2007 Camaro
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 2
From: British Columbia
Car: 90 IROC 5.7 hardtop
Engine: L98
Transmission: T5 swap
Axle/Gears: Yup -- they still work
2007 Camaro
Check it out. Borrowed these links from various sites...
LS2 6.0 400hp 6-speed independent rear end uhmm.... where do I get in line?
http://imageevent.com/face440/camaro
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....0070B432F3&p=0
LS2 6.0 400hp 6-speed independent rear end uhmm.... where do I get in line?
http://imageevent.com/face440/camaro
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....0070B432F3&p=0
That is really really really good news, but...
I dont really like the one that their proposing at first glance anyway. From a design standpoint it has a couple really awkward angles. (I have no idea whats going on with that rear quarter.) And I would want Chevrolet to actually be innovative, and not just follow suite with Ford and Dodge are doing. That low roofline and long hood look even more exagerated than the Charger/Magnum, which I find really hard to drive. I dont know the pricepoint difference, but if it has all the features of the Corvette, but is bigger, heavier and no more practical, I would buy the Vette. I would have preferred seeing a smaller 3 door coupe, like the RX8 but better looking with a real engines. I think that would gain traction with the people that cant afford the CTS-V but want an american sport sedan.
I hope so. As a young guy I dont want the only selling feature of the 5th gen being "nestalgia."
Maybe Ive been waiting so long for this that anything would have let me down. I am warming up to it the more I look at the pictures.
I dont really like the one that their proposing at first glance anyway. From a design standpoint it has a couple really awkward angles. (I have no idea whats going on with that rear quarter.) And I would want Chevrolet to actually be innovative, and not just follow suite with Ford and Dodge are doing. That low roofline and long hood look even more exagerated than the Charger/Magnum, which I find really hard to drive. I dont know the pricepoint difference, but if it has all the features of the Corvette, but is bigger, heavier and no more practical, I would buy the Vette. I would have preferred seeing a smaller 3 door coupe, like the RX8 but better looking with a real engines. I think that would gain traction with the people that cant afford the CTS-V but want an american sport sedan.
the Camaro Concept is intended to explore customer reaction to design and engineering elements that might lead to an all-new version of the Camaro.
Maybe Ive been waiting so long for this that anything would have let me down. I am warming up to it the more I look at the pictures.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
I really like it and I really want one. Make mine a bolero red Z28 with red interior. A dover white Z28 with red interior would do as well.
If I picture a modern Camaro in my mind's eye, that is what I see. It's retro without being a ripoff of an original design.
I hate that inlet at the leading edge of the hood. Who the hell thought that would be a good idea? If they wanted to be cute with the hood they should have put a flapper at the back of the cowl.
If I picture a modern Camaro in my mind's eye, that is what I see. It's retro without being a ripoff of an original design.
I hate that inlet at the leading edge of the hood. Who the hell thought that would be a good idea? If they wanted to be cute with the hood they should have put a flapper at the back of the cowl.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Trending Topics
I think they did a great job on the exterior... almost exactly what I had in mind. Concept cars always look a little strange to me... but hopefully if decide to build it (I hope they do!) they will fine tune the lines and wheel design so it doesn't look quite as heavy and bloated.
The interior is a different story... that interior concept does nothing for me at all... I understand they were trying to go for the minimalistic look of the '67 camaro interior with only two large gauges... but IMO it looks way to futuristic and not especially practical. I don't want to be looking down at the center console to check my fuel or water temp.. taking your eyes that far off the road would be scary. I also think the general design of the thin rectangular analog gauges in the center console is just for appearance. A guage with a sweep that small is practically useless. The good thing is it will most likely come with HUD... so it won't really matter.... I love the HUD on my GTP... it's one of my favourite things about the car.
Just my .02
The interior is a different story... that interior concept does nothing for me at all... I understand they were trying to go for the minimalistic look of the '67 camaro interior with only two large gauges... but IMO it looks way to futuristic and not especially practical. I don't want to be looking down at the center console to check my fuel or water temp.. taking your eyes that far off the road would be scary. I also think the general design of the thin rectangular analog gauges in the center console is just for appearance. A guage with a sweep that small is practically useless. The good thing is it will most likely come with HUD... so it won't really matter.... I love the HUD on my GTP... it's one of my favourite things about the car.
Just my .02
Last edited by johnyIROC; Jan 13, 2006 at 02:38 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by johnyIROC
The interior is a different story... that interior concept does nothing for me at all... it looks way to futuristic and not especially practical. I don't want to be looking down at the center console to check my fuel or water temp... taking your eyes that far off the road would be scary. I guess it will most likely come with HUD... so it won't really matter.
Just my .02
The interior is a different story... that interior concept does nothing for me at all... it looks way to futuristic and not especially practical. I don't want to be looking down at the center console to check my fuel or water temp... taking your eyes that far off the road would be scary. I guess it will most likely come with HUD... so it won't really matter.
