Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

Stupid honda

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-19-2013, 09:39 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Rossman89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: ohio, akron
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 rs camaro
Engine: chevy 355
Transmission: automatic 700r4
Axle/Gears: 410 gears
Stupid honda

This guy i work with drives an 07 honda civic si and he tells the most ridiculous lies. The car is stock and he claims hes hit 166mph. Ive done tons of research on the car and no matter what i say he just wont admit his stories are bs. Short of actually dragging this idiot to the track ( i doubt he would do it anyways ) im looking for way to disprove his stories. ive asked him to use a dash cam or anything like that and hes always got an excuse. I realize it shouldnt bother me but his stories are just soo ridiculous. So as soon as i get my camaro put together ( hopefully this week ) im going to try and get this guy on the track. its the best way i can think to shut him up without losing my job
Old 05-19-2013, 10:03 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
 
zraffz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sussex County, NJ
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Stupid honda

Dude when people talk about how fast they've gone in their car it's lame anyway. I don't care if he did or didn't do 166MPH in his car, even if his car was capable of doing that it would probably take a solid minute of acceleration.
Old 05-19-2013, 11:52 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
86White_T/A305's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada,Ont
Posts: 2,209
Received 26 Likes on 20 Posts
Car: 1987 TransAm Ttop
Engine: 2005 LQ4
Transmission: Ls1 T56
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: Stupid honda

he meant 166kmh lol..had you fooled
Old 05-20-2013, 01:43 AM
  #4  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
oamhmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elmwood Park, NJ
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 84 Trans AM
Engine: Goodwrench 350 Crate motor
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Stupid honda

I'm too lazy to do this right now but do some research and find out for the 07 SI:

1) sixth gear ratio, and final drive transaxle ratio
2) red line for the K20 engine, I think its 7300 rpm
3) Stock tire size

Armed with this data you can find out if the engine red lines in 6th before hitting 166, If it doe then you've flat out proved he is lying.

If it comes close then he is still lying because this does take into account aerodynamic drag and friction.
Old 05-20-2013, 02:18 AM
  #5  
Member
 
Kevin Lee 487's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Highland Indiana
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Trans Am Ram Air
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by oamhmad
I'm too lazy to do this right now but do some research and find out for the 07 SI:

1) sixth gear ratio, and final drive transaxle ratio
2) red line for the K20 engine, I think its 7300 rpm
3) Stock tire size

Armed with this data you can find out if the engine red lines in 6th before hitting 166, If it doe then you've flat out proved he is lying.

If it comes close then he is still lying because this does take into account aerodynamic drag and friction.
Its going to take more than 200hp to push a stock weight Civic to 166mph. A stock LS1 can BARELY hit those speeds if the limiter is disabled and thats a good 120hp more than the Civic. The Civic would have to shave a good bit of weight to hit those speeds with a stock engine.

Last edited by Kevin Lee 487; 05-20-2013 at 02:30 AM.
Old 05-20-2013, 07:44 AM
  #6  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
88FormulaF_Bomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: nw indiana
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 firebird formula 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
its not a stock engine, he has a aem short ram intake with a k&n cone filter, ngk plugs and 8mm wires, a flowmaster glasspack and a wing I'm suprised he could only hit 166 with that monster


Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Old 05-20-2013, 11:40 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member
 
zraffz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sussex County, NJ
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 1994 Z28
Engine: 355 LT1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by 88FormulaF_Bomb
its not a stock engine, he has a aem short ram intake with a k&n cone filter, ngk plugs and 8mm wires, a flowmaster glasspack and a wing I'm suprised he could only hit 166 with that monster


Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
... So it's a stock motor lol.
Googled it. Stock governor is set at 137. Car has the gearing to hit 180 but that doesn't include aerodynamics. As stated an ls1 has trouble doing that, I certainly doubt a civic can.
Old 05-20-2013, 12:50 PM
  #8  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
88FormulaF_Bomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: nw indiana
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 firebird formula 350
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Originally Posted by zraffz

... So it's a stock motor lol.
Googled it. Stock governor is set at 137. Car has the gearing to hit 180 but that doesn't include aerodynamics. As stated an ls1 has trouble doing that, I certainly doubt a civic can.
I know I was playing like the civic kids listing a bunch of bull **** as "mods"



