heads?? TFS 23's or Edelbrock 6085's???????
heads?? TFS 23's or Edelbrock 6085's???????
Trying to pick a head for my combo but can't decide between TFS 23 degree heads or Edelbrock performer 6085's. I know that everyone basically aqree's that AFR makes the best heads but they dont fit in to my bugit. Also wondering which RR to go with 1.5's or 1.6's and what pushrod length would I need.
Mods:
-bored .030 over
-fully balanced
-KB Hypereutectic pistons
-all ARP bolts
-Gm ZZ3 cam 208/221 .474"/.501"
-fully ported stock upper,lower and runners
-airfoil
-Holly AFPR
-MSD 6A, 8.5 wires and coil
-3inch Flowmaster catback minus the cat
-180 stat
-all free mods
Mods:
-bored .030 over
-fully balanced
-KB Hypereutectic pistons
-all ARP bolts
-Gm ZZ3 cam 208/221 .474"/.501"
-fully ported stock upper,lower and runners
-airfoil
-Holly AFPR
-MSD 6A, 8.5 wires and coil
-3inch Flowmaster catback minus the cat
-180 stat
-all free mods
i would also like to know what time slips I can expect. My car ran a 14.35@96.2 with a 2.053 60 foot time with only a fresh set of plugs and wires.
[This message has been edited by TA88GTA (edited September 20, 2001).]
[This message has been edited by TA88GTA (edited September 20, 2001).]
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Car: 1987 GTA originally 350TPI 3.27posi
Engine: 383 C.I.D.
Transmission: 700R4
I think everyone would say go with the TFS 23 cause 1) they flow better 2) cost less or the same and 3)if you stroke the motor in the future will support the bigger cubes.
However, the Edelbrock's would be a better match for your engine now because 1) smaller port=faster velocity 2)Comes with the correct Combustion size so you don't lose compression as opposed to the TFS 23* 3)Heads were designed with TPI in mind. 4)Proven Results. Someone on this board ran 13.00 with these heads box stock on a 350 TPI with a Superam and 219 Cam and stock shortblock . The small port, high velocity heads are proven to make power with your ported stock TPI and a mild cam like the ZZ4 engine. You should probably be in the 13.3-13.5 area depening how your tuning skills.
My take is that Edelbrocks are just as good or better box stock than a set of fully ported L-98 aluminum heads.
The TFS 23 heads are better matched to a 383 or bigger engine or a Supercharged engine that's looking to lower Compression Ratio in order to run more boost.
I'm sure I started an argument and others will agree with most of what I said but there's more detail to get into.
However, the Edelbrock's would be a better match for your engine now because 1) smaller port=faster velocity 2)Comes with the correct Combustion size so you don't lose compression as opposed to the TFS 23* 3)Heads were designed with TPI in mind. 4)Proven Results. Someone on this board ran 13.00 with these heads box stock on a 350 TPI with a Superam and 219 Cam and stock shortblock . The small port, high velocity heads are proven to make power with your ported stock TPI and a mild cam like the ZZ4 engine. You should probably be in the 13.3-13.5 area depening how your tuning skills.
My take is that Edelbrocks are just as good or better box stock than a set of fully ported L-98 aluminum heads.
The TFS 23 heads are better matched to a 383 or bigger engine or a Supercharged engine that's looking to lower Compression Ratio in order to run more boost.
I'm sure I started an argument and others will agree with most of what I said but there's more detail to get into.
Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: Stuarts Draft, VA
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: modified L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt
I would agree. If you plan on keeping the long tube style intake (incl. SR) I would say go with the Edelbrocks. The smaller port was designed for a TPI in order to keep the velocity high. That is the reason I chose them for my car, and have been pleased.
If you ever plan on stepping up to a MR though, I would say get something else. AFR's would work exceptionally nice with a MR.
------------------
Black 88 GTA L98
261 RWHP, 345 RWTQ
13.406 @ 103.72 MPH
ZZ4 bottom end, Edelbrock 6085 heads, LT4 HOT cam, GMPP 1.6 RR's, ported stock TPI, SLP 1 3/4" headers, no cat, Dynomax cat-back, Stock PROM
E.T.F.A Member #11
If you ever plan on stepping up to a MR though, I would say get something else. AFR's would work exceptionally nice with a MR.
------------------
Black 88 GTA L98
261 RWHP, 345 RWTQ
13.406 @ 103.72 MPH
ZZ4 bottom end, Edelbrock 6085 heads, LT4 HOT cam, GMPP 1.6 RR's, ported stock TPI, SLP 1 3/4" headers, no cat, Dynomax cat-back, Stock PROM
E.T.F.A Member #11
I've got the 6085's and I'm VERY pleased with them. I use the AS&M runners and the ZZ-9 cam. I run consistent 12.90's but I managed to pull a 12.84 and a 12.80 out of it 2 weeks ago. That's N/A with a little bitty 3.27 rear 
The only complaint I have pertains to any aluminum head:
This past summer I pulled the threads out of 2 spark plug holes in my 6085 heads...had to pull the heads and get them "Heli-coiled"...and yes, I did use "anti-seize" on the plugs...ALWAYS.
If you ask me, I don't know why Edelbrock doesn't put Heli-coils in their heads at the factory...they should. In fact, all aluminum head manufacturers should.
Torq

The only complaint I have pertains to any aluminum head:
This past summer I pulled the threads out of 2 spark plug holes in my 6085 heads...had to pull the heads and get them "Heli-coiled"...and yes, I did use "anti-seize" on the plugs...ALWAYS.
If you ask me, I don't know why Edelbrock doesn't put Heli-coils in their heads at the factory...they should. In fact, all aluminum head manufacturers should.
Torq
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
From: PA
Car: 88 Firebird WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
On the topic of pulling threads from al heads, why does trickflow specifically mention NEVER to use antiseize on the plugs or header bolts, but only use motor oil on the threads.
Why?
Why?
Trending Topics
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 404
Likes: 1
From: Evansville, IN USA
Car: '89 GMC Pickup
Engine: 383 SBC Stealth Ram
Transmission: 700R4/VIG 3200
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by JoelOl75:
On the topic of pulling threads from al heads, why does trickflow specifically mention NEVER to use antiseize on the plugs or header bolts, but only use motor oil on the threads.
Why?
</font>
On the topic of pulling threads from al heads, why does trickflow specifically mention NEVER to use antiseize on the plugs or header bolts, but only use motor oil on the threads.
Why?
</font>
------------------
_ ___ _
SMasterson
The 6085 heads work very well and produce some pretty good results. I have run them with a long runner / small cam and run mid 13's... With a SuperRam and 219* cam they get the car to 12.8's with no problem. The quality of the head is great and I have not ported them.... right out of the box
------------------
Hank
87'IROC Z28
Hanks 87 IROC
------------------
Hank
87'IROC Z28
Hanks 87 IROC
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86IROC112
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
Aug 17, 2015 02:00 PM





