motor isnt built for dynamite then you're gonna be fixin some stuff eventually.
I COULD BE WRONG:hail:
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 89 formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: Stock 700r4
My car runs like crap on anything less than 92 octane. I dont know why, but it goes way down on power and loses what little get up and go it has left.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,749
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by NjccBflo
93 is "more explosive" then 87 basically. this would explain better mpg and performance. but if the motor isnt built for dynamite then you're gonna be fixin some stuff eventually.
I COULD BE WRONG:hail:
93 is "more explosive" then 87 basically. this would explain better mpg and performance. but if the motor isnt built for dynamite then you're gonna be fixin some stuff eventually.
I COULD BE WRONG:hail:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
12
Oct 1, 2015 09:50 PM





