ultimate tbi mod?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: yuma, az
Car: 91 camaro rs
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: what ever stock is
ultimate tbi mod?
i was reading up on the mod page, and was wondering, the gold "ring" came off the tbi the other day when i was doing some work. and i was wondering how you got the air cleaner on with out it interferring with anything. i have an edelbrook open air cleaner with a big ole k&n filter. i think it's like three or four inches tall. it's huge. when i tried it, it with out the ring, it just didn't look like it fit right.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Hypertech and CFM-tech both sell a version of it. I ordered mine at Autozone from Hypertech.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
"A very effective air intake modification made by Hypertech. It uses an open and countoured design to maximize the air flow into the tbi unit. Get rid of that stock restrictive air cleaner to tbi adapter now! Designed for full size trucks - some modifactions may be needed for other applications for it raises air cleaner base approx 1" over stock."
- taken from cfm-tech (costs 45+shipping there)
I've heard claims of something like 12hp just from adding these, but, ya, no.
they can be useful though, you can use them for any air cleaner modification to both make the job easier, and flow a *little* more air.
personally I'd like to see it used on the rai/cai mod that very few people around here do and, including myself, seem to have a real serious problem with finishing, due to the sheer amount of parts and time involved to make it work right.
I still think it's worth it though, and this is one of the parts that can help make it happen.
cfm-tech also seems to sell the only stock looking air intake tubing available for such a design.
but we're talking about open elements right now, and I think with that spacer, since it raises the height by 1", you'd be required to use a drop base air cleaner in conjunction with that, and it would also be the most effective setup for flow, am I right?
- taken from cfm-tech (costs 45+shipping there)
I've heard claims of something like 12hp just from adding these, but, ya, no.
they can be useful though, you can use them for any air cleaner modification to both make the job easier, and flow a *little* more air.
personally I'd like to see it used on the rai/cai mod that very few people around here do and, including myself, seem to have a real serious problem with finishing, due to the sheer amount of parts and time involved to make it work right.
I still think it's worth it though, and this is one of the parts that can help make it happen.
cfm-tech also seems to sell the only stock looking air intake tubing available for such a design.
but we're talking about open elements right now, and I think with that spacer, since it raises the height by 1", you'd be required to use a drop base air cleaner in conjunction with that, and it would also be the most effective setup for flow, am I right?
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
On a 255 RWHP 350 TBI engine the hypertech power bowl was worth 10 RWHP with no other changes. Bumping the number to 265 RWHP. I don't know what my 312 would make without it as I haven't ever dyno'd it with the stock 2" restrictive as hell spacer on it. I need to take a picture of the stock spacer compared to the power bowl and let you'll see for yourself. Here is one I found on the net of t he hypertech powerbowl installed on a tbi. Notice how open the area around the injectors is.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Notice that a drop base air cleaner and the thinnest ring you can find will do about the same thing. Spectre makes some plastic spacer rings that come in a box at autozone. They are 5 1/8" in diamerter and start at like 1/2" and go to 1". My stock TBI van spacer ring is 3.5" tall and miserable for flow.
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
alright, I'll agree that with a fairly modified 305 you could see some effective results from the power bowl, but you can't sit there and tell me that you're gonna get 10+ hp at the crank on a stock engine, thats higher than most open element setups will give you?
if that's true, than you could get that, an open element air filter(especially if you went with an amsoil foam or k&n cotton filter), the tbi mods, and like, maybe a new muffler and be making 190+ crank hp on the stock engine, I'm having trouble believing that.
if that's true, than you could get that, an open element air filter(especially if you went with an amsoil foam or k&n cotton filter), the tbi mods, and like, maybe a new muffler and be making 190+ crank hp on the stock engine, I'm having trouble believing that.
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
take it a step further and get a full catback, tbi injector spacer, maybe a properly setup rai/cai setup, and get a vafpr as opposed to prom tuning, and you'd theoretically be making 195, maybe 200 crank hp, it seems somewhat unbeliveable to me.
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,404
Likes: 492
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by FreeLoader
take it a step further and get a full catback, tbi injector spacer, maybe a properly setup rai/cai setup, and get a vafpr as opposed to prom tuning, and you'd theoretically be making 195, maybe 200 crank hp, it seems somewhat unbeliveable to me.
take it a step further and get a full catback, tbi injector spacer, maybe a properly setup rai/cai setup, and get a vafpr as opposed to prom tuning, and you'd theoretically be making 195, maybe 200 crank hp, it seems somewhat unbeliveable to me.
