E-tec 170s or 200s for my combo?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
E-tec 170s or 200s for my combo?
Ok. I am in the process of saving money for a set of edelbrock E-tecs. I will be running a xe270 roller camshaft, edelbrock rpm air gap, a 670cfm street avenger carb, edelbrock TES headers to a 3'' hooker catback. I will be running 3.73 gears and spinning to about 5600 or so.
Would I see benefits from the 200cc etecs? I wont be spinning very high so I thought the 170s would probably be enough.
Im shooting for 300rwhp. I should hope that is possible with that setup. If not more. Id like to see a 12.9 timeslip also.
Which heads?
Would I see benefits from the 200cc etecs? I wont be spinning very high so I thought the 170s would probably be enough.
Im shooting for 300rwhp. I should hope that is possible with that setup. If not more. Id like to see a 12.9 timeslip also.
Which heads?
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
i would go with the e-tec 200's. with traction, guarenteed 12's
just think, the 170cc's are the replacement for the stock vortecs,
200cc's are meant more as a fast burn replacement.
just think, the 170cc's are the replacement for the stock vortecs,
200cc's are meant more as a fast burn replacement.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Not that I come even close to knowing anything.
Why the 670 carb??? Sounds small for what you are doing???
Espically with the 200's
Matt
Why the 670 carb??? Sounds small for what you are doing???
Espically with the 200's
Matt
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,111
Likes: 53
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1988 Firebird S/E
Engine: 406Ci Vortec SBC
Transmission: TH-350/3500stall
Axle/Gears: 7.5" Auburn 4.10 Posi-Traction
For a 350 with that cam the 170's are the right choice.
They will likely even make more peak horsepower than the 200's in your application.
Thje 200's are better suited to a larger CID motor and or a higher rpm motor with a larger cam.
get a 750cfm carb.
The Protopline "906" vortec replacements are a great head too.
They cost less and flow more than either stock vortecs or either of the Edelbrock Etecs.
Brodix makes a Vortec/fastburn style head too.
www.brodix.com
www.protopline.com
They will likely even make more peak horsepower than the 200's in your application.
Thje 200's are better suited to a larger CID motor and or a higher rpm motor with a larger cam.
get a 750cfm carb.
The Protopline "906" vortec replacements are a great head too.
They cost less and flow more than either stock vortecs or either of the Edelbrock Etecs.
Brodix makes a Vortec/fastburn style head too.
www.brodix.com
www.protopline.com
Here is a Car Craft article where both the E-tec 170s and 200s sneezed out 400hp on a 350 with a little cam, in the range you are looking.
However for a cam in that range the 170s would be the right choice.
http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/56978/index.html
A bit more cam is not going to hurt you at all, I would think that over.
How did you come to pick the cam you are planning to run anyway?
Erson TQ40H hydraulic flat-tappet cam (intake/exhaust specs: 0.503/0.503-inch valve lift with 1.6:1 rockers, 218/228-degrees duration at 0.050, 110/110-degree centerline, 110-degree lobe displacement angle).
When tested with the TQ40H cam, the E-Tec 200 was down compared to its smaller E-Tec 170 sister in both peak and average numbers. This cam just isn’t big enough to keep up with the heads’ larger ports.
A bit more cam is not going to hurt you at all, I would think that over.
How did you come to pick the cam you are planning to run anyway?
Last edited by OMINOUS_87; Nov 13, 2003 at 08:28 AM.
Banned
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
From: ILL
Car: 1986 Pontiac TA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70
I would opt for the 170 heads but have Comp Cam custom grind a single pattern cam based on a XE profile.
My choice for cam would be a 224/224@.050 ground on a 110lsa with 2 degs advance. This will give extremely strong midrange and top end power.
www.geocities.com/dzperf
My choice for cam would be a 224/224@.050 ground on a 110lsa with 2 degs advance. This will give extremely strong midrange and top end power.
www.geocities.com/dzperf
Trending Topics
I would opt for the 170 heads but have Comp Cam custom grind a single pattern cam based on a XE profile.
My choice for cam would be a 224/224@.050 ground on a 110lsa with 2 degs advance. This will give extremely strong midrange and top end power.
My choice for cam would be a 224/224@.050 ground on a 110lsa with 2 degs advance. This will give extremely strong midrange and top end power.
If however you ever plan to run N2O it would be nice to have some split between the intake and exhaust.
