Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Photo proof of differences between auto/manual starters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #1  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
Photo proof of differences between auto/manual starters

Well, I got my t-5 bellhousing to go over the automatic starter snout easily enough, but after I removed the starter from the engine block I couldn't get it to go back in the bellhousing far enough to get the bolts in. In fact, it was holding me out by a good 3/4".

I went up to the parts store to get a manual starter, and it's a pretty big difference between the two. Not just the snout like I originally thought.

The new one looks to be about 1/3 smaller, lighter, and has a smaller and more rounded snout.

Here's the pics:
Attached Thumbnails Photo proof of differences between auto/manual starters-dsc01106.jpg  

Last edited by onebinky; Oct 30, 2004 at 07:14 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 07:12 PM
  #2  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
two
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 07:12 PM
  #3  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
three
Attached Thumbnails Photo proof of differences between auto/manual starters-dsc01108.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 07:15 PM
  #4  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
Here's the second pic. It wouldn't let me edit the second post to add the pic in.
Attached Thumbnails Photo proof of differences between auto/manual starters-dsc01107.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #5  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
That's not auto/manual; that's 14"/12.8", or 168 tooth/153 tooth, or T-10/T-5, or 350/700, or whatever you want to call it.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 01:22 AM
  #6  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
So it's just a different tooth count between the flywheel and flexplate? I laid em next to each other and they looked the same OD, although I admit I didn't count the teeth. The big starter was original to my 87 IROC, the smaller one is the manual version for the 87. It was the original flexplate too, we have two others in addition to the one I took off my car from thirdgens we've parted out that are the same.

In any case, I'm happy because I get to use a smaller, lighter starter that works with my setup

Thanks for the input RB
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 06:44 AM
  #7  
acescarrsRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 1
From: Kaneohe,HI
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 383 in building process
Transmission: 700r4
I don't know if this applies to Chevy, but the differences between an auto & manual starter on a ,excuse my language , Ford, is on the gear that engages with the flexplate or flywheel. One gear is smaller than the other.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 07:29 AM
  #8  
John Millican's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
The only way those pictures are "photo proof" is if they are both genuine GM starters. You have to compare apples to apples. If one is GM and the other a parts store starter then there isn't any "photo proof". Different rebuilders and manufacturers vary in size slightly, some more then others.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 08:31 AM
  #9  
ljnowell's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
The only way those pictures are "photo proof" is if they are both genuine GM starters. You have to compare apples to apples. If one is GM and the other a parts store starter then there isn't any "photo proof". Different rebuilders and manufacturers vary in size slightly, some more then others.
Exactly. If you went to three different parts stores and bought a starter from the same car, it wouldnt be surprising for them to be three different physical sizes.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 09:08 AM
  #10  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
They're both GM starters. The larger one is the 3510-S for older 350/400/4-speed cars and some 700 cars, and the smaller one is the one that most of these cars use.

Some application examples: The small one is on my 78 El Camino, and was on my wife's 84 Caprice that she used to have (the Elky has a 350 and the Caprice a 700), and is the stock one for my T-5 car as well. The large one is the one for my 74 Caprice 454.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #11  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
Incidentally, they DO NOT interchange.... you use the one with a 14" flywheel or flex plate (with 168 teeth), and the other with a 12.8" flywheel or flex plate (153 teeth). Makes no difference whether it's auto or manual; the starter goes with the flywheel diameter.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 12:39 PM
  #12  
Dyno Don's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Originally posted by RB83L69
That's not auto/manual; that's 14"/12.8", or 168 tooth/153 tooth, or T-10/T-5, or 350/700, or whatever you want to call it.
You are dead wrong on this one.
What he says is correct.
Those two starters do show the difference between the auto and the manual starters, it has nothing to do with the flywheel tooth count.
Notice the bolt pattern, they are both for the 153 tooth flywheel.
the 168 tooth flywheel starter has an offset bolt pattern.

No flame intended , just setting the record straight.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 02:29 PM
  #13  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
Originally posted by Dyno Don
You are dead wrong on this one.
What he says is correct.
Those two starters do show the difference between the auto and the manual starters, it has nothing to do with the flywheel tooth count.
Notice the bolt pattern, they are both for the 153 tooth flywheel.
the 168 tooth flywheel starter has an offset bolt pattern.

No flame intended , just setting the record straight.
Well, I respect both of your guy's opinions, so I'm staying out of this one for now

I wasn't trying to start anything, my intention was to offer up some photos for the guys doing the auto-t5 swap. I had seen some confusion as far as the starter situation goes, and thoughtt this might help clarify things.

Both of the flywheels are the same OD though, I set the flexplate on top of the flywheel when I had them out of the car to comnpare them. Not sure if it makes a difference, but I also counted the teeth on the pinions today before I put the new starter in. It's the same count on both of them.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #14  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
Originally posted by John Millican
The only way those pictures are "photo proof" is if they are both genuine GM starters. You have to compare apples to apples. If one is GM and the other a parts store starter then there isn't any "photo proof". Different rebuilders and manufacturers vary in size slightly, some more then others.
The only ones that would be different in size are the aftermarket ones. Remans and rebuilds are the stock casing with new internals, it wouldn't be cost effective for them to manufacturer a completely new case. Heck, all of them I've ever sold or bought still have the delco P/N's stamped in the side of the casings. The only way you would get a different size one is if they packaged them wrong.

