Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

what does a .... run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2002, 10:40 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
what does a .... run

curious as to what a 69 camaro with a 396 runs stock in the 1/4 and what are the hp and tq stats
Old 10-13-2002, 10:45 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
psycomaross's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Laughing at rjmcgees threats
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know, but I sure would love to have one.

I wasted post 200 on this!

Last edited by psycomaross; 10-13-2002 at 10:55 PM.
Old 10-13-2002, 10:54 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
Mark A Shields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Stock would be like 14s most likely, those didn't come with the best tires back then, of course I'm sure now it could hit 13s with better tires, which I assume it has. This is just a guess, but I could be wrong.
Old 10-13-2002, 10:55 PM
  #4  
Senior Member

 
no_car_yet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: newfoundland Canada
Posts: 507
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
they weren't actually incrediably fast for their hp. they were quite heavy too, all steel, no fibacrap. well a buddy of mine has a 1967 camaro SS 350, in ORIgional condition. he raced it a couple of times and ran a 15.0-15.3. I would say a 69 with a 396 is reasonable faster though. I would say about anywhere in a 14 stock, but there aren't many stock ones left around
Old 10-13-2002, 11:26 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member
 
5.0mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually the funny thing is with all that metal, and no fiberglass the older cars were lighter (well some)! My '66 coupe weighed alot less than my '89, and the '89 had the back seat out, pass seat out, and lightweight fron runners! I would put my old car at 2800-3000 with me in it. My car was 3256 with the pass seat, and Drag Lites!
Old 10-13-2002, 11:26 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member
 
5.0mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh ya, I would say theat car should see high 13s with traction, and 14s without it!
Old 10-14-2002, 12:14 AM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
RockinIroc91's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know in 69' the 396 could be had with as much as 375hp and 400 lb of torque and with a 4 spd and a good driver could hit a mid 13 in the 1/4.
Old 10-15-2002, 07:48 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
84TAProject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are not that heavy. Id be surprised if my father's 67 camaro weighed more than my t/a, even with the big block. As for the question, hes got a 454 in his car. The 396 had low oil pressure (aka good reason to put bigger motor in). All I know is with a truck type cam, he is still able to make me look silly. My car is probably low 14 range, and he easily kills it.
Old 10-15-2002, 05:34 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: MD
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've got an issue of Camaro Performers where they had a vintage road test on a 396 SS Camaro. They got it to run 14.1@99, with traction and shifter issues.
Old 10-15-2002, 07:57 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
f-crazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
my grandpa has a 68 dz302 z28.....he ran a 14.2 with it...that thing screams!!....he shifted it at 7,500....i love that little motor

im sure you could give a ls1 a run for its money with a 396
Old 10-16-2002, 02:35 PM
  #11  
Member
 
LYV18F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Brunswick, NJ
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
good luck finding one that's stock

and willing to race you
Old 10-16-2002, 04:04 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
iroc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
L35= 396/325hp
L34= 396/350hp
L78= 396/375hp
(RPO L89 added aluminum cylinder heads on the L78; no gains stated from the factory, supposedly 20hp gain with the heads)

Since those numbers are gross hp, just minus roughly 50hp from the numbers. Big Block Camaros were about 3300lbs curb weight; so with those numbers you can make your own judgements on times
Old 10-16-2002, 04:58 PM
  #13  
Senior Member

 
CamaroFreak406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
I don't think stock the 396 would even touch a new LS1 for a few reasons. One the fact that the hp rating (as Iroc22 stated) was gross and not net so the LS1 is putting pretty much the same hp down. The second reason the technology increase is emense. The T-56 alone will wax the M-22's in the '69 Camaro.

So I'll tell you what, if you can find a stock '69 396 Camaro (Good Luck) and a stock '02 Camaro SS (w/ a stock LS1 and 6 speed) I'll take the '02 and beat you in the quarter by over a second and a half and just absolutly murder you in the turns ('69 Big Blocks couldn't handle for crap, or any Big Blocks for that matter!).

Actually I don't think the '69 camaro's where in the low 14's. I'm pretty sure the 302 was 14.8-14.9 and the 396 was somewhere about 15.0 - 15.2. Just my firstgen knowledge talking.

Later, Garrett
Old 10-16-2002, 08:58 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by iroc22
L35= 396/325hp
L34= 396/350hp
L78= 396/375hp
(RPO L89 added aluminum cylinder heads on the L78; no gains stated from the factory, supposedly 20hp gain with the heads)

Since those numbers are gross hp, just minus roughly 50hp from the numbers. Big Block Camaros were about 3300lbs curb weight; so with those numbers you can make your own judgements on times

whats the diff between gross and net hp?

one flywheel one RWHP or something?
Old 10-16-2002, 10:21 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Abel Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
Actually, I think net is at the flywheel. Gross is without alot of functions that the car has to perform taken out. It was kind of dumd to have that rating in the first place. I'm sure someone can put this better than I can.
Old 10-16-2002, 10:58 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

 
iroc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
They're both rated at the flywheel. Gross hp is taken with only a water pump; and they use open exhaust. Net ratings are with all accessories in place (no A/C compressor), manifolds (headers if stock) and full exhaust with mufflers. Basically Net hp is "as installed".
Old 10-18-2002, 06:28 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Abel Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
Am I to think you're going to race one of these monsters, Wankie?
Old 10-18-2002, 07:22 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
84TAProject's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ive raced a 67 camaro. It raped me pretty bad. Of course it has a 454 and it was from a roll. And it was my father. I told him wait till I supercharge my car. Im trying to beat him to motivate him to get a bigger cam and better heads. Of course he needs posi, so I can kill him off the line, then it comes howling by me.
Old 10-19-2002, 12:47 AM
  #19  
TGO Supporter

 
MdFormula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland; USA
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i would of thought low 14s also..
Old 10-20-2002, 02:44 AM
  #20  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Abel Kane
Am I to think you're going to race one of these monsters, Wankie?
when I get my turbo motor you can count on it if I see one
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
06-20-2017 04:04 AM
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
12-02-2016 06:33 PM
perZ
TPI
3
08-21-2015 05:51 PM
IroczFan
Carburetors
1
08-18-2015 05:19 AM
eightsixseven
Tech / General Engine
1
08-14-2015 03:09 PM



Quick Reply: what does a .... run



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 PM.