Hypertech chip
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: TH700-R4
Hypertech chip
I just installed a hypertech thermomaster chip in my 87 IROC 305. Now the car has less power,the check engine light is on, the car idles at 1500RPM and it wont comunicate with my scan tool. I put the stock chip back in and the car runs perfect. The car has a 160 stat, 185 fan switch, adjustable fuel pressure regulator set at 50PSI, headers no cat and a Borla 3" exhaust. Any advice?
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: TH700-R4
yes but does GM offer any higher performance PROMS? I havent seen any if they do. Somebody has to make a decent chip that does what its supposed to.
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: I said that when I was sober...ish
Car: 1985 Mustang GT
Engine: hamsters
Transmission: a hamster wheel
I had a hypercrap chip in my car, it made it ping so now I use it to pee on, send it back and get the things to burn your own chips, you will learn so much about your car and how to tune it for the same price as the chip. see the diy prom board for more info.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by OutsiderIROC-Z
GM put a high performance chip in their cars?
GM put a high performance chip in their cars?
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: I said that when I was sober...ish
Car: 1985 Mustang GT
Engine: hamsters
Transmission: a hamster wheel
Originally posted by volksjager
I find that very hard to believe. Do you work for GM or something? I think your giving the GM engineers WAY to much credit
I find that very hard to believe. Do you work for GM or something? I think your giving the GM engineers WAY to much credit
Originally posted by volksjager
I think your giving the GM engineers WAY to much credit
I think your giving the GM engineers WAY to much credit
You'll at least gain some knowledge and experience with chip burning. Or just go buy a hypercrap chip and see how much better they are than the GM engineers.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Re: Hypertech chip
Originally posted by volksjager
I just installed a hypertech thermomaster chip in my 87 IROC 305. Now the car has less power,the check engine light is on, the car idles at 1500RPM and it wont comunicate with my scan tool. I put the stock chip back in and the car runs perfect. The car has a 160 stat, 185 fan switch, adjustable fuel pressure regulator set at 50PSI, headers no cat and a Borla 3" exhaust. Any advice?
I just installed a hypertech thermomaster chip in my 87 IROC 305. Now the car has less power,the check engine light is on, the car idles at 1500RPM and it wont comunicate with my scan tool. I put the stock chip back in and the car runs perfect. The car has a 160 stat, 185 fan switch, adjustable fuel pressure regulator set at 50PSI, headers no cat and a Borla 3" exhaust. Any advice?
The debate on off the shelf chips is neverending but either way your check engine light should not come on. I would call Hypertech or whoever you bought it from.
I am one of the few people that saw a gain from a Hypertech chip and I backed it up with actual track runs. My car had a cold air intake and an aftermarket muffler at the time so it wasn't completely stock.
So many people on here are quick to quote what a few others opinions are when in reality they have no experience with it themselves.
Moderator
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 2
From: Schererville , IN
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
Hypertech chips are garbage, period. U want proof, come on by and ill load up both bins for u and u can compare them for yourself. Take a walk over to the dyi-prom board here and start reading , we're all going faster, whether stock or modified than we were with anything gm had to offer us :-) All it takes is a lot more time and knowledge thna money to get started and working your way to an undeerstanding of what/how it works
There are custom chips(custom tuners who will work with u too) out there that work decently for stock cars and yes they were tuned for mileage and emiisions first and then performance, the big 3 have to do it that way.
Hypertech, Jet, and any of the other 10 sec 20hp advertisers out there are smoking it out their tailpipe and we have all seen it and proved it over at the prom board
Later
Jeremy
PS those hypertech fan swithces? i will sell u them all day for only 20$, i can get them at carquest for ohhh a whole 10$ i think :-)
There are custom chips(custom tuners who will work with u too) out there that work decently for stock cars and yes they were tuned for mileage and emiisions first and then performance, the big 3 have to do it that way.
Hypertech, Jet, and any of the other 10 sec 20hp advertisers out there are smoking it out their tailpipe and we have all seen it and proved it over at the prom board
Later
Jeremy
PS those hypertech fan swithces? i will sell u them all day for only 20$, i can get them at carquest for ohhh a whole 10$ i think :-)
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Almost everyone on the DIY board is burning chips for decently to seriously modified cars. It is a HUGE challenge to learn how to do that which is why so few people are actually doing it.
The bottom line is that for a stock car the Hypertech chip is better than the stock GM one. Is it worth the money? Not to you because you have the equipment and I assume you know what you are doing.
Is it that much different than the factory one? Probably not. From what I hear they only added a little bit of timing at higher RPMs and not much else. How is that considered garbage though to someone that doesn't have the equipment or knowledge to do it themselves?
With the few mods this guy has he doesn't need to start learning how to burn his own PROMs quite yet.
The bottom line is that for a stock car the Hypertech chip is better than the stock GM one. Is it worth the money? Not to you because you have the equipment and I assume you know what you are doing.
Is it that much different than the factory one? Probably not. From what I hear they only added a little bit of timing at higher RPMs and not much else. How is that considered garbage though to someone that doesn't have the equipment or knowledge to do it themselves?
