TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Are there downfalls to an AFPR?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 04:59 PM
  #1  
Hg's Avatar
Hg
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
From: Midwest City, Oklahoma
Car: '87 Z
Engine: 355 in the works
Transmission: 700R4
Are there downfalls to an AFPR?

I'm trying to plan what I'm getting this summer to speed this LB9 up. Someone told me once that headers, catback, and an AFPR is almost a guaranteed 50HP, is this true? I know an AFPR is a rough tuning instrument, but I don't plan on learning to burn my own proms. I'm still a little confused as to how to use an AFPR also. Do I need some kind of computer monitor to use it properly? Will it hurt mileage that much? Right now these are my planed mods, they're going on an '87 Z28 LB9 (305 TPI) w/700R4:

SLP Single Inlet Cold Air Induction(stupid MAF, no dual for me)
Hooker Headers #2055
Hooker Catback
AFPR(can anyone recomend a good one?) and fuel pressure gauge
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 05:07 PM
  #2  
IROCKER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Well it's not a guaranteed 50HP so don't get your hopes up too high. The only real tuning tool for it that you'll need is a fuel pressure gauge...either a removable one or a in-line fuel rail one from Accel.

You can make your own AFPR for cheap. But I personally went with the unit from Holley...nice looking billet aluminum piece and very very easy to adjust.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 05:11 PM
  #3  
Hg's Avatar
Hg
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
From: Midwest City, Oklahoma
Car: '87 Z
Engine: 355 in the works
Transmission: 700R4
Does it hurt mileage that much? Or does it all depend on how high you set it?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 05:15 PM
  #4  
IROCKER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
I only put mine on this winter so I haven't got to play around with it alot. But logically yes it should affect your mileage depending on how high you set it.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 06:01 PM
  #5  
Drew's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 20,310
Likes: 1,066
From: Salina, KS
Someone jump in here and correct me if I'm wrong, but an AFPR isn't going to do anything to change the MPG. Higher fuel pressure is primarily going to improve the fuel atomization, you might get a little extra fuel thru the injector, but its not going to be noticable from fill up to fill up... To flow a significant amount of fuel (enough to notice in your wallet or on your odometer) you'd need to swap injectors or increase the pulse width/duty cycle of the injectors.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 06:11 PM
  #6  
BigMike92Z's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 484
Likes: 1
From: winter springs, FL
Car: 2006 Pontiac GTO
Transmission: rowing through 6 gears
i think im gonna agree with drew on this one more or less because i bumped my fuel pressure up from 35-45 psi and really saw no loss in MPG.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 06:13 PM
  #7  
88ROC1LE's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
I agree with Drew, I bolted on a TPiS AFPR and really haven't seen any change in gas milage, even with my headers i didn't notice a large change
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 08:33 PM
  #8  
MikeInAZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 735
Likes: 2
From: Portales, NM USA
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
I can't help but think that the AFPR, properly set, would improve mileage. It might not be noticable, but if you're changing from a squirt type pattern that a low fuel pressure would cause to a spray atomized type pattern that a higher pressure (within reason) would give, it would seem you would get better mileage, a minute amount of added horsepower AND less emissions to boot.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 08:42 PM
  #9  
JAY87GTA's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: Bartow, FL
If you're cruising and the car is operating in closed loop properly then it will have no effect on the MPG because the computer uses the O2 sensor to control the enrichment. Basically the computer will cut the pulse width down to compensate for the higher pressure. It is also somewhat true for larger injectors. I went to the 24 lbs with no other changes and picked up a couple of MPG, I'm assuming that it came from better atomization and the fact that the injectors are no longer dribbling into the intake. Later
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 09:32 PM
  #10  
Boxeat2469's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 354
Likes: 1
From: near Chicago
The stock setting is 42 PSI. Much track testing has showed that any type of increase will greatly benefit both horse power and torque. Here's some dyno testing on a stock 350 motor which substantiates those claims:

42 PSI (stock) 46 PSI 50 PSI
RPM Torq HP Torq/diff HP/diff Torq/diff HP/diff
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2250 237.7 101.8 254.9/17.2 109.2/ 7.4 275.0/37.3 117.8/16.0
2500 241.7 115.1 262.1/20.4 124.8/ 9.7 283.3/41.6 134.9/19.8
2750 241.5 126.5 275.2/33.7 144.1/17.6 297.0/55.5 155.5/29.0
3000 237.1 135.4 278.2/41.1 158.9/23.5 305.5/68.4 174.5/39.1
3250 233.8 144.7 278.9/45.1 172.6/27.9 311.3/77.5 192.6/47.9
3500 241.0 160.6 278.2/37.2 185.4/24.8 309.5/68.5 206.3/45.7
3750 246.6 176.1 283.4/36.8 202.4/26.8 303.3/56.7 216.6/40.5
4000 250.4 190.7 278.3/27.9 212.0/21.3 298.0/47.6 227.0/36.3
4250 251.6 203.6 272.5/20.9 220.5/16.9 289.1/37.5 233.9/30.3
4500 253.5 217.2 257.3/ 4.2 220.5/ 3.3 277.0/23.5 237.3/20.1
4750 245.0 221.6 242.1/-2.9 219.0/-2.6 266.4/21.4 240.9/19.3
5000 227.6 216.7 225.0/-1.4 214.2/-2.5 237.8/10.2 226.4/ 9.7

It shows that by increasing the fuel pressure to 50 PSI, results in maximum torque increase of 58 ft-lbs (along with a much flatter torque curve) and a maximum horse power increase of 19 HP over stock. 46 PSI also provides a noticable increase which should work well for day-to-day street driving. An adjustable fuel pressure regulator (see Chap 5.2) is required to increase the fuel pressure.

