Very Slow 350
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 350 V-Eight
Transmission: T5
Very Slow 350
Finaly got my Camaro out to the track. Lost almost every race. My specs: 355 bored .030, sealed power pistons,stock cam, ported L98 heads, professional products intake manifold, Flowtech headers, A/C and emmisions dumped, Edelbrock 600 performer carb, lightweight flywheel, T5 (V6 one) 3:42 rear end. I would hit 20mph@3000rpm's in 1st gear, if I stayed in 1st any longer the car wouldnt even accelerate because its a 4.03 gear. It would just keep reving up. 2nd gear would get me to 45mph@4000rpm's, then that gear would die out. 3rd, 4th, and 5th are the only useful gears, but on an 1/8 mile I can finish before im done with 3rd. Do I have to change the gears in the tranny or is there sumthin else I can do? Basicaly, no low end acceleration, need to change that...
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
stock cam
What cam is it? A 929? Peanut cam? Either of those will produce that exact result... no power whatsoever past 3500 RPM.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
I agree with RB. You can do whatever you want. As long as you have a factory cam of that magnitude, or lack thereof, for that matter, That has the same effect as studying for brain surgery with half of a brain on your own shoulders.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
I serioulsy doubt it's the same as the L98 cam; but I could be wrong. AFAIK all of the TBI motors got a peanut cam of some sort in order to work best in the RPM range (just barely off-idle) that TBI is designed for. Wouldn't make too much sense to put together a motor with heads that hit a brick wall at 3500 RPM, and a cam that did anything else.
That's probably the malfunction.
Get a decent cam.
That's also a testament to the wisdom (?) of using a 6-cylinder transmission behind a V8.
That's probably the malfunction.
Get a decent cam.
That's also a testament to the wisdom (?) of using a 6-cylinder transmission behind a V8.
Trending Topics
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Originally posted by 5.8L Camaro
The cam is from an '89 L05 9C1 police package engine. It is the same cam used in the 350 in an '89 Iroc-Z. Dont know the specs
The cam is from an '89 L05 9C1 police package engine. It is the same cam used in the 350 in an '89 Iroc-Z. Dont know the specs
Let me put it this way - That cam does not have lobes, it has a mild swelling where the lobes should be.
Get a real cam in there, and you'll be very impressed by the difference
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
That won't you much, but if anything though, with a cam like that, you might want taller gears (3.23 or 3.08) , because that cam is a torque cam, not a hp cam.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
put in a real cam, forget the rear end. buy a v8 trans and you'll be miles ahead.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,187
Likes: 0
From: E.B.F. TN
Car: Tree Huggers
Engine: Do Not
Transmission: Appreciate Me.
Originally posted by Air_Adam
...That cam does not have lobes, it has a mild swelling where the lobes should be...
...That cam does not have lobes, it has a mild swelling where the lobes should be...
5.8 No gears are going to realistically help that problem. And Flowtechs are not on my list of performance mods. Once that's done, you may find the need for a new tranny in a relativly short span of time. Good luck.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
If its an L05 cam, it will be of the peanut grind classification. As RB stated, the cam was designed to support the swirl port heads that are designed for low end torque. Not high end power. an idle-3500 powerband is about all i would give it.
Like AA said, if you dont change the cam, at least get some numerically larger gears. Possibly up to 3.42. That will help you off the line, at the expense of higher speed cruising. However, with gears like 3.23 and 3.42, that really shouldnt be an issue.
The thing is this: You can do all you want to try to make up for the weaknesses of that cam. gears help the acceleration of the car, they do not change the engines overall output. Changing the cam will. Why do you have no low end acceleration? because you have no bottom end gearing? No. Because your engine is tied down by a cam designed to make power UNDER 3500 rpm.
Changing the cam with the engine in the car isnt that hard. I have done it on a few occasions. Just need to get everything in front of the timing cover out of the way, jack the engine up enough to loosen all the oil pan bolts and LOWER the pan, not remove, just lower it enough for the timing covers lip to clear. You will need to get the radiator and a/c condensor out of the way as well. the supports that form an "X" in front will need to be unbolted as well. I can maneuver my cam between them, but it is risky as nicking the lobes or cam bearing surfaces is not the top thing on my to-do list.
