Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

how exactly does a 92 have more HP..

Old Jan 27, 2002 | 12:47 AM
  #1  
breathment's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 1
From: Bedford, Tx
how exactly does a 92 have more HP..

ok.

88 GTA----
230@4400 HP
330@3200 TQ

89-----
240@4400 HP
345@3200 TQ

what makes the jump? i know that some 89+ had dual cats. but does that really cause that much of a power gain? if so then wouldn't just gutting a single cat do that for u?? and headers and y-pipe bringing me above that??
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2002 | 03:28 AM
  #2  
Zepher's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Ya, dual cats = less restriction.
Gutting yours should do the same. Headers and full exhaust will help as well.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2002 | 10:52 AM
  #3  
GreenProStreet's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Dual cats were only available as an option and 1LE packages, I thought. I am thinking it was a better cam; check the specs.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2002 | 02:43 PM
  #4  
87transam5.7tpi's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 0
From: Nebraska
ya the 89's had a better cam.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2002 | 03:23 PM
  #5  
blue91rs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: albany area. NY
They upgraded from the MAF sensor to speed density type sensor. Thats what made the jump in hp + torque, plus probably better PROM programing.

Last edited by blue91rs; Jan 27, 2002 at 03:31 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2002 | 03:27 PM
  #6  
blue91rs's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: albany area. NY
opps, me wetarted... I thought you were asking the diff. between an 88 and a 92, my mistake. Thats what I get for not reading the post....
Yeah, I think they had a cam change.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 07:04 AM
  #7  
TransamGTA350's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 322
From: South Windsor, CT
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: ZZ6TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 3.70:1
The 88' and 89' 350's used the same cam. The 10hp difference was from the dual cat setup that was standard on the 89'. Your horsepower numbers are correct for a Camaro, but you must subtract 5hp for the firebirds due to the more restrictive intake. So it is really 225 for the 88', and 235 for the 89'.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 01:09 PM
  #8  
Nitroburn's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: RI USA
Just to show how much an exhaust can play a part in power gains (or losses), the 1970 Chevy 350 LT-1 Engine Code 'CTL' was rated at 375 HP when installed in the Covette. That exact same engine was only rated at 360 HP when intstall in the 70 1/2 Z-28. This was due to the Camero having smaller pipes coming off the exhaust manifolds (2 1/4" compared to the Vette's 2 1/2"), having more bends in the pipes (going over the rear axle on the Camero were the Vette was under the rear suspension) and last the Camero having a dual inlet/dual out muffler (the Vette of course, having two mufflers.

The way an enigne breathes makes all the difference in how it will perform. The faster you can get the exhaust the faster you can get fresh air/fuel in!!!

Later...

Mike
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 01:39 PM
  #9  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
GM also found 5 more horsepower in 1990 by changing the pistons.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 02:08 PM
  #10  
TransamGTA350's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 322
From: South Windsor, CT
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: ZZ6TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Borg Warner 3.70:1
The 5hp gain in 1990 was actually due to a few things including lighter pistons. They used hypereutectic pistons that i'm pretty sure bumed the compression up to 9.8:1, but the compression may not have changed. Someone else may know the answer to that. The other things were a revised cam profile that had a tighter lobe separation angle, and the use of a a speed density fuel management system instead of the MAF system. The only reason that helped was because of the better airflow into the throttle body since there was no MAF sensor in the way. This seems like a lot of work for 5hp, and in reality was more like 10-15, but ratings are just numbers. Ask anyone with a stock SD 350TPI and they will tell you how much better they run than any MAF car.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 02:20 PM
  #11  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
No the new pistons didnt bump up the compression, the head design was still the same, they just changed the material. (Hypereuetic, like you mentioned). I didnt think that the Speed Density TPIs actually made more horsepower than the MAFs, but then again they could be just numbers.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 04:13 PM
  #12  
breathment's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,175
Likes: 1
From: Bedford, Tx
Originally posted by TransamGTA350
The 88' and 89' 350's used the same cam. The 10hp difference was from the dual cat setup that was standard on the 89'. Your horsepower numbers are correct for a Camaro, but you must subtract 5hp for the firebirds due to the more restrictive intake. So it is really 225 for the 88', and 235 for the 89'.
or in my case add 5 HP to the T\A #'s since my intake is gutted.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2002 | 07:58 PM
  #13  
kevinc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 3
Car: 1982 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Originally posted by iroc22
No the new pistons didnt bump up the compression, the head design was still the same, they just changed the material. (Hypereuetic, like you mentioned).
I was thinking the comp ratio should have increased when the revised piston design was implemented...going from dish-tops to flat-tops using the same chamber volume should account for a decent bump you'd think.

Ah well, I got no data to check against.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2002 | 08:39 AM
  #14  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Wow, look at all the inaccuracies and misinformation in this thread!!

Hey Nitroburn, whats a Camero?? Is that like a Fireberd??

Dual cats are NOT standard on 89 cars. The single cat 89 350s are rated at 230 horsepower, with the dual cats being 240 hp. The single cat 305s are 220 horsepower and 230 with dual cats. Dual cats ARE standard on 90-92 350 cars, but still optional on 305 5-speed cars.

The 5 hp difference between 89 and 90-92 cars is the change in pistons, increasing compression from 9.3:1 to 9.7:1. This only affects 350s, the 305s remain the same, 230 hp with dual cats.

The 88 and 89 350 and 305 5-speed cars use the same cam. Its 207/213 duration, .415"/.430" lift, and 117 LSA. The 90-92 cam is 203/207, .413"/.428" lift, and 115 LSA. The speed density cars make more power with a smaller cam.

Now, gutting your stock cat may or may not improve power, but if you get caught, its a $10,000 fine and possibly jail time for tampering with your emissions equipment. Its better to spend the $100 and replace it with a good new high-flow cat, like from Car Sound. Today's catalytic converters are really good, and dont affect the power very much, 5 hp or less. You wont feel that.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
transamch
DFI and ECM
18
Jul 4, 2014 11:08 AM
MustangBeater20
Engine Swap
3
May 5, 2014 09:19 PM
87_TA
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Mar 31, 2013 04:33 PM
87_TA
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Mar 31, 2013 04:22 PM
FRMULA88
Cooling
5
Aug 27, 2012 02:47 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.