This is from the FAQ section of this site.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 10:08 PM
  #11  
Swapmaster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 792
Likes: 4
From: Somewhere over the rainbow
As stated above the ECM reduces the pulse width of a larger
injector so actual fuel flow will remain the same. That is unless
the injector is so large that the Block Learn table in the ECM
bottoms out then it will throw a code 45 for being too rich.

The benifit comes from better atomization of the fuel as also
stated above. Actually a smaller injector with a higher pressure
set so the Block Learn figure is at 128 (the center of the table)
will atomize the fuel into smaller particles which will burn more
completely and thus produce more power with the same amount
of fuel.

The ideal injector would be one that could turn a liquid into pure
vapor. That would ensure ALL of the fuel in the cylinder
had the best possible chance of burning.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2002 | 11:45 PM
  #12  
Swapmaster's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 792
Likes: 4
From: Somewhere over the rainbow
I talked to a guy who owns a Corvette shop here and he said
they use 305 injectors and up the pressure to get a better spray
pattern.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 12:17 AM
  #13  
iroc_cragg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Ab Canada
Hey

I am planning on getting a AFPR for my 1985 IROC Z Camaro witha 305 TPI LB9. The good thing about AFPR is that u can adjust them to any setting. When u are driving on the street from day to day u can set it to the stock setting, Then when u go to the track on friday night u can set it to 50 PSI to get the maxium performance. I dont think that setting it to 50 PSI for 4 hours a week is goin to do anything to then engine or milage. To me the only thing that AFPRs are good for is better ETs at the track. Im not sure if they do anything for day to day driving. Im I was wrong anywhere people tell me so I know what Im talking about.... thanks

http://camaroz28.cardomain.com/id/56424
Attached Thumbnails Are there downfalls to an AFPR?-iroc5small.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 02:08 AM
  #14  
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
Administrator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 7,386
Likes: 1
From: In a mint Third Gen!
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
I think that FAQ is pretty much BS.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 07:55 AM
  #15  
MikeInAZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 735
Likes: 2
From: Portales, NM USA
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
There are other reasons besides racing to use the AFPR. A totally stock 305 MAY benefit if it has low fuel pressure. GM says anything down to 28 PSI is "within specs".

So taking a low fuel pressure and bumping it up to the "targeted stock setting" could improve overall performance.

In regards to MPG or fuel delivery amounts. It's not so much a matter of how much fuel is delivered as it is how it is delivered and how it is consumed.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 09:04 AM
  #16  
tpivette89's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
i have mine set at 48 PSI all the time (vac hose disconnected), and have no loss in MPG. Hey, IROCKER, you have the Holley AFPR unit right? in the picture in Jegs, it looks like it comes with the rubber gasket as well. Is this true?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 10:04 AM
  #17  
Ed Maher's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,197
Likes: 10
From: Manassas VA
Car: 04 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12 T56
As has already been stated, as long as the car is operating in closed loop, the AFPR won't hurt mileage at all. I was getting 26 mpg in my 305 w/ 50psi on 22lb injectors in mixed highway driving.

The important thing to rememeber is that no one setting is right for everyone. The beauty of an AFPR is that you can adjust / tune it under controlled conditions like at the track, or in some back to back g-tech runs. SOTP is garbage. You might think it's faster from the changed exhaust note of running it too rich.

And yes, a lot of the FAQ is garbage. It's legacy though, and nobody really has the time to edit out the junk. That table of gains was probably copied from the TPIS book or something 6 years ago, lol.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 12:24 PM
  #18  
iroc_cragg's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Calgary Ab Canada
Hey

Is it true that a AFPR will give u HP and lower ur ETs at the track

http://camaroz28.cardomain.com/id/56424
Attached Thumbnails Are there downfalls to an AFPR?-iroc5small.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2002 | 03:26 PM
  #19  
IROCKER's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
From: Ontario, Canada
Actually after reading what Mike said I retract my original answer. The better atomization thus leading to better efficiency would make more sense. The efficiency of the spray pattern would probably make up for the small amount of extra fuel being pump through.

tpivette89: It comes with a replacement diaphram. Very easy to install and use.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
norcalz28
Northern California
26
Dec 7, 2016 12:49 PM
2012sergen11
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
6
Oct 13, 2015 07:38 PM
Reid Fleming
TPI
2
Oct 10, 2015 09:56 PM
alpine247
TPI
1
Sep 16, 2015 05:25 PM
355tpipickup
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Sep 4, 2015 05:32 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.