How clean will a healthy, well-balanced engine run?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
From: Hayward, CA
Car: 91 camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: T56
How clean will a healthy, well-balanced engine run?
Ok, I admit it. I'm a bit of a tree-hugger. So I'm feeling a little guilty about gutting the cat. And ditching the smog pump. And the EGR. But I'm trying to convince myself that a healthy, well-balanced engine will run cleaner than normal. For example, I had all the injectors flow-matched. Before their flow rates varied about 8%, now they're all within 2% of each other. So I'm thinking that my air-fuel ratio will be 14.7 in all cylinders, rather than having the computer find some happy medium between too rich in one cylinder and too lean in another. Also I was kinda hoping this would help with gas mileage. I had the engine balanced during the rebuild too. So what do you guys think? Please tell me I'm not as polluting as I think I am.
------------------
91 Z28
Come see The Vicious...
------------------
91 Z28
Come see The Vicious...
It'll run pretty good... people have passed emissions without any smog crap on, I'm one of them... (with the new NJ dyno emissions check w/no smog pump)
Do yourself a favor, and mother earth, and invest in a high flowing cat, it won't hurt performance much, if at all, and it'll be healthier for your nose, ever smell a car without a cat? YEah... blech.
------------------
1985 Camaro SC - 2.8L, auto.
C'mon, spin 'em for papa...
http://www.xenodrgn.f2s.com/Frontright.jpg
Do yourself a favor, and mother earth, and invest in a high flowing cat, it won't hurt performance much, if at all, and it'll be healthier for your nose, ever smell a car without a cat? YEah... blech.
------------------
1985 Camaro SC - 2.8L, auto.
C'mon, spin 'em for papa...
http://www.xenodrgn.f2s.com/Frontright.jpg
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ViciousZ:
Ok, I admit it. I'm a bit of a tree-hugger.</font>
Ok, I admit it. I'm a bit of a tree-hugger.</font>
------------------
1987 GTA L98 MD8
355, TFS Heads, LT4 Hot Cam
My GTA
The Minnesota F-body Club
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ViciousZ:
For example, I had all the injectors flow-matched. Before their flow rates varied about 8%, now they're all within 2% of each other. So I'm thinking that my air-fuel ratio will be 14.7 in all cylinders, rather than having the computer find some happy medium between too rich in one cylinder and too lean in another.</font>
For example, I had all the injectors flow-matched. Before their flow rates varied about 8%, now they're all within 2% of each other. So I'm thinking that my air-fuel ratio will be 14.7 in all cylinders, rather than having the computer find some happy medium between too rich in one cylinder and too lean in another.</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Also I was kinda hoping this would help with gas mileage. I had the engine balanced during the rebuild too. So what do you guys think? Please tell me I'm not as polluting as I think I am.</font>
But rest assured, if/when you get the PROM tuned perfectly to your combo, the engine will run clean enough to keep you from losing sleep over all of those poor trees......
------------------
1987 GTA L98 MD8
355, TFS Heads, LT4 Hot Cam
My GTA
The Minnesota F-body Club
Matt87GTA is right-on with what he said in his reply. when you say healthy, i asume that means you included a bigger cam along with whatever else you did? at idle and without a cat, the hydrocarbons are killing more of your brain cells than good green bud will. if your more stock, then it"s o.k. but on a stock setup, you need a small amount of backpressure for peak low-end performance so gutting the cat was a bad idea
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
From: Hayward, CA
Car: 91 camaro
Engine: 383
Transmission: T56
Birds are falling out of the sky because of me!
Ahh, the guilt!! I only gutted the cat because it was clogged and making a bunch of ratteling noises. And I just don't have the cash to spring for a new high-flow converter right now. As for the EGR, I couldn't figure out how to make it work with vette heads and my Edelbrock TES. And the smog pump, well, it was in the way. I had Ed at Fastchip burn me a PROM for my combo. About the cat, since I deleted the air pump, I've heard that the converter will get clogged easier since I don't have that air going to it. Is this true?
------------------
91 Z28
Come see The Vicious...
Ahh, the guilt!! I only gutted the cat because it was clogged and making a bunch of ratteling noises. And I just don't have the cash to spring for a new high-flow converter right now. As for the EGR, I couldn't figure out how to make it work with vette heads and my Edelbrock TES. And the smog pump, well, it was in the way. I had Ed at Fastchip burn me a PROM for my combo. About the cat, since I deleted the air pump, I've heard that the converter will get clogged easier since I don't have that air going to it. Is this true?------------------
91 Z28
Come see The Vicious...
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: The State of Hockey
Car: 1987 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Miniram'd 383, 24X LS1 PCM
Transmission: TH700R4, 4200 stall
Axle/Gears: 9", 4.33:1
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by ViciousZ:
Birds are falling out of the sky because of me!
Ahh, the guilt!!</font>
Birds are falling out of the sky because of me!
Ahh, the guilt!!</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">I only gutted the cat because it was clogged and making a bunch of ratteling noises.</font>
I believe you.............. 
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">About the cat, since I deleted the air pump, I've heard that the converter will get clogged easier since I don't have that air going to it. Is this true?</font>
The factory style catalytic converter is a three chamber design. It has an initial chamber of catalyst material that aids in the burning of the excess hydrocarbons (fuel) and lowering of NOx emissions. Then it has a middle chamber where it receives the fresh air from the A.I.R pump. This chamber basically dilutes the exhaust and allows the final chamber to be much mre effective at finishing off the 'cleaning' of the emissions. That last chamber has a slightly different type of catalyst material in it that is more sensitive to being overloaded with hydrocarbons, but is more effective at burning them and lowering NOx emissions. So the overall system is designed to do the best job possible at getting 'clean' emissions.
So removing the fresh air from the equation could cause the catalytic converter to fail since it is being slightly overloaded with hydrocarbons compared to what it was designed to handle. But if the engine is running well, it should not ruin the converter just by removing the A.I.R system. The problems with the catalytic converter breaking up and melting would be when/if some sort of excessively rich mixture condition was present that completely overwhelmed the abilities of the converter to do it's job and pushes it to the point that it overheats, melts, and eventually clogs up with it's own internals. So it is true that removing the A.I.R pump (basically the pump is the entire system...) can cause the catalytic converter fail prematurely - but it is likely not going to directly cause the failure...
Now, for those of you that followed all of that information well, I have this to point out. GM never got our cars to run 'clean'. They slapped a band aid on the cars in the form of the A.I.R system. This system basically 'dilutes' the emissions of our cars and makes it seem like they are running 'cleaner' than they really are. The cost in all of this band aid slapping: power. This system of pumping air into the exhaust is all powered by the engine in the first place, costing power and therefore requiring us to use more rpm and fuel to get what we want for performance, at any given time, from our cars.... So did the 'emissions equipment' really lower the emissions of our cars? I say no...... not that it really matters anymore... just funstuff to think about....
Hope that helps a bit,
Laterzzzzz
------------------
1987 GTA L98 MD8
355, TFS Heads, LT4 Hot Cam
My GTA
The Minnesota F-body Club
[This message has been edited by Matt87GTA (edited November 05, 2001).]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Mar 5, 2017 06:37 PM





