TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

a couple questions....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 04:06 PM
  #1  
matching#s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Car: 89 rs convertible, 99 Tahoe custom, 71 RS/SS 350 camaro (in restoration)
Engine: 305, 350, & 383 stroker
Transmission: 700r4 & Th350
a couple questions....

87 octane? Is it the truth or a myth that a stock TBI camaro will run better and faster using only 87 octane rather than premium? I am switching over to the holley 670. Do I have to bore the manifold to 2"? I just don't want to tear the whole car apart to do so. Thanks and have a great afternoon everyone.

Bob
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 04:14 PM
  #2  
Z28GEN3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: Buckeye AZ
I dont know about the holley TBI but if the bores are 2's in dia, and the manifold is not then you arent gaining anything by not boring it, you are esentialy choking the engine at the manifold, it creates an air restriction. taking the manifold off the engine is not a big task, i can have mine off in a few minutes.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #3  
matching#s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
From: Santa Rosa, CA
Car: 89 rs convertible, 99 Tahoe custom, 71 RS/SS 350 camaro (in restoration)
Engine: 305, 350, & 383 stroker
Transmission: 700r4 & Th350
just parnoid I guess

Well I guess I am just paranoid. I've never had good luck with removing distributors and having the car fire up after re-installation. I'm very **** about the procedure while doing it too. I get the wifes finger nail polish so that I put it back in exactly as removed and I still have to start all over again with the timing etc. They never seem to fire up for me. But, it sounds like I need to remove the manifold anyway then. I guess it would be better to purchase the edelbrock performer TBI intake over simply boring out the stock one. Thanks for the info my friend. Have a great afternoon!

Bob
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 05:46 PM
  #4  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,749
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: just parnoid I guess

Originally posted by matching#s
Well I guess I am just paranoid. I've never had good luck with removing distributors and having the car fire up after re-installation. I'm very **** about the procedure while doing it too. I get the wifes finger nail polish so that I put it back in exactly as removed and I still have to start all over again with the timing etc. They never seem to fire up for me. But, it sounds like I need to remove the manifold anyway then. I guess it would be better to purchase the edelbrock performer TBI intake over simply boring out the stock one. Thanks for the info my friend. Have a great afternoon!

Bob
You will still have to bore out the edelbrock TBI intake as well. Unforntunatly it comes with the small stock bore sizes. No big deal. I bored mine to 2" with ease. You only need 87 octane if you have no timing advance and have everything else stock. To much octane can delay ingnition causing a loss of power and throttle repsonse. You only need 890 or higher if you run more than 0* advance on your base timing and or you have a high mileage motor with carbon deposits that are causing ping.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 06:32 PM
  #5  
red90bird's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 349
Likes: 1
From: CO
Car: 1990 Firebird
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 4L60E
I'm wanting to get the same holley tbi for my car (and the edle intake to go with it) how do you bore an intake though? just take it to a machine shop? I'd like to know how that setup works out for you. be sure to post back w/the results.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2004 | 07:13 PM
  #6  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
See my mod's.......run's on 87 and has 180K on the shortblock.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 05:39 AM
  #7  
90RS305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
The octance debate has been going on longer then the different octanes have been around. Personally for my car, I use 91, for when I use anything else my gas miles just goes to all hell. It's really not even a performance issue for me. I average right about ~20mpg and have hit 30 with 91, and my last tank of 87 brought a wopping 14mpg. As far as bolt ons and timing advances or the like, though, yeah upping your octane is deff. a good idea...

Bruce (90RS305)
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2004 | 06:06 AM
  #8  
DM91RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,854
Likes: 0
From: Ga
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
MPG avg's 20 in mixed driving with the usual "play time" mixed in.

Wonder what it "could" get with some real tuning, not my lazy get it running approach.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 02:44 PM
  #9  
deadhead1882's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore MD area
Car: 82 El Camino
Engine: built 355
Transmission: T-56 upgraded internal
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.42
i have stock timing, and only a cat back exhaust, and cant get my car to run good at all with 87, 89 is even sometimes touchy, all ive used the 2 yrs ive had it has been 93 on east coast, and now 91 that im west coast, any ideas on this, its got a newer fuel filter
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #10  
NjccBflo's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
for what i remember from Internal Engine class years back.. octane boosts are only required for higher compression ratio motors. threoretically: if your working a high milage motor with CC carbon buildup / or modded motors (specifically ported intakes, heads, or dometops) you're prolly looking at a motor that is 1/2 psi or more over factory compression, hence needing higher octane.
93 is "more explosive" then 87 basically. this would explain better mpg and performance. but if the motor isnt built for dynamite then you're gonna be fixin some stuff eventually.

I COULD BE WRONG:hail:
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 10:26 AM
  #11  
ponykiller1992's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 89 formula 350
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: Stock 700r4
My car runs like crap on anything less than 92 octane. I dont know why, but it goes way down on power and loses what little get up and go it has left.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 10:56 AM
  #12  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,749
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by NjccBflo

93 is "more explosive" then 87 basically. this would explain better mpg and performance. but if the motor isnt built for dynamite then you're gonna be fixin some stuff eventually.

I COULD BE WRONG:hail:
Close but a little off. Gasoline doesn't explode (in the combustion chamber) at all and octane ratings have nothing to do with "power units" of the fuel. Meaning, a higher number does not mean it has more chemical energy. What it does mean in a non-nerd way of explaing it is that it can take more compression before it ignites. If you use fuel that does not have a high enough octance rating in a motor that needs it that the compression stroke will add enough heat to the mxutre to pre-ignite it before the spark does. That is knock. On the other hand, if you use to high of an octane the compression stroke does not add enough heat/compression to the mix so that it is properly set off by the spark. As stated above carbon deposits can cause pre-ignition because they heat up and act like little spark plugs setting off the mix pre-maturely.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 12:23 PM
  #13  
NjccBflo's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
:werd:
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2004 | 04:25 PM
  #14  
Ronny's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 4
From: wisconsin
i dropped from 92 to 89 and found no reduction in performance. no KC(yet).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
F-body-fan
Auto Detailing and Appearance
37
Jan 12, 2023 01:49 PM
hectre13
Car Audio
26
Mar 3, 2022 05:38 PM
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
12
Oct 1, 2015 09:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.