TBI Throttle Body Injection discussion and questions. L03/CFI tech and other performance enhancements.

G-Tech times..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 06:32 AM
  #1  
JeffC1500TBI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
G-Tech times..

ok something is wrong here..

with my base timing set to 0* and running the engine too cold and using my stock 235/75/15 I was running 15.45's at 96mph (GTECH TIME)


now I have base timing to 5* and the new thermostat allows the engine to get up to temp (about 175F) and I'm running my 255-50-16's.. best I could get was 15.85 at 88mph or something like that.. other times where 16 flat and 16.3

I dunno if not launching well makes a big diff in the time but I can't seem to hook up .. so I'll get on it and it starts to spin and then I let off and get back on it..

if I take off nice and slow and then lay into it I get a 16..

pavement is still cold here and maybe I should run like 30psi in the rear instead of 38 for the runs?????????

my buddy seems to think I should be able to get 14's out of it?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 06:58 AM
  #2  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
i would drop rear tire pressure to 25 psi at least. i wouldnt think you would be able to hook with 38 psi on a cold street
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 07:18 AM
  #3  
JeffC1500TBI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally posted by brodyscamaro
i would drop rear tire pressure to 25 psi at least. i wouldnt think you would be able to hook with 38 psi on a cold street
ya that seems a little firm at 38.. but for some reason kumho themselves told me to run 40 all around because of the weight of the vehicle.. I ended up going 40 in front and 38 in the rear..
maybe I'll try it at 25 just for a run. I don't want to ruin the tires..
or maybe I'll put my stock on the rear to do a run and put 25 in them..

anyone else have opinions? do you think I'm loosing more than a second from spining and stuff?
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 08:25 AM
  #4  
Sonar_un's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: '86 T/A
Engine: 350/LT1 Intake
Transmission: 700R4 - Built
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
Re: G-Tech times..

Originally posted by JeffC1500TBI
ok something is wrong here..

with my base timing set to 0* and running the engine too cold and using my stock 235/75/15 I was running 15.45's at 96mph (GTECH TIME)

now I have base timing to 5* and the new thermostat allows the engine to get up to temp (about 175F) and I'm running my 255-50-16's.. best I could get was 15.85 at 88mph or something like that.. other times where 16 flat and 16.3

my buddy seems to think I should be able to get 14's out of it?
I hate to burst your bubble, but its highly unlikely that a bump in timing and bigger rims will take a mid 15's truck (or car for that matter) into the 14's. You *MAY* gain a tenth or two.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 09:30 AM
  #5  
91Bird305's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 1
From: Davison / Troy ,Michigan
Car: 1991 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 3.8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Dana 60
I hate to burst your bubble, but its highly unlikely that a bump in timing and bigger rims will take a mid 15's truck (or car for that matter) into the 14's. You *MAY* gain a tenth or two.
Agreed. Sorry
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 09:57 AM
  #6  
kdrolt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 849
Likes: 2
From: MA
Car: 93 GM300 platforms
Engine: LO3, LO5
Transmission: MD8 x2
15.45 @ 96 is too quick and waaaay too fast for a CK pickup, even with your mods.

The GTech is typically 0.2 sec too soon and 2-3 mph too fast, as compared to track data, due to the differences in how the GTech vs track measures time and speed.

So 15.45 @ 96 should be more like 15.7 @ 92+ mph at the track.... which your truck MIGHT do given the mods, but ONLY if you have a custom ECM, and more specifically more fuel to feeds the mods. You won't get more power unless you have more fuel.

I suspect however that you didn;t have the GTech zero'd properly when you did the 15.45 run.... so the later runs were probably more representative: 15.85 @ 88 mph.... which at a track would be 16.0 to 16.1 at 85 mph.

Remember that your truck weighs as much, or more, as a fullsize Caprice, and you have the same engine (LO5). A neighbor of mine has a 93 Caprice with similar mods to your truck, and his car is a lot more aerodynamic. He's run 15.50 @ 87 mph at a track, and he too lacks fuel/ECM mods. So with a good launch (slightly warmer weather, lower REAR tire pressure), you might actually run 15.7 to 15.8 @ 85 mph at a track.

You will need to get more fuel to really see the benefit of the mods to your engine. It gets said over and over on this forum that speed density cars (and trucks) don't see significant performance gains from bolts ons because the ECM can't respond to the mods like a MAF-car can.

In summary - your 15.45 @ 96 GTech run was a fluke. Don't believe it. The 15.8 @ 88 mph GTech run is probably very representative. Lastly, IF you mods the fuel system // ECM, then you might see high 14s on a good day. IMO. HTH. - Ken
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2002 | 08:36 PM
  #7  
JeffC1500TBI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
ok well I did a couple more runs tonight with 25 lbs in the rears.. (btw the 16 " wheels are actually a bit smaller diameter than the 15" 235/75's) I still can't get it to hook up as well as I would like.. I lay into the throttle about half way and it still spins both wheels and then I always for some reason end up laying into it more and spins even more..

anyway best run tonight was 15.22 @91mph

dunno If I should put my stock wheels on the back this week-end and run 20lbs or sometin..
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2002 | 03:00 AM
  #8  
Jza's Avatar
Jza
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 4,384
Likes: 2
From: Tulsa, OK
Just for the heck of it, try setting the timing back 1° to 4° BTDC, and put a little weight in the bed.

The reason I say this is my TBI car runs faster at 4° than at 5°, and you might get a little better traction with something over the rear wheels (but not so much it slows you down obviously) .
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2002 | 06:51 AM
  #9  
JeffC1500TBI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally posted by Jza
Just for the heck of it, try setting the timing back 1° to 4° BTDC, and put a little weight in the bed.

The reason I say this is my TBI car runs faster at 4° than at 5°, and you might get a little better traction with something over the rear wheels (but not so much it slows you down obviously) .
do you have the same mods as me???

I have a custom chip the edelbrock sent me to match their heads,cam,intake combo.. they told me it had a very agresive spark curve.. apparantly it was made to use on regular fuel with base timing of 8 degrees.. I was getting a little pre-ignition with it at 8 and I was use 93 octain fuel.. at 5 it seems ok.

btw so everyone knows my truck weighs in at approx 4160lbs..
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2002 | 05:48 PM
  #10  
JeffC1500TBI's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
ttt
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BAK12484
Tech / General Engine
12
Nov 27, 2001 02:57 AM
silver89Rs
Electronics
1
Nov 7, 2001 07:47 PM
IrocJT
TBI
4
Jun 8, 2001 10:10 PM
91Bird305
TBI
12
May 12, 2001 07:41 PM
My90Iroc
Aftermarket Product Review
3
May 9, 2001 05:39 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 AM.