If you perform a search, you will see the specific steps involved. It is one of the things on these cars that isn't as hard as it sounds like.
Like AA said, if you dont change the cam, at least get some numerically larger gears. Possibly up to 3.42. That will help you off the line, at the expense of higher speed cruising. However, with gears like 3.23 and 3.42, that really shouldnt be an issue.
The thing is this: You can do all you want to try to make up for the weaknesses of that cam. gears help the acceleration of the car, they do not change the engines overall output. Changing the cam will. Why do you have no low end acceleration? because you have no bottom end gearing? No. Because your engine is tied down by a cam designed to make power UNDER 3500 rpm.
Changing the cam with the engine in the car isnt that hard. I have done it on a few occasions. Just need to get everything in front of the timing cover out of the way, jack the engine up enough to loosen all the oil pan bolts and LOWER the pan, not remove, just lower it enough for the timing covers lip to clear. You will need to get the radiator and a/c condensor out of the way as well. the supports that form an "X" in front will need to be unbolted as well. I can maneuver my cam between them, but it is risky as nicking the lobes or cam bearing surfaces is not the top thing on my to-do list.
If you perform a search, you will see the specific steps involved. It is one of the things on these cars that isn't as hard as it sounds like.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Originally posted by Stekman
Like AA said, if you dont change the cam, at least get some numerically larger gears. Possibly up to 3.42. That will help you off the line, at the expense of higher speed cruising. However, with gears like 3.23 and 3.42, that really shouldnt be an issue.
Like AA said, if you dont change the cam, at least get some numerically larger gears. Possibly up to 3.42. That will help you off the line, at the expense of higher speed cruising. However, with gears like 3.23 and 3.42, that really shouldnt be an issue.
Its exactly the opposite cam that needs 3.73 or 4.11 gears... those gears make up for cams with no bottom end torque, like say, the old 327/350hp cams. Those had nothing below 2500 revs, but took off like a bullet after that. They needed the shorter gears (higher numerically) to help them off the line.
He needs exactly the opposite - gears that will get him more top speed, not more off the line grunt.
I still agree with everyone else though. The only way you will really see more than a tenth or two out of a gear change is if you do the cam as well.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
Great, now you've got me all confused by posting taller gears and 3.08/3.23 making me think hes got lousy 2.73 gearing.....
[/rant] j/k its all good Adam
[/rant] j/k its all good Adam
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Originally posted by Stekman
Great, now you've got me all confused by posting taller gears and 3.08/3.23 making me think hes got lousy 2.73 gearing.....
[/rant] j/k its all good Adam
Great, now you've got me all confused by posting taller gears and 3.08/3.23 making me think hes got lousy 2.73 gearing.....
[/rant] j/k its all good Adam
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 350 V-Eight
Transmission: T5
I have a camshaft from an '89 L98 with only 50k miles on it. Would that be worth putting in until I have the money for a good one?(this comming winter)
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Add up everything it takes to put in a cam. Include gaskets, fluids, things you might just change anyway just because you're there like spark plugs or hoses or filters, etc. Include a couple of things that you might discover when you get there, that it's too worn out to put back on but you don't know it just yet, like a water pump. Be honest: put down EVERYTHING. Don't leave it out just because you think you can get by without it. Except, we'll let you fudge a little bit, and don't necessarily include that chrome timing cover you've always wanted because your motor doesn't leak enough oil. Pad it a little bit, to make up for any consumables you might run out of in the process, or tools to buy, or parts that break as you work on them.
Then think about if it's really wise spending all that money, plus your time and effort, putting in some lame stock cam that you can be absolutely certain is going to be a disappointment.
Now: is it "worth putting in"?
Then think about if it's really wise spending all that money, plus your time and effort, putting in some lame stock cam that you can be absolutely certain is going to be a disappointment.
Now: is it "worth putting in"?
