Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

gas mileage gains with an aluminum driveshaft?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 12:47 PM
  #1  
Keith5's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington NC
Car: C1500
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
gas mileage gains with an aluminum driveshaft?

Any gas mileage gains experienced with an aluminum driveshaft? Just wondering. Also what is the most anyone has increased their mileage?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 01:08 PM
  #2  
xxwarrior36xx's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: kalamazoo, Mi, USA
You gainpower to the rear wheels thats all I know of. I don't hink you get batter gas mileage I don't see how ou would anyways.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 01:10 PM
  #3  
Corry's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt SLP Torsen, 3.73 ratio
Yes and no, there will be less power sapped since that driveshaft is lighter, and takes less time to spool up, meaning less time in higer RPMS upon accelleration. Also, a little less power is required to keep it going...so yeah, maybe a little better gas milage, but in the grand scheme of things, you removed what, 20 lbs from a 3500+lbs car? It isn't going to make a huge difference, but every little bit helps, and like I said, it will help performance by accellerating faster My gas milage sucks, but then, 3.73 gears don't help with that
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 01:22 PM
  #4  
Keith5's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington NC
Car: C1500
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
You would have to gain some gas mileage. You're reducing weight on the car, and reducing rotational mass which saps the engines power even before it gets to the wheels.

It shouldn't take anypower to "keep" a driveshaft going. Objects in motion tend to stay in motion. The only gain would be upon accleration. It should also help braking some. It won't "try to stay in motion" as hard as the steel shaft would. Plus the car will weight less as a whole.

Has anyone actually noticed a gain after installing one is what I'm asking. A gain that they are sure is a result of the aluminum driveshaft because there was not another mod that went on at the same time.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 01:25 PM
  #5  
Keith5's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington NC
Car: C1500
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
I'm also know there isn't going to be a huge difference. I expect upto 1 mpg though. Just want to see how long it will take one of those to pay for itself. On my car, if it gained me 1 mpg, it would take 100,000 miles, he he.

I plan on getting one this summer too. Is the 4th gen shaft as light as the 1LE shaft?
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 08:36 PM
  #6  
Buck268's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: Troy, MI, USA
Originally posted by Keith5

It shouldn't take anypower to "keep" a driveshaft going. Objects in motion tend to stay in motion. The only gain would be upon accleration. It should also help braking some. It won't "try to stay in motion" as hard as the steel shaft would. Plus the car will weight less as a whole.
that is true - but remember, friction is still present...
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 08:48 PM
  #7  
RSaussie91's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Hey, where could I look to find an aluminum rive shaft? any sites? For a third gen, 91 RS 305 TBI
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 08:49 PM
  #8  
RSaussie91's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
I meant to say, Drive shaft. sorry.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 09:02 PM
  #9  
82camaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,860
Likes: 3
From: NE
Car: 82 camaro SC
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
The heavier spinning mass will maintain speed better going up and down even small hills--maybe mileage would be worse with the aluminum shaft? If you are worried about friction, the aluminum shaft is quite a bit bigger. I'll bet you won't see a noticeable change in mileage.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2002 | 09:09 PM
  #10  
Keith5's Avatar
Thread Starter
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
From: Wilmington NC
Car: C1500
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73
Originally posted by 82camaro
If you are worried about friction, the aluminum shaft is quite a bit bigger. I'll bet you won't see a noticeable change in mileage.
The weight of the shaft is what would cause the friction. The size would cause more air friction though.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Irocguy01
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
10
Sep 28, 2015 02:03 PM
Eric2ndGen
Transmissions and Drivetrain
0
Aug 31, 2015 12:33 AM
dbrochard
History / Originality
5
Aug 30, 2015 05:56 PM
FreeSpirit
Tech / General Engine
6
Aug 29, 2015 05:47 PM
InfinityShade
Transmissions and Drivetrain
15
Aug 22, 2015 08:00 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 AM.