Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

engine balancing question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2009 | 09:04 PM
  #1  
louflemm's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
engine balancing question

i just bought a eagle crankshaft its balanced. this one kid keeps telling me i absolutely have to get the crank balanced to my pistons rods wrist pin exe.

i dont understand this cause if all the pistons weigh the same, and the crank itself is balanced then why would i have to get the pistons balanced to the crank. this guy says the bobweight couterbalanced the piston rods exe.

on the other hand my father is telling me itl be alright. he has built engines in the past and his take on things is what i said if all the pistons weigh the same and the crank is balanced it will run right.

i could understand this in pure drag racing with blueprinting your engine but this is a street car occassional drag racing.

so my question is is this abosolutely necessery.
Reply
Old May 31, 2009 | 09:27 PM
  #2  
impaled's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 504
Likes: 1
Car: 1985 Camaro and 1996 Mustang GT
Engine: 350 4bbl/281
Transmission: 700R4/4R70W
Axle/Gears: 9" rear/8.8" 4.10
Re: engine balancing question

it should make as much as of an effect unless you are spinning 6000+ RPM, but.

i am also in question to this in some degree.

subscribed.
Reply
Old May 31, 2009 | 10:03 PM
  #3  
UNCLE TOM's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,403
Likes: 4
From: ms. gulf coast
Car: 91 R/S , 89 dodge p/u
Engine: L31 GM crate re-cammed , 318
Transmission: T-5 , 4 speed auto
Axle/Gears: 3.42 , ?
Re: engine balancing question

listen to your dad . you should be fine . if still in doubt send eng. to me .
i will then put it in my 91r/s and run it as a daily driver . in 2 or 3 years i should be able give you a good honest result . such a deal , how could you refuse ??? oh well , just a small joke . you will be o.k. , good luck .
Reply
Old May 31, 2009 | 11:22 PM
  #4  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: engine balancing question

Every time you mix and match rotating assembly parts, it should be balanced.

Your crankshaft isn't balanced. You either have an internally or externally balanced crankshaft. That just determines where the balance weights are located.

The weight of the rotating assembly determines where weight is added or removed from the counterweights to balance the engine. The weight of the rod, rod bolts/nuts, piston, wrist pin, rings, rod bearing are all taken into affect.

The weight of each item is not the same. You may buy new pistons and they'll all be the same weight or very close to it but the wrist pins also need to be the same weight. If they're not, it's easier to adjust the weight on the pistons to match a piston to a wrist pin. The rods will have different big and small end weights. These are adjusted to be all the same.

Once all the components are adjusted to weigh the same, the total weight is then added to bob weights on the crankshaft and the crankshaft balance is adjusted for that weight. It doesn't matter if it's an internally or externally balanced crank, using non factory parts means the rotating assembly should be balanced.

You can throw it together like it is but you're investing a lot of money to take a chance there won't be a vibration. A few grams imbalance will translate to pounds at higher rpms.
Reply
Old May 31, 2009 | 11:47 PM
  #5  
BASSETT IROC 85's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Heart of Dixie
Car: 1987 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 inch 342
Re: engine balancing question

you are right if all the pistons, rods, and pins weight the same you should be ok. The problem is their is only two ways to know for sure. One have it balanced. Two put it together and try. Now having said that, I have ballanced several engines and I have seen pistons that were very close, rods very close, all not needing any material removed to balance. I have seen almost as many pistons that the weight was all over the place requiring weight removal. The crank is another story. When Eagle are any one else sells you a crank they can't balance it properly because they have no way of knowing what pistons, rods, or engine size the crank is being used.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 04:22 AM
  #6  
Quick_Trans_Am's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: Northwestern Pennsylvania
Car: 1985 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 with stuffs.
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.10 Posi
Re: engine balancing question

Originally Posted by Stephen 87 IROC
Every time you mix and match rotating assembly parts, it should be balanced.

Your crankshaft isn't balanced. You either have an internally or externally balanced crankshaft. That just determines where the balance weights are located.

The weight of the rotating assembly determines where weight is added or removed from the counterweights to balance the engine. The weight of the rod, rod bolts/nuts, piston, wrist pin, rings, rod bearing are all taken into affect.

The weight of each item is not the same. You may buy new pistons and they'll all be the same weight or very close to it but the wrist pins also need to be the same weight. If they're not, it's easier to adjust the weight on the pistons to match a piston to a wrist pin. The rods will have different big and small end weights. These are adjusted to be all the same.

Once all the components are adjusted to weigh the same, the total weight is then added to bob weights on the crankshaft and the crankshaft balance is adjusted for that weight. It doesn't matter if it's an internally or externally balanced crank, using non factory parts means the rotating assembly should be balanced.

You can throw it together like it is but you're investing a lot of money to take a chance there won't be a vibration. A few grams imbalance will translate to pounds at higher rpms.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 09:45 AM
  #7  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: engine balancing question

Those cranks come pre-balanced to something like 1800 grams of bobweight, but if your rods and pistons work out to be like a 1900 or 1700 gram bobweight, and you don't re-balance, you'll destroy the engine very quickly.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #8  
AlkyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 17,264
Likes: 168
From: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: engine balancing question

Wow. I wish my BBC bob weight was that light. I use lightweight pistons but they still have a huge dome and I use H beam rods. I dug out my balance sheet. My bob weight is 2333.4 grams.

The pistons with wrist pins are 805.6 each. Times 2 per throw and and that's 1611.2 just for the pistons and wrist pins. The rest of the weight is from the rods, rings etc.

My balance sheet shows the crank was spun up 10 times before it was perfectly balanced. The 9th time, it was still 3 gm out on the right plane. On the first spin, it was out 89 gm on the left plane and 42.8 on the right. I know it had some heavy mallory slugs added to help correct the balance to offset for the lightweight pistons.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2009 | 09:18 AM
  #9  
Atilla the Fun's Avatar
On Probation
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: engine balancing question

I'm not sure that 1800 is the right number for the OP's crank, but it served to illustrate the point.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
italiano67
Tech / General Engine
8
Dec 11, 2016 09:21 AM
InfinityShade
Transmissions and Drivetrain
15
Aug 22, 2015 08:00 PM
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
Aug 16, 2015 11:40 PM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM
cRoe4
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
Aug 7, 2015 08:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.