3.73 posi???
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Quebec , Canada
Car: Z28 / 1982
Engine: 305 (LG4) Stock
Transmission: TH350
3.73 posi???
Could you tell me if it's true, that in 1982 1983 1984 it was possible to have a 3.73 posi-traction with aluminium drum brake?
If yes, what was the RPO?
If yes, what was the RPO?
Re: 3.73 posi???
Originally posted by Peter82Z28
Could you tell me if it's true, that in 1982 1983 1984 it was possible to have a 3.73 posi-traction with aluminium drum brake?
If yes, what was the RPO?
Could you tell me if it's true, that in 1982 1983 1984 it was possible to have a 3.73 posi-traction with aluminium drum brake?
If yes, what was the RPO?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Yes.
Rather ordinary in the L69 cars. Very very rare in 82, since there were no L69s that year.
One of the reasons that those 83-85 L69 cars are among the primo ones to try to find.
Rather ordinary in the L69 cars. Very very rare in 82, since there were no L69s that year.
One of the reasons that those 83-85 L69 cars are among the primo ones to try to find.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Quebec , Canada
Car: Z28 / 1982
Engine: 305 (LG4) Stock
Transmission: TH350
Thanks for the info guys
The reason why I asked this question, it's because I found one (suppose to be a 3.73 ,but not seen yet)and the guy said to me that it was very rare... and I was not sure!!
The reason why I asked this question, it's because I found one (suppose to be a 3.73 ,but not seen yet)and the guy said to me that it was very rare... and I was not sure!!
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Don't pay for it until you pop the cover off and count the teeth and verify the presence of a posi carrier. If it isn't what you want, be prepared to walk out right then and there, don't even bother haggling or feeling like you "owe" the guy something for showing it to you; if he said it's a 3.73 posi and it's not a 3.73 or it's not pois, he lied. No point in you feeling guilty or obligated, because he lied.
There's no "almost as good as" or "it laid down 2 stripes" or "it felt like 3.73s". It's all BS at that point.
Kind of like buying a car, and the owner tells you it's a 350, "It's gotta be, it runs too strong to be a 305". Yeah right.
RPO codes are worthless. Liars use RPOs. The truth lives in the parts themselves.
There's no "almost as good as" or "it laid down 2 stripes" or "it felt like 3.73s". It's all BS at that point.
Kind of like buying a car, and the owner tells you it's a 350, "It's gotta be, it runs too strong to be a 305". Yeah right.
RPO codes are worthless. Liars use RPOs. The truth lives in the parts themselves.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Quebec , Canada
Car: Z28 / 1982
Engine: 305 (LG4) Stock
Transmission: TH350
Originally posted by RB83L69
Don't pay for it until you pop the cover off and count the teeth and verify the presence of a posi carrier.
Don't pay for it until you pop the cover off and count the teeth and verify the presence of a posi carrier.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Quebec , Canada
Car: Z28 / 1982
Engine: 305 (LG4) Stock
Transmission: TH350
I have met the guy and here's the differential
And like RB83L69 has mentioned, I have pop the cover off and...suprise it's not a 3.73 like he told me but a 3.42!!!
But a 3.42 and my Th350 it's a good combo...what do you think...I buy or not?
And like RB83L69 has mentioned, I have pop the cover off and...suprise it's not a 3.73 like he told me but a 3.42!!!
But a 3.42 and my Th350 it's a good combo...what do you think...I buy or not?
Last edited by Peter82Z28; Oct 2, 2004 at 10:38 AM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
I wouldn't buy it.... it's an Eaton Gov-Lock, affectionately known as the "Grenade Lock" by the S truck people; and it's drum brakes.
The way the Gov-Lock works, is that it acts like an open diff until the RPM difference between the 2 axles exceeds some value, I've been told 100 RPM; at which point the little weights operate the clutches. It's really not appropriate for high-power cars; it's more for trucks and mud. They grenade when they lock up suddenly on pavement.
