Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

1982 Super T10 Availability Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 02:33 PM
  #1  
Rocky Rotella's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
1982 Super T10 Availability Question

We know that the Super T-10 4-speed manual was available with the 5.0L V-8 in the 1982 Firebird and Camaro.

Might anyone know at what point during the 1982 model year the Super T10 was replaced by the Saginaw 4-speed? And why?

Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 03:23 PM
  #2  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,866
Likes: 2,428
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1982 Super T10 Availability Question

Not sure about "replace".

Both transmissions were available, as far as I can recall, at the same time. Granted, it's been over 40 yrs now, and since the 82 305 cars only came w LG4 or CrossFire, I wasn't particularly interested. Looked SO DAMN GOOD, especially the pace car, butt TOTALLY underwhelming to drive. Not sure how it was possible to specify one or the other.

I later traded in the 4-speed (T-10) 79 Z28 I had at the time on a 83 L69 Z28.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 03:40 PM
  #3  
Rocky Rotella's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Re: 1982 Super T10 Availability Question

I should clarify, the light-duty Saginaw with 3.50:1 first gear ratio was available with the 4-cyl and 6-cyl all year.

However, I believe toward the end of the 1982 model year the moderate-duty Saginaw with 2.85:1 first gear ratio replaced the Super T10 behind the 5.0L.

I'm hoping to find a bulletin or breakpoint that notes it.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 04:38 PM
  #4  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,866
Likes: 2,428
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1982 Super T10 Availability Question

Again, from memory, there were FAR more Saggys than T-10s. I'd say, by at least 5 or 6 to 1.

Again, from memory, I don't recall any "replacement". Seems as though one of the 1st 82s I drove in the fall of 81 had a Saggy. I could be wrong though, it WAS close to 45 yrs ago after all, near half a century. Can't honestly say I've ever driven one with the T-10. Stick cars were FAR less numerous than auto anyway. Between ... that ... and the underwhelming engines (CrossFire was available with 200C only) I didn't buy any 82.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 05:18 PM
  #5  
jmd's Avatar
jmd
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,519
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: 1982 Super T10 Availability Question

I don't know.

I have gone down a path of researching "which got this part, and which got the other?" in the past and it was inconclusive.

Have you collected any window sticker or build sheet info from any 82 V8 cars? Do the V6 and 4cyl. cars have build sheet info that would show something for a Saginaw that is different than any T10 car?

Good luck researching.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 05:51 PM
  #6  
sofakingdom's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 27,866
Likes: 2,428
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: 1982 Super T10 Availability Question

I have not the faintest dimmest foggiest remotest hint of a whiff of a glimpse of a clue about 4- or 6-cyl cars myself. Not sure I've ever seen more than a quick glance under the hood of a 6-cyl one; butt in a fit of ghoulish schadenfreude one day, I scoped out a 4-cyl in a junkyard. Kind of like looking at a bad wreck that you don't want to look at but just can't help it. Not my proudest moment I admit.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 06:12 PM
  #7  
8t2 z-chev's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 115
From: belle fourche,s.d.
Car: '82 z28
Engine: L83 5.7
Transmission: 700r4-1985
Axle/Gears: 3.42 posi
Re: 1982 Super T10 Availability Question

My 4th week of March '82 build had the T-10
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 11:06 PM
  #8  
Dens71TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 24
From: Midwest
Car: '82 Recaro T/A, '71 Trans Am
Engine: 305CFI/455HO
Transmission: TH700R4/M22
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.42
Re: 1982 Super T10 Availability Question

The bulk of the manual transmissions used in '82 V8 powered Camaro's and Firebirds were T10's produced and
stockpiled in 1981. Afterwards the T10 assembly line was retooled for producing 5-speeds. Demand was much
higher that expected and the stock of T10s ran out in July 1982.






Reply
Old Jul 18, 2024 | 11:08 PM
  #9  
Firechicken82's Avatar
Supreme Member
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 339
From: CT
Car: 82 TA
Engine: Zz430 clone w a torquestorm blower
Transmission: Magnum f
Axle/Gears: Ford 9 w 4.11
Re: 1982 Super T10 Availability Question

My first 82 TA was an early build, my dad ordered it in late 81. It had a Saginaw in it. It actually had 3 Saginaws in it. They didn't hold up well to my father's shifting. I had a friend who had an 82 z28 w a t10. That car only had one t10, they seem to do a little better. I never really understood the reason why some got one trans over the other. Both cars were loaded w most options.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rocky Rotella
History / Originality
3
Jul 23, 2024 01:04 PM
Bowtiebruiser
History / Originality
2
Mar 17, 2009 07:41 AM
wildjeff
History / Originality
10
May 19, 2006 10:08 AM
3rdgenparts
History / Originality
12
Mar 17, 2004 01:05 AM
CamaroFreak406
Transmissions and Drivetrain
3
Nov 18, 2001 07:47 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.