does this combo look ok
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Beaufort, SC
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
does this combo look ok
been busting my a$$ to build this thing, and just thought i would get some info from more experienced fuel injection guys on whay they think of this setup, and whether or not it will play nice together. its in a 89 trans am gta 350 with auto.
<LI class=pdetail>Cam and Lifters, Hydraulic Flat Tappet, Advertised Duration 268/278, Lift .420/.442, Chevy, Small Block, Kit <LI class=pdetail>Hedman Hedders 68460 headers, Street, Full-Length, Steel, Painted, Chevy, Pontiac, Camaro, Firebird, 1982-92, 5.0, 5.7L
<LI class=pdetail>Cylinder Heads, Aluminum, Assembled, 64cc Chamber, 200cc Intake Runner, <LI class=pdetail>Intake Manifold, Stealth Ram EFI, Aluminum, Natural, Multi-Port, C<LI class=pdetail>Throttle Body, Twin 58mm<LI class=pdetail>Rocker Arms, Stud Mount, Full Roller, Aluminum, 1.6 Ratio<LI class=pdetail>also used .015 head gaskets to raise compress<LI class=pdetail>used holley fuel rail with afpr<LI class=pdetail>stock bottom end
after looking some more, the heads can handle way more cam, but not sure if i want to do it. what do you guys think, is setup good as is, or does the cam seem to small for the rest of the build. what crank hp #'s would you predict with this, and what do you think i could gain with the larger cam, heads will hold all the way to .6 lift. this car is not my daily driver, and actually sees very little street time, it is being built as an all around race car to be able to autox, drag, and road endurance race. any input is greatly appreciated.
<LI class=pdetail>Cam and Lifters, Hydraulic Flat Tappet, Advertised Duration 268/278, Lift .420/.442, Chevy, Small Block, Kit <LI class=pdetail>Hedman Hedders 68460 headers, Street, Full-Length, Steel, Painted, Chevy, Pontiac, Camaro, Firebird, 1982-92, 5.0, 5.7L
<LI class=pdetail>Cylinder Heads, Aluminum, Assembled, 64cc Chamber, 200cc Intake Runner, <LI class=pdetail>Intake Manifold, Stealth Ram EFI, Aluminum, Natural, Multi-Port, C<LI class=pdetail>Throttle Body, Twin 58mm<LI class=pdetail>Rocker Arms, Stud Mount, Full Roller, Aluminum, 1.6 Ratio<LI class=pdetail>also used .015 head gaskets to raise compress<LI class=pdetail>used holley fuel rail with afpr<LI class=pdetail>stock bottom end
after looking some more, the heads can handle way more cam, but not sure if i want to do it. what do you guys think, is setup good as is, or does the cam seem to small for the rest of the build. what crank hp #'s would you predict with this, and what do you think i could gain with the larger cam, heads will hold all the way to .6 lift. this car is not my daily driver, and actually sees very little street time, it is being built as an all around race car to be able to autox, drag, and road endurance race. any input is greatly appreciated.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: does this combo look ok
Might want to redo your links so they can be read.
Is the block a roller cam block?
Is the block a roller cam block?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Beaufort, SC
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: does this combo look ok
yes, but i converted to hydraulic flat tappet, budget mandated. but i saved the stuff i took off so i could convert back if could ever afford a roller cam.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,736
Likes: 14
From: Not in Kansas anymore
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: 383 SP EFI/ 4150 TB
Transmission: T400
Axle/Gears: QP 9" 3.73
Re: does this combo look ok
Your cam choice will do nothing to help the HSR breath given it will spin over 6K with the right combo.Even with the 1.6's rockers you only have .470 lift.
Could have put a ZZ4 roller cam in there; .470 / .510 (w/ 1.5's ) that would work better and reuse your old lifters.
Brand new take outs always on eBay for less than $140
The money wasted on the unneeded 58mm TB would be better spent on a roller cam .You have good heads , good intake but no cam to work with them
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Beaufort, SC
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: does this combo look ok
well i saved all the stuff to switch it back so no big deal. i thought that cam might be a little small for the setup, so i picked up 1.6 ratio rockers. guess that ain't enough. i will try and find a used roller cam and put that in instead.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Beaufort, SC
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: does this combo look ok
how bout with a cam like this?