Just my .02
Keep in mind... this is just the concept version. If they make it the production version should be more practical and hopefully not as bloated... I really do like the overall package and if they aren't coming out until 2009 I could be in the market for one.... the only major problem is anyone who is in the market for one of those would probably step up to the new vette because it is just unreal.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Stouffville, Ontario
Car: 83WS6TA
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: TH350C
Axle/Gears: 3:23
If I was going to spend $40K or so on a car I'd just build one of these. Plain aluminum interior and a few guages is all that's needed..lol
Originally posted by George
:
:
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Cruz'N Bruz'R
BARF!
You guys can have it, I'll be in the Challenger line.
BARF!
You guys can have it, I'll be in the Challenger line.

That and it will require NASA engineers to modify.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Stouffville, Ontario
Car: 83WS6TA
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: TH350C
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Originally posted by Acceld Z
That and it will require NASA engineers to modify.
That and it will require NASA engineers to modify.
I'd rather just have a decent truck for a daily and some kind of race car or at least an older non-emissions car to have fun with.
Originally posted by johnyIROC
We already have 1 barely streetable car... the new camaro is supposed to have displacement on demand and be able to pull 30MPG HWY.. but yeah if you are looking only for all out performance this would probably not be the right car.
We already have 1 barely streetable car... the new camaro is supposed to have displacement on demand and be able to pull 30MPG HWY.. but yeah if you are looking only for all out performance this would probably not be the right car.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5
Originally posted by Acceld Z
You'd better get used to standing in line waiting for that Challenger. If it's like anything else they build, it'll be taking extended leaves of absence from drivability at the dealership
That and it will require NASA engineers to modify.
You'd better get used to standing in line waiting for that Challenger. If it's like anything else they build, it'll be taking extended leaves of absence from drivability at the dealership

That and it will require NASA engineers to modify.
Maybe it's because I really haven't touched it yet
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Cruz'N Bruz'R
Maybe, but I think you got the worst possible problem vehicle that they could put out. I beat the crap out of mine, and no problem so far.
Maybe it's because I really haven't touched it yet
Maybe, but I think you got the worst possible problem vehicle that they could put out. I beat the crap out of mine, and no problem so far.
Maybe it's because I really haven't touched it yet
I beat on my truck and it broke. All the ****ing time.
My wife beat on it too, just in a different way.
I was referring more to the DCX service departments. They're terrible and getting worse. I wouldn't even want to try to get a Challenger serviced. They'd **** it up in all kinds of ways. You'd bring it in for an oil change and leave with a ECM flash that kills 40hp because some shmuck in Phoenix reported a little bit of "ping".
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Originally posted by Acceld Z
You mean other than the balljoints and transmission not being able to move the truck after a sitting for a few days
I beat on my truck and it broke. All the ****ing time.
My wife beat on it too, just in a different way.
I was referring more to the DCX service departments. They're terrible and getting worse. I wouldn't even want to try to get a Challenger serviced. They'd **** it up in all kinds of ways. You'd bring it in for an oil change and leave with a ECM flash that kills 40hp because some shmuck in Phoenix reported a little bit of "ping".
You mean other than the balljoints and transmission not being able to move the truck after a sitting for a few days
I beat on my truck and it broke. All the ****ing time.
My wife beat on it too, just in a different way.
I was referring more to the DCX service departments. They're terrible and getting worse. I wouldn't even want to try to get a Challenger serviced. They'd **** it up in all kinds of ways. You'd bring it in for an oil change and leave with a ECM flash that kills 40hp because some shmuck in Phoenix reported a little bit of "ping".
Just to toss in , I would be affraid to buy anythngi new from Dodge , we know a guy that has the new magnum that has been more in the service shop than on the road
. All electrical stuff too. Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5
Originally posted by Acceld Z
You mean other than the balljoints and transmission not being able to move the truck after a sitting for a few days
I beat on my truck and it broke. All the ****ing time.
My wife beat on it too, just in a different way.
I was referring more to the DCX service departments. They're terrible and getting worse. I wouldn't even want to try to get a Challenger serviced. They'd **** it up in all kinds of ways. You'd bring it in for an oil change and leave with a ECM flash that kills 40hp because some shmuck in Phoenix reported a little bit of "ping".
You mean other than the balljoints and transmission not being able to move the truck after a sitting for a few days
I beat on my truck and it broke. All the ****ing time.
My wife beat on it too, just in a different way.
I was referring more to the DCX service departments. They're terrible and getting worse. I wouldn't even want to try to get a Challenger serviced. They'd **** it up in all kinds of ways. You'd bring it in for an oil change and leave with a ECM flash that kills 40hp because some shmuck in Phoenix reported a little bit of "ping".
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by D's89IROCZ
Just to toss in , I would be affraid to buy anythngi new from Dodge , we know a guy that has the new magnum that has been more in the service shop than on the road
. All electrical stuff too.
