Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 01:54 AM
  #1  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

well, im in HS of course and ive got two kids who wanna race. one kid has a foxbody RUSTang w/ a stock 4cyl. not to worried about him. the other kid has a 95? i believe, or at least that body style eclipse. its fwd and stock other than a catback and thats all. I have an automatic 91 rs 305 tbi, w/ 8.5mm msd wires, ac delco rapid fire plugs, edelbrock open air element, and exhaust chopped off at y pipe ( bought it like that, saving up for a whole system). if i race from a dig, think i have a chance?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 07:31 AM
  #2  
90CamaroTBI's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
Car: 91 Formula, 89 IROC
Engine: LB9, LB9
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi 2.73, Posi 2.73
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

The Mustang is no problem. I raced a turbo eclipse with intake and exhaust from a stop with my RS with the mods listed, and beat him by like a car length, maybe a little more.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #3  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

sweet. i just think it would be horrible to lose. i'd get ragged on soo much.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 12:36 PM
  #4  
atc3434's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
From: Weedsport, NY
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Mustangs a no problem, the eclipse depends on a lot. Three questions, n/a or turbo, auto or stick, fwd or awd?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 09:34 PM
  #5  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

the eclipse is a stick 4cyl FWD nonturbo w/ a catback. but also weighted down with a heavy box and amp.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 10:08 PM
  #6  
chevy boi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: califorina
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

those cars shouldent be a problem, but with you pipes cut off at the y pipe it could kill all you low end tq, but if its runing stong you will be fine

if you could ,go to the track so you can rub the timeslip in there face and there no about them not raceing or you are them jumping the line
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2007 | 11:54 PM
  #7  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Take it from a 4 cyl Mustang owner. Unless you have a school bus or plan on taking of a few wires and towing a trailer, you will be alright. AND thats coming from someone with the 93 (105 hp vs 88hp for the previous years) and a 5-speed!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2007 | 01:33 AM
  #8  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

so the eclipse is my worry. i mean my car is running quite strong. i have low end tq. maybe not as much as i could? but its there. if i get a good launch think he'll be able to catch up?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2007 | 05:49 AM
  #9  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Originally Posted by 25thmustang
AND thats coming from someone with the 93 (105 hp vs 88hp for the previous years) and a 5-speed!
17.93 in mine! woot!
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2007 | 07:59 PM
  #10  
80smetalfan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

The Eclipse might be closer than you think, depends on the tune of your car. If I knew what you ran in the 1/4, I could tell you more. There are a lot of L03 cars on here in the 16s, which isn't too far away from an Eclipse like the one racing you. But if you're in good tune, you should have him by a couple cars at least.
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2007 | 11:04 PM
  #11  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Originally Posted by 25thmustang
Take it from a 4 cyl Mustang owner. Unless you have a school bus or plan on taking of a few wires and towing a trailer, you will be alright. AND thats coming from someone with the 93 (105 hp vs 88hp for the previous years) and a 5-speed!

what times are the turbo 4cyl good for?


and just to check to the orignal poster the mustang isn't a turbo is it?
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 02:14 AM
  #12  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

A stock SVO, would be a lower 15 higher 14 car. But like most turbo cars a few tweaks and hello low 14s high 13s. They will run good but the more power you make the tougher it is. There is a local one just went for sale. 91K miles, red/grey 86 SVO. Cars clean as hell and the dealer wants $7995. I stopped in and had to basically wait in line to look at it!
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 11:49 AM
  #13  
gta31's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: pittsburgh
Car: 87 gta
Engine: l98
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

your right just a few tweaks there are two brothers by me and one has the turbo and that thing screams and his brother who has the ford probe with that turbo motor and it will suprise u if your not pretty quick
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2007 | 12:12 PM
  #14  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

the stang isnt turboed.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 07:37 AM
  #15  
86camarokid's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L mpfi V-6
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

watch out for the eclipse, even though its NA they can still be quick, i used to have a 95 GS eclipse, and they pull hard as hell around 4 grand... you should have have him bad off the line but those little things run good on top end so... long as he don't have a cam or anything like that you should be alright... if it was a turbo'd awd 1st gen, you wouldn't stand much of a chance
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 10:59 AM
  #16  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

the first gen eclipse is slow enough that a 305TBI can laugh at it atleast. hell a v6 would prolly laugh at the first gens and I don't think the second gens are that much quicker.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 03:43 PM
  #17  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

