TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

how do i run premium?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 02:20 PM
  #1  
MaNiAk86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Highwood, IL
Car: 1983 trans am
Engine: Vortec 350 w/ a comp cam
Transmission: B&Mth350 2800holeshot
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 3.23's
how do i run premium?

i have a 1986 lb9 tpi motor and i would like to advance the timing so i can run premium fuel(93 octane) to get a little more power, but im not sure how much to advance it. the stock setting for my car is 6 degrees advanced.

all your help is greatly appreciated!

Last edited by MaNiAk86; Sep 16, 2006 at 02:25 PM. Reason: added info
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 05:02 PM
  #2  
jethawk's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Windsor,Ontario
Car: 1991 Firebird Formula WS6
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
10-12 base should be good...
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2006 | 11:40 PM
  #3  
MaNiAk86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Highwood, IL
Car: 1983 trans am
Engine: Vortec 350 w/ a comp cam
Transmission: B&Mth350 2800holeshot
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 3.23's
wow 10 - 12 seems kinda high, i was thinking more like 9-10, but ill do some more research.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 12:29 AM
  #4  
jethawk's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Windsor,Ontario
Car: 1991 Firebird Formula WS6
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42's
i run 12 degree's base on 91 with my LB9 with no issues.... but every engine likes different things...
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 12:43 AM
  #5  
89Nighthawk's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Car: 89 GTA Nighthawk
Engine: 389 CID Vortec TPI
Transmission: TCI 700R4 w/Vigilante
Higher octane doesn't mean more power unless your getting knock with lower octane.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 01:21 AM
  #6  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
I went from 6 to 8 and it was fine. So I went from 8 to 10 and everything is ok. Running 93 octane.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 11:23 AM
  #7  
MaNiAk86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
From: Highwood, IL
Car: 1983 trans am
Engine: Vortec 350 w/ a comp cam
Transmission: B&Mth350 2800holeshot
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 3.23's
thanks for all the help guys. once i run out of my 87 ill fill her up with some shell v-power 93 then bring her home and advance the timing. i think ill start with 9 and adjust from there.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 12:11 PM
  #8  
Grim Reaper's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,907
Likes: 5
From: The Bone Yard
Car: Death Mobile
Engine: 666 c.i.
Unfortunately, just twisting the dissy does not usually give more spark advance on these cars. These engines are extremely prone to detonation. So much so, that EVEN with the stock timing, at WOT (if you monitor it with a scan tool), that it triggers so much knock to the Knock Sensor that the engine starts to pull timing out of the engine.

I have seen it where adding a couple of degrees results in LESS overall timing in WOT than when it was stock due to the Knock Sensor pulling out far more timing than when the dissy was left in the stock position.
I have done a TON of experimentation and the only effective way to increase the timing is to add the timing via the eprom and then control the Knock Sensor. In fact, the BEST way on a basically stock engine is to control the Knock Sensor so it only pulls out 1* @ WOT and find the amount of spark advance the engine can handle WITHOUT incurring detonation.

I have observed that if the Knock Sensor starts to pull tiing and causes the overall spark to "bounce around", you usually can't run as much timing as if you had just "controlled" the Knock Sensor properly and then found the maximum amount of timing the engine can handle without incurring detonation.

Using "mechanical methods" to gain more performance on these cars just don't work very effectively. Eliminating the KS entirely is not a good idea either as it is a great "safeguard" in case you get a "bad tank of gas"...which seems to happen more often these days. I tend to control the KS only in WOT and let it "do its job" in part-throttle cruise.

BTW, once you properly control the KS and optimize the spark for premium, there IS a definite power gain (over tuning for 87). This is based on a number of years of experimenting and programming the eprom on my car (after finding the mechanical methods just didn't work).
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2006 | 07:24 PM
  #9  
MikeH's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 2
From: Fla
Car: 90 IROC
Engine: 406
Transmission: GMPP 93/4L60
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.27
Hi Glenn.....good to know your still around, havent seen to many of your posts lately.

As always your posts are straight forward and very informative!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eightsixseven
Tech / General Engine
2
Dec 16, 2024 01:50 PM
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
Dec 2, 2016 06:33 PM
perZ
TPI
3
Aug 21, 2015 05:51 PM
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
3
Aug 13, 2015 07:35 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.