Also be sure you have decent exhaust sytem after the heads, 1 5/8 Hedman LTs would be a fine choice.
Last edited by OMINOUS_87; Nov 13, 2003 at 09:26 AM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
670cfm carb...because I have it already. I may step up to 750cfm someday but not right now.
I was looking at the extreme energy roller cam series. I have a roller camshaft so I didn't have that many cams to choose from. I would go with the xe282 if its streetable...definetly more cam than the xe270. Unless you guys know some better cams. I will get 1.6 rockers to.
BTW what is the XR276HR-10 cam? what part number is that?
Oh about the exhaust. I have edelbrock TES now. I would maybe switch to 1 3/4'' SLPs. Shorties only. I will not run longtubes and/or dual exhaust again.
I was looking at the extreme energy roller cam series. I have a roller camshaft so I didn't have that many cams to choose from. I would go with the xe282 if its streetable...definetly more cam than the xe270. Unless you guys know some better cams. I will get 1.6 rockers to.
BTW what is the XR276HR-10 cam? what part number is that?
Oh about the exhaust. I have edelbrock TES now. I would maybe switch to 1 3/4'' SLPs. Shorties only. I will not run longtubes and/or dual exhaust again.
Last edited by 88Camaro350; Nov 13, 2003 at 11:16 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Not that I come even close to knowing anything.
I would think the carb should be top on your list. sell the one you got on ebay and pick up something bigger.
670 sound small for even what you are running now, let alone adding more speed goodies.
Matt
I would think the carb should be top on your list. sell the one you got on ebay and pick up something bigger.
670 sound small for even what you are running now, let alone adding more speed goodies.
Matt
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
WTF dude...670cfm is plenty for alot of setups. They 670cfm street avenger is made for 300-400hp. Until the cam swap I could not get the carb to stop running rich. After the cam swap and the smallest jets I have in my jet kit it finally stopped running rich.
A 750cfm would not give me any performance gains. Maybe at 7000rpm but I dont need that. The 670cfm street avenger with the right size jets will work fine. I am not getting a 750cfm carb yet. I dont think I will need it.
Carb is not on the top of the list. Its on the bottom. I dont know why everyone thinks a 750 is the magical carb for every setup. Why put a 750cfm on a stock 305 and throw in some #50 jets just so it won't run rich.........ok im gonna stop before i get pissed.
A 750cfm would not give me any performance gains. Maybe at 7000rpm but I dont need that. The 670cfm street avenger with the right size jets will work fine. I am not getting a 750cfm carb yet. I dont think I will need it.
Carb is not on the top of the list. Its on the bottom. I dont know why everyone thinks a 750 is the magical carb for every setup. Why put a 750cfm on a stock 305 and throw in some #50 jets just so it won't run rich.........ok im gonna stop before i get pissed.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
No need to curse at me I said
"Not that I come even close to knowing anything. "
You don't need to defend your self to me, I am just curious why.
I have no beef, that old lady stole it.
It just sounds small for a modded 350 and what your gonna do.
I guess I am more use to the FI specs and everyone throwing a 1000 ram jet on a stock 305. [not really though]
Matt
"Not that I come even close to knowing anything. "
You don't need to defend your self to me, I am just curious why.
I have no beef, that old lady stole it.
It just sounds small for a modded 350 and what your gonna do.
I guess I am more use to the FI specs and everyone throwing a 1000 ram jet on a stock 305. [not really though]
Matt
BTW what is the XR276HR-10 cam? what part number is that?
What conditions do you consider required for a street engine?
I run a XR276HR-12, and consider it well mannered for street use.
I may step up to 750cfm someday but not right now.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Stock stall right now. I will be getting a better stall soon. Probably in the range of 2400-2800 stall.
Street cam to me = enough vacuum to keep my power brakes happy and it needs to idle OK. Rough is fine but I can't have it stalling out and I can't have it idling at 1500rpm to keep it running.
I'll look into those cams you mentioned. Page 142 or jegs or summit?
Street cam to me = enough vacuum to keep my power brakes happy and it needs to idle OK. Rough is fine but I can't have it stalling out and I can't have it idling at 1500rpm to keep it running.
I'll look into those cams you mentioned. Page 142 or jegs or summit?
Stock stall right now. I will be getting a better stall soon. Probably in the range of 2400-2800 stall.
