Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Engine is too powerful for trany

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 01:36 AM
  #1  
Dabesiv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 1982 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: GM crate motor Goodwrench 5.7 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Engine is too powerful for trany

So around a year ago I swapped in a 350 crate from the stock 305. After a few months the trany started to act up and my shop said its due to the extra power of the 350 ( around 100 hp more). Not a huge deal, had the 200c rebuilt with stronger gears to take the power for around $700. Now the car has even more power and its starting to tear the trany apart again, there were shavings and metal bits in the pan. So I decided I'll bite the bullet and pay for a new better trany. I really want something with more gears, the 3 speed is terrible on gas, like 12 mpg on a good day. I'm gonna try to take out a loan for the new trany, but just wanted an opinion on what to go with. I'm back and fourth between a 700r4 and a t56. Either one is gonna take some modifications to make it work and Im sure the t56 will cost more. So any ideas?
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 02:50 AM
  #2  
abray1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 3
From: Malvern, Arkansas
Car: 90 IROC 2-92 Zs blk vert & prpl
Engine: stealth ram brodix track 1 ful port
Transmission: 700r4 4l80e
Axle/Gears: iroc 375 lokr 92 Z 277 pos vert 327
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

4l80e. I have one but havent installed it yet. Basically a turbo 400 with overdrive. How many t400s do you hear tearing up?
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 10:21 AM
  #3  
TTOP350's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,214
Likes: 1,140
From: Il
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

Not sure what your doing with the car but this will work very well for ya.
http://www.700r4l60e.com/
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 10:55 AM
  #4  
Dabesiv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 1982 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: GM crate motor Goodwrench 5.7 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

Originally Posted by abray1
4l80e. I have one but havent installed it yet. Basically a turbo 400 with overdrive. How many t400s do you hear tearing up?
thats a good point, is it much different than the 700r4 in terms of install?
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 10:57 AM
  #5  
Dabesiv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 1982 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: GM crate motor Goodwrench 5.7 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

Originally Posted by TTOP350
Not sure what your doing with the car but this will work very well for ya.
http://www.700r4l60e.com/
Thanks for the link. The car is my daily driver as well as a little accelerated fun on weekends. If thats what your asking
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 11:39 AM
  #6  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,873
Likes: 2,430
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

If all you've "added" is 100 HP, then the engine isn't "too strong" for the trans; rather, the trans is "too weak" even for that moderate power level. Which of course is true, being as how it's a 200C, argualbly THE WORST auto trans ever jammed down the throat of the unsuspecting public by GM.

The 700 is the way to go... fairly simple install really. Drill the 2 83-up crossmember holes in your "frame"; get a 700 with a F-body extension housing, and a 83-up drive shaft, torque arm w mount, and crossmember.

Everything else hooks RIGHT UP.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 06:10 PM
  #7  
Dabesiv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 1982 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: GM crate motor Goodwrench 5.7 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
If all you've "added" is 100 HP, then the engine isn't "too strong" for the trans; rather, the trans is "too weak" even for that moderate power level. Which of course is true, being as how it's a 200C, argualbly THE WORST auto trans ever jammed down the throat of the unsuspecting public by GM.

The 700 is the way to go... fairly simple install really. Drill the 2 83-up crossmember holes in your "frame"; get a 700 with a F-body extension housing, and a 83-up drive shaft, torque arm w mount, and crossmember.

Everything else hooks RIGHT UP.
Thats what I was thinking since everyone says its an easy swap. I know the 200c is ****, I've hated it. The low price to rebuild it was far too convincing to pass up though. I still need to do some shopping to find out whats needed and the costs. Do any of the 4th gens have an aluminum drive shaft? I might as well go with everything I want to put in it at this time.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 08:42 PM
  #8  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,873
Likes: 2,430
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

Yup; 4th gen Al DS bolts right up into a 3rd gen with a 700. AFAIK all the LS1 cars have it, don't know for sure about the LT1s but I don't think so.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2012 | 09:30 PM
  #9  
bmorgil's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 42
Likes: 1
Car: 1984 Trans Am Recaro Edition
Engine: Chevy 383 Stroker
Transmission: Probuilt 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 with a Detroit Locker
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

Careful on that aluminum drive shaft. I highly recommend one.Yes the newer Model birds use an aluminum shaft. it will go right in. As I am retired from the now debunked Dana corporation, I could fill volumes with what my tech service guy's found out about Birds'. Just make sure you have it. The aluminum shafts are much lighter and the can actually hold more torque and RPM. BUT..they are a little short (about .500). The rule of thumb is you should have at least 2 times the spline shaft diameter in the trans at all times. Just make sure you have it. Without enough engagement at high driveshaft RPM's, you will loose the driveshaft to "Critical Speed". It can and will kill.

