cam confusion
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: rapid city S.D.
Car: 92 camaro
Engine: lo3 v8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt posi 4.10
cam confusion
OK I have a 406 10.5/1 sbc. I am using desktop dyno 2003 to help find the perfect grind. According to the symulator to build the best torque curve it wants me to run 260/292 seat to seat duration. I am wondering how a cam with such a big difference in duration will run out.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: cam confusion
That depends on your cylinder heads. You must have what.. vortecs or something? Something with really bad exhaust flow?
That's strange it specs out a seat to seat duration as a recommendation... Especially a 260 intake seat to seat, that's going to build INSANELY high cylinder pressure. That going to be for use in a truck or something with low RPM usage?
I can't help but disagree with your findings there...
That's strange it specs out a seat to seat duration as a recommendation... Especially a 260 intake seat to seat, that's going to build INSANELY high cylinder pressure. That going to be for use in a truck or something with low RPM usage?
I can't help but disagree with your findings there...
On Probation
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: cam confusion
I'm less surprised. Yes, the big block chev is a different engine entirely, but consider that GM's performance parts cams for it changed from a 224/224 duration-at-fifty to 211/230 duration, still at fifty, and increased torque from idle on up, and still made the same peak HP at the same RPM.
The cam specs you posted are more extreme, and I'd bet every cam company you call will suggest a bit less of a difference between intake and exhaust. Using COMP's hyd. roller XE street lobes, I'd say a 258/276 or 264/282 would give you a streetable compromise between your old DD program and conventional grinds. For such a small intake lobe, stay under 10:1 with aluminum heads for pump premium gas.
The cam specs you posted are more extreme, and I'd bet every cam company you call will suggest a bit less of a difference between intake and exhaust. Using COMP's hyd. roller XE street lobes, I'd say a 258/276 or 264/282 would give you a streetable compromise between your old DD program and conventional grinds. For such a small intake lobe, stay under 10:1 with aluminum heads for pump premium gas.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
Re: cam confusion
Atilla, did you misread? We are talking about an SBC engine eh? Unless you're making a comparison to a BB?
I think with 260 seat duration he'd be looking at about what... 210 @.050"? At the very max? Talking hyd flat tappet here... With a 10.5:1 engine, that'll be a little too much cyl pressure IMHO.
Hey, main question that hasn't been asked yet - what operating RPM are you shooting for here? Or better yet, what cylinder heads? AND, what HP you going for?
I think with 260 seat duration he'd be looking at about what... 210 @.050"? At the very max? Talking hyd flat tappet here... With a 10.5:1 engine, that'll be a little too much cyl pressure IMHO.
Hey, main question that hasn't been asked yet - what operating RPM are you shooting for here? Or better yet, what cylinder heads? AND, what HP you going for?
Supreme Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 5
From: Pitman, NJ
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Re: cam confusion
OK I have a 406 10.5/1 sbc. I am using desktop dyno 2003 to help find the perfect grind. According to the symulator to build the best torque curve it wants me to run 260/292 seat to seat duration. I am wondering how a cam with such a big difference in duration will run out.
I just gave you the best advice you'll ever get when it comes to cams.
...But seriously, you won't regret it.
On Probation
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: cam confusion
those 2 BBCs, the 454 and the 502, are the only engine I could think of that (1) everyone can look up easily, and (2) has such a large difference in the lobes.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: rapid city S.D.
Car: 92 camaro
Engine: lo3 v8
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt posi 4.10
Re: cam confusion
Well here's my plan, 500hp/500tq. I am using pro comp 210cc heads, I know there not the greatest but they are affordable. I have trw forged slugs 10.5/1 on a zero deck. My block is fresh though no work at all. So compression isn't locked in yet. Im planning on using a tpi setup. So that in its self will keep my r's down around 5000 maybe 5500. The engine is going in a 92 rs, street drivin.
Trending Topics
On Probation
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: cam confusion
Save yourself some hassle and get a baseline with an off-the-shelf cam. The zz4 cam in the FastBurn 385-horse crate engine from GM gives 385 HP at 5600 rpm, and those heads are 210cc like yours. I have this cam, bought it new from SDPC, never used it, you can have it for $50 plus shipping.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




