89 vs mustang
89 vs mustang
Hey I am new to the site and just wanted to say that this is a cool place. Any hoot, my buddy has a 2002 V6 mustang with, Cai, pulleys, true duals, k&n air filter, and a tune, I have a stock 89 Iroc with a 350
who wins? He says its gonna be close but he will edge me.
who wins? He says its gonna be close but he will edge me. Last edited by 89Iroczcar; Jul 19, 2007 at 05:41 PM.
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
From: Weedsport, NY
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: 89 vs mustang
Yea, he's smoking a good load. He'd have to to be internally modded (cam/heads) or boosted to get those numbers out of the 3.8 in the Ford. Even if he was, I doubt he's got the torque to match a stock L98. Shouldn't be ap roblem.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 355 with Super Ram
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt with a True-trac
Re: 89 vs mustang
i think it will be closer then you will want. but if your Iroc is running the way it should then you will be able to pull from the start and stay there. that L98 has more torque then the v6 at least i would think so.
----------
thats right it's a 99. haha 3.8 junk a$$ v6. noway!!! you have that all day long. i was thinking the new 4.0 that comes with more then 200 hp.
----------
thats right it's a 99. haha 3.8 junk a$$ v6. noway!!! you have that all day long. i was thinking the new 4.0 that comes with more then 200 hp.
Last edited by 89N10GTA; Jul 19, 2007 at 10:04 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
From: Weedsport, NY
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: 89 vs mustang
i think it will be closer then you will want. but if your Iroc is running the way it should then you will be able to pull from the start and stay there. that L98 has more torque then the v6 at least i would think so.
----------
thats right it's a 99. haha 3.8 junk a$$ v6. noway!!! you have that all day long. i was thinking the new 4.0 that comes with more then 200 hp.
----------
thats right it's a 99. haha 3.8 junk a$$ v6. noway!!! you have that all day long. i was thinking the new 4.0 that comes with more then 200 hp.
Trending Topics
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 355 with Super Ram
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt with a True-trac
Re: 89 vs mustang
thats really hard to say. if it's not all BS then he might be able to high 14's. i really wouldn't worry about it much. if he likes to talk S%$# then remind him that there is nothing cool about a 6cyl mustang. i think the woman that lives next to me has a 6cyl mustang and she is 90.
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
From: Weedsport, NY
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Re: 89 vs mustang
He might be just under a 15.0 with the gears, the mods above, and a good launch, you should easily beat that with a stock L98 in almost any running condition, certianly with a good running one. For comparison, my 99 Grand Am would run even with a stock 99 v6 stang, and that car went 15.7 stock.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
From: Rhode Island
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 355 with Super Ram
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt with a True-trac
Re: 89 vs mustang
there really is noway to say. it's all in how the car was treated if well treated not much. but i can tell you mine didn't lose any power it has gain it
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 872
Likes: 1
From: Weedsport, NY
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mongoose462ci
North East Region
0
Sep 16, 2015 11:46 PM
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
8
Sep 12, 2015 08:39 PM




