16 MPG City | 12 MPG Highway ???
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 923
Likes: 2
From: Bakersfield, CA
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: ProBuilt 700r4
Axle/Gears: G92 3.23
16 MPG City | 12 MPG Highway ???
16 MPG City | 12 MPG Highway ???
this is strange, i get a constant mpg of 16 in the city, i took it on a road trip where i did 80-90mph the whole way and filled my tank up and did the math and it comes to 12 mpg on the highway..... why would my mpg drop for highway driving, i dont get it
this is strange, i get a constant mpg of 16 in the city, i took it on a road trip where i did 80-90mph the whole way and filled my tank up and did the math and it comes to 12 mpg on the highway..... why would my mpg drop for highway driving, i dont get it
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
That's not highway driving, that's speeding.
The drop in economy with increase in speed is not linear.
The drop in economy with increase in speed is not linear.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Near Milwaukee, WI
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 383 Fuel Injected
Transmission: Pro-Street 700-R4 by Pro-built
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt w/posi
The power required to move a mass is proportional to velocity to the 3rd power, so it takes alot more power to go a little faster.
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 923
Likes: 2
From: Bakersfield, CA
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 383 SuperRam
Transmission: ProBuilt 700r4
Axle/Gears: G92 3.23
so for the weight of the car, it would be more efficient at a lower speed, lighter cars would be more effecient at a higher speed, that makes sense, so what would be a good speed to keep for the best effeceincy?
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,004
Likes: 4
From: Yellowknife, NWT, Canada
Car: 84 Z28
Engine: 357
Transmission: TH-350C
Axle/Gears: 3.43
speed limit...
Your lucky, you more than double my gas milage in town and i would really hate to see what mine would do cruising highways.
Your lucky, you more than double my gas milage in town and i would really hate to see what mine would do cruising highways.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Near Milwaukee, WI
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 383 Fuel Injected
Transmission: Pro-Street 700-R4 by Pro-built
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt w/posi
The mass of the car does not come into play when you are cruising at a constant velocity, it is all about aerodynamics. Assuming a constant drag coefficient, lets pretend your car takes 25 horsepower to cruise at 50 mph, it would then take 84 horsepower to go 75 mph, and it would take 200 hp to go 100 mph. You see the idea, it is not at all linear, it is a cubic relationship.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Near Milwaukee, WI
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 383 Fuel Injected
Transmission: Pro-Street 700-R4 by Pro-built
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt w/posi
That is why the EPA tests highway gas mileage for cars using aerodynamic drag model assuming the car is only going 65 mph, that is why no one gets the gas mileage that the epa says their car is supposed to get, cause everyone speeds, even a little bit.
Last edited by pellmanm; Sep 30, 2005 at 10:31 PM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by QuickStyle
so for the weight of the car, it would be more efficient at a lower speed, lighter cars would be more effecient at a higher speed, that makes sense, so what would be a good speed to keep for the best effeceincy?
so for the weight of the car, it would be more efficient at a lower speed, lighter cars would be more effecient at a higher speed, that makes sense, so what would be a good speed to keep for the best effeceincy?
you go faster your make for a lot more drag
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by pellmanm
That is why the EPA tests highway gas mileage for cars using aerodynamic drag model assuming the car is only going 65 mph, that is why no one gets the gas mileage that the epa says their car is supposed to get, cause everyone speeds, even a little bit.
That is why the EPA tests highway gas mileage for cars using aerodynamic drag model assuming the car is only going 65 mph, that is why no one gets the gas mileage that the epa says their car is supposed to get, cause everyone speeds, even a little bit.
but there are times that you get better then what the EPA says you get also
I have quite a few times have gotten more then what the EPA says and generally in my mazda it was those times I was traveling at speeds faster then 65mph
my honda which is a higher mileage car was rated at 25/35 and yet I have gotten an AVG of 38mpg quite a few times doing a mix of about 40%city and the rest hwy
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Near Milwaukee, WI
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 383 Fuel Injected
Transmission: Pro-Street 700-R4 by Pro-built
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt w/posi
That is true, but generally consumer reports don't report what the epa does, but that is besides the point, the point is the slower you go, it takes relatively much less power. By relatively i mean if you are driving a semi or a ferrari.
P~v^3
P~v^3
Last edited by pellmanm; Oct 1, 2005 at 12:12 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by pellmanm
That is true, but generally consumer reports don't report what the epa does, but that is besides the point, the point is the slower you go, it takes relatively much less power. By relatively i mean if you are driving a semi or a ferrari.
P~v^3
That is true, but generally consumer reports don't report what the epa does, but that is besides the point, the point is the slower you go, it takes relatively much less power. By relatively i mean if you are driving a semi or a ferrari.
P~v^3
but will say the difference between a between speeds using a ferrarri vs a semi the difference is going to be much larger with that semi
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Topeka, Kansas
Car: 82 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Plus, the way you drive in general helps. If you stay at a steady. consistent speed, instead of slowing down, then speeding back up or generally letting your MPH change by more than a couple either way, you'll get much better fuel economy.
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 43,187
Likes: 42
From: Littleton, CO USA
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: L92/LQ4 (both w/4" stroke)
Transmission: 4L80E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Weight certainly is a factor in cruise economy if you're going up & down hills.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
May 28, 2019 01:47 PM






