several mods vs. turbo . . . which one?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: T-5 w/centerforce dual friction plate clutch
several mods vs. turbo . . . which one?
right no i have a 92 z28 with a 305 5spd. it has the ram air setup, airfoil, cat back exhuast, forged pistons at a 10:1 compression ratio, and a mild cam. this summer i am probably going to spend between 2 to 3 grand on my car and i'm either going to get slp headers, big mouth manifold, siamesed runners, and a 150 shot of nos. with this setup i figure i will be in the low 13's or high 12's. OR do you think instead of buying all that get a turbo. i think the turbo will probably be around the same price as the other mods combined, so which one should i do? thanks
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
From: San Rafael, CA
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI (L98)
Transmission: 700RJunk
Considering your budget, i'd go with a set of mods like a good set of aluminum heads, headers, and do the appropriate intake/fuel system mods. Considering what you have already done, those mods should definatley give you some measurable gains. Now a turbo would be even better. It'll cost about the same.........times 3.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Well a super charger and a turbo are the same thing just a supercharger runs off a belt so nah 
Plus that is a damn good power adder.

Plus that is a damn good power adder.
Last edited by 5SIZ; May 13, 2002 at 05:12 PM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,512
Likes: 0
From: Tucson
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
super chargers may drain a little power but the gains you get from it are worth it, especially the ATI, but thats my opinion.
Last edited by 5SIZ; May 13, 2002 at 05:23 PM.
You are running too high of compression to run much boost, but your motor sounds like it would handle the nitrous just fine
I would recommend going with a good set of heads though. I have some spare vortecs...
I would recommend going with a good set of heads though. I have some spare vortecs... what?
How can he run more boost with aluminum heads? A 64cc combustion chamber is the same wether cast, or aluminum. The aluminum head isn't going to run at a cooler enough temp to let him run more boost. If he wanted to go with bigger combustion chambers, then I could see that, but a cast head will handle boost just as good as aluminum. Aluminum will just cost more.
Since you got 3 posts I'll figure you haven't read up much.
Aluminum is far less prone to detonation due to its different thermal Inefficiencies. Heat escapes the combustion chamber, thus moving you further away from preignition (detonation)
64cc for 64cc, aluminum will tollerate a whole point more of compression than cast.
Aluminum is far less prone to detonation due to its different thermal Inefficiencies. Heat escapes the combustion chamber, thus moving you further away from preignition (detonation)
64cc for 64cc, aluminum will tollerate a whole point more of compression than cast.
I have read up a lot more than you think I know. I have a tpi truck running 12 psi and and I get 12.47@ 112. I have done all the work myself, and I know what I am doing around boost. Using my fjo wideband o2 system I have determined that stock polished cast iron heads are no more prone to detonate than aluminum heads. I have had both. He can't run much boost with either heads with 10.0:1 compression. It is as simple as that. His motor is better for No2
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, IN
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R
Well....not to stir the pot or anything, but GMI Fast claims to have run 10.5:1 compression with quite a bit of boost. Check out the power adders board.
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, IN
Car: 86 Cutlass
Engine: 350
Transmission: 200-4R
just takes brains and effort
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




