dynoed the car. went to the track. about to give up.
dynoed the car. went to the track. about to give up.
i had my car dynoed for the very first time yesterday. from what i can see on the graph there is somethin seriously wrong with it and i dont know what to do or how to fix it. i dont have much experience with dyno graphs but i'm pretty sure the hp curve isn't supposed to start dying at 3200! also it looks like my a/f ratio is very rich at higher RPMs. i had my pressure set at 50 so last night i went to the track and lowered it to about 42. car ran worse by a tenth. i've ran it now several times and i can't seem to get anything lower than 14.8 with 92mph traps and 2.1 60's. i tried setting the FP even lower but the car started to run worse. so i bumped it up again. i dont know if the fact i'm running rich has anything to do with the early loss of power, or if there is something wrong with the motor itself. there is a sticker on the block that says "remanufactured", and since i dont have any history on the car im thinking maybe it has a cam that doesn't belong on this motor.
the torque is definitely noticeable. last night i took a late 70s trans am off the line by like 4 cars, but he eventually caught up and got a 14.6 to my 14.9! i have no top end!
i'd like to hear some suggestions cuz i'm seriously thinking of not wasting my money anymore and just save up for another motor or another car. motor and tranny seem to be strong and i try to keep this car in top shape. mods are in my sig. thanks.
the torque is definitely noticeable. last night i took a late 70s trans am off the line by like 4 cars, but he eventually caught up and got a 14.6 to my 14.9! i have no top end!
i'd like to hear some suggestions cuz i'm seriously thinking of not wasting my money anymore and just save up for another motor or another car. motor and tranny seem to be strong and i try to keep this car in top shape. mods are in my sig. thanks.
i had the stock regulator in when it was dynoed, i just did the quarter trick to raise the FP. before i went to the track i put in the adjustable one at about 42 psi. one guy at the dyno shop said 5 psi drop should be enough to get the a/f ratio to the right level. i know i dropped 8 but doubt 3 psi woulda made a big difference. it's just running way too rich and i dunno if this is why the motor is dying so early.
Last edited by llvll4l2c91350; Oct 5, 2003 at 11:30 AM.
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: under the hood
Car: 88 gta ....89 formula 350
Engine: 5.7......383
Transmission: heavily reworked 700r4
im thinking your on the right track when you say the cam might be your problem. it might not be computer compatible. when i had my motor rebuilt in my gta they put a cam in it that would pull real hard on bottom end but after 3300 it would just stop pulling and run rich. it may or may not be your problem but it was mine......just my 2 cents worth...........
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45
FYI: According to your graph your HP peak is at 3900 RPMs not 3200. Your torque is what is dropping off after 3200 RPMs. Are yuo disconnecting and plugging the vacuum line when setting the fuel pressure?
Originally posted by DannyT
FYI: According to your graph your HP peak is at 3900 RPMs not 3200. Your torque is what is dropping off after 3200 RPMs. Are yuo disconnecting and plugging the vacuum line when setting the fuel pressure?
FYI: According to your graph your HP peak is at 3900 RPMs not 3200. Your torque is what is dropping off after 3200 RPMs. Are yuo disconnecting and plugging the vacuum line when setting the fuel pressure?

yeah im setting the FP with the vacuum line disconnected and plugged.
Last edited by llvll4l2c91350; Oct 5, 2003 at 04:35 PM.
Originally posted by clippjr8
you runnin the stock prom? that is prob the prob.
you runnin the stock prom? that is prob the prob.
So there's no way to contact the previous owner or anything like that so maybe you can find out what kind of cam is in there?
you guys are right. i looked at it again and realized i hadn't lined up the peaks with the #'s on the side correctly. but i still have a problem. TQ and HP are still dying too early and am running extremely rich. i should have a steady rising line until about 4800 and maybe even more with the ported plenum and runners.
yea im runing the stock prom. but i doubt it needs to be reprogrammed already with the basic bolt ons i have.
as for contacting the previous owner. i was thinkin of going to the dealer where i bought it from and trying to find out. it's probably been too long though (2 years since i bought the car).
sorry for the mistake
Originally posted by llvll4l2c91350
you guys are right. i looked at it again and realized i hadn't lined up the peaks with the #'s on the side correctly. but i still have a problem. TQ and HP are still dying too early and am running extremely rich. i should have a steady rising line until about 4800 and maybe even more with the ported plenum and runners.
yea im runing the stock prom. but i doubt it needs to be reprogrammed already with the basic bolt ons i have.
as for contacting the previous owner. i was thinkin of going to the dealer where i bought it from and trying to find out. it's probably been too long though (2 years since i bought the car).
sorry for the mistake
you guys are right. i looked at it again and realized i hadn't lined up the peaks with the #'s on the side correctly. but i still have a problem. TQ and HP are still dying too early and am running extremely rich. i should have a steady rising line until about 4800 and maybe even more with the ported plenum and runners.
yea im runing the stock prom. but i doubt it needs to be reprogrammed already with the basic bolt ons i have.
as for contacting the previous owner. i was thinkin of going to the dealer where i bought it from and trying to find out. it's probably been too long though (2 years since i bought the car).
sorry for the mistake
from what i can see, the afr drops below 11.0 to 1 at 3400 rpms. i would say that you do need to burn a prom to fix your prob. need to play with the timing and fuel to get the afr correct the rest of the way through the rpms. that is what i think the easiest way to fix your prob would be.
