what does a .... run
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
what does a .... run
curious as to what a 69 camaro with a 396 runs stock in the 1/4 and what are the hp and tq stats
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Someone owes me 10,000 posts
Posts: 7,164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 99 Formula
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 342
Stock would be like 14s most likely, those didn't come with the best tires back then, of course I'm sure now it could hit 13s with better tires, which I assume it has. This is just a guess, but I could be wrong.
#4
Senior Member
they weren't actually incrediably fast for their hp. they were quite heavy too, all steel, no fibacrap. well a buddy of mine has a 1967 camaro SS 350, in ORIgional condition. he raced it a couple of times and ran a 15.0-15.3. I would say a 69 with a 396 is reasonable faster though. I would say about anywhere in a 14 stock, but there aren't many stock ones left around
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Kensington, CT
Posts: 1,530
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually the funny thing is with all that metal, and no fiberglass the older cars were lighter (well some)! My '66 coupe weighed alot less than my '89, and the '89 had the back seat out, pass seat out, and lightweight fron runners! I would put my old car at 2800-3000 with me in it. My car was 3256 with the pass seat, and Drag Lites!
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They are not that heavy. Id be surprised if my father's 67 camaro weighed more than my t/a, even with the big block. As for the question, hes got a 454 in his car. The 396 had low oil pressure (aka good reason to put bigger motor in). All I know is with a truck type cam, he is still able to make me look silly. My car is probably low 14 range, and he easily kills it.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SE Michigan
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
my grandpa has a 68 dz302 z28.....he ran a 14.2 with it...that thing screams!!....he shifted it at 7,500....i love that little motor
im sure you could give a ls1 a run for its money with a 396
im sure you could give a ls1 a run for its money with a 396
#12
Supreme Member
L35= 396/325hp
L34= 396/350hp
L78= 396/375hp
(RPO L89 added aluminum cylinder heads on the L78; no gains stated from the factory, supposedly 20hp gain with the heads)
Since those numbers are gross hp, just minus roughly 50hp from the numbers. Big Block Camaros were about 3300lbs curb weight; so with those numbers you can make your own judgements on times
L34= 396/350hp
L78= 396/375hp
(RPO L89 added aluminum cylinder heads on the L78; no gains stated from the factory, supposedly 20hp gain with the heads)
Since those numbers are gross hp, just minus roughly 50hp from the numbers. Big Block Camaros were about 3300lbs curb weight; so with those numbers you can make your own judgements on times
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Stevens Point Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula
Engine: 350 firebreathing inches of Small Block Chevrolet
Transmission: A 700R4 that has trouble handling the formentioned 350.
I don't think stock the 396 would even touch a new LS1 for a few reasons. One the fact that the hp rating (as Iroc22 stated) was gross and not net so the LS1 is putting pretty much the same hp down. The second reason the technology increase is emense. The T-56 alone will wax the M-22's in the '69 Camaro.
So I'll tell you what, if you can find a stock '69 396 Camaro (Good Luck) and a stock '02 Camaro SS (w/ a stock LS1 and 6 speed) I'll take the '02 and beat you in the quarter by over a second and a half and just absolutly murder you in the turns ('69 Big Blocks couldn't handle for crap, or any Big Blocks for that matter!).
Actually I don't think the '69 camaro's where in the low 14's. I'm pretty sure the 302 was 14.8-14.9 and the 396 was somewhere about 15.0 - 15.2. Just my firstgen knowledge talking.
Later, Garrett
So I'll tell you what, if you can find a stock '69 396 Camaro (Good Luck) and a stock '02 Camaro SS (w/ a stock LS1 and 6 speed) I'll take the '02 and beat you in the quarter by over a second and a half and just absolutly murder you in the turns ('69 Big Blocks couldn't handle for crap, or any Big Blocks for that matter!).
Actually I don't think the '69 camaro's where in the low 14's. I'm pretty sure the 302 was 14.8-14.9 and the 396 was somewhere about 15.0 - 15.2. Just my firstgen knowledge talking.
Later, Garrett
#14
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by iroc22
L35= 396/325hp
L34= 396/350hp
L78= 396/375hp
(RPO L89 added aluminum cylinder heads on the L78; no gains stated from the factory, supposedly 20hp gain with the heads)
Since those numbers are gross hp, just minus roughly 50hp from the numbers. Big Block Camaros were about 3300lbs curb weight; so with those numbers you can make your own judgements on times
L35= 396/325hp
L34= 396/350hp
L78= 396/375hp
(RPO L89 added aluminum cylinder heads on the L78; no gains stated from the factory, supposedly 20hp gain with the heads)
Since those numbers are gross hp, just minus roughly 50hp from the numbers. Big Block Camaros were about 3300lbs curb weight; so with those numbers you can make your own judgements on times
whats the diff between gross and net hp?
one flywheel one RWHP or something?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
Actually, I think net is at the flywheel. Gross is without alot of functions that the car has to perform taken out. It was kind of dumd to have that rating in the first place. I'm sure someone can put this better than I can.
#16
Supreme Member
They're both rated at the flywheel. Gross hp is taken with only a water pump; and they use open exhaust. Net ratings are with all accessories in place (no A/C compressor), manifolds (headers if stock) and full exhaust with mufflers. Basically Net hp is "as installed".
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Brougham 2dr Coupe
Engine: 403 Olds v8, bored .030 over
Transmission: 350 T.H. 3A, shift kit
Am I to think you're going to race one of these monsters, Wankie?
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive raced a 67 camaro. It raped me pretty bad. Of course it has a 454 and it was from a roll. And it was my father. I told him wait till I supercharge my car. Im trying to beat him to motivate him to get a bigger cam and better heads. Of course he needs posi, so I can kill him off the line, then it comes howling by me.
#20
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Caldwell,ID
Posts: 5,389
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by Abel Kane
Am I to think you're going to race one of these monsters, Wankie?
Am I to think you're going to race one of these monsters, Wankie?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
12-02-2016 06:33 PM
eightsixseven
Tech / General Engine
1
08-14-2015 03:09 PM