Over 10 on 1 Cylinder?!
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Car: 1987 Chevy Stepside
Engine: 350 TBI w/ a Cam
Transmission: 3 Speed Stick w/ granny low
Over 10 on 1 Cylinder?!
So I have a 350 sitting waiting to go into my camaro... The problem is that when i had themachine work redone the machinist told me one cylinder was too rusted to just hone so he suggested boring the 1 cylinder over 10. I said no that rediculous do them all or do none but my father insisted on letting him do it.
What I am want to know is, is this engine a big paper weight now?
Can the engine be balanced with 1 cylinder 10 over?
And if its alright to drive like that would beating on it make a difference?
What I am want to know is, is this engine a big paper weight now?
Can the engine be balanced with 1 cylinder 10 over?
And if its alright to drive like that would beating on it make a difference?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Car: 1987 Chevy Stepside
Engine: 350 TBI w/ a Cam
Transmission: 3 Speed Stick w/ granny low
Noone? I thought this would be a simple "theres no problem with that" or "thats ****ed up" question.
Senior Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
From: Northern California, Redding
Car: Red 1987 IROC Convertible
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.45
That is a common practice on 2-cycle outboard boat motors (that melt pistons every once in a while) but I've never heard of doing it on a car engine.
I would think that it will be fine, just kind of a strange approach. Are you re-using 7 of the old pistons? If so, then ok, you maybe saved a few bucks on parts. Still it sounds kind of back-woods to me.
I would think that it will be fine, just kind of a strange approach. Are you re-using 7 of the old pistons? If so, then ok, you maybe saved a few bucks on parts. Still it sounds kind of back-woods to me.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Point Pleasant, NJ
Car: 1987 Chevy Stepside
Engine: 350 TBI w/ a Cam
Transmission: 3 Speed Stick w/ granny low
Yeah I think its really stupid and just off... If one cylinder is .040 over I think I might just have him do the other 7.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
it should be fine with one cylinder .010 over the rest. Are you planning on balancing the motor? Race type motor or street? how much you putting into the motor total? $? I think you'll be ok, unless you're doing a high buck race motor, then you want it all the same...
I've torn down high-mile engines that have had ONE +.010 piston, or less than a full complement. That's a cheap and dirty way to repair an engine, but it works. If balance is not much of a consideration, or even if it is, it can be done. For the cost of a full set of pistons, and the minimal cost savings of boring only one cylinder, it may not be worth it.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
I totally agree with vader. I was always wondered if that could be done (never did it though), but I was afraid of balance issues. The way I looked at it, you have one cylinder that's SLIGHTLY more displacement than the rest, and I was always worried about putting more load on just one area of the crankshaft.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