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Az
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: Custom Built 327
Transmission: Tremec 5-speed
Your tranny will be fine the way it is. Whats your tire size in the rear? You might want to get a taller tire like a 28inch. Second I would get a beefier cam that will run within your setup. Thirdly, your engine will only rev 4000rpm max? I would think you'd be able to get at least 5000rpm out of it with it being a stick shift in all. Dont replace your 3.42 gears, they're a nice gear for your setup. Hope this helps.
Last edited by YenkoZL1; Jun 15, 2004 at 10:56 PM.
Re: Very Slow 350
Originally posted by 5.8L Camaro
\ I would hit 20mph@3000rpm's in 1st gear, if I stayed in 1st any longer the car wouldnt even accelerate because its a 4.03 gear. It would just keep reving up. 2nd gear would get me to 45mph@4000rpm's, then that gear would die out. 3rd, 4th, and 5th are the only useful gears, but on an 1/8 mile I can finish before im done with 3rd. Do I have to change the gears in the tranny or is there sumthin else I can do? Basicaly, no low end acceleration, need to change that...
\ I would hit 20mph@3000rpm's in 1st gear, if I stayed in 1st any longer the car wouldnt even accelerate because its a 4.03 gear. It would just keep reving up. 2nd gear would get me to 45mph@4000rpm's, then that gear would die out. 3rd, 4th, and 5th are the only useful gears, but on an 1/8 mile I can finish before im done with 3rd. Do I have to change the gears in the tranny or is there sumthin else I can do? Basicaly, no low end acceleration, need to change that...
Also, why ask the question if you don't want to hear the answer? Changing rear gears to a numerically lower gear will slow you down, not speed you up.
You need a new cam, and you need to spend some time tuning the thing. Even a peanut cam should not fall on its face at 3k rpms.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
Re: Re: Very Slow 350
Originally posted by owned
Changing rear gears to a numerically lower gear will slow you down, not speed you up.
Changing rear gears to a numerically lower gear will slow you down, not speed you up.
His cam is a torque cam, so he needs taller gears to make up for the lack of top end. If you still disagree, read my previous posts up above.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I have a 93 caprice lo5. Had the roller camshaft. I put a micrometer on it when I pulled the cam out and guess what....it was the same cam that my lo3 had in it. Lift wise anyways.
I installed a lt4 cam and noticed a HUGE difference. Its not even the hotcam...just a factory lt4 cam. Nice little upgrade. Now I'm working on getting rid of the swirl ports. Probably upgrade the cam again to. But so far it has served me well.
I installed a lt4 cam and noticed a HUGE difference. Its not even the hotcam...just a factory lt4 cam. Nice little upgrade. Now I'm working on getting rid of the swirl ports. Probably upgrade the cam again to. But so far it has served me well.
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
Re: Re: Re: Very Slow 350
Originally posted by Air_Adam
gonna swap it out. His cam has no top end, so if he uses shorter (higher numerically) gears, he will run out of gear long before he crosses the 1/4mi marker.
gonna swap it out. His cam has no top end, so if he uses shorter (higher numerically) gears, he will run out of gear long before he crosses the 1/4mi marker.
But generally, the higher the numerical value, the more you gain on acceleration, at the expense of top end, engine permitting. And vice versa with numerically smaller gears. You gain on the top end at the expense of acceleration. So if off the line power is what you want, numerically larger gears are for you. If you want a gear that will carry you across the 1/4 line with that little cam, then smaller gearing is what you need.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 350 V-Eight
Transmission: T5
Originally posted by YenkoZL1
Your 3.42 rear gears are fine. Just get a beefier cam. Its cheaper to do a cam swap than a gear swap anyways.
Your 3.42 rear gears are fine. Just get a beefier cam. Its cheaper to do a cam swap than a gear swap anyways.
Last edited by 5.8L Camaro; Jun 16, 2004 at 02:44 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, Az
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: Custom Built 327
Transmission: Tremec 5-speed
Yes your car does have a roller cam. Some do cost $250 but for what you need it'll be cheaper. Normally you'd need to new spring etc... but thats why I said to get a cam that would work within your setup. Find the max lift your valve springs will take and find a cam that will work with it. Not saying to buy a cam that would max out your springs, just one that will have better duration and lift than your stock cam. I'd find a GM roller or Crane roller they dont seem to be as expiensive as others.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