Bob

Last edited by bmorgil; Sep 23, 2012 at 09:33 PM. Reason: mistake
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2012 | 11:25 PM
  #10  
Dabesiv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 1982 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: GM crate motor Goodwrench 5.7 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

Originally Posted by bmorgil
Careful on that aluminum drive shaft. I highly recommend one.Yes the newer Model birds use an aluminum shaft. it will go right in. As I am retired from the now debunked Dana corporation, I could fill volumes with what my tech service guy's found out about Birds'. Just make sure you have it. The aluminum shafts are much lighter and the can actually hold more torque and RPM. BUT..they are a little short (about .500). The rule of thumb is you should have at least 2 times the spline shaft diameter in the trans at all times. Just make sure you have it. Without enough engagement at high driveshaft RPM's, you will loose the driveshaft to "Critical Speed". It can and will kill.

Bob
That scares me a bit haha, I'll probably have a shop install it and I could make sure that is something they pay attention to.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2012 | 11:28 PM
  #11  
abray1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,057
Likes: 3
From: Malvern, Arkansas
Car: 90 IROC 2-92 Zs blk vert & prpl
Engine: stealth ram brodix track 1 ful port
Transmission: 700r4 4l80e
Axle/Gears: iroc 375 lokr 92 Z 277 pos vert 327
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

The 4l80e bolts in but it bolts about 9 1/2 inches back on the crossmember so it will have to have work. The length is close to the same but the driveshaft will need work also. Myself and many others I know have torn up 700s for years and it gets old so your forced to look at what will hold horsepower and that is a 4l80e. Many people claim to have 700s that are bullet proof but I have seen many of them behind 700 and 800 horse small and big chevys and they break after spending over a thousand dollars.A stock 4l80e will hold. A built one will last for years or at least my buddies has behind his 454 chevelle for many years.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2012 | 11:30 PM
  #12  
Dabesiv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 1982 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: GM crate motor Goodwrench 5.7 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Yup; 4th gen Al DS bolts right up into a 3rd gen with a 700. AFAIK all the LS1 cars have it, don't know for sure about the LT1s but I don't think so.
Well I'm pricing out this job now and am curious as to if I'd be fine with buying a regular 700r4 or if it's worth the money to order a new built one from someplace like monster transmissions. I'ts like $300-$600 more than what I'm seeing the 700r4 going on ebay etc, but I'd be paying a lot for shipping with ebay and the quality might be worth it from monster. Any ideas? I'll check the aftermarket vendor reviews too but might as well ask here.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2012 | 11:56 PM
  #13  
Dabesiv's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 648
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
Car: 1982 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: GM crate motor Goodwrench 5.7 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Engine is too powerful for trany

Originally Posted by abray1
The 4l80e bolts in but it bolts about 9 1/2 inches back on the crossmember so it will have to have work. The length is close to the same but the driveshaft will need work also. Myself and many others I know have torn up 700s for years and it gets old so your forced to look at what will hold horsepower and that is a 4l80e. Many people claim to have 700s that are bullet proof but I have seen many of them behind 700 and 800 horse small and big chevys and they break after spending over a thousand dollars.A stock 4l80e will hold. A built one will last for years or at least my buddies has behind his 454 chevelle for many years.
I honestly don't know if ill be having this thirdgen up over 500 hp haha, I'd love it dearly but this thing is my daily driver too. I'd be hesitant with the 4l80e being around $1000 more than a 700r4 if its worth actually putting in now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BRoss99
Electronics
28
Aug 10, 2025 05:08 PM
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
InfinityShade
Transmissions and Drivetrain
15
Aug 22, 2015 08:00 PM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.