hows my time
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
hows my time
with my current sig, a slightly modified SA map on a stock 89 vette chip,
my best was 13.1 @ 108mph.
is this decent.
my best was 13.1 @ 108mph.
is this decent.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA, US of A
Car: 94 Z28
Engine: LT1 w/ headers, catback, CAI, tune
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
What was the 60 foot?
I'd say that's pretty good on street tires, I was thinking it'd have a little more in it however from your C5 race thread...
I'd say that's pretty good on street tires, I was thinking it'd have a little more in it however from your C5 race thread...
Trending Topics
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 14
From: Sac, CA
Car: '89 GTA
Axle/Gears: 3.27/9-bolt
My calc says a 108 trap has the potential for about a 12.5 at best.
So you have several more tenths to pull out of it if you can figure out how.
This isn't the proper board for this thread though dude.
So you have several more tenths to pull out of it if you can figure out how.
This isn't the proper board for this thread though dude.
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: in front of mustangs
Car: 91 z-28 conv.
Engine: 350 vortec tpi crate
Transmission: 700r4
Nice time. ditto on traction and mid 12s. keep us posted. have you changed the control arms etc? also how about tire pressure, did you have a chance to adjust that?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
108 should go 12.7s or so with good traction. congrats on the times btw.. sorry I couldn't make the track, i ended up getting laid multiple times that night in multiple places, so I was a little busy.
yea what are you running for a gear and stall? becuase i have almost an identical setup to you..but haven't ran mine yet. Just finishing up a converter swap and I have 3.73's in mine. Do you guys think my setup has more potential than traviz? I'm curious to see what i'm gonna do. People were telling me low 13's, then some said mid-low 12's...I'm gonna have to get some sticky tires too it sounds like..
my mods are in the sig...
my mods are in the sig...
Last edited by klumb15; Nov 20, 2005 at 10:43 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by 89IrocZ350TPI
Ya get some traction and you should be in the low low 12's. How bad are you spinning? Are you running DR's
Ya get some traction and you should be in the low low 12's. How bad are you spinning? Are you running DR's
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 0
From: Antelope, CA
Car: 89 IrocZ/17 LS 1LE
Engine: 383/LGX
Transmission: 400/TR-3160
Axle/Gears: 3.08/3.27
Originally posted by lilbowilson
What gear and stall are you running?
What gear and stall are you running?
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Nic
Yea 108 will definitely get you a 12.5 with a good 60'...hell I'm doing it with a 1.85
Yea 108 will definitely get you a 12.5 with a good 60'...hell I'm doing it with a 1.85
But my car most likely weighs less than the average thirdgen, which is why 108 would be good for similar times!
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Westminster, Maryland
Car: 1984 camaro z28 / 1994 jeep wrangler
Engine: 383 stroker / 4.0 HO straight 6
Transmission: built 700r4 / 5 speed
i was going to get a b&m torque converter but the guy who built my tranny talked me out of it and led to me to a custom converter for about the same price, so if he doesnt like it then its prolly not very good
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by Nic
hell I'm doing it with a 1.85
hell I'm doing it with a 1.85
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,494
Likes: 3
From: Woodland, CA
Car: '02 Z06
Engine: L33 5.7
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Stock IRS
thanks kairless for filling in for me, i been offline the last few days, my 60 foots are on avg 2.05ish
my 2400 stall is good i guess.. i cant stall it for a **** from a stop cuz my car creeps forward, i need better brakes and vacuum to hold them tires in place.
my 2400 stall is good i guess.. i cant stall it for a **** from a stop cuz my car creeps forward, i need better brakes and vacuum to hold them tires in place.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 608
Likes: 1
From: Oshkosh wi
Car: 77 Firebird
Engine: 454
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 4.10
Originally posted by fly89gta
I'd kill for that right now but I'm afraid of grenading the POS 10-bolt lol
I'd kill for that right now but I'm afraid of grenading the POS 10-bolt lol
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by 84firebird383
It does seem to be hit or miss with the 7.5 ten bolt, but if you have an automatic then your chances for its survival are alot better than if you have a manual.I get 1.62 60' times with mine and its the 26 spline.I'm thinking of putting in some frame connectors and going to 4.10's and see how long it will last in the low 1.5 range.
It does seem to be hit or miss with the 7.5 ten bolt, but if you have an automatic then your chances for its survival are alot better than if you have a manual.I get 1.62 60' times with mine and its the 26 spline.I'm thinking of putting in some frame connectors and going to 4.10's and see how long it will last in the low 1.5 range.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
My car weighs 3200 lbs, I wish it were 2800, but I dont feel like gutting it to go faster!
106 traps are usually good for 12.6-12.8 with a good 60', my car just has no top end charge, which explains the low mph on the slicks. There are other factors too (it usually traps well over 106).
106 traps are usually good for 12.6-12.8 with a good 60', my car just has no top end charge, which explains the low mph on the slicks. There are other factors too (it usually traps well over 106).
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by stu
sigh....
sigh....
Believe me I have been slow with high traps, gives you an idea of power! Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM
backtothe80s
Suspension and Chassis
33
Sep 5, 2015 12:39 AM