Posted from Thirdgen.org App for Android
Old 05-20-2013, 01:44 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member
 
Dakota W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by zraffz
Its going to take more than 200hp to push a stock weight Civic to 166mph. A stock LS1 can BARELY hit those speeds if the limiter is disabled and thats a good 120hp more than the Civic. The Civic would have to shave a good bit of weight to hit those speeds with a stock engine.
Civic weighs 2-2200 lbs, camaro weighs 1000+ lbs more than the civic, so that extra 120 hp is really irrelevant.
Old 05-20-2013, 04:52 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Kevin Lee 487's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Highland Indiana
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Trans Am Ram Air
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by Dakota W.
Civic weighs 2-2200 lbs, camaro weighs 1000+ lbs more than the civic, so that extra 120 hp is really irrelevant.
The current gen civics weigh over 2800.

according to this http://autos.yahoo.com/honda/civic-s...fications.html, a 2007 Civic Si Couple with a 6 speed manual falls just shy of 2900lbs.
So yea, no way is a stock Si even breaking 145, let alone hitting 166.

A C5 Vette can get up to about 175. Thats 345hp @ 3219-3229lbs ( depending on trans ). I'm ballparking it here but a stock weight Si would need around 250whp to hit 160.

Last edited by Kevin Lee 487; 05-20-2013 at 05:01 PM.
Old 05-20-2013, 07:21 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Brando5641's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Siloam Springs AR.
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1998 Trans/Am, 1989 RS Camaro
Engine: LS1, LQ9 6.0
Transmission: 4L60E, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 2.73
Re: Stupid honda

Old 05-20-2013, 08:11 PM
  #12  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Rossman89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: ohio, akron
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 rs camaro
Engine: chevy 355
Transmission: automatic 700r4
Axle/Gears: 410 gears
Re: Stupid honda

You guys have been great lol. Hes saying he can do166mph because he had his govenor taken off. Oahmad thanks for giving me that formula ill get the info and shut him up
Old 05-20-2013, 08:39 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Rossman89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: ohio, akron
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 rs camaro
Engine: chevy 355
Transmission: automatic 700r4
Axle/Gears: 410 gears
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by oamhmad
I'm too lazy to do this right now but do some research and find out for the 07 SI:

1) sixth gear ratio, and final drive transaxle ratio
2) red line for the K20 engine, I think its 7300 rpm
3) Stock tire size

Armed with this data you can find out if the engine red lines in 6th before hitting 166, If it doe then you've flat out proved he is lying.

If it comes close then he is still lying because this does take into account aerodynamic drag and friction.



I have the data but dont know how to use it. Sixth gear Ratio is .66 and final drive is 4.765. Redline is 7800 and tires size is 215/45-17. Could you explain how this works?
Old 05-20-2013, 09:00 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
plum92_camaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: Stupid honda

https://www.thirdgen.org/calculations
use the info here.
Old 05-21-2013, 12:14 AM
  #15  
Member
 
Kevin Lee 487's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Highland Indiana
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Trans Am Ram Air
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by Rossman89
You guys have been great lol. Hes saying he can do166mph because he had his govenor taken off. Oahmad thanks for giving me that formula ill get the info and shut him up
If I had $5 for every person I've heard say that, I would own a LS1 WS6 by now.

I even had 1 moron tell me my L98 was governed at 120 because " His buddys Fox Body raced a 3rd gen and slowly passed him at 125 " . Tried telling him for quite a while that L98s weren't governed and that it was more than likely a 305 which WERE governed at 120 IIRC.

Last edited by Kevin Lee 487; 05-21-2013 at 12:19 AM.
Old 06-11-2013, 03:32 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
bowtietilidie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: pottstown, pa
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 firebird, 2004 impala
Re: Stupid honda

so was he playing forza or what?
Old 06-12-2013, 08:21 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

 
cuisinartvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sanctuary state
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Car: 67 ******mobile
Engine: 385 Solid roller
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 4.11
Re: Stupid honda

People are full of it come on
Ran into a guy that worked at gas station a mo ago talking up his prelude about how quick it got to 140 kind of laughed and said "Ok".. he kept on and on finally told him Id like to see. His reply was my "old truck" couldnt do 140 to keep up it was too old. Had it well ove rthat and gets there quick