Just to toss in , I would be affraid to buy anythngi new from Dodge , we know a guy that has the new magnum that has been more in the service shop than on the road
. All electrical stuff too. DCX takes a well engineered structure and drapes garbage over it. It's a good thing they have old Benz stuff to start with.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Originally posted by Acceld Z
My Dakota R/T had started having weird electronic problems about a month before we got rid of it. It was the nail in the coffin.
DCX takes a well engineered structure and drapes garbage over it. It's a good thing they have old Benz stuff to start with.
My Dakota R/T had started having weird electronic problems about a month before we got rid of it. It was the nail in the coffin.
DCX takes a well engineered structure and drapes garbage over it. It's a good thing they have old Benz stuff to start with.
AKKKKK I worked with a guy ...same truck ...same thing .
. They really have no clue abotu fuel managment aswell. They have the worst milage around . My unlce sold his Dodge because of it ( and he ain;t hurtin for cash and has owned all kinds of sports cars) ...sorry to drift off of topic
Originally posted by Acceld Z
My Dakota R/T had started having weird electronic problems about a month before we got rid of it. It was the nail in the coffin.
My Dakota R/T had started having weird electronic problems about a month before we got rid of it. It was the nail in the coffin.
Uhhhh - that wouldn't happen to be the truck that Dave is driving around, is it?
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Hylton
Uhhhh - that wouldn't happen to be the truck that Dave is driving around, is it?
Uhhhh - that wouldn't happen to be the truck that Dave is driving around, is it?
Dave's R/T doesn't do anyhting really weird other than chew tires off of both ends of the truck. He's responsible for one end though
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5
Yeah, I'm guilty of that, but those Kumho's put up such a good fight, I bought 4 more.
And the truck sucks back the gas, but's it's quicker than either of my thirdgen's were when i got them.
And if I remember correctly, I mentioned the R/T's first, but you always loved the Lightnings. So there.
And now, I guess I'll have to go get me a turbo buick of the GN type to keep with our tradition.
And the truck sucks back the gas, but's it's quicker than either of my thirdgen's were when i got them.
And if I remember correctly, I mentioned the R/T's first, but you always loved the Lightnings. So there.
And now, I guess I'll have to go get me a turbo buick of the GN type to keep with our tradition.
Last edited by Cruz'N Bruz'R; Jan 18, 2006 at 09:31 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Cruz'N Bruz'R
Yeah, I'm guilty of that, but those Kumho's put up such a good fight, I bought 4 more.
And the truck sucks back the gas, but's it's quicker than either of my thirdgen's were when i got them.
And if I remember correctly, I mentioned the R/T's first, but you always loved the Lightnings. So there.
And now, I guess I'll have to go get me a turbo buick of the GN type to keep with our tradition.
Yeah, I'm guilty of that, but those Kumho's put up such a good fight, I bought 4 more.
And the truck sucks back the gas, but's it's quicker than either of my thirdgen's were when i got them.
And if I remember correctly, I mentioned the R/T's first, but you always loved the Lightnings. So there.
And now, I guess I'll have to go get me a turbo buick of the GN type to keep with our tradition.

GN prices aren't reasonable. Complete ****boxes start at $12,000. My car wasn't cheap and isn't the nicest but it would have been a hell of alot more if it was GN
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by Cruz'N Bruz'R
And now, I guess I'll have to go get me a turbo buick of the GN type to keep with our tradition.
And now, I guess I'll have to go get me a turbo buick of the GN type to keep with our tradition.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 4
From: In the Garage
Car: Camaro
Engine: 6.2L
Transmission: T56
I like it. It could be improved especially with respect to the grill. It shore dont look very aerodynamic to me so I cant see it staying as is. The windshield is kinda low and I'm kinda tall. I drove a new Mustang a few weeks back and couldn't see any traffic light sunless I bent down which SUCKED. other than that the Mustang drove pretty weel. SOLID braking wow first time I could say tha about a Ford
Actually... Now that I am into the LS1 thers are many many things that are far more serviceable thn conventional SBC's. Like practically all gaskets being void displacement so no replacing required. Simplified design on all mech parts making servicing or modding so quick and easy. Things like oiling system and tunability are waaaaaaay better than any previous offerings. The new Camaro will use a version of an LS series powerplant and I for one couldn't be more pleased. Great power, light weight and stellar mileage. Not to mention kick ars durability
That's the problem with all of them now - no user servicable parts inside.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
From: St Catharines, ON
Car: '85 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally posted by George
You all know of course that it's going to look something like this if and when it hits the streets:
You all know of course that it's going to look something like this if and when it hits the streets:
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 2
From: Toronto CANADA - GM Parts Rep.
Car: 1987 Iroc Z28
Engine: The KING of the 3rd gen TPI's.
Transmission: Beefed up T5
Axle/Gears: Aussie 3.45's
Originally Posted by George
You all know of course that it's going to look something like this if and when it hits the streets:
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Stouffville, Ontario
Car: 83WS6TA
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: TH350C
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Originally Posted by Zedsled
You should get a job at GM...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
84z96L31vortec
Tech / General Engine
7
Aug 20, 2017 12:16 AM





