Changed to higher octane rating
Changed to higher octane rating
Humm... for awhile I was sure I was putting in Regular with an octane rating of 87 will I decided to switch to Pemium with 92 Octane rating. I ran the tank nice and dry, so my question is, is this alright or could it possibly damage my engine. Or will I slowly notice the effects over time as I continue to use a higher octane rating.
_________________
305 TBI 1989 Camaro RS
Transfer Project: Smashed 1990 IROC-Z 350 TPI
_________________
305 TBI 1989 Camaro RS
Transfer Project: Smashed 1990 IROC-Z 350 TPI
87 WOW, I have always put 94 in mine, but mine is not a stock motor
------------------
1986 Iroc z28
4bbl 350 V8 430 hp
300 shot NOS
6 spd Manual
20" Iroc replica Rims
2, 12" Alpine Subs
4.11 gear ratio
1/4 mile - 10.52s and 10.86s
------------------
1986 Iroc z28
4bbl 350 V8 430 hp
300 shot NOS
6 spd Manual
20" Iroc replica Rims
2, 12" Alpine Subs
4.11 gear ratio
1/4 mile - 10.52s and 10.86s
GM says that 87 is fine for that motor. I think the compression ratio is like 8.x to 1 on the tbi motor, so you shouldnt NEED 93. That said I WOULD put the good stuff in. You probably will not notice a major performance increase, but you may see a pretty good boost in mileage.
Moderator


Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,268
Likes: 169
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
There's no more energy in 92 octane pump gas as there is in 87. Octane is the fuels resistance to detonation. If your engines doesn't ping (spark knock) with 87 then you're not going to notice any difference with 92 except a light wallet.
The chance of increased milage is possible however I don't think it offsets the extra cost of the fuel.
------------------
Follow my racing progress on Stephen's racing page
and check out the race car
87 IROC-Z SuperPro ET Bracket Race Car
461 naturally aspirated Big Block
Best ET on a time slip: 11.242 altitude corrected to 10.89
Best MPH on a time slip: 121.52 altitude corrected to 125.89
Altitude corrected rear wheel HP: 497.9
Best 60 foot: 1.546
Racing at 3500 feet elevation but most race days it's over 5000 feet density altitude!
Member of the Calgary Drag Racing Association
87 IROC bracket car, 91 454SS daily driver, 95 Homebuilt Harley
The chance of increased milage is possible however I don't think it offsets the extra cost of the fuel.
------------------
Follow my racing progress on Stephen's racing page
and check out the race car
87 IROC-Z SuperPro ET Bracket Race Car
461 naturally aspirated Big Block
Best ET on a time slip: 11.242 altitude corrected to 10.89
Best MPH on a time slip: 121.52 altitude corrected to 125.89
Altitude corrected rear wheel HP: 497.9
Best 60 foot: 1.546
Racing at 3500 feet elevation but most race days it's over 5000 feet density altitude!
Member of the Calgary Drag Racing Association
87 IROC bracket car, 91 454SS daily driver, 95 Homebuilt Harley
I'll try it for 3 re-fuelings and get back to ya.
I'll count how much it cost, how many miles, vs. regular cost and miles, and compare the two. See if I gotta better milage and if the cost was within excepable range. Premiun is only 1.22 here
[This message has been edited by un4givin89 (edited August 08, 2001).]
I'll count how much it cost, how many miles, vs. regular cost and miles, and compare the two. See if I gotta better milage and if the cost was within excepable range. Premiun is only 1.22 here
[This message has been edited by un4givin89 (edited August 08, 2001).]
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by un4givin89:
Milage boost is what I'm looking for, over perforamce. Daily driver</font>
Milage boost is what I'm looking for, over perforamce. Daily driver</font>
Ive noticed the effect form higher octance gallon for gallon 85 vrs 91, 91 would get about 2/3 MPG more than 85. At leat it paid for the 25cents more per gallon cost.
SSC
Trending Topics
How bout this:
QUOTE:::
The higher octane you go, the less fuel mileage you
will get. Higher octane burns much slower and is only
beneficial in very high-load situations, not for daily
driving.
Someone told me this, thoughts??
QUOTE:::
The higher octane you go, the less fuel mileage you
will get. Higher octane burns much slower and is only
beneficial in very high-load situations, not for daily
driving.
Someone told me this, thoughts??
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
As usual, I have to agree with Steve; higher octane by itself has little or no effect on your gas mileage.
I have been doing EXTENSIVE experiments with various octanes and the modifying my eprom accordingly. If you advance the spark and lean out the engine, then YES I can exceed the gas mileage using 94 vs 87. But this required extensive modification of the eprom. I actually can obtain Highway mileage of 30 US MPGs with my L98. Under the same situation with my original tables in my eprom, my best with 87 was 25 US MPGs.
However, this 20% increase in gas mileage requires a 20% increase in cost. So, from a money point of view, its the same cost.