Street cam to me = enough vacuum to keep my power brakes happy and it needs to idle OK. Rough is fine but I can't have it stalling out and I can't have it idling at 1500rpm to keep it running.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Right now this is my only car. I can knock the head/cam/converter swap in a day easy. Im not worried about that. I just need something that will idle good, make good vacuum ect. This car may go on trips and such so It still needs to be reliable.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I've thought about using n20. I dont know if the bottom end will take it once I get the new heads and cam.
I am gonna go with the 170cc E-tecs, performer RPM airgap, and a xe268 or xe270 cam with 1.6 roller rockers. I think this combo would make gobs of streetable HP. And should still drive well.
Long as I can take car of those pesky mustangs ill be ok
I am gonna go with the 170cc E-tecs, performer RPM airgap, and a xe268 or xe270 cam with 1.6 roller rockers. I think this combo would make gobs of streetable HP. And should still drive well.
Long as I can take car of those pesky mustangs ill be ok
I am gonna go with the 170cc E-tecs, performer RPM airgap, and a xe268 or xe270 cam with 1.6 roller rockers. I think this combo would make gobs of streetable HP. And should still drive well.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Can you get me the specs of that cam your recommending. I could find it in jegs or summit.
I MAY go with 3.42s I havent decided yet. I cant decide if I wanna get a th350 or a better 700r4...if i stay 700r4 3.73s it is.
I MAY go with 3.42s I havent decided yet. I cant decide if I wanna get a th350 or a better 700r4...if i stay 700r4 3.73s it is.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
$$$$$$ for that cam. 345$. It better be a killer cam. Im not sure what Ill do for a cam yet but im pretty set on the etec 170s/
$$$$$$ for that cam. 345$. It better be a killer cam.
Where did you get 345$ from?
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...2D08%2D423%2D8
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I searched the part number on the manufacturers site. Said 345$ there. That looks like a good cam for what I am doing. I may go with that.
I need to get a stall and my gears first. What is a good stall for cheap?
I need to get a stall and my gears first. What is a good stall for cheap?
What is a good stall for cheap?
That looks like a good cam for what I am doing. I may go with that.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Id like to try to keep the powerband around 2000-5600. I will shift around that. I don't like having to low-end. I don't hardly have any low-end now. I think some 3.73s gears should solve that problem. I need to get the rear-end and suspension done. And a stall. Then the heads and cam.
Im a poor college student...cheap stall would be in the 300$ range. Id like to have a 9.5'' converter but way to expensive...ill probably end up with a 11'' or 12'' stall.
Im a poor college student...cheap stall would be in the 300$ range. Id like to have a 9.5'' converter but way to expensive...ill probably end up with a 11'' or 12'' stall.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
From: Midlothian,VA. 23112-6108
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 5.0 w/ Holly carb
Transmission: TH-700R4
I am building a fuel injected 406 to go in my 1LE '82 Z28. Here are the reccomendations from JayAdams at CompCams;
Cam 12-560-4
Heads Edelbrock E-Tec 170
Rockers 1.6 self aligning INTAKE
1.5 self aligning EXHAUST
Converter Use a stock vette converter (which I currently use in my TH700R4)
Induction Holly Stealth Ram (for a trouble free installation and user friendly)
My intention is to use this car strictly on the street with some mild autocross/road type stuff.
One of his comments really impressed me "For the model and year of the car you have you are limited to a single cat and a single 3" exhaust pipe. Keeping this in mind focus on developing all the torque you can get from idle to 4,000 RPM and you will have a killer setup for the street. It will also work well with your A/C and ower brakes. 4,000 to 5,500 will take care of itself.
He predicts 525 LBS of torque at 3,600 (475@2,500)and 430 HP at 5,000. That is exactly what I want, and I can drive the car daily.
Just my 2 cents worth, andyZ28
Cam 12-560-4
Heads Edelbrock E-Tec 170
Rockers 1.6 self aligning INTAKE
1.5 self aligning EXHAUST
Converter Use a stock vette converter (which I currently use in my TH700R4)
Induction Holly Stealth Ram (for a trouble free installation and user friendly)
My intention is to use this car strictly on the street with some mild autocross/road type stuff.
One of his comments really impressed me "For the model and year of the car you have you are limited to a single cat and a single 3" exhaust pipe. Keeping this in mind focus on developing all the torque you can get from idle to 4,000 RPM and you will have a killer setup for the street. It will also work well with your A/C and ower brakes. 4,000 to 5,500 will take care of itself.