With the few mods this guy has he doesn't need to start learning how to burn his own PROMs quite yet.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Originally posted by 3.8TransAM
Hypertech, Jet, and any of the other 10 sec 20hp advertisers out there are smoking it out their tailpipe and we have all seen it and proved it over at the prom board
Hypertech, Jet, and any of the other 10 sec 20hp advertisers out there are smoking it out their tailpipe and we have all seen it and proved it over at the prom board
I proved this at the racetrack, not on the internet.
Originally posted by DannyT
I proved this at the racetrack, not on the internet.
I proved this at the racetrack, not on the internet.
If you ran faster with that chip...bully for you, but your engine is probably suffering from it too.
On a side note, tuning these engines to meet EPA guide lines is what makes the power, a clean burning engine makes more power. Look at the little V6's being made today, they meet very strict emissions laws and crank out well over 200 hp doing it....hmmm clean=power
Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Sweden (malmö)
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI 350 sd
Transmission: A4
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: TH700-R4
I called hypertech today the tech i talked to sounded like some moron hillbilly. he said I must have got the wrong chip. but the part number matches right up. I'm just gonna send the worthless POS back to Summit racing and run the stock PROM untill I build an 350 at which time I will try to burn a PROM or maybe go to a DFI or FAST system. Thanks for all the input.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
Originally posted by Morley
[B]Did you do a scan of your ECM on your 1/4 mile runs? You'd probably be shocked by what you see. Adding timing and a little more fuel at WOT is NOT the way to go, you need hard data on what is happening with the engine before just slapping in more fuel and timing.
If you ran faster with that chip...bully for you, but your engine is probably suffering from it too.
[B]Did you do a scan of your ECM on your 1/4 mile runs? You'd probably be shocked by what you see. Adding timing and a little more fuel at WOT is NOT the way to go, you need hard data on what is happening with the engine before just slapping in more fuel and timing.
If you ran faster with that chip...bully for you, but your engine is probably suffering from it too.
My point is ONLY that it ran faster with the Hypertech chip when my car was nearly stock.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Laval, Canada
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
I gained 2-3 MPH by running the ARAP code which is from a 1989 Automatic Corvette on an otherwise stock '89 L98. I ran my stock chip and then flipped over to this on the same day at the track and that was the difference.
I also have improved my part throttle response, gas mileage(enabled highway mode), start up crank time(2-3 cranks vs 6-8), fan temperatures(on at 208 off at 204), and learned alot.
Now that I am swapping heads and installing headers I can adjust to the new flow numbers.
Burning your own chips is the best value for your dollar period. Aside from the performance you may gain, the knowledge will help you understand your engine in greater detail so when the time comes to actually upgrade some components making the most of them will come in very handy.
Morly is right that a clean running engine makes power. And overall GM did a great job, but a massed produce vehicle usually meets the lowest common denominator thus tuning for your exact conditions and modifications, even small ones, does maximize the efficiency of the engine, thus making more power.
All this should be done with a proper scanning tool and logging features so that all changes can be measured.
I also have improved my part throttle response, gas mileage(enabled highway mode), start up crank time(2-3 cranks vs 6-8), fan temperatures(on at 208 off at 204), and learned alot.
Now that I am swapping heads and installing headers I can adjust to the new flow numbers.
Burning your own chips is the best value for your dollar period. Aside from the performance you may gain, the knowledge will help you understand your engine in greater detail so when the time comes to actually upgrade some components making the most of them will come in very handy.
Morly is right that a clean running engine makes power. And overall GM did a great job, but a massed produce vehicle usually meets the lowest common denominator thus tuning for your exact conditions and modifications, even small ones, does maximize the efficiency of the engine, thus making more power.
All this should be done with a proper scanning tool and logging features so that all changes can be measured.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 1
From: Grand Island, NY
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Originally posted by DOOSKI
Does the highway mode really work? Why didnt they enable this on GM?
Does the highway mode really work? Why didnt they enable this on GM?
When highway more is envoked it produces more NO.
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Laval, Canada
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
They highway mode should work. I haven't had a chance to measure it in mileage because I barely did 100 miles since I've enabled it, but my datalog of some of those miles shows that it goes into highway mode and leans out the AFR to 15.1:1-15.4:1.
Now I still need to enable Highway spark mode as well, but I am installing Vortec heads as we speak so I will first retune for idle and past throttle, then highway and hopefully by then I will have procured myself a wideband O2 sensor and start tuning for WOT!
Now I still need to enable Highway spark mode as well, but I am installing Vortec heads as we speak so I will first retune for idle and past throttle, then highway and hopefully by then I will have procured myself a wideband O2 sensor and start tuning for WOT!
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Laval, Canada
Car: 2004 BMW 330Cic
Engine: 3.0
Transmission: 6 speed
No...certain conditions need to be met for Highway mode to be enable and in the programming of the original chip certain conditions will never be met.
Such as Min. RPM for highwat spark mode : 6350
That's a tad higher than my normal cruising speed!!!
Such as Min. RPM for highwat spark mode : 6350
That's a tad higher than my normal cruising speed!!!
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: I said that when I was sober...ish
Car: 1985 Mustang GT
Engine: hamsters
Transmission: a hamster wheel
6350! I dont think my engine goes that high, I know Ive never checked, I dont think the gas mileage is going to help much at that speed, which for me would be about 300mph, heh
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gunner242
Electronics
7
Dec 25, 2015 04:49 PM
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Oct 15, 2015 05:00 PM