Cam Style
Hydraulic flat tappetBasic Operating RPM Range
2,200-5,700Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift
224Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift
234Duration at 050 inch Lift
224 int./234 exh.Advertised Intake Duration
282Advertised Exhaust Duration
292Advertised Duration
282 int./292 exh.Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.465 in.Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.488 in.Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.465 int./0.488 exh. liftLobe Separation (degrees)
114Intake Valve Lash
0.000 in.Exhaust Valve Lash
0.000 in.
or would this be better?
Cam Style
Hydraulic flat tappetBasic Operating RPM Range
4,000-7,200Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift
254Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift
264Duration at 050 inch Lift
254 int./264 exh.Advertised Intake Duration
312Advertised Exhaust Duration
322Advertised Duration
312 int./322 exh.Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.533 in.Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.555 in.Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.533 int./0.555 exh. liftLobe Separation (degrees)
114Intake Valve Lash
0.000 in.Exhaust Valve Lash
0.000 in.
is that in the right area
Cam Style
Hydraulic flat tappetBasic Operating RPM Range
2,200-5,700Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift
224Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift
234Duration at 050 inch Lift
224 int./234 exh.Advertised Intake Duration
282Advertised Exhaust Duration
292Advertised Duration
282 int./292 exh.Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.465 in.Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.488 in.Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.465 int./0.488 exh. liftLobe Separation (degrees)
114Intake Valve Lash
0.000 in.Exhaust Valve Lash
0.000 in.
or would this be better?
Cam Style
Hydraulic flat tappetBasic Operating RPM Range
4,000-7,200Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift
254Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift
264Duration at 050 inch Lift
254 int./264 exh.Advertised Intake Duration
312Advertised Exhaust Duration
322Advertised Duration
312 int./322 exh.Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.533 in.Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.555 in.Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.533 int./0.555 exh. liftLobe Separation (degrees)
114Intake Valve Lash
0.000 in.Exhaust Valve Lash
0.000 in.
is that in the right area
On Probation
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,319
Likes: 19
From: Northern Utah
Car: seeking '90.5-'92 'bird hardtop
Engine: several
Transmission: none
Axle/Gears: none
Re: does this combo look ok
how bout with a cam like this?
Cam Style
Hydraulic flat tappetBasic Operating RPM Range
2,200-5,700Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift
224Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift
234Duration at 050 inch Lift
224 int./234 exh.Advertised Intake Duration
282Advertised Exhaust Duration
292Advertised Duration
282 int./292 exh.Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.465 in.Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.488 in.Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.465 int./0.488 exh. liftLobe Separation (degrees)
114Intake Valve Lash
0.000 in.Exhaust Valve Lash
0.000 in.
or would this be better?
Cam Style
Hydraulic flat tappetBasic Operating RPM Range
4,000-7,200Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift
254Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift
264Duration at 050 inch Lift
254 int./264 exh.Advertised Intake Duration
312Advertised Exhaust Duration
322Advertised Duration
312 int./322 exh.Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.533 in.Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.555 in.Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.533 int./0.555 exh. liftLobe Separation (degrees)
114Intake Valve Lash
0.000 in.Exhaust Valve Lash
0.000 in.
is that in the right area
Cam Style
Hydraulic flat tappetBasic Operating RPM Range
2,200-5,700Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift
224Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift
234Duration at 050 inch Lift
224 int./234 exh.Advertised Intake Duration
282Advertised Exhaust Duration
292Advertised Duration
282 int./292 exh.Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.465 in.Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.488 in.Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.465 int./0.488 exh. liftLobe Separation (degrees)
114Intake Valve Lash
0.000 in.Exhaust Valve Lash
0.000 in.
or would this be better?
Cam Style
Hydraulic flat tappetBasic Operating RPM Range
4,000-7,200Intake Duration at 050 inch Lift
254Exhaust Duration at 050 inch Lift
264Duration at 050 inch Lift
254 int./264 exh.Advertised Intake Duration
312Advertised Exhaust Duration
322Advertised Duration
312 int./322 exh.Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.533 in.Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.555 in.Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio
0.533 int./0.555 exh. liftLobe Separation (degrees)
114Intake Valve Lash
0.000 in.Exhaust Valve Lash
0.000 in.
is that in the right area
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Beaufort, SC
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: does this combo look ok
yea, but i want it to be more of a topend motor. this isn't a dd that much, i really just want a fast race car. i think i am gonna try a zz4. hopefully that will do what i want.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
roysatikas
Transmissions and Drivetrain
0
Sep 22, 2015 08:15 PM






