Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

'89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 11:02 PM
  #1  
chevyracingrox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 1
From: IL
Car: 88 IROC, 76 Malibu Classic
Engine: 350 TPI, 350
Transmission: 700R4, 4-speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ????
'89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

who do you think would win? heres the set up
'89 2.9L:
manual t-5
no egr
cat delete
stock size all season radials
(about 4 years manual transmission experience)

malibu 3.1L
4 sp. auto
stock
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 11:36 PM
  #2  
fly89gta's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

You...the race should take about 2 minutes though
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2007 | 11:47 PM
  #3  
gary sanders's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: princeton,west virginia
Car: 89 trans am GTA,90 model trans am 350 tuneport,87 firebird
Engine: 355 small block
Transmission: 5 speed,auto 700r4
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

02 malibu 3.1 will take it,they have 200 horse power,your 2.8 might have 150 hp if its running at its best.Ive raced these 3.1 malibu,s with a stock 1976, 305 V8 2 barrel carb,in a firebird,malibu almost won!!!! 305 IN 1976 was rated at 175 horse with a 2 barrell,and 215 foot pounds of torque.
The malibu is not a heavy car, about 2400 pounds in 2001.A camaro or firebird with a 2.8 will be about 3000 pounds.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 12:09 AM
  #4  
chevyracingrox's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 1
From: IL
Car: 88 IROC, 76 Malibu Classic
Engine: 350 TPI, 350
Transmission: 700R4, 4-speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ????
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

Originally Posted by gary sanders
02 malibu 3.1 will take it,they have 200 horse power,your 2.8 might have 150 hp if its running at its best.Ive raced these 3.1 malibu,s with a stock 1976, 305 V8 2 barrel carb,in a firebird,malibu almost won!!!! 305 IN 1976 was rated at 175 horse with a 2 barrell,and 215 foot pounds of torque.
The malibu is not a heavy car, about 2400 pounds in 2001.A camaro or firebird with a 2.8 will be about 3000 pounds.
yea, i've driven this car. its no slug. it gets to the speed limiter and actually feels like it could go a lot faster.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #5  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

The Malibu will likely win that race.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 11:56 AM
  #6  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

My mother owns one. I'm going with the Mali.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 03:53 PM
  #7  
flaming-ford's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, near columbus
Car: 89 iroc-z
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: wc-t5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi (4 now)
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

my sister has one and it basically was dead even with my old l03 with 1.6 roller rockers, 3in catback, smog delete, and open element so your real screwed sorry to say.

although if you can run them to over 100 you may win!

my sis's is governed to 100 mph hers is a 2k or 2k1 can't remember.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #8  
brodyscamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

Limit your races to pedestrians, tractor-trailers, and bicyclists....

You'll be golden then...

Last edited by brodyscamaro; Dec 16, 2007 at 04:54 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 07:34 PM
  #9  
Street Lethal's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,538
Likes: 206
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

^ .... don't forget street sweepers.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 08:48 AM
  #10  
rik89gta's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: CHICAGO
Car: 89 FORMULA 350
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 BOLT/ 3.27 GEARS
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

I own a 99 Malibu with the 3.1. Even though it has a cylinder misfiring,,, its still quicker than my 86 Camaro with the 2.8 motor.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #11  
youngbuck007's Avatar
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 47
Likes: 1
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

2.8's are slugs. Only reason to race em is for pure fun, unless you enjoy losing.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #12  
Imadude_134's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: La Mirada, California
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ZT LSD with 3.42 - LS1 brakes
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

My gf used to have a 98 Malibu with the 3.1 (3100 series II) and it would kick the crap out of my 91 LO3...

So I would put my money on the Malibu

Limit your races to pedestrians, tractor-trailers, and bicyclists....

You'll be golden then...
^ .... don't forget street sweepers.
And Semi-trucks with double 53' trailers...

Electric cars...

And if you are lucky... Geo Metro Auto (3 speed)

haha...

-Tim-
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #13  
ZONES89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
From: Hou. TX
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

Pretty sad when you can be told that you would be better off with a 305.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 01:43 PM
  #14  
Imadude_134's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
From: La Mirada, California
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: L98 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: ZT LSD with 3.42 - LS1 brakes
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

Originally Posted by ZONES89RS
Pretty sad when you can be told that you would be better off with a 305.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 01:52 PM
  #15  
travishenry's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: Elverta, California
Car: 1988 Z28 Camaro
Engine: TPI 350
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

Hey i got a lo3 in my car. jk jk lol my lo3 is junk getting a new 350 next week. Bout the race i woulg just stand on the gas and dump the clutch at like red line. Well just drive the crap out of it, but i think i have to go with what everybody else said. The malibu might take you.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 05:58 PM
  #16  
flaming-ford's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, near columbus
Car: 89 iroc-z
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: wc-t5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi (4 now)
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

The malibu might take you.[/QUOTE]


no mights about it, they will beat a l03 car from factory and stay probably nose to nose with a tpi auto car honestly.....

i ran my sis's at the track once with a mildly slippy tranny it got a 17.1 not bad considering i run terrible at the track and the tranny slipped a little lol.....

definetly use to make me look bad on the 50-80 sprints lol.

hell i run a 15 flat with my 305 5 spd tpi car car with full bolt ons so yah if i can run a 17.1 with a malibue then youre in trouble.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 07:52 PM
  #17  
84RIceEater's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Kirkland Washington
Car: 84 Camaro. 90 integra
Engine: LG4, 1.6 (402hp)
Transmission: 700r4, JDM ITR w/ kaaz LSD
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

sad you have a "sports car" and he has a cheap family car.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 08:26 PM
  #18  
Stevo's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 1
From: Northern, VA
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
Re: '89 2.8L vs. '02 malibu 3.1L

I pick the mali. by a long shot.

Id be embarrassed to even try, shrug it off your "too good" for that kind of race anyway...lol. Seriously i wouldnt even try to race anyone in an L03 third gen...my gf's old RS probably couldn't even hang with half the soccer mom minivans on the road. Let alone a 2.8...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HoosierinWA
Tech / General Engine
5
Oct 7, 2015 10:15 AM
bplessy
TPI
0
Sep 30, 2015 12:14 PM
MitcherNeaf
DIY PROM
3
Sep 24, 2015 09:23 PM
3.8TransAM
Body
2
Sep 17, 2015 02:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 AM.