I am now trying to modify my eprom by backing of the timing and reducing the "leaness" of my mixture, so I can return to burning 87. I figure that if I can get 28 US MPGs and using 87, I actually work out paying less.
My goal is also to obtain the same performance with 87 as I do with 94.
I have been doing EXTENSIVE experiments with various octanes and the modifying my eprom accordingly. If you advance the spark and lean out the engine, then YES I can exceed the gas mileage using 94 vs 87. But this required extensive modification of the eprom. I actually can obtain Highway mileage of 30 US MPGs with my L98. Under the same situation with my original tables in my eprom, my best with 87 was 25 US MPGs.
However, this 20% increase in gas mileage requires a 20% increase in cost. So, from a money point of view, its the same cost.
I am now trying to modify my eprom by backing of the timing and reducing the "leaness" of my mixture, so I can return to burning 87. I figure that if I can get 28 US MPGs and using 87, I actually work out paying less.
My goal is also to obtain the same performance with 87 as I do with 94.
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Car: 89 Turbo Trans Am and lots of non-3rd gens
Engine: 231 SFI Turbo's, LT4, LT1
Transmission: 2004r, 4L60E
Glenn's experiments are correct. Higher octane gas burns slower than lower octane gas. Therefore in order to reep any befits of the higher octane gas, you must increase your timing curve so that the spark plug creates the spark earlier giving the gas more time to fully burn.
*
Unless of course you are experiencing any degree of Knock Retard already with the 87 octane, then the higher octane gas should help cure that problem, but you probably won't know if you're getting any KR without a scan tool to monitor it with.
*
And yes, using higher octane with a higher timing curve will produce more power to a certain extent. In my Turbo cars, on 93 octane I can run about 17psi of boost and run a 1/4 in the mid-12's. Put in 116 octane leaded with a chip programmed for it with the same boost and run about .3-.4 tenths faster, but this also allows me to crank up the boost to 25psi with then cuts another full second off the 1/4 times to mid/low 11's
------------------
Rob
High Performance & Party page
Pics of my rides past & present and recent party pics!
89 TTA #426 20th Anniversary turbo 3.8 bone stock
79 TA 6.6l - all original stock
94 Silverado Tuned Port Injected
87 Grand National- lil' ole V6, 12.40 @ 108 w/1.79 60'
95 Trans Am Conv.- LT1
*
Unless of course you are experiencing any degree of Knock Retard already with the 87 octane, then the higher octane gas should help cure that problem, but you probably won't know if you're getting any KR without a scan tool to monitor it with.
*
And yes, using higher octane with a higher timing curve will produce more power to a certain extent. In my Turbo cars, on 93 octane I can run about 17psi of boost and run a 1/4 in the mid-12's. Put in 116 octane leaded with a chip programmed for it with the same boost and run about .3-.4 tenths faster, but this also allows me to crank up the boost to 25psi with then cuts another full second off the 1/4 times to mid/low 11's

------------------
Rob
High Performance & Party page
Pics of my rides past & present and recent party pics!
89 TTA #426 20th Anniversary turbo 3.8 bone stock
79 TA 6.6l - all original stock
94 Silverado Tuned Port Injected
87 Grand National- lil' ole V6, 12.40 @ 108 w/1.79 60'
95 Trans Am Conv.- LT1
Just curious, when I bought my camaro the guy told me not to use the cheep gas, use the 91 or better at least.
What happens if I do use the regular 87? My cars an 84 305. Is the car gonna run like crap or something?
What happens if I do use the regular 87? My cars an 84 305. Is the car gonna run like crap or something?
Personal experience between 87 and 94 with my old 92 RS 305 TBI, I got an extra 80km out of a tank which in the end result off set the cost, plus it just felt stronger. anyways I always run 94 ... if it's my GTA or my old 81 OLDS delta 88 307.
------------------
1989 GTA 350 TPI
Stock:
- T-tops
- Dual cats
- 9-Bolt 7.75" Rearend
- 3.27 gears
Mods:
- Dynomax Super Turbo Muffler
1992 RS 305 TBI - Sold
------------------
1989 GTA 350 TPI
Stock:
- T-tops
- Dual cats
- 9-Bolt 7.75" Rearend
- 3.27 gears
Mods:
- Dynomax Super Turbo Muffler
1992 RS 305 TBI - Sold
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
I also concur with Glenn's observation.
Higher "octane" gas usually has additives to reduce its combustion rate. Most often the additive is either alcohol or MTBE. Neither of these has anywhere near the heat content (energy) per unit volume (gallons) that gasoline has; in other words, they are inferior as fuels. So the higher the proportion of them there is in the fuel, the more fuel has to be burned to release a given amount of energy.
As a result, any specific car will always get the best mileage out of the lowest "octane" fuel that will burn in a controlled manner in it, that is, as long as it doesn't explode uncontrollably ("ping", "spark knock", etc.). The only time you can get better mileage is if the ignition timing can be advanced farther to allow enough time for more complete combustion of a leaner mixture. So, to actually get better mileage out of premium, both the timing and fuel delivery curves have to be adjusted. If that doesn't happen, then the mileage will be worse.