I was able to make 245 RWHP from a 350 TBI, by using a VAFPR and the stock ECM. The idle was far from consistent though. Otherwise it ran okay. It had ported 305 HO heads and a Mellings MTC1 cam that I later switched out for a stock vortec truck cam.
http://www.chevytalk.org/threads/sho...ue#Post1031628
Last edited by Fast355; Feb 26, 2006 at 11:06 AM.
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
yes, but you're talking about far more extensive changes then I am.
the biggest change I mentioned was the catback, which can be gotten for ~200 bucks.
lets remove that.
you get the bowl, injector spacer, open element(non paper filter), and I guess we'll include the vafpr.
theoretically that's ~20 crank hp gain, but many people that do that around here don't mention that kind of gain.
also, I'm talking 305 here, 350's historically seem to be far more responsive to such simple mods.
the biggest change I mentioned was the catback, which can be gotten for ~200 bucks.
lets remove that.
you get the bowl, injector spacer, open element(non paper filter), and I guess we'll include the vafpr.
theoretically that's ~20 crank hp gain, but many people that do that around here don't mention that kind of gain.
also, I'm talking 305 here, 350's historically seem to be far more responsive to such simple mods.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1
I installed an open element yesterday, unfortunately I didn't end up with a base like those ones, but heck.. not bad though.
I think all those air cleaner variations just add a little bit here and there, maybe laughable for some people, for some not so laughable.
They may add 2 horsepower, they may add 10 horsepower.
2 horsepower will mean something at the track, not a lot, but can mean the difference.
I would say, if the mod is cheap enough, try it.
After all it's not all those mods offered by Casper's Electronics .
where everything costs 80 bucks and do absolutely nothing or even hurt performance.
I think all those air cleaner variations just add a little bit here and there, maybe laughable for some people, for some not so laughable.
They may add 2 horsepower, they may add 10 horsepower.
2 horsepower will mean something at the track, not a lot, but can mean the difference.
I would say, if the mod is cheap enough, try it.
After all it's not all those mods offered by Casper's Electronics .
where everything costs 80 bucks and do absolutely nothing or even hurt performance. Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
I somewhat disagree, I think throwing 30 bucks here and 40 bucks there for 3 and 4 hp adds up really quickly, and can be more effectively used elsewhere, but that's what TGO is here for.
I must say though, while a lot of these little things DO add power many of them add power now and make little difference later, and many others are vise versa.
you really have to look a a build from a finished perspective, to do it the most cost effectively.
also, many companies make variations on the same part, and some of those parts actually work, where where other companies variations don't, which can make things confusing...this is also where TGO plays one of its best roles.
I must say though, while a lot of these little things DO add power many of them add power now and make little difference later, and many others are vise versa.
you really have to look a a build from a finished perspective, to do it the most cost effectively.
also, many companies make variations on the same part, and some of those parts actually work, where where other companies variations don't, which can make things confusing...this is also where TGO plays one of its best roles.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1
Agreed. Forgot to add that, something that may add as little as 2 or 3 horsepower now, may open up for the entire engine to add more later on once more mods are done.
BIG exhaust (ok bad example but oh well) add yes quite a bit, most likely not as much as a properly tuned exhaust, i.e. well matched, but do more and more engine mods, and it'll bring it all out.
BIG exhaust (ok bad example but oh well) add yes quite a bit, most likely not as much as a properly tuned exhaust, i.e. well matched, but do more and more engine mods, and it'll bring it all out.
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
um, that could arguably be said about every single mod you ever bolt onto your engine, the whole goal is to make the engine as efficient as possible, if you think about it.
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
oh hey fast, I dunno if I asked earlier, but is that black thing on the power bowl a vaccum line, or is maybe a place to put your IAC sensor? or is it something else?
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: Bradenton, FL
Car: 1997 Camaro z28
Engine: 350 LT1 built to LT4
Transmission: a
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi
by IAC i meant air temp....but you answered my question anyway.
i'm guessin no by the pic, but do you think the air temp sensor would fit in there if you took the hose out?
i'm guessin no by the pic, but do you think the air temp sensor would fit in there if you took the hose out?
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 LS1
Does the drop base air cleaner, bowl base (as I call it
), raise the air filter assembly anything ? It looks like it would decrease space between top of air cleaner and hood, by what, 1/2 inch to 1 inch ?
), raise the air filter assembly anything ? It looks like it would decrease space between top of air cleaner and hood, by what, 1/2 inch to 1 inch ? Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Glowsock
Tech / General Engine
2
Sep 11, 2015 11:09 PM