So they are both genuine GM starters, they just have new internals.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 02:43 PM
  #15  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
This one is a BBB rebuild that I bought 2 years ago for my girlfriends 85 Z28.
Attached Thumbnails Photo proof of differences between auto/manual starters-dsc01109.jpg  
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 02:48 PM
  #16  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
here's the reman I bought for my 87 last fall, this is the one I just removed. It's whatever brand pepboys carries with the lifetime warranty.

The first one there I got at trakauto when they were still in the area. I worked there for 2 years, and every single one we carried had the OE stamps on it. We carried mostly BBB, had some delco remans, and an off brand. Can't recall the name of it, it's going back about 5 years now
Attached Thumbnails Photo proof of differences between auto/manual starters-dsc01112.jpg  

Last edited by onebinky; Oct 31, 2004 at 02:53 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2004 | 08:03 PM
  #17  
John Millican's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 1997 Jeep Wrangler
Engine: 4.0L
Transmission: 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 8.8 rear, 4.56 gears, 4:1 transfer
Interesting.....
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 07:40 AM
  #18  
gmgod's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
Car: 92 T/A VERT
Engine: LB9
Transmission: AUTO
Axle/Gears: 7.5 / 3.42's
So you do have to use a manual specific starter for the t-5 swap? I'm doing one and just bought a delco reman for an auto about a year ago
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 08:03 AM
  #19  
2.73's Suck's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: I said that when I was sober...ish
Car: 1985 Mustang GT
Engine: hamsters
Transmission: a hamster wheel
I just used a BFH to get the auto one into the manual housing when I did the swap. Still works to this day.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 10:03 AM
  #20  
transambill's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Car: 91 Firebird Formula
Engine: ZZ4 fast burn with TPIS mini ram.
Transmission: Viper T10 6 spd.
Axle/Gears: 3.73
From my experience the gear on the starter doesn't have a diff. teeth count. The nose cone on the starter will have either a strait across bolt pattern or a diagnal bolt pattern. This is what determins how close to the flexplate the starter gear is once the starter is installed.The side by side pic looks like a factory V8 starter and the new one actually looks like a 4.3 V6 starter. They will both work with a 8cyl. Actually where heat soak or header clearence is a consern I've used the smaller starter and have never had any problems. I just wouldn't expect it to live very long trying to start some high compression 14 to 1 motor.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 01:58 PM
  #21  
jwscab's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
From: NJ/PA
Car: Yes
Engine: Many
Transmission: Quite a few
there are in fact many variations from GM on these starters, for sure. Some later model starters do have a smaller casting in the snout area, since I had the exact same problem switching from a TH350 to a T5, and i had to grind down the housing a bit to get it to clear. I doubt the factory did what I did, so they have different versions. This was in a late 70's early 80's g body.

both starters in the picture have the same bolt pattern. same flywheel. they also had different body sizes for the starter motor, most of the larger style are classifed as 'heavy duty'

to further clarify, there are two flywheel sizes. 153 tooth and 168 tooth. 153 tooth is typically a straight mounting pattern. 168 tooth can have a staggered mouting pattern or a straight mounting pattern.

so its not really a auto vs manual, as much as which starter you have from the factory(or on the car now). Good point to bring up though, since you can get burned with the starter if you have the 'heavy duty' one.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2004 | 11:18 PM
  #22  
Zepher's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by gmgod
So you do have to use a manual specific starter for the t-5 swap? I'm doing one and just bought a delco reman for an auto about a year ago
No, you don't have to swap starters.
In fact, when we did the T5 to Auto (and vice versa on my friends car) we left the starters installed.

You may have an issue putting it back in if you take it out like onebinky did. I haven't taken mine out yet so I do not know if I'll have problems putting it back in.

Oh, the cars were my 88 Formula 305TPI Auto and my friends 88 GTA 305TPI 5 Speed. I've got the T5 now and he has the Auto.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 12:26 AM
  #23  
Dyno Don's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
No, you don't have to swap starters.

You shouldn't make broad statements like that when there is confusion. For a fact, if you have a T-5 starter it will fit an auto or manual but not otherwise. It would not be uncommon to find a replacement starter of the wrong kind, that works.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 12:32 AM
  #24  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
so its not really a auto vs manual, as much as which starter you have from the factory(or on the car now). Good point to bring up though, since you can get burned with the starter if you have the 'heavy duty' one.
Shoulda specified that this was proof for the thirdgens only I'm sure they have a billion variations to the SBC starter, and then a billion more improvements and changes to the different starters

As far as I can tell, only three variations were used on the thirdgens. The big pre 88 or so that I posted, the small pre 88 or so I posted, and then from the catalogs I was looking at it looks like in 89 or 90 GM switched to a starter that is common between the autos and manuals. I have yet to verify that one with my own eyes though, and don't remember from when I still had my 92. If my brother has his up this weekend I'll take a look underneith it.