He predicts 525 LBS of torque at 3,600 (475@2,500)and 430 HP at 5,000. That is exactly what I want, and I can drive the car daily.
Just my 2 cents worth, andyZ28
Cam 12-560-4
Heads Edelbrock E-Tec 170
Rockers 1.6 self aligning INTAKE
1.5 self aligning EXHAUST
Converter Use a stock vette converter (which I currently use in my TH700R4)
Induction Holly Stealth Ram (for a trouble free installation and user friendly)
Heads Edelbrock E-Tec 170
Rockers 1.6 self aligning INTAKE
1.5 self aligning EXHAUST
Converter Use a stock vette converter (which I currently use in my TH700R4)
Induction Holly Stealth Ram (for a trouble free installation and user friendly)
2. You cant bolt a HSR upto a Vortec/E-tec/Fatsburn head.
3. The 1.6/1.5 rocker combo sounds reasonable as the E-tec heads have a wicked exhaust port, I/E of 80%.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
From: Midlothian,VA. 23112-6108
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 5.0 w/ Holly carb
Transmission: TH-700R4
Specs at http://www.compcams.com/Technical/Se...60-4&Submit=Go
Duration 224 intake 236 exhaust
Lift .477 intake .490 exhaust (w/1.6 intake=.508 Intake lift)
Seperation 113 degrees
I may end up not using the stealth ram but using the genVII Accel system instead.
Duration 224 intake 236 exhaust
Lift .477 intake .490 exhaust (w/1.6 intake=.508 Intake lift)
Seperation 113 degrees
I may end up not using the stealth ram but using the genVII Accel system instead.
Duration 224 intake 236 exhaust
Lift .477 intake .490 exhaust (w/1.6 intake=.508 Intake lift)
Seperation 113 degrees
Lift .477 intake .490 exhaust (w/1.6 intake=.508 Intake lift)
Seperation 113 degrees
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
From: Midlothian,VA. 23112-6108
Car: 1982 Z-28
Engine: 5.0 w/ Holly carb
Transmission: TH-700R4
I agree with you for a carb engine. But I was told it will be fine for a DFI setup. Not mention the larger cubic inches of a 406.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 1
From: Tucson,AZ,USA
Car: Junk
Engine: Junk with nitrous
Transmission: Junk with gears
Why are you wanting to run E-tecs? I didn't get a chance to read through the whole thread, but if you have a carb, 350 with that 270 grind cam don't limit yourself to only the brands the magazines advertise. Ever heard of Canfields?? Cost exactly the same as the Etech 200's, but make as much power as AFR 195 (which cost a hell of a lot more). I have the canfields on my firebird, was going to go with E tec's until a friend with a 11.80/canfield equiped chevelle knocked me upside the head
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Originally posted by ANDYZ28
I am building a fuel injected 406 to go in my 1LE '82 Z28. Here are the reccomendations from JayAdams at CompCams;
Cam 12-560-4
Heads Edelbrock E-Tec 170
I am building a fuel injected 406 to go in my 1LE '82 Z28. Here are the reccomendations from JayAdams at CompCams;
Cam 12-560-4
Heads Edelbrock E-Tec 170
Mental note to self (Don't talk to JayAdams ever).
