How much cam is too much cam?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: forged 357
Transmission: 700r4, 2200-2400 stall, vette servo
Axle/Gears: stock pegleg 2.73 drum (temp)
How much cam is too much cam?
roller 350 bored 040 over
forged crank, rods, pistons
Comp XE 233/239, .569/.577, 112
vortec heads, suited to match the cam
approximately 9.3:1 compression ratio
not a daily driver, but definitely one that I'd like to be ABLE to drive, ya know? Not go on trips or anything, but at least be able to get around for a bit.
what are your thoughts? concerns? opinions? suggestions?
forged crank, rods, pistons
Comp XE 233/239, .569/.577, 112
vortec heads, suited to match the cam
approximately 9.3:1 compression ratio
not a daily driver, but definitely one that I'd like to be ABLE to drive, ya know? Not go on trips or anything, but at least be able to get around for a bit.
what are your thoughts? concerns? opinions? suggestions?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
too much lift for the heads, they don't flow as much at .550 as they do at .500, try a XE274 if you want better driveability
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: forged 357
Transmission: 700r4, 2200-2400 stall, vette servo
Axle/Gears: stock pegleg 2.73 drum (temp)
Originally Posted by xpndbl3
too much lift for the heads, they don't flow as much at .550 as they do at .500, try a XE274 if you want better driveability
but why is it too much lift?
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
If you are porting your heads, you won't know how much is too much until they are done.
For the above, it's too much because the heads don't flow as well above .550 as they do at .500" so it's basically choking down at and towards peak cam lift.
For the above, it's too much because the heads don't flow as well above .550 as they do at .500" so it's basically choking down at and towards peak cam lift.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: forged 357
Transmission: 700r4, 2200-2400 stall, vette servo
Axle/Gears: stock pegleg 2.73 drum (temp)
Originally Posted by Stekman
If you are porting your heads, you won't know how much is too much until they are done.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,995
Likes: 0
From: Toledo, OH
Car: 1992 Firebird
Engine: forged 357
Transmission: 700r4, 2200-2400 stall, vette servo
Axle/Gears: stock pegleg 2.73 drum (temp)
Originally Posted by madmax
It'll be fine on the street.
Why such low compression?
Why such low compression?
i suppose i can mill em
Trending Topics
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,893
Likes: 2,436
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Vortec heads have 64cc chambers nominal.
Vortec heads respond VERY POORLY to home porting. About all you can do to the intake side, is just clean up whatever imperfections were left in the casting and machining processes; if the shape of the port is altered significanlty, it almost always hurts flow. Anything beyond casting flash removal and smoothing the steps from seat machining, is a step backwards. The exhaust side is a different matter, it's just like any other stock exhaust port, and can be worked up the same as others. But not the intake. I wouldn't bet on gaining much on top of their stock flow, unless you have a flow bench and work in small steps and check after each step, and have a stack of cores so that when you go backwards, you can throw it away and start over.
If your CR is really 9.3:1, that's too much cam. It will be sort of gutless at low RPMs. You'll need ALOT of converter to get it to launch hard. I'd make real sure to get an accurate calculation of that; AFTER head work if it modifies the chamber, and include the head gasket, and BE SURE to include the ACTUAL deck clearance. Remember, virtually all stock or near-stock pistons, ADD .025" or so of deck clearance to the .025" that's already there from the factory. That's .050" total. Which is a MASSIVE error, if you leave it out; over 10cc in that space.
As far as the head flow being less at higher lifts, the valve will spend VERY VERY LITTLE time anywhere near peak lift. If you have a real steep tall ramp on the cam, then the other 95% of the time, you'll gain flow from the larger opening. I wouldn't be so concerned about the cam's valve lift slightly exceeding the heads' "port stall" lift.
Vortec heads respond VERY POORLY to home porting. About all you can do to the intake side, is just clean up whatever imperfections were left in the casting and machining processes; if the shape of the port is altered significanlty, it almost always hurts flow. Anything beyond casting flash removal and smoothing the steps from seat machining, is a step backwards. The exhaust side is a different matter, it's just like any other stock exhaust port, and can be worked up the same as others. But not the intake. I wouldn't bet on gaining much on top of their stock flow, unless you have a flow bench and work in small steps and check after each step, and have a stack of cores so that when you go backwards, you can throw it away and start over.
If your CR is really 9.3:1, that's too much cam. It will be sort of gutless at low RPMs. You'll need ALOT of converter to get it to launch hard. I'd make real sure to get an accurate calculation of that; AFTER head work if it modifies the chamber, and include the head gasket, and BE SURE to include the ACTUAL deck clearance. Remember, virtually all stock or near-stock pistons, ADD .025" or so of deck clearance to the .025" that's already there from the factory. That's .050" total. Which is a MASSIVE error, if you leave it out; over 10cc in that space.
As far as the head flow being less at higher lifts, the valve will spend VERY VERY LITTLE time anywhere near peak lift. If you have a real steep tall ramp on the cam, then the other 95% of the time, you'll gain flow from the larger opening. I wouldn't be so concerned about the cam's valve lift slightly exceeding the heads' "port stall" lift.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
induction setup? carb, FI?
xe274 is fine, but you want a roller cam. Perhaps look at the roller variant, xr27x (I forget...).
That cam would idle just sub 1000RPM I'd think, but your CR should be up a bit, do calculate it very accurately, as sofa mentioned.
xe274 is fine, but you want a roller cam. Perhaps look at the roller variant, xr27x (I forget...).
That cam would idle just sub 1000RPM I'd think, but your CR should be up a bit, do calculate it very accurately, as sofa mentioned.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







