T56 behind a 305 Engine
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
Car: Transam, 85
Engine: 305 HO, 4bbl Carb, G Engine
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73
T56 behind a 305 Engine
For a stock 85 Transam with 305 /T5. Is it possible to install a T56 (from a 2000 Transam).
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 308
From: NJ
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
Yes, but you're better off using an LT style T56 really since you don't need a special pilot bushing
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
Car: Transam, 85
Engine: 305 HO, 4bbl Carb, G Engine
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
My current clutch is almost gone, and can get a relatively cheap 2000 T56 ($1k). What special bushing do I need. Is it about a new clutch cylinder, new bigger hole ?
If that be the case with 2000 ones, then with LT1 T56 (93-97) be a simple installation without any new added item/fix.
If that be the case with 2000 ones, then with LT1 T56 (93-97) be a simple installation without any new added item/fix.
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 308
From: NJ
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
The LT T56 is a direct bolt on, you use all the parts from a 4th gen and bolts it in and go.
I THINK the pilot bushing for the LS T56 to a SBC is just a "special", it's not a part you can buy from the local store. It's a McLeod bushing and it is WAY more expensive than the regular ones. You can buy, mock up and check though a regular one might work. It's been so long since my friend did in his second gen I don't remember what pilot he used.
Where are you located? I might be interested in trading for the LS T56 for an LT T56
I THINK the pilot bushing for the LS T56 to a SBC is just a "special", it's not a part you can buy from the local store. It's a McLeod bushing and it is WAY more expensive than the regular ones. You can buy, mock up and check though a regular one might work. It's been so long since my friend did in his second gen I don't remember what pilot he used.
Where are you located? I might be interested in trading for the LS T56 for an LT T56
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
There's other things with the LS style, TO setup, PP I assume. I'd suggest if you get it, get everything.
Is the LS flywheel a direct bolt on?
Regardless, search for LS T56 and see what comes up, no experience, but as I recall not just a bolt in deal
Is the LS flywheel a direct bolt on?
Regardless, search for LS T56 and see what comes up, no experience, but as I recall not just a bolt in deal
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 308
From: NJ
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
Yes, the LS Bellhousing bolts right on, just need a different pilot bushing
Trending Topics
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 132
From: Orange, CA
Car: '90 Trans Am-12.45@110.71
Engine: 355 w/AFR 195's Elem. 400/430 HP/TQ
Transmission: Tremec T-56
Axle/Gears: 12 Bolt 3.73
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 308
From: NJ
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 458
Likes: 171
From: East Moline, IL
Car: 88 T/A, 91 Formula, 94 Firehawk
Engine: 400 Pontiac, 5.0 TPI, 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 700R4, T5, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10, 3.42, 3.42
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
I might add while not the most favorable of all the years a 93 version might be the best for a 305 as I believe it has a lower first gear similar to the T5. Might be better suited for it possibly
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
But since he's asking about a 98-02 T56,
The ratios of a 94-02 F-body T56 are not going to help an L69 / 3.73 car. At all.
6th is worse for drivability. And it's worse for top end.
1st is worse for take-off.
The V8 third gen T5 ratios are what a lot of third gens work best with.
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 188
Likes: 1
Car: Transam, 85
Engine: 305 HO, 4bbl Carb, G Engine
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
There are two gearsets in '93. One shorter. One very similar to the V8 T5 1-4.
But since he's asking about a 98-02 T56,
The ratios of a 94-02 F-body T56 are not going to help an L69 / 3.73 car. At all.
6th is worse for drivability. And it's worse for top end.
1st is worse for take-off.
The V8 third gen T5 ratios are what a lot of third gens work best with.
But since he's asking about a 98-02 T56,
The ratios of a 94-02 F-body T56 are not going to help an L69 / 3.73 car. At all.
6th is worse for drivability. And it's worse for top end.
1st is worse for take-off.
The V8 third gen T5 ratios are what a lot of third gens work best with.
JMD: Seeing that you have :L69/T56 combo, I assume you are speaking from experience.
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,881
Likes: 2,434
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
I also have a L69/T-56 combo. Although, the engine isn't anywhere near stock anymore. But the same principles apply.
The T-56 flywheel is UNBELIEVABLY heavy. This keeps the 305, a small motor with relatively low torque, from revving quickly.
The T-56 5th gear is about the same ratio as the stock L69 T-5 5th ratio, which was .73. Not too bad for cruising. I screwed up once and put the LG4/L03 5th in one of my T-5s once; it was AWFUL. The .73 5th already is a bit ... much ... of a step from 4th; that change in ratio made it far worse. I pulled the transmission back out the same day and changed the 5th back. 6th in the T-56 is even worse; although with the .7x 5th it has, 6th is not so "bad", so much as, just mostly useless.
T-56 6th gear is .50. This means that at 65 mph, the engine is doing around 1350-1400 RPM. It has basically no power whatsoever at that RPM. The car has to be doing at least 75 before 6th is really useful at all.
1st gear is 2.6x. almost as low a ratio as 2nd in the T-5. 1st in the T-5 was 2.9x. This means that taking off with the T-56 is like the T-5 combo would have been with a 3.35 rear gear. The T-56 is almost like taking off with the T-5 in 2nd gear. Not quite all the way that, but getting there. The T-56 REALLY hurt the car's "leave".
All in all it's not a good match, as-is. The T-56 combo would be MUCH happier with more rear gear. 4.10 would restore 1st to about the same as 1st with the T-5, and similarly lower the vehicle speed at which 6th would become useful. 4.56 would probably be even better for a 305 with more cam but then the penalty from the heavy flywheel would get even worse.
Butt, on the plus side of things, I never tore up the T-56, no matter how hard I shifted it.
Someday maybe...
The T-56 flywheel is UNBELIEVABLY heavy. This keeps the 305, a small motor with relatively low torque, from revving quickly.
The T-56 5th gear is about the same ratio as the stock L69 T-5 5th ratio, which was .73. Not too bad for cruising. I screwed up once and put the LG4/L03 5th in one of my T-5s once; it was AWFUL. The .73 5th already is a bit ... much ... of a step from 4th; that change in ratio made it far worse. I pulled the transmission back out the same day and changed the 5th back. 6th in the T-56 is even worse; although with the .7x 5th it has, 6th is not so "bad", so much as, just mostly useless.
T-56 6th gear is .50. This means that at 65 mph, the engine is doing around 1350-1400 RPM. It has basically no power whatsoever at that RPM. The car has to be doing at least 75 before 6th is really useful at all.
1st gear is 2.6x. almost as low a ratio as 2nd in the T-5. 1st in the T-5 was 2.9x. This means that taking off with the T-56 is like the T-5 combo would have been with a 3.35 rear gear. The T-56 is almost like taking off with the T-5 in 2nd gear. Not quite all the way that, but getting there. The T-56 REALLY hurt the car's "leave".
All in all it's not a good match, as-is. The T-56 combo would be MUCH happier with more rear gear. 4.10 would restore 1st to about the same as 1st with the T-5, and similarly lower the vehicle speed at which 6th would become useful. 4.56 would probably be even better for a 305 with more cam but then the penalty from the heavy flywheel would get even worse.
Butt, on the plus side of things, I never tore up the T-56, no matter how hard I shifted it.
Someday maybe...
Last edited by sofakingdom; Sep 27, 2020 at 10:10 AM.
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,261
Likes: 461
From: RI
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.11 LS1 Rear End
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 308
From: NJ
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 4.8 LR4
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 Bolt
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
I put my .5 6th in gear down to around 45-50 around town with my little 4.8, you guys are nuts
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,261
Likes: 461
From: RI
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.11 LS1 Rear End
Re: T56 behind a 305 Engine
Mine is connected to an LT1 and @ 1300 RPM an LT1 in 6th gear SUCKS ! 

Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 458
Likes: 171
From: East Moline, IL
Car: 88 T/A, 91 Formula, 94 Firehawk
Engine: 400 Pontiac, 5.0 TPI, 5.7 LT1
Transmission: 700R4, T5, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.10, 3.42, 3.42
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OutLaw305
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Mar 3, 2004 09:21 AM