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Fairview Heights Illinois
Car: 1986 Irocz
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.25:1
Originally posted by ChrisFormula355
Ever heard of Canfields?? Cost exactly the same as the Etech 200's, but make as much power as AFR 195 (which cost a hell of a lot more). I have the canfields on my firebird, was going to go with E tec's until a friend with a 11.80/canfield equiped chevelle knocked me upside the head
Ever heard of Canfields?? Cost exactly the same as the Etech 200's, but make as much power as AFR 195 (which cost a hell of a lot more). I have the canfields on my firebird, was going to go with E tec's until a friend with a 11.80/canfield equiped chevelle knocked me upside the head
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
Another vote for the E-tec 170's....or even the Canfield 195's. They are both priced about the same and are great heads. I'm with Ominous...single pattern cam, for sure. How about the Magnum HR270 with 1.6 ratio rockers. That would be about a 525" lift on both intake and exhaust with about 219 degrees duration @ .050. Your goal of 300 rwhp should be a cinch with this combo.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 2
From: Lower Salford, PA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.3L Victor EFI
Transmission: Tremec TKO 600
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"/4.11 Trac-Lok
Originally posted by ChrisFormula355
Why are you wanting to run E-tecs? I didn't get a chance to read through the whole thread, but if you have a carb, 350 with that 270 grind cam don't limit yourself to only the brands the magazines advertise. Ever heard of Canfields?? Cost exactly the same as the Etech 200's, but make as much power as AFR 195 (which cost a hell of a lot more). I have the canfields on my firebird, was going to go with E tec's until a friend with a 11.80/canfield equiped chevelle knocked me upside the head
Why are you wanting to run E-tecs? I didn't get a chance to read through the whole thread, but if you have a carb, 350 with that 270 grind cam don't limit yourself to only the brands the magazines advertise. Ever heard of Canfields?? Cost exactly the same as the Etech 200's, but make as much power as AFR 195 (which cost a hell of a lot more). I have the canfields on my firebird, was going to go with E tec's until a friend with a 11.80/canfield equiped chevelle knocked me upside the head
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 857
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix, AZ
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350HO
Transmission: M4
Originally posted by ChrisFormula355
Why are you wanting to run E-tecs? I didn't get a chance to read through the whole thread, but if you have a carb, 350 with that 270 grind cam don't limit yourself to only the brands the magazines advertise. Ever heard of Canfields?? Cost exactly the same as the Etech 200's, but make as much power as AFR 195 (which cost a hell of a lot more). I have the canfields on my firebird, was going to go with E tec's until a friend with a 11.80/canfield equiped chevelle knocked me upside the head
Why are you wanting to run E-tecs? I didn't get a chance to read through the whole thread, but if you have a carb, 350 with that 270 grind cam don't limit yourself to only the brands the magazines advertise. Ever heard of Canfields?? Cost exactly the same as the Etech 200's, but make as much power as AFR 195 (which cost a hell of a lot more). I have the canfields on my firebird, was going to go with E tec's until a friend with a 11.80/canfield equiped chevelle knocked me upside the head
I agree with you for a carb engine. But I was told it will be fine for a DFI setup. Not mention the larger cubic inches of a 406.
Yep, great choice. The Canfields are great.
170cc ports on a fuel injected 406!
Whatever you do it seems you need to invest some more time in combo research before you spend alot of money on mismatched parts.
Last edited by OMINOUS_87; Nov 17, 2003 at 07:05 PM.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Car: 86 firebird with 98 firebird interi
Engine: pump gas 427sbc Dart Lil M 13.5:1
Transmission: Oldani TH400 w/ BTE 9" convertor
Axle/Gears: 31 spline Moser/full spool/4.11Rich
Ominous, I'm totally on board with your suggestion to the 170 heads and cam for the intended purpose of this motor. Too many people get teh idea of big heads are the stuff-not unless you have big cubes, the big cam is for those of you who want to spin 8K or higher. This package listed above is a very potent street motor that will defineately put down some mustangs-non cobra-and newer 4th gens if traction is right, plus live forever. What more could you want besides a bigger carb?!! I will agrgue to the death on this subject since I HAVE been there and HAVE done that starting with a 600cfm and currently running a 950HP on my POS 355 with 305 heads. No one car tell me dropping .23 in the 60' and 1 full second in the 1/4 plus picking up 5mph at the big end is over carbed. I had the 600, 750, 830, and now the 950HP. Your choice of the 670cfm is there because you have it, but when you get ready to really pick up some hp/tq. get a bigger carb as you will not be disappointed and will be glad you spent the money.
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 5
From: Albuquerque, NM
Car: 1966 El Camino Custom
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73 12 bolt with Brute Strength
For the rwhp 88Camaro350 is after (300), I think the Holley Avenger is fine. When the need for more power comes (and it will), then go with a bigger cam and the bigger carb.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 1
From: Waterloo, Iowa
Car: 86 firebird with 98 firebird interi
Engine: pump gas 427sbc Dart Lil M 13.5:1
Transmission: Oldani TH400 w/ BTE 9" convertor
Axle/Gears: 31 spline Moser/full spool/4.11Rich
Originally posted by wesilva
For the rwhp 88Camaro350 is after (300), I think the Holley Avenger is fine. When the need for more power comes (and it will), then go with a bigger cam and the bigger carb.
For the rwhp 88Camaro350 is after (300), I think the Holley Avenger is fine. When the need for more power comes (and it will), then go with a bigger cam and the bigger carb.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
[Sold] Flowmaster exhaust system
Night rider327
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Oct 9, 2015 09:25 AM
TMZIrocZ350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Oct 7, 2015 12:09 PM