The way the Gov-Lock works, is that it acts like an open diff until the RPM difference between the 2 axles exceeds some value, I've been told 100 RPM; at which point the little weights operate the clutches. It's really not appropriate for high-power cars; it's more for trucks and mud. They grenade when they lock up suddenly on pavement.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Quebec , Canada
Car: Z28 / 1982
Engine: 305 (LG4) Stock
Transmission: TH350
I'm disappointed
It's not easy to find one...and weird this differential was in a Camaro Z28 1984???
And for the drum brake that ‘s what I already have.
Which one is the best for me ?
It's not easy to find one...and weird this differential was in a Camaro Z28 1984???
And for the drum brake that ‘s what I already have.
Which one is the best for me ?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
THE ONE to look for, would be a 90-92 disk brake rear with 3.42s. Or 3.23; you could then put 3.73s in it.
The early rears have the smaller axles. The early (88-back) disc brakes suck, and their hydraulics are not compatible with yours which means you'd have to replace the master cyl and prop valve in order for them to have any chance of working right; and then modify the prop valve and add the caliper recall kit to get them closer to right. The 90-up rears with discs use a system that has the same hydraulic requirements as drums; in fact, in those years, the MC and PV were the same part # for discs and drums. That rear will bolt right up into your car as if it was meant to go there. The only adaptation you'll have to do, is to get the end of the steel brake line off of the donor car, maybe the last 6" or so, and splice it onto the end of your steel line; because 84-up rears use a metric bubble flare line where yours (and mine) uses a SAE fitting. You would have the same issue with that 84 rear. Your car's parking brake actuator, unlike the ones in certain later cars, will hook right up to the cables on the late rear.
I have a 91 or 92 disc rear in my 83. It came to me with 3.23s. I had the axle tubes welded, added LCA lowering brackets, put in 3.73s (which was actually the stock gear in my car, being a HO) with an Eaton high-perf posi, and used a crush sleeve eliminator. I am still using my 83 MC and PV with SAE fittings, and the parking brake is perfect.
That one in the pic might be better than what you've got, and if it's cheap (like less than $200) it might be worth doing; but it's not the best choice of parts.
The early rears have the smaller axles. The early (88-back) disc brakes suck, and their hydraulics are not compatible with yours which means you'd have to replace the master cyl and prop valve in order for them to have any chance of working right; and then modify the prop valve and add the caliper recall kit to get them closer to right. The 90-up rears with discs use a system that has the same hydraulic requirements as drums; in fact, in those years, the MC and PV were the same part # for discs and drums. That rear will bolt right up into your car as if it was meant to go there. The only adaptation you'll have to do, is to get the end of the steel brake line off of the donor car, maybe the last 6" or so, and splice it onto the end of your steel line; because 84-up rears use a metric bubble flare line where yours (and mine) uses a SAE fitting. You would have the same issue with that 84 rear. Your car's parking brake actuator, unlike the ones in certain later cars, will hook right up to the cables on the late rear.
I have a 91 or 92 disc rear in my 83. It came to me with 3.23s. I had the axle tubes welded, added LCA lowering brackets, put in 3.73s (which was actually the stock gear in my car, being a HO) with an Eaton high-perf posi, and used a crush sleeve eliminator. I am still using my 83 MC and PV with SAE fittings, and the parking brake is perfect.
That one in the pic might be better than what you've got, and if it's cheap (like less than $200) it might be worth doing; but it's not the best choice of parts.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Quebec , Canada
Car: Z28 / 1982
Engine: 305 (LG4) Stock
Transmission: TH350
Thanks RB83L69 for your help
It's exactly the price (200.00$CAN)what the guy ask for and I think I'll buy it and someday if I can find one like you said...I will resell!!
Last thing... RB83L69 how did you know all those things about the differentiel...I'm impressed :hail:
It's exactly the price (200.00$CAN)what the guy ask for and I think I'll buy it and someday if I can find one like you said...I will resell!!
Last thing... RB83L69 how did you know all those things about the differentiel...I'm impressed :hail:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Oct 15, 2015 05:00 PM