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: helldon, fl
Car: 87 trans am GTA
Engine: tesla permanent magnet
Transmission: 93 T-56
Axle/Gears: moser 12bolt w/ 3.73
i would put a vaccum guage on their and see what it pulls that would help detect traces of a larger cam , an since SD cars live off manifold press. a drop in vacc. would run the way rich, MAF can get away to an extent but you really cant fool the MAP sensor , whats going to tough is when get the chip theyre gonna want to know what cam you have , also it doesnt hurt to check the timing that can really make difference.
good hunting young anakin :lala:
good hunting young anakin :lala:
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Car: 1989 Formula 350 / 2000 Lightning
Engine: GM HO 350 Crate (Vortec headed w/TPI) / SC 5.4 330
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 (Raptor Rebuild Kit)
Originally posted by quickL98
also it doesnt hurt to check the timing that can really make difference.
also it doesnt hurt to check the timing that can really make difference.
I agree totally.....My bolt on L98 would only put out 192 RWHP, I noticed the pinging, Decreased timing and picked up another 15 horses(RW that is)
Timing is EVERYTHING!!!!!!
Later
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 5
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
if u were at 50 psi fuel pressure on the dyno and u are WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY RICH, decreasing it should help, BUT u cant go down 8psi of pressure and expect it to help. thats way to much of a decrease, start at 48, then 46, then 44. oh yes and timing is very very important with all this. try 8-10* advance, i run 12, my car runs best there.
i agree, decreasing FP should help, but should it really change the a/f curve that much? mine is literally off the chart it's so rich. i have the timing only a couple of degrees advanced from stock (8*). my friend's 85 LB9's (almost same mods as me) a/f ratio line is a lot closer to where it should be on the graph, with 50 psi of FP.
i wouldn't be surprised if i do have a bad cam in there. i remember even with stock FP regulator and before i did any mods, the car just never felt like it had any power up top.
i wouldn't be surprised if i do have a bad cam in there. i remember even with stock FP regulator and before i did any mods, the car just never felt like it had any power up top.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Car: 2005 Subaru STI
Engine: 153ci of Turbo Power!
Transmission: 6-Speed
1) You need some serious pump-shot (acceleration enrichment) because you are lean when the throttle is stabbed. Increase the values in the AE vs. Delta %TPS table in the PROM.
2) You are rediculously rich across the board. Change the PE vs. Coolant table by decreasing by ~18%. This corresponds to about a 2.0 AFR change.
3) Use the PE vs. RPM table to smooth out that AFR graph.
Here's an example of what I was able to do via this type of tuning ...
http://www.celligent.com/tim/iroc/dyno/dyno_afr.jpg
Tim
2) You are rediculously rich across the board. Change the PE vs. Coolant table by decreasing by ~18%. This corresponds to about a 2.0 AFR change.
3) Use the PE vs. RPM table to smooth out that AFR graph.
Here's an example of what I was able to do via this type of tuning ...
http://www.celligent.com/tim/iroc/dyno/dyno_afr.jpg
Tim
Originally posted by TRAXION
1) You need some serious pump-shot (acceleration enrichment) because you are lean when the throttle is stabbed. Increase the values in the AE vs. Delta %TPS table in the PROM.
2) You are rediculously rich across the board. Change the PE vs. Coolant table by decreasing by ~18%. This corresponds to about a 2.0 AFR change.
3) Use the PE vs. RPM table to smooth out that AFR graph.
1) You need some serious pump-shot (acceleration enrichment) because you are lean when the throttle is stabbed. Increase the values in the AE vs. Delta %TPS table in the PROM.
2) You are rediculously rich across the board. Change the PE vs. Coolant table by decreasing by ~18%. This corresponds to about a 2.0 AFR change.
3) Use the PE vs. RPM table to smooth out that AFR graph.

i know i'll need to eventually learn about this stuff. i dont plan on keeping this car in the pathetic high 14's area.
Last edited by llvll4l2c91350; Oct 6, 2003 at 05:46 PM.
now i really dont know what to do. i'm thinkin it could be a bad cam, but what if someone already installed a better than stock cam, but just didn't reprogram the prom.
also, could bad injectors be causing this???
i seriously feel like yankin the damn motor out of this car and tossing it in the nearest lake
also, could bad injectors be causing this???
i seriously feel like yankin the damn motor out of this car and tossing it in the nearest lake
20 for vacuum at idle is right where you are supposed to be for a stock/almost stock cam. Under accelleration you should loose vaccuum, not gain it. Once your rpm's level out so will your vaccuum #'s.
I'm definately interested in seeing what is making you so rich. Keep us updated
Matt
I'm definately interested in seeing what is making you so rich. Keep us updated
Matt
Check your exhaust system - things that will make a basically stock set up run so rich (aside from the fuel at 50psi) is bad cat,,, flattened "Y-pipe", or crimped exhaust pipes.
I'd also check the lifter adjustment and set it between 1/4 and 1/2 turn - unless you set them yourself - no telling where they're set.
I'd also check the lifter adjustment and set it between 1/4 and 1/2 turn - unless you set them yourself - no telling where they're set.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 4
From: orlando, fl usa
Car: 1986 pontiac TA
Engine: 360 HSR
Transmission: 700r4 3300 yank converter
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt
the vacuum will drop then rise if you are doing this in park and part throttle. it should drop and stay at 0 if you are doing a WOT run.
Originally posted by Kevin Gray
Check your exhaust system - things that will make a basically stock set up run so rich (aside from the fuel at 50psi) is bad cat,,, flattened "Y-pipe", or crimped exhaust pipes.
Check your exhaust system - things that will make a basically stock set up run so rich (aside from the fuel at 50psi) is bad cat,,, flattened "Y-pipe", or crimped exhaust pipes.
Last edited by llvll4l2c91350; Oct 17, 2003 at 11:25 PM.
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, NE
Car: 1988 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: TH350
Take that piece of **** 160 degree thermostat out and put the 195 degree stat back in. The computer is reading that your engine is still running in cold start up, therefore its just dumping more fuel in there then needed. Its trying to warm the engine up with a rich fuel mixture.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 3
From: Austin
Car: 82 Z-28
Engine: 383 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
What size injs are you using?
Sounds like maybe the ECM thinks they are smaller than they really are.
Could also be the ECM coolant temp sensor. It may be telling the ECM that the eng is colder than it really is.
Either interface with the ECM via laptop and check the reported temp or you can check the sensors resistance using an ohm meter and the temp/resistance look-up chart below (which I copied from one of Vaders posts).
BTW, I would run at least a 180* thermostat in any eng. Especially a computer controlled eng.
Sounds like maybe the ECM thinks they are smaller than they really are.
Could also be the ECM coolant temp sensor. It may be telling the ECM that the eng is colder than it really is.
Either interface with the ECM via laptop and check the reported temp or you can check the sensors resistance using an ohm meter and the temp/resistance look-up chart below (which I copied from one of Vaders posts).
BTW, I would run at least a 180* thermostat in any eng. Especially a computer controlled eng.
Last edited by ZZ28ZZ; Oct 18, 2003 at 02:53 AM.
i'll check on the CTS and the MAP. AFAIK the injectors are stock 22#'ers. but i'd have to verify. i think LT1 injectors look the same but have higher flow, which would be causing a power loss if the ECM hasn't been reprogrammed.
i put in a 180* stat last night, and cleaned up my air filter a bit. went to the track but unfortunately wont know if it made any difference. only got to run once for 1/8 mile, and the launch was terrible.
i put in a 180* stat last night, and cleaned up my air filter a bit. went to the track but unfortunately wont know if it made any difference. only got to run once for 1/8 mile, and the launch was terrible.
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 13
From: St. Augustine, FL
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12 bolt-3.73
The 160 thermostat isn't the cause of any of your problems. Everyone of us one here runs one, including me, and I have my fan running all the time.
Turn your fuel pressure down, the factory tune is already rich enough.
Do you have access to a scanner or data logger? That's what you need to adjust the air/fuel.
Turn your fuel pressure down, the factory tune is already rich enough.
Do you have access to a scanner or data logger? That's what you need to adjust the air/fuel.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 1
From: Cherry Hill, NJ
Car: 92 Trans Am 'Vert
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5 Speed
Are you throwing any codes? It almost sounds like your knock sensor is picking up massive amounts of knock, which is causing the ECM to over compensate with fuel. First things first... get under the car with an ohm meter, and test that knock sensor. It should read 3.9k ohms. If it doesent read that, then theres your starting point.
truck heads in my L98?!?!?!?!?!
well i think i finally found my problem. the # on the heads that are in my car read 14102191 which according to different posts on here, are not stock heads and happen to be TRUCK HEADS!!!

i remember i checked the # a long time ago but all it said was 350 so i left it at that. never ocurred to me back then that a 350 isn't necessarily an L98.
now i know why that dumbass mechanic charged so cheap for a head replacement 2 years ago. i wish i had known back then what i know now. but of course that was before i even joined this site.
now on to look for new heads!!!!

i remember i checked the # a long time ago but all it said was 350 so i left it at that. never ocurred to me back then that a 350 isn't necessarily an L98.
now i know why that dumbass mechanic charged so cheap for a head replacement 2 years ago. i wish i had known back then what i know now. but of course that was before i even joined this site.
now on to look for new heads!!!!
Last edited by llvll4l2c91350; Oct 19, 2003 at 03:21 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
14
Jan 31, 2025 05:10 PM








