TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

305 vs 350 Memcal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 11:06 PM
  #1  
Ricco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Bartlesville, OK
Car: 2011 Cummins HO
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.43
305 vs 350 Memcal

Is there an actual difference between a Memcal from a 305 vs a memcal from a 350 or ar they identical and its just the program thats different?

I'm assuming it is the latter for any given year..
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 01:30 AM
  #2  
1bad91Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

If it's the same year with same ECM's then the memcal is the same, the PROM will be different for 305's and 350's and 305/5-speeds will be different from 305/auto's.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 08:57 AM
  #3  
64deux's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: southeast
Car: GM WHAT ELSE IS THERE
Engine: 327 bottom tpi top
Transmission: 700r
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

The memcal assembly contains both the functions of the PROM and the CALPAK. Like the PROM, it contains the calibrations needed for a specific vehicle. It also is the fuel back up control for the computer should it become damaged or faulty.
To allow one type of computer to be used for many different vehicles, a device called a Programable Read Only Memory (PROM) unit is used. The PROM is located inside the computer and has system calibration information based upon the vehicle's axle ratio, engine, transmission, weight, and other specific configurations of the vehicle.
If the computer is equipped with a CALPAK chip, it will be located next to the PROM and must be transferred along with the PROM

in other words the memcal and prom are the same unless the ecm has a calpak then the prom is seperate
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2009 | 09:35 AM
  #4  
Ricco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Bartlesville, OK
Car: 2011 Cummins HO
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Thanks guys - the reason I asked is when I look at TPIParts.net for replacement chips, it says you need a Memcal from the original motor (of the same displacement) - I'm guessing now b/c thats b/c they dont change the cylinder size constant or the fuel and spark tables in the PROM as opposed to the "limp home" type function.

Next question is, can I install a Corvette MAP/TPI bin on a PROM and install it on my 305 MAP/TPI Memcal? I am building a Aluminium headed 350 with a T56 and figured that the Vette bin file would be a pretty good starting point... If so, can you give me any pointers on finding that vette bin i am looking for? I have looked at heaps of places that list endless bin files but none of them have trustworthy desriptions and most are just "a bunch of letters.bin"

Maybe i will post that Q in the DIY Prom forum...

Thanks again!
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2009 | 12:05 AM
  #5  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

The Corvette PROM has oil temp sensors in it, and you will get a SES light if the computer doesnt see those inputs. I found that out the hard way.

I'm now using a modified AXXD, which is a 305 5-speed G92 chip.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #6  
Ricco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Bartlesville, OK
Car: 2011 Cummins HO
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

I'm guessing it is too much work to add oil temp sensors then?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 02:17 AM
  #7  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

I asked the Corvette guys, because I wanted to add an oil temp sensor myself, and they said yes its more work than its worth.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #8  
Ricco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Bartlesville, OK
Car: 2011 Cummins HO
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Hmm.. I wonder how TPIParts.net gets around that then? The mention on their website that they can start with a Corvette bin file but they dont mention the CEL b/c of Oil Temp sensors...

Is it an electrical or mechanical challenge do you know?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 11:38 PM
  #9  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Yes, if you do a custom chip you can turn off the flags in the Constant Table so it will not check for the oil temp sensor.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 09:41 AM
  #10  
Ricco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Bartlesville, OK
Car: 2011 Cummins HO
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Well now you are confusing me even further.. If you can simply turn them off, why did you revert to a modified 305 bin instead of sticking with the Corvette bin?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 02:06 AM
  #11  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

At the time I was using the Corvette bin, I didnt have the capability to do my own custom chips. Once we realized the problem with the oil temp sensor setting the SES light, the guy doing my chips changed programs.

I had switched from a 305 5-speed with 19lb injectors to a 350 5-speed with 22lbs injectors and Corvette heads, so we thought starting with the Corvette chip would be better. As it turns out, the 305 5-speed chip worked just fine with the Corvette fuel and spark tables copied into it.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2009 | 08:53 AM
  #12  
Ricco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Bartlesville, OK
Car: 2011 Cummins HO
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

So when you say "chip" you mean you used the actual PROM/Memcal from a Corvette? And it was this PROM that had the oil temp sensor stuff in it.. So switching back to the original 305 5 speed PROM overcame that problem.

So the next question is, whats the differences between a 305/Auto PROM and a 305/5 speed PROM? Is it all programable from within the bin file?

What I want to know for sure is, if i use my original 305/Auto PROM and install a Corvette 350/6 Speed bin file, will it effectivley make my 305/Auto PROM seem like a Vette 350/6 Speed?

OR do i need to install a 305/5 Speed bin file onto the same 305/Auto Prom and copy in the Vette fuel and spark tables? This seems more logical to me given what you have said.

Thanks for the help by the way! Just trying to learn all this stuff
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2009 | 11:09 PM
  #13  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

When I say chip I mean the programming coded in the PROM, in this case. I guess I should use the term bin file? And the PROM is the part of the memcal that holds the black rectangular pieces on the top. And the memcal is the whole thing that plugs into the ECM.