You may have an issue putting it back in if you take it out like onebinky did. I haven't taken mine out yet so I do not know if I'll have problems putting it back in.
Hmm, now that I think about it, I think the weight of the trans flexes the bellhousing just enough to not allow the snout to clear. The first time I pulled the starter I only had the bellhousing on. That time it was to install the flywheel cover between the starter and bellhousing. It reinstalled perfectly. The second time was to change the oilpan gasket. This time I had the trans bolted up to the bellhousing already, and it wouldn't let me back in with the starter. I wish I would have realized that last weekend, coulda saved $60...

Maybe a jack under the tailshaft would have been all it took to get it back in there?

I guess that's what I get for only working on it a few hours at a time on weekends. Makes it harder to remember the details

EDIT: I still have the old one in my garage, maybe I'll give it a try this upcoming weekend if I have time. I'll post up the results if they're helpful.

Last edited by onebinky; Nov 3, 2004 at 12:35 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 12:58 PM
  #25  
Zepher's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 4
From: Norfolk, VA. USA
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Originally posted by Dyno Don
No, you don't have to swap starters.

You shouldn't make broad statements like that when there is confusion. For a fact, if you have a T-5 starter it will fit an auto or manual but not otherwise. It would not be uncommon to find a replacement starter of the wrong kind, that works.
So, are you saying that my Auto Starter won't work with my T5, or are you saying that I may have a replacemtent starter that may be a 5 speed unit?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 08:03 PM
  #26  
Fei's Avatar
Fei
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Richland, WA
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 94 383 LT-1
Transmission: Tremec 3550
I was under the impression that there were 4 different starters for our cars. 2 for the 12" wheel one with a small diamater motor for the manual and a larger diamater motor for the auto. And the same for the 14" wheel.

I could be completely wrong on this but when I tore the starter out of my 84 with the 12" and a 5-speed it was very small and then when I took the starter out of my 86 with the 12" and a auto it was bigger (had to drop exhaust to get it out) I did and t-5 swap on that car and used the same starter so I know there are 2 different sized (VERY different sized) starters for the 12" wheel.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 09:18 PM
  #27  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Originally posted by onebinky
So it's just a different tooth count between the flywheel and flexplate? I laid em next to each other and they looked the same OD, although I admit I didn't count the teeth. The big starter was original to my 87 IROC, the smaller one is the manual version for the 87. It was the original flexplate too, we have two others in addition to the one I took off my car from thirdgens we've parted out that are the same.

In any case, I'm happy because I get to use a smaller, lighter starter that works with my setup

Thanks for the input RB
stock 168 tooth flywheel starters use staggered bolt pattern and equal length bolts.

stock 153 tooth flywheel starters use parallel bolt pattern and unequal length bolts.

Here a couple post I've posted regarding the "2 different starters / T56 starters" topics:

starter post 1

starter post 2


Originally posted by Dyno Don
You are dead wrong on this one.
What he says is correct.
Those two starters do show the difference between the auto and the manual starters, it has nothing to do with the flywheel tooth count.
Notice the bolt pattern, they are both for the 153 tooth flywheel.
the 168 tooth flywheel starter has an offset bolt pattern.

No flame intended , just setting the record straight.
You're trying to play a 33&1/3 on the 45 or 78rpm settings.

Just becuase something is an automatic doesn't mean it got a 168 flywheel. You're so off base, the guy playing left field could tag you out at first.



Originally posted by Fei
I could be completely wrong on this but when I tore the starter out of my 84 with the 12" and a 5-speed it was very small and then when I took the starter out of my 86 with the 12" and a auto it was bigger (had to drop exhaust to get it out) I did and t-5 swap on that car and used the same starter so I know there are 2 different sized (VERY different sized) starters for the 12" wheel.
Yes. The L98/A4 cars got a larger nosecone on their starter than the 305/M5 cars. Not sure on the 305/A4 ones.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 10:58 PM
  #28  
onebinky's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
stock 153 tooth flywheel starters use parallel bolt pattern and unequal length bolts.
Both were this style, good info

My car was a 305/700r4, so they are larger as well.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 01:34 AM
  #29  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
more pics

Large nose starter

Small nose starter

Note: the small nose works in a T56 bellhousing. The large nose does not.

Last edited by jmd; Feb 18, 2014 at 10:11 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 05:46 AM
  #30  
novass's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 1
From: Grand Island, NY
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
I had the factory starter in my formula when I swapped from an auto to a manual. The starters nose would not fit in the bellhousing "bump" for the t5.

What I did instead of purchasing another, I took my die grinder to the nose of the auto starter and reduced its size so that It would fit. I figured if it didn't work, oh well, I would need to get another starter any way.

It has worked fine all season long.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
two-if-by-sea
Problems / Help / Suggestions / Comments
1
Aug 31, 2015 06:30 PM
5spdcamaro
Tech / General Engine
1
Aug 28, 2015 02:12 AM
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
Aug 21, 2015 02:12 PM
milk
Engine Swap
10
Aug 10, 2015 06:26 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.