So, un4givin, your friend or whoever is right. If you discard all the marketing hype and chest-beating on the subject, and stick straight to the facts, that's where they lead. Basically, if your engine's CR, driving habits, etc. etc. don't cause spark knock with regular, then you're actually better off with it than with "premium" (regular gas mixed with extra alcohol or MTBE).
------------------
"So many Mustangs, so little time..."
ICON Motorsports
Higher "octane" gas usually has additives to reduce its combustion rate. Most often the additive is either alcohol or MTBE. Neither of these has anywhere near the heat content (energy) per unit volume (gallons) that gasoline has; in other words, they are inferior as fuels. So the higher the proportion of them there is in the fuel, the more fuel has to be burned to release a given amount of energy.
As a result, any specific car will always get the best mileage out of the lowest "octane" fuel that will burn in a controlled manner in it, that is, as long as it doesn't explode uncontrollably ("ping", "spark knock", etc.). The only time you can get better mileage is if the ignition timing can be advanced farther to allow enough time for more complete combustion of a leaner mixture. So, to actually get better mileage out of premium, both the timing and fuel delivery curves have to be adjusted. If that doesn't happen, then the mileage will be worse.
So, un4givin, your friend or whoever is right. If you discard all the marketing hype and chest-beating on the subject, and stick straight to the facts, that's where they lead. Basically, if your engine's CR, driving habits, etc. etc. don't cause spark knock with regular, then you're actually better off with it than with "premium" (regular gas mixed with extra alcohol or MTBE).
------------------
"So many Mustangs, so little time..."
ICON Motorsports
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,242
Likes: 3
From: Somewhere around the South Side of Chicago just crusin' in one of the Niteriders
Car: 92RS 25th Anniv./88 IROC Z28 Vert
Engine: 305 TBI w/Tpi Air / 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4/700r4
Axle/Gears: Posi
I have been experiencing the "ping/knock" sound on acceleration with using the regular gas. When I went up to "87" on my last 2 fillups it was a lot less noticable. Now I plan to try the premium pump next. I'll probably trade the gas milage for the "no ping" sound. I can't stand it! Any other idea?
------------------
86 Camaro Black SS Coupe, T Tops, Flowmaster, Custom Paint, Dunlop Road Kings S/R tires, Wheel Country Directional Chrome Wheels,new charcoal & gray interior including seats and door panels, new carpet and headliner, complete front end suspension rebuild, new Valve seals, and more mods to come
http://www.angelfire.com/sports/niterider/86camaro.html
Morgan_Andre@hotmail.com
------------------
86 Camaro Black SS Coupe, T Tops, Flowmaster, Custom Paint, Dunlop Road Kings S/R tires, Wheel Country Directional Chrome Wheels,new charcoal & gray interior including seats and door panels, new carpet and headliner, complete front end suspension rebuild, new Valve seals, and more mods to come
http://www.angelfire.com/sports/niterider/86camaro.html
Morgan_Andre@hotmail.com
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Worth, TX
Car: 89 Turbo Trans Am and lots of non-3rd gens
Engine: 231 SFI Turbo's, LT4, LT1
Transmission: 2004r, 4L60E
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by 86NiteRider:
I have been experiencing the "ping/knock" sound on acceleration with using the regular gas. When I went up to "87" on my last 2 fillups it was a lot less noticable. Now I plan to try the premium pump next. I'll probably trade the gas milage for the "no ping" sound. I can't stand it! Any other idea?
</font>
I have been experiencing the "ping/knock" sound on acceleration with using the regular gas. When I went up to "87" on my last 2 fillups it was a lot less noticable. Now I plan to try the premium pump next. I'll probably trade the gas milage for the "no ping" sound. I can't stand it! Any other idea?
</font>
An older car that used to run fine on lower octane may start to have detonation/pre-ignition/ knock/ping problems due to a number of factors:
1) EGR passage ways are clogged not allowing the EGR to function properly is common.
2) Excessive carbon buildup in cylinders, thus causing a higher compression ratio, which would also lead to clogged EGR.
3) Fuel injectors clogged not allowing enough fual to enter cylinders.
4) Fuel pump weak not producing enough fuel pressure to feed the injectors properly.
5) Weak spark or too hot of a spark. Try colder spark plugs, test coil, new cap, etc.
*
I would tend to look at the EGR first, its the easiest to diagnose by removing the EGR, mine were clogged on my truck with less than 100k miles on it.
Either way, if using higher octane gas cures it, then its worth it! Unless you want to build a new engine
That's what I'm in the process of doing now![This message has been edited by 2QUIK6 (edited August 09, 2001).]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
someone972
Transmissions and Drivetrain
6
Aug 30, 2015 12:52 AM





