Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

what does a .... run

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 10:40 PM
  #1  
rx7speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
what does a .... run

curious as to what a 69 camaro with a 396 runs stock in the 1/4 and what are the hp and tq stats
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 10:45 PM
  #2  
psycomaross's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Laughing at rjmcgees threats
I don't know, but I sure would love to have one.

I wasted post 200 on this!

Last edited by psycomaross; Oct 13, 2002 at 10:55 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 10:54 PM
  #3  
Mark A Shields's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 1
From: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Stock would be like 14s most likely, those didn't come with the best tires back then, of course I'm sure now it could hit 13s with better tires, which I assume it has. This is just a guess, but I could be wrong.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 10:55 PM
  #4  
no_car_yet's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 507
Likes: 1
From: newfoundland Canada
they weren't actually incrediably fast for their hp. they were quite heavy too, all steel, no fibacrap. well a buddy of mine has a 1967 camaro SS 350, in ORIgional condition. he raced it a couple of times and ran a 15.0-15.3. I would say a 69 with a 396 is reasonable faster though. I would say about anywhere in a 14 stock, but there aren't many stock ones left around
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 11:26 PM
  #5  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
Actually the funny thing is with all that metal, and no fiberglass the older cars were lighter (well some)! My '66 coupe weighed alot less than my '89, and the '89 had the back seat out, pass seat out, and lightweight fron runners! I would put my old car at 2800-3000 with me in it. My car was 3256 with the pass seat, and Drag Lites!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2002 | 11:26 PM
  #6  
5.0mustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
From: Kensington, CT
Oh ya, I would say theat car should see high 13s with traction, and 14s without it!
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2002 | 12:14 AM
  #7  
RockinIroc91's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
I know in 69' the 396 could be had with as much as 375hp and 400 lb of torque and with a 4 spd and a good driver could hit a mid 13 in the 1/4.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 07:48 AM
  #8  
84TAProject's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
They are not that heavy. Id be surprised if my father's 67 camaro weighed more than my t/a, even with the big block. As for the question, hes got a 454 in his car. The 396 had low oil pressure (aka good reason to put bigger motor in). All I know is with a truck type cam, he is still able to make me look silly. My car is probably low 14 range, and he easily kills it.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 05:34 PM
  #9  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 1
From: MD
I've got an issue of Camaro Performers where they had a vintage road test on a 396 SS Camaro. They got it to run 14.1@99, with traction and shifter issues.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2002 | 07:57 PM
  #10  
f-crazy's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
my grandpa has a 68 dz302 z28.....he ran a 14.2 with it...that thing screams!!....he shifted it at 7,500....i love that little motor

im sure you could give a ls1 a run for its money with a 396
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 02:35 PM
  #11  
LYV18F's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: South Brunswick, NJ
good luck finding one that's stock

and willing to race you
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 04:04 PM
  #12  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
L35= 396/325hp
L34= 396/350hp
L78= 396/375hp
(RPO L89 added aluminum cylinder heads on the L78; no gains stated from the factory, supposedly 20hp gain with the heads)

Since those numbers are gross hp, just minus roughly 50hp from the numbers. Big Block Camaros were about 3300lbs curb weight; so with those numbers you can make your own judgements on times
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 04:58 PM
  #13  
CamaroFreak406's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 674
Likes: 2
From: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
I don't think stock the 396 would even touch a new LS1 for a few reasons. One the fact that the hp rating (as Iroc22 stated) was gross and not net so the LS1 is putting pretty much the same hp down. The second reason the technology increase is emense. The T-56 alone will wax the M-22's in the '69 Camaro.

So I'll tell you what, if you can find a stock '69 396 Camaro (Good Luck) and a stock '02 Camaro SS (w/ a stock LS1 and 6 speed) I'll take the '02 and beat you in the quarter by over a second and a half and just absolutly murder you in the turns ('69 Big Blocks couldn't handle for crap, or any Big Blocks for that matter!).

Actually I don't think the '69 camaro's where in the low 14's. I'm pretty sure the 302 was 14.8-14.9 and the 396 was somewhere about 15.0 - 15.2. Just my firstgen knowledge talking.

Later, Garrett
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 08:58 PM
  #14  
rx7speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by iroc22
L35= 396/325hp
L34= 396/350hp
L78= 396/375hp
(RPO L89 added aluminum cylinder heads on the L78; no gains stated from the factory, supposedly 20hp gain with the heads)

Since those numbers are gross hp, just minus roughly 50hp from the numbers. Big Block Camaros were about 3300lbs curb weight; so with those numbers you can make your own judgements on times

whats the diff between gross and net hp?

one flywheel one RWHP or something?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 10:21 PM
  #15  
Abel Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
Actually, I think net is at the flywheel. Gross is without alot of functions that the car has to perform taken out. It was kind of dumd to have that rating in the first place. I'm sure someone can put this better than I can.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2002 | 10:58 PM
  #16  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
They're both rated at the flywheel. Gross hp is taken with only a water pump; and they use open exhaust. Net ratings are with all accessories in place (no A/C compressor), manifolds (headers if stock) and full exhaust with mufflers. Basically Net hp is "as installed".
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2002 | 06:28 PM
  #17  
Abel Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
Am I to think you're going to race one of these monsters, Wankie?
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2002 | 07:22 PM
  #18  
84TAProject's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Ive raced a 67 camaro. It raped me pretty bad. Of course it has a 454 and it was from a roll. And it was my father. I told him wait till I supercharge my car. Im trying to beat him to motivate him to get a bigger cam and better heads. Of course he needs posi, so I can kill him off the line, then it comes howling by me.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2002 | 12:47 AM
  #19  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
i would of thought low 14s also..
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2002 | 02:44 AM
  #20  
rx7speed's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Abel Kane
Am I to think you're going to race one of these monsters, Wankie?
when I get my turbo motor you can count on it if I see one
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eightsixseven
Tech / General Engine
2
Dec 16, 2024 01:50 PM
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
Dec 2, 2016 06:33 PM
perZ
TPI
3
Aug 21, 2015 05:51 PM
IroczFan
Carburetors
1
Aug 18, 2015 05:19 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 PM.