He declined the invite of course
If only he knew....lol Some people have no idea.
Old 07-28-2013, 10:39 AM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
morrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: simi valley, southern cali
Posts: 865
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro Rs.R
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Stupid honda

sooo what was the out come of that wicked si haha
Old 07-28-2013, 10:41 AM
  #19  
Senior Member

 
morrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: simi valley, southern cali
Posts: 865
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro Rs.R
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Stupid honda

my dads jetta is a vr6, itys a w block v6 makes around 236 hp, it cant get past 150... it took milles for it to get there ever so slowly lol, the guys on crack lol
Old 07-28-2013, 11:23 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member
 
Dakota W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: Stupid honda

You need at least 300-350hp to get to 150mph. about 500hp if you want to go to 200mph.
Old 07-29-2013, 06:19 AM
  #21  
Supreme Member

 
midias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Henrietta NY
Posts: 4,372
Received 189 Likes on 149 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by Dakota W.
You need at least 300-350hp to get to 150mph. about 500hp if you want to go to 200mph.
Wow NOT true, not true at all

A stock A4 2.0 turbo putting out about 180hp can and has hit 150mph. Not much over that but it can be done. Now to go faster the curve of top speed vs HP is exponential but your figure of 300-350 is way off.
Old 07-29-2013, 01:33 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member
 
Dakota W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by midias
Wow NOT true, not true at all

A stock A4 2.0 turbo putting out about 180hp can and has hit 150mph. Not much over that but it can be done. Now to go faster the curve of top speed vs HP is exponential but your figure of 300-350 is way off.
Sorry, meant to say in our cars. And 300 at the crank.
Old 07-29-2013, 01:43 PM
  #23  
Member
 
Kevin Lee 487's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Highland Indiana
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Trans Am Ram Air
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by Dakota W.
Sorry, meant to say in our cars. And 300 at the crank.
I would think that number should be closer to 250 crank. A LS1 4th gen can get pretty close to 170 ( with the 162mph limiter disabled ) and they have 340-350bhp depending on the year. The weight is very close between a 3rd and 4th gen
Old 07-29-2013, 02:33 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

 
midias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Henrietta NY
Posts: 4,372
Received 189 Likes on 149 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by Kevin Lee 487
I would think that number should be closer to 250 crank. A LS1 4th gen can get pretty close to 170 ( with the 162mph limiter disabled ) and they have 340-350bhp depending on the year. The weight is very close between a 3rd and 4th gen


The bigger and correct factor for 3rd and 4th gens is the gear ratio and type of transmission. 2.73 gears and you will have issues. 3.42 and a T5 will get you there better.

The other issue is even with ideal gearing is you will need to rev near 5000 rpm or higher. our engines don't like that. They fall on their face and stop making enough power.

A 190hp L69 with 3.73 and the .73 5th may come close but it will be turning near 5500 rpm.
Old 07-29-2013, 02:57 PM
  #25  
Member

 
manolis1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: new york , n.y. , USA
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: klowny1969 <-youtube 4 3rd gen vids
Engine: subscribe to klowny1969 on youtube!
Transmission: subscribe to my channel on youtube
Re: Stupid honda

I'm going to sell my turdgen and buy a civic!!! I cant believe what i've been missing out all this time!!
Old 07-29-2013, 09:31 PM
  #26  
Member
 
Kevin Lee 487's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Highland Indiana
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Trans Am Ram Air
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by midias
The bigger and correct factor for 3rd and 4th gens is the gear ratio and type of transmission. 2.73 gears and you will have issues. 3.42 and a T5 will get you there better.

The other issue is even with ideal gearing is you will need to rev near 5000 rpm or higher. our engines don't like that. They fall on their face and stop making enough power.

A 190hp L69 with 3.73 and the .73 5th may come close but it will be turning near 5500 rpm.
Yea thats definitely true. The TPIs don't breathe for crap. I sometimes forget that the LS1s have stupid top end compared to the 3rd gens.

Maybe one day I'll have to see how fast I can get my TA to go.
Old 07-29-2013, 10:41 PM
  #27  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by manolis1969
I'm going to sell my turdgen and buy a civic!!! I cant believe what i've been missing out all this time!!
Don't even joke like that...
Old 07-30-2013, 02:28 AM
  #28  
Supreme Member
 
Dakota W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by midias
The bigger and correct factor for 3rd and 4th gens is the gear ratio and type of transmission. 2.73 gears and you will have issues. 3.42 and a T5 will get you there better.

The other issue is even with ideal gearing is you will need to rev near 5000 rpm or higher. our engines don't like that. They fall on their face and stop making enough power.

A 190hp L69 with 3.73 and the .73 5th may come close but it will be turning near 5500 rpm.
My LB9 never had a problem with 7k. I drove it that hard, and it still has the best wear out of any block I've ever seen. Never bent a rod, never broke a lifter. The LB9 is a stronger motor than everyone makes it out to be.
Old 07-30-2013, 06:12 AM
  #29  
Supreme Member

 
midias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Henrietta NY
Posts: 4,372
Received 189 Likes on 149 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by Dakota W.
My LB9 never had a problem with 7k. I drove it that hard, and it still has the best wear out of any block I've ever seen. Never bent a rod, never broke a lifter. The LB9 is a stronger motor than everyone makes it out to be.
You spun a LB9 to 7000 rpms?
Old 07-30-2013, 08:25 AM
  #30  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by midias
You spun a LB9 to 7000 rpms?
Naw, his tach was way off.
Old 07-30-2013, 08:33 AM
  #31  
Supreme Member

 
midias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Henrietta NY
Posts: 4,372
Received 189 Likes on 149 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am L69
Engine: Sniper EFI Powered 355
Transmission: WC T5 w/ Steel Support Plate
Axle/Gears: 3.42 10 Bolt Posi
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by evgax58
Naw, his tach was way off.
I figure it would probably do it once, maybe twice.
Old 07-30-2013, 04:12 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
jaybdaboat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Indianapolis, in
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Sports coupe/z28
Engine: 2.8/ swapping 5.3
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Open 3.42
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by Kevin Lee 487
Yea thats definitely true. The TPIs don't breathe for crap. I sometimes forget that the LS1s have stupid top end compared to the 3rd gens.

Maybe one day I'll have to see how fast I can get my TA to go.
Make sure you record it
Old 07-30-2013, 04:15 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member
 
Dakota W.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Aloha, Oregon
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Christine Z28
Engine: RV Cam and Intake 350 SBC
Transmission: 5speed
Axle/Gears: 3.08 ls Posi
Re: Stupid honda

Originally Posted by evgax58
Naw, his tach was way off.
It's off by about 250rpm, and it was off the tach.
Old 08-28-2013, 12:02 PM
  #34  
Member

 
jjcuff1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Iroc-Z Red T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI LB9 55k miles
Transmission: Auto 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi
Re: Stupid honda

Well I personally owned and solid my civic SI after 120k miles and I needed bigger car. Once loaded up with 3-4 people and 50+miles of daily commuting the lack of torque is evident in the K20A and painful. always ringing the motor out to 6k just to merge on hi-way, mileage typically was 21-22MPG!!! I bought a loaded M35 with twice the power and same or better gas mileage! LOL

So 166mph in a SI NOT!!!. It feels super quick driving inside of it. and it will scream and feels like an indy car on twisties. You can keep her screaming at 4500rom in 2 or 3r then just mash it and pull up to 8000 easy I think stock mine hit redline like 8400RPM 2nd cam doesnt even come on until 4500-5000 and you do not feel it until 6000 then it is like a mini turbo until 8000.

No torque so unless you get perfect launch or already at boil point they are 15sec cars maybe 0-60 is low because you can pull 60mph in 2nd if you hold rpm. but then it falls down.

Now onto the 3rd gen. My 92 RS L03 had a fuel cutoff for sure and it was 115mph. I know from personal experience. First thing I did was pull that out of the prom.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ALIENhumanoid
Members Camaros
80
04-23-2016 11:35 PM
djmarch
Tech / General Engine
29
10-02-2015 10:41 PM
83ho87gn
Exhaust
1
09-26-2015 08:49 PM
spartanreaper
Engine Swap
12
09-25-2015 07:22 PM
83ho87gn
Tech / General Engine
2
09-24-2015 08:58 AM



Quick Reply: Stupid honda



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:37 PM.