Its my understanding there are parts of the bin file that we dont quite understand yet. So I would start with the bin file that has the right transmission and modify it to your specs. Yes you can erase your existing chip/PROM with ultraviolet light and reprogram it using a chip burner. You cannot reprogram changes to the existing chip/PROM until you erase it first and burn your new program onto it. You could use either the 305 5-speed f-body bin file, or the Corvette 6-speed bin file, with the oil temp SES check turned off.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #14  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

So if one were doing a MAF to SD setup and has a 91-92 730 ecm, and needed a memcal as well, but didnt want to spend 300 bucks for a new GM 350 memcal, could one use the 305 TPI memcal ?

Since guys use 350 computers for 383's and 400+ inch motors anyway, why does the memcal matter? Shouldnt a TPI 305 memcal work just as good as a 350 memcal?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 08:28 AM
  #15  
Ricco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Bartlesville, OK
Car: 2011 Cummins HO
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
So if one were doing a MAF to SD setup and has a 91-92 730 ecm, and needed a memcal as well, but didnt want to spend 300 bucks for a new GM 350 memcal, could one use the 305 TPI memcal ?

Since guys use 350 computers for 383's and 400+ inch motors anyway, why does the memcal matter? Shouldnt a TPI 305 memcal work just as good as a 350 memcal?
Thats pretty much what I was trying to figure out. Having read and re-read the replys in this thread many times, I am going with the understanding that the Memcals are pretty much the same but the programming in the PROM is different (as you would expect). I also expect that you should be fine using a 305 Memcal but will need to adjust the several perameters in the bin to alter it sufficiently enough to support a 350 motor - Displacement, Injector size, fuel & spark tables etc etc..
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 08:43 AM
  #16  
marine68's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: SAN ANTONIO TEXAS
Car: 89 IROC Z28
Engine: 5.7 L Edelbrock perf /holley 3310
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9 BOLT 3:27
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

ricco, can you answer my thread about no fuel pump, injector pulse. i beleive you know the answer.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #17  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Originally Posted by Ricco
Thats pretty much what I was trying to figure out. Having read and re-read the replys in this thread many times, I am going with the understanding that the Memcals are pretty much the same but the programming in the PROM is different (as you would expect). I also expect that you should be fine using a 305 Memcal but will need to adjust the several perameters in the bin to alter it sufficiently enough to support a 350 motor - Displacement, Injector size, fuel & spark tables etc etc..
See thats my thing, I burn my own chips and the motor in question isnt even in the same ball park as the stock L98 or LB9. I was going to use $59 on a twin turbo 400 using 730 ecm. I was under the impression you need a memcal for the chip/prom thing to work and it has to be a 350 memcal for some reason.

Then i thought well my motor isnt a 350 nor is it the same style block so why would it matter?

Since the prom/chip is gonna be completely custom for my application, any memcal should be ok? Or are there still some changes to make in the bin file that only applies to the memcal side of things?
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 06:05 PM
  #18  
Ricco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Bartlesville, OK
Car: 2011 Cummins HO
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
See thats my thing, I burn my own chips and the motor in question isnt even in the same ball park as the stock L98 or LB9. I was going to use $59 on a twin turbo 400 using 730 ecm. I was under the impression you need a memcal for the chip/prom thing to work and it has to be a 350 memcal for some reason.

Then i thought well my motor isnt a 350 nor is it the same style block so why would it matter?

Since the prom/chip is gonna be completely custom for my application, any memcal should be ok? Or are there still some changes to make in the bin file that only applies to the memcal side of things?
You're at exactly the same place as I am at :-) Although my build doesnt sound as radical as yours.

I'm guessing that if anything, it is just the "limp home" mode that would be different but "limp home" for a 305 can't be that different from "limp home" for a 350 etc.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009 | 06:07 PM
  #19  
Ricco's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Bartlesville, OK
Car: 2011 Cummins HO
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.43
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Originally Posted by Ricco
You're at exactly the same place as I am at :-) Although my build doesnt sound as radical as yours.

I'm guessing that if anything, it is just the "limp home" mode that would be different but "limp home" for a 305 can't be that different from "limp home" for a 350 etc.
Kevin, could you chime in? Are you using a 305 or 350 memcal with your custom PROM program?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #20  
Kevin91Z's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 10,950
Likes: 26
From: Orange, SoCal
Car: 1990 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: 355 TPI siamesed runners
Transmission: Tremec T56
Axle/Gears: 12-Bolt 3.73
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
So if one were doing a MAF to SD setup and has a 91-92 730 ecm, and needed a memcal as well, but didnt want to spend 300 bucks for a new GM 350 memcal, could one use the 305 TPI memcal ?

Since guys use 350 computers for 383's and 400+ inch motors anyway, why does the memcal matter? Shouldnt a TPI 305 memcal work just as good as a 350 memcal?
305 or 350 does not matter. What matters is that its a V8 TPI memcal.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009 | 07:35 PM
  #21  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Re: 305 vs 350 Memcal

Got yah! i think i'm gonna try a 305 memcal then for TPI. You may have saved me 300 bucks
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xkingcodex
Engine Swap
14
Feb 12, 2020 07:43 PM
Jake_92RS
Tech / General Engine
8
Jan 28, 2020 10:37 PM
Dwayne614
Engine Swap
5
Sep 28, 2015 08:33 AM
Keith5
DFI and ECM
2
Aug 27, 2015 04:37 PM
st.evel07
Engine Swap
5
Aug 13, 2015 06:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.