An NA Eclipse pulls "hard as hell" after 4000 RPM. I can only imagine how you would describe the pull of something not a 15 or 16 second car!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #18  
Nic's Avatar
Nic
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Originally Posted by 25thmustang
An NA Eclipse pulls "hard as hell" after 4000 RPM. I can only imagine how you would describe the pull of something not a 15 or 16 second car!
Glad you said that so I didn't have to
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 10:40 PM
  #19  
rocluvr0013's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
From: Chico/Antioch California
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Originally Posted by 25thmustang
An NA Eclipse pulls "hard as hell" after 4000 RPM. I can only imagine how you would describe the pull of something not a 15 or 16 second car!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #20  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Originally Posted by 25thmustang
An NA Eclipse pulls "hard as hell" after 4000 RPM. I can only imagine how you would describe the pull of something not a 15 or 16 second car!
for 15's your giving it too much credit. that would be more along the lines of a turbo. I would say more like easily high 16's 17's or so. I used to drive a first gen and it was very very slow. about on par with my corsica I would say. raced a second gen on a freeway one time against my rx7. this was a more or less no shift race and his was an auto any so that takes a lot of the skill out of it right there. I was leaving him everytime. only once did I have a little bit of a problem and that was cause he got a good jump on me and took two cars before I was able to really get the downshift and gas it and by that time I was easily realing him back in. and this was with my rx7 in 4th after the downshift at 60-65mph I should of been in third instead.


oh and the rx7 in question runs maybe at the track 16.4@86mph at best if I was able to launch (driver error) and didn't get a 2.3 and lots of wheel hop might have been even then at best low 16 or so... so that just goes to show how much worse an n/a eclipse is.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 11:56 AM
  #21  
86camarokid's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L mpfi V-6
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

sorry forgot to say mine was far from stock and some how i seen that comming... lol and like i said earlyer long as it WAS stock he would have it... i'm not saying they are fast cars stock, even the turbo'd ones, and yes i have driving both 1st gen N/A and turbo along with 2nd gen of both
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2007 | 10:30 PM
  #22  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

even modified still being n/a I do'nt see them being THAT quick
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 07:15 AM
  #23  
86camarokid's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L mpfi V-6
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

a gutted eclipse on the bottle and a fully built motor and you couldn't see it being quick??? ok... but i'd like not to argue..
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #24  
rx7speed's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

a gutted eclipse with a built street motor OFF the bottle I don't see being that quick.

but if you want to talk about non-N/A applications and use a bottle that is another story
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 01:42 PM
  #25  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

N/A means no power adder, and nitrous is a power adder... A built gutted nitroused anything can and will be fast. But your average street N/A Eclipse isnt going to make me say anything other than... "wheres the turbo?"!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 12:09 AM
  #26  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

i dont think any races will be happening....the eclipse is always...busy??? and heres a convo on myspace w/ the stang owner lol.


-------------

STANG OWNER:

look at it this way

it will never beat me in a race

my mustang is running to much torque and horsepower to lose

i used to like toyotas up until my best friend wrecked his

and then i saw how bad it got messed up

talk about totalled

trust me i have wrecked mine about 2 times now

all it has to show is like 2 dents

1st-rear ended sum 1 not a scratch on either car
2nd went into a turn too shapr and slid into a ditch then a pole-a dent

i cant do that with my dads truck or my moms car, they will suffer too much damage

thats y i like older cars

they r built like tanks

not like the newer cooler faster cars that are made today

they r mostly plastic and fiber glass

dont get me wrong i like ur car

it was built rite back in what 88-90?

my car isnt slow

u would be supprised to se that its an 11.23 second car

i have already ran it down the track and that was my time

so its fast, and thats all it needs to be is just like it is

cuz it gets the job done

it gets me to school and home and around town, and wherever else i wanna go

my car is safe and may not be n itrous/suped up fast, but its still safe intown fast
----------
ME:
alright..."my car is safe and may not be n itrous/suped up fast"- but it runs an 11.23. thats not stock. whatcha runnin?

engine specs! engine specs! engine specs! engine specs! engine specs!

STANG OWNER:

stock 4 cyl. with a couple of mods, ne 1 know what an HP chip is?

other than that, all new filters and timing belt sparkplugs and thats about it

it was runnin that fast b4 i got it tho, and all i did was add the new filters and plugs, and a timing belt vut thats all i did to it

ME:


wanna race? all i have is a camaro w/a 305.

STANG OWNER:

when and where?

and i only race 4 slips

Last edited by sinESter; Apr 30, 2007 at 12:11 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 12:17 AM
  #27  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

ME:

...omg...are u serious?!?!

STANG OWNER:

yes i am, i only race 4 pinks, my car may not win now, but the car i do race with does win

a old old camaro

with a 454 small block chevy runs on alot of power, not to mention nitrous injection

not a car id drive around town

only on weekends at my best friends house

ME:

... I always wanted a challenge..



well..i wanna chance at the stang. it runs 11.25's. not too slow. if i beat that. then ill chase down the camaro w/ the " 454 sbc" ahhaha

STANG OWNER:

****,i would but muh car is a pacer its over heatin alot lately

ME:

no race?

STANG OWNER:

not with a ****ed up car,just found out my passanger side front tire is showing metal,and my clutch is slipping
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 12:17 AM
  #28  
91 camaro racer's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 8
From: Fairfield, CA
Car: 91camaro rs,2014 silverado 5.3L
Engine: 5.7Lcarb,5.3L
Transmission: 700-r4, 6L80
Axle/Gears: strange 3.73's
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

11.23?? maybe in the 1/8!!!

"not with a ****ed up car,just found out my passanger side front tire is showing metal,and my clutch is slipping"

i think he is getting a little scared
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 12:18 AM
  #29  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

all i say is..
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 12:25 AM
  #30  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

im all sad. my camaro is hungry too..lol...heres a pic of said RUSTang.

Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #31  
thirdgenSS's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:15 AM
  #32  
25thmustang's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

First off I cant even follow the garbage you guys posted back and forth to wachother... Second off an 11.2 might be an 1/8th time, might! Also to note he sounds like the dumbest ******* alive, please just never talk to him again!
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 02:48 PM
  #33  
chevy boi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: califorina
Car: 1989 i roc-z28
Engine: 350 tpi l98
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

i think i can beat that mustang with my 89 honda lol. 11s with a NA no n20 4 cly that great
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 05:53 PM
  #34  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

well....the eclipse got ahold of me today...we raced...i SPANKED him lol. had my buddy come along and take pictures.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #35  
sinESter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Canby OR
Car: 91 RS
Engine: 305 tbi
Transmission: 700r4
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Originally Posted by 25thmustang
First off I cant even follow the garbage you guys posted back and forth to wachother... Second off an 11.2 might be an 1/8th time, might! Also to note he sounds like the dumbest ******* alive, please just never talk to him again!
lol...well he obviously doesnt wanna race anymore..so no worries there. and he meant the 11.2 to be in the qtr.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #36  
EvilCartman's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

Good grief that mustang guy is so full of himself. As for the eclipse, I was going to say you'd have no problem with it. I drove one and it was gutless as all can be.
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 12:11 PM
  #37  
86camarokid's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 2.8L mpfi V-6
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

haha i think thats great you spanked that stang... i mean i love mustangs but when someones that retarded they deserved it...way to go
Reply
Old May 5, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #38  
Z.ROC28's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Mooresville, N.C.
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 L03 TBI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 10 bolt posi / 3.43
Re: 91 rs vs Fbody mustang AND 95? eclipse

LOL @ the stang guy. That's the funniest thing I've read all week. Ain't it hard havin' a 305? I can't wait till I can get one of my 350's built...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hectre13
Car Audio
26
Mar 3, 2022 05:38 PM
ndndndnd
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
Sep 28, 2015 08:00 AM
okfoz
History / Originality
18
Sep 22, 2015 03:37 PM
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
8
Sep 12, 2015 08:39 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.