Guess what some Ford people said
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
From: SYLVANIA,OHIO,USA
Car: 89 Formula
Guess what some Ford people said
"I just hope Ford puts more "beans" on the motor so we don't have to spend money just to keep up with the GM twins." Some also said if the new mustang sucks they will go buy a Camaro or something different, And they also briged a gap with us about all the ricers. "Well,
Many of the high end "ricers" used to put up a few good numbers but most of them cost over $40,000 (and most of them are dead now). Now for the same price, I can get an LS1 Camaro or a Cobra and fiddle with it and run circles around it. Now stock, they are pretty fast but for the price you pay, they should have been faster. That's just my opinion of course. Besides, their parts are more expensive too."
Many of the high end "ricers" used to put up a few good numbers but most of them cost over $40,000 (and most of them are dead now). Now for the same price, I can get an LS1 Camaro or a Cobra and fiddle with it and run circles around it. Now stock, they are pretty fast but for the price you pay, they should have been faster. That's just my opinion of course. Besides, their parts are more expensive too."
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ede:
this isn't tech. if you want to post non tech please use macgyvers board at www.nethirdgen.org </font>
this isn't tech. if you want to post non tech please use macgyvers board at www.nethirdgen.org </font>
Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: LB9
Transmission: 700-R4
This isn't tech and I'm sure it will be locked. The reason cars like preludes won't ever be as fast as they should for the price is that Honda/Toyota/Acura will NOT under any circumstances jeopardized their beloved "image of reliability" they've worked so hard for. What this means is little engines, rev to the moon but don't make power down low no matter what! They just want all those good rankings in consumer reports. And why the hell do they always put "too bulky to be nimble" for the camaro/firebird in there?? What does that even mean? In parking lots I completely agree - but at speed these are the most nimble cars around!! I seriously think that magazine played quite a role in taking the f body so far out of the market - and it's not even true! Sorry, just had to vent 
------------------
I ROCK
...so you don't have to.

------------------
I ROCK
...so you don't have to.
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 371
Likes: 1
From: Kirkwood, MO, USA
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 454
Transmission: Th400
Axle/Gears: 3.73
A new mustang gt is 5 to 10 thousand dollars less than a new f-body. What do you get for the extra cash? No trunk and a half to a full second quicker in the quarter, a stronger transmission but a weaker rearend. That is why new mustangs are outselling f-bodys. It's the MONEY!
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
5 to 10 thousand dollars less? What kinda crack are you smoking? They're about $1000 difference between a Mustang GT and a Camaro Z28 with the same options. A Trans Am is about $3-4 more.
------------------
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.23 @ 107.62 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
------------------
1991 Camaro Z28
5.7L 5-Speed (originally 305)
13.23 @ 107.62 MPH
Southern California
Member: SoCal 3rd Gen F-Bodies
Webmaster: SoCal F-Bodies
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Why is a Firebird always more expensive than the Camaro?? Poncho's have always been more than Chev's, why? Brand loyalty? different options?
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
Cause they're better
------------------
1987 GTA L98 MD8 GH3
355 '97 Vortec 4-bolt block, TRW(suck) forged pistons 10:1 CR, TFS 23*, LT4 Hot Cam, Ported plenum and intake, SLP Siam Runners, BBK 52mm TB, Edelbrock TES, gutted Cat, Flowmaster, CAI w/K+N cone, AFPR, TB bypass, !AIR, !A/C, !EVAP, ARAP, 2300 stall, Alum. Driveshaft, Hotchkis STB, '99 Camaro seats.
Coming Soon!!: Fourth gen 3.42:1 rear, Spohn LCAs and Panhard.
------------------
1987 GTA L98 MD8 GH3
355 '97 Vortec 4-bolt block, TRW(suck) forged pistons 10:1 CR, TFS 23*, LT4 Hot Cam, Ported plenum and intake, SLP Siam Runners, BBK 52mm TB, Edelbrock TES, gutted Cat, Flowmaster, CAI w/K+N cone, AFPR, TB bypass, !AIR, !A/C, !EVAP, ARAP, 2300 stall, Alum. Driveshaft, Hotchkis STB, '99 Camaro seats.
Coming Soon!!: Fourth gen 3.42:1 rear, Spohn LCAs